Juice extractor
Kim September 26, 1
U.S. patent number D362,597 [Application Number D/022,562] was granted by the patent office on 1995-09-26 for juice extractor. Invention is credited to Jong Gill Kim.
| United States Patent | D362,597 |
| Kim | September 26, 1995 |
Juice extractor
Claims
The ornamental design for a juice extractor, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kim; Jong Gill (Sucho-ku, Seoul, KR) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | D/022,562 |
| Filed: | May 6, 1994 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Nov 27, 1993 [KR] | 24346 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/665 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/665,666,369,372,384,386,679 ;99/501-506 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D118270 | December 1939 | Strauss |
| D236283 | August 1975 | McCue |
| 2767644 | October 1956 | Bireley |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Pennie & Edmonds
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a juice extractor showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a front elevation view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 