Chair
Lowsky September 13, 1
U.S. patent number D350,443 [Application Number 07/892,506] was granted by the patent office on 1994-09-13 for chair. Invention is credited to Bernie Lowsky.
| United States Patent | D350,443 |
| Lowsky | September 13, 1994 |
Chair
Claims
The ornamental design for a chair, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lowsky; Bernie (North Miami Beach, FL) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/892,506 |
| Filed: | June 1, 1992 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/369; D6/379 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/334,369,370,374,375,376,379,500,501,502 ;297/419,446 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D316492 | April 1991 | Martin |
| D327181 | June 1992 | White |
Other References
|
McGuire Top of the Vine, reprint from Town & Country, Aug. 1984, chair at bottom left.. |
Primary Examiner: Holtje; Nelson C.
Assistant Examiner: Watson; Gary D.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Malin, Haley, DiMaggio & Crosby
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of the chair showing the new design;
FIG. 2 is a back view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom view thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 