U.S. patent number D321,361 [Application Number 07/315,039] was granted by the patent office on 1991-11-05 for display unit for an overhead projector. This patent grant is currently assigned to Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba. Invention is credited to Masaaki Iino.
United States Patent | D321,361 |
Iino | November 5, 1991 |
Inventors: | Iino; Masaaki (Yokohama, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba
(Kawasaki, JP) |
Appl. No.: | 07/315,039 |
Filed: | February 24, 1989 |
Sep 13, 1988 [JP] | 63-35997 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D16/235; D6/300; D16/236 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/300,308,310-312 ;D16/221,225,232,235,236 ;D18/40 ;40/152,159.2,490,511,513 ;353/61,66,98,119,122,DIG.3,DIG.4,DIG.5 |
D270067 | August 1983 | Ackeret |
D270068 | August 1983 | Ackeret |
D302434 | July 1989 | Cawthorne |
D309679 | August 1990 | Ackeret |
3281977 | November 1966 | Koontz |
3544211 | December 1970 | Albee, Jr. |
3642359 | February 1972 | Kitch |
4632529 | December 1986 | Levin |
4732468 | March 1988 | Wright |
Catalog of DG/One DP-400 System of Nippon Data General. . Sharp LCD Unit QA-50, "Dempa Shimbun", published Feb. 9, 1988. . Fujitsu LCT "Dempa Shimbun", published Mar. 28, 1988.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.