U.S. patent number D317,165 [Application Number 07/261,820] was granted by the patent office on 1991-05-28 for lawn mower. This patent grant is currently assigned to Deere & Company. Invention is credited to Dean W. Benter, Kenneth D. Schweitz, Kevin F. Thompson.
United States Patent | D317,165 |
Schweitz , et al. | May 28, 1991 |
Inventors: | Schweitz; Kenneth D. (Oconomowoc, WI), Benter; Dean W. (Horicon, WI), Thompson; Kevin F. (Brooklyn, NY) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Deere & Company (Moline,
IL) |
Appl. No.: | 07/261,820 |
Filed: | October 26, 1988 |
Current U.S. Class: | D15/14 |
Field of Search: | ;D15/14,15,16,23 ;56/11.8,13.4,16.7,17.5,202,255 ;180/89.1,89.12,900 |
D249519 | September 1978 | Haffner et al. |
D307911 | May 1990 | Miyawaki et al. |
D308681 | June 1990 | Sadakane et al. |
Toro, "Grassmaster Model 20673" brochure, picture on p. 1. . American Honda Motor Company, "Honda Lawn Mowers", 4 pages, dated 1987, published in the United States. . The Toro Company, "Toro--We Take the Hard Work Out of Yard Work", 20 pages, dated 1987, published in the United States. . Outboard Marine Corporation, "Lawn-Boy--America's Long-Running Tradition", 12 pages, dated 1987, published United States.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.