U.S. patent number D319,637 [Application Number 07/402,591] was granted by the patent office on 1991-09-03 for tape drive. This patent grant is currently assigned to International Business Machines Corporation. Invention is credited to Richard D. Kusel, Martin J. Marotti, Roland Zapfe.
United States Patent | D319,637 |
Kusel , et al. | September 3, 1991 |
Inventors: | Kusel; Richard D. (Tucson, AZ), Marotti; Martin J. (Tucson, AZ), Zapfe; Roland (Tucson, AZ) |
---|---|
Assignee: | International Business Machines
Corporation (Armonk, NY) |
Appl. No.: | 07/402,591 |
Filed: | September 1, 1989 |
Current U.S. Class: | D14/361 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/100,102,104,107,108,109 ;D13/184 ;360/97-99,132,133 ;361/330,331,334,335,390-395,415,426 ;200/5A,5R,6A,6R ;369/132,176,178,34,292 |
D245158 | July 1977 | Davis, Jr. |
D261138 | October 1981 | Davis, Jr. |
D282469 | February 1986 | Lemoine, Jr. et al. |
D283423 | April 1986 | Baugh |
4644427 | February 1987 | Ashby |
4817071 | March 1989 | Carlson et al. |
4860133 | August 1989 | Baranski |
4912575 | March 1990 | Shiosaki |
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Jul. 1985, p. 1, Westinghouse Accutrol 300 Frequency Control-Microprocessor. Computer Box Group 290.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.