U.S. patent number D360,461 [Application Number D/026,626] was granted by the patent office on 1995-07-18 for portable air freshener. This patent grant is currently assigned to Odorite International, Inc.. Invention is credited to Scott D. Gillespie.
United States Patent | D360,461 |
Gillespie | July 18, 1995 |
Inventors: | Gillespie; Scott D. (Shawnee Mission, KS) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Odorite International, Inc.
(Kansas City, MO) |
Appl. No.: | D/026,626 |
Filed: | August 2, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/366 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/366-369,364 ;422/5,120,122,124,305 ;239/60,53,54,55,51.5,56 |
D309943 | August 1990 | Jones et al. |
D327423 | June 1992 | Turner-Adams |
1091929 | March 1914 | Hammesfarr |
3990848 | November 1976 | Corris |
3993444 | November 1976 | Brown |
4035451 | July 1977 | Tringali |
4040568 | August 1977 | Mason, Jr. et al. |
4059422 | November 1977 | Steiner |
4111655 | September 1976 | Quincey |
4301095 | November 1981 | Mettler et al. |
4338859 | July 1982 | Claytor |
4396557 | August 1983 | Deluca |
4523870 | June 1985 | Spector |
4743406 | May 1988 | Steiner et al. |
5087273 | February 1992 | Ward |
5141707 | August 1992 | Brite |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.