U.S. patent number D367,659 [Application Number D/005,942] was granted by the patent office on 1996-03-05 for refrigerator door ice dispenser insert. This patent grant is currently assigned to White Consolidated Industries, Inc.. Invention is credited to Charles D. Baker, Douglas K. Ritterling.
United States Patent | D367,659 |
Baker , et al. | March 5, 1996 |
Inventors: | Baker; Charles D. (Dublin, OH), Ritterling; Douglas K. (Galloway, OH) |
---|---|
Assignee: | White Consolidated Industries,
Inc. (Cleveland, OH) |
Appl. No.: | D/005,942 |
Filed: | March 17, 1993 |
Current U.S. Class: | D15/89 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/79-91 ;62/340,344,389 ;222/146.1,146.6,504 ;241/282.1,DIG.17 |
3429140 | February 1969 | White |
3537132 | November 1970 | Alvarez |
3982406 | September 1976 | Hanson et al. |
4089436 | May 1978 | Marks |
4739629 | April 1988 | True |
5033273 | July 1991 | Buchser et al. |
1985 Sweets Catalog File vol. 3 11.27a, p. 10, GE. Side-by-Side Refrigerator, Automatic Icemaker. . 1985 Sweets Catalog File vol. 3 11.27a p. 8, Hotpoint. Refreshment Center. . 1985 Sweets Catalog File vol. 3 11.27a p. 9, Hotpoint. Water Dispenser. . Domus No. 683 May 1987 (No Page No.) White Westinghouse Refrigerator.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.