Window component extrusion
Franson July 23, 1
U.S. patent number D372,108 [Application Number D/039,565] was granted by the patent office on 1996-07-23 for window component extrusion. This patent grant is currently assigned to Mikron Industries. Invention is credited to Jeffrey R. Franson.
| United States Patent | D372,108 |
| Franson | July 23, 1996 |
Window component extrusion
Claims
The ornamental design for a window component extrusion, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Franson; Jeffrey R. (Kent, WA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Mikron Industries (Kent,
WA) |
| Appl. No.: | D/039,565 |
| Filed: | May 31, 1995 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D25/124 |
| Field of Search: | ;D25/52,60,124 ;49/DIG.2,504-505 ;52/204.5,204.56,204.51,204.1,730.3 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D308421 | June 1990 | Westphal et al. |
| D353470 | December 1994 | Cole |
| D357076 | April 1995 | Franson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Seed and Berry
Description
FIG. 1 is a top right perspective view of a window component extrusion showing my new design, the window component extrusion being of indefinite length; and,
FIG. 2 is a bottom left perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 