U.S. patent number D359,190 [Application Number D/017,856] was granted by the patent office on 1995-06-13 for foot support cushion. This patent grant is currently assigned to Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.. Invention is credited to Thomas S. Hargest, Richard W. Raburn.
United States Patent | D359,190 |
Hargest , et al. | June 13, 1995 |
Inventors: | Hargest; Thomas S. (Charleston, SC), Raburn; Richard W. (Simpsonville, SC) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Span-America Medical Systems,
Inc. (Greenville, SC) |
Appl. No.: | D/017,856 |
Filed: | January 24, 1994 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/601; 5/650; D24/192 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/595,596,601,606,604 ;128/882,878,879 ;D24/183,190-192,189 ;5/640,648,650,646,647,649,922 |
Re30444 | December 1980 | Spann |
D225472 | December 1972 | Lowrey et al. |
D287641 | January 1987 | Schaefer |
D337217 | July 1993 | Strickland |
3903878 | September 1975 | Spann |
3931654 | January 1976 | Spann |
3939829 | February 1976 | Spann |
3946451 | March 1976 | Spann |
4135504 | January 1979 | Spann |
4210317 | July 1980 | Spann |
4327714 | May 1982 | Spann |
4433678 | February 1984 | Spann |
4573456 | March 1986 | Spann |
OR. Positioners Ad, Foot ProtectorA, top right side of page.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.