Hat
Newman March 5, 1
U.S. patent number D367,552 [Application Number D/016,055] was granted by the patent office on 1996-03-05 for hat. Invention is credited to Alfred T. Newman.
| United States Patent | D367,552 |
| Newman | March 5, 1996 |
Hat
Claims
The ornamental design for a novelty hat, as shown.
| Inventors: | Newman; Alfred T. (Newport Beach, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/016,055 |
| Filed: | December 2, 1993 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/882; D2/865 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/865,869,882,886,887,889 ;2/195.1,195.8,173,209.3,209.13 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D49972 | November 1916 | Schmidt |
| D287421 | December 1986 | Seaggs |
| 975582 | November 1910 | Swindell |
| 2069020 | January 1937 | Schuessler |
| 2168765 | August 1939 | Dowd |
| 3109176 | November 1963 | Schuessler |
| 4872218 | October 1989 | Holt |
| 196629 | Dec 1938 | CH | |||
Assistant Examiner: Mortimer; Paula
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a novelty hat showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a left side elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 