U.S. patent number D322,872 [Application Number 07/358,189] was granted by the patent office on 1991-12-31 for combined pet stool and ramp. Invention is credited to E. Boyd Holbrook.
United States Patent | D322,872 |
Holbrook | December 31, 1991 |
Inventors: | Holbrook; E. Boyd (Tucker, GA) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | 07/358,189 |
Filed: | May 30, 1989 |
Current U.S. Class: | D30/160; D6/349; D6/335; 119/28.5 |
Field of Search: | ;D3/30.5 ;119/28.5,19,28,83,29,29.5 ;D6/349,353,501,335,480,484 ;D30/158,160,119 ;182/222 ;108/90 ;297/439 ;128/87R |
D87229 | June 1932 | McGowen |
D92703 | July 1934 | Crego |
D254813 | April 1980 | Kossar |
2579797 | December 1951 | Churchfield et al. |
2593319 | April 1952 | Levitin et al. |
2639114 | May 1953 | Allen |
3159141 | December 1964 | Paterek |
3173398 | March 1965 | Raymond |
3472224 | October 1969 | Ewerwahn |
4057031 | November 1977 | Williams et al. |
4212090 | July 1980 | Ehrlich |
Home Craftsman; Jul.-Aug. 1949; p. 23; item #16, bottom center page. . Lloyd Chromium Furniture Catalog No. 41-A; p. 52, item SFS-45-E, left side page. . Brauer Bros. Mfg. Moose Brand Sporting Goods Dog Furnishings Catalog; p. 18, Katnip Tree.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.