U.S. patent number D371,017 [Application Number D/030,004] was granted by the patent office on 1996-06-25 for curio console. This patent grant is currently assigned to Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Avis E. Tobin, Jr., Guy A. Walters, III.
United States Patent | D371,017 |
Walters, III , et al. | June 25, 1996 |
Inventors: | Walters, III; Guy A. (High Point, NC), Tobin, Jr.; Avis E. (Thomasville, NC) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Thomasville Furniture Industries,
Inc. (Thomasville, NC) |
Appl. No.: | D/030,004 |
Filed: | October 20, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/661 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/432-448 ;312/204,257 |
D224871 | October 1972 | Winrow |
"Four Centuries" by Henredon, Mar. 5, 1970 p. 40; night stand on page. . "Directions" by Woodward & Lothrop Aug. 1991, p. 4; Chifferobe #0405, top left on page. . "Directions" by Woodward & Lothrop Jan. 21, 1993 p. 27; China #2710 on page. . Thomasville American Oak Catalog, p. 16, Apr. 1991. . Thomasville Santa Fe Catalog, pp. 6, 7, 8 and 12, Apr. 1984. . Thomasville Lakehouse Catalog, pp. 13, and 15 1992. . Cassina advertisement, date unknown; believed to be prior art. . Gordon's Catalog, date unknown; at least as early as 1980.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.