Lipstick case
Fiore April 2, 1
U.S. patent number D368,554 [Application Number D/030,850] was granted by the patent office on 1996-04-02 for lipstick case. This patent grant is currently assigned to Amway Corporation. Invention is credited to Trevor Fiore.
| United States Patent | D368,554 |
| Fiore | April 2, 1996 |
Lipstick case
Claims
The ornamental design for a lipstick case, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Fiore; Trevor (Dana Point, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Amway Corporation (Ada,
MI) |
| Appl. No.: | D/030,850 |
| Filed: | November 10, 1994 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D28/85; D9/529 |
| Field of Search: | ;D28/76,77,85-91 ;D9/529,300,338,560,566,572-575 ;132/317,318 ;401/88,89,95,98 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D53445 | June 1919 | Humphrey |
| D57312 | March 1921 | Connor |
| D58072 | June 1921 | Corey |
| D60286 | January 1922 | Eberhart |
| D60288 | January 1922 | Eberhart |
| D76539 | October 1928 | Harpfer |
| D92148 | May 1934 | McGiveran |
| D136477 | October 1943 | Roselle |
| D161051 | November 1950 | Piccoli |
| D180113 | April 1957 | Slater |
| D196329 | September 1963 | Weckesser |
| D234077 | January 1975 | Peterson |
| D256331 | August 1980 | Gindek et al. |
| D261107 | October 1981 | Harris |
| D261108 | October 1981 | Harris |
| D261231 | October 1981 | Grip |
| D261232 | October 1981 | Grip |
| D280138 | August 1985 | Bakic |
| D280139 | August 1985 | Bakic |
| D280854 | October 1985 | Matalon |
| D285174 | August 1986 | Teschner |
| D300758 | October 1989 | Nitta |
| D310275 | August 1990 | Su |
| D324332 | March 1992 | Seifert et al. |
| D329607 | September 1992 | Dinand et al. |
| 2065800 | December 1936 | Freeman |
| 4116350 | September 1978 | Allasia |
| 4527699 | July 1985 | Nama et al. |
| 4778300 | October 1988 | French et al. |
| DM/022325 | Mar 1992 | XH | |||
| 533770 | Jun 1980 | JP | |||
| 569689 | Jan 1982 | JP | |||
| 589816 | Dec 1982 | JP | |||
| 609408 | Oct 1983 | JP | |||
| 616076 | Jan 1984 | JP | |||
| 739479 | Jul 1988 | JP | |||
| 762021 | May 1989 | JP | |||
| 774605 | Nov 1989 | JP | |||
| 774606 | Nov 1989 | JP | |||
| 797511 | Oct 1990 | JP | |||
| 803299 | Dec 1990 | JP | |||
| 805656 | Jan 1991 | JP | |||
| 805657 | Jan 1991 | JP | |||
| 813600 | Mar 1991 | JP | |||
| 819287 | Mar 1991 | JP | |||
| 869322 | May 1991 | JP | |||
| 822901 | Nov 1991 | JP | |||
| 825703 | Dec 1991 | JP | |||
| 830883 | Mar 1992 | JP | |||
| 831712 | Mar 1992 | JP | |||
| 837324 | May 1992 | JP | |||
| 840038 | Jun 1992 | JP | |||
| 848576 | Sep 1992 | JP | |||
| 852558 | Nov 1992 | JP | |||
| 887139 | Dec 1993 | JP | |||
Assistant Examiner: Tuttle; C.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Amway Corporation
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a lipstick case showing my new design with the cap removed for completeness of disclosure; the undisclosed sides of the lipstick tube being identical to the sides shown;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof, the side opposite being a identical to the side shown;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof, the side opposite being identical to the side shown;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 