U.S. patent number D315,854 [Application Number 07/103,568] was granted by the patent office on 1991-04-02 for electric saw. This patent grant is currently assigned to Ryobi Ltd.. Invention is credited to Kiyoshi Hoshino, Hideki Kawakami.
United States Patent | D315,854 |
Kawakami , et al. | April 2, 1991 |
Inventors: | Kawakami; Hideki (Hiroshima, JP), Hoshino; Kiyoshi (Tokyo, JP) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Ryobi Ltd. (Hiroshima,
JP) |
Appl. No.: | 07/103,568 |
Filed: | October 1, 1987 |
Apr 2, 1987 [JP] | 62-12900 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D8/66; D8/67; D8/68; D8/69 |
Field of Search: | ;D8/61-70 ;30/370,374,375,376,388,390,391 |
D281663 | December 1985 | Tsuru et al. |
3447577 | June 1969 | Burrows et al. |
4245390 | January 1981 | Bond |
4787145 | November 1988 | Klicker et al. |
1199964 | Sep 1965 | DE | |||
Black & Decker Power Tools and Accessories Catalog, .COPYRGT.1985, p. 69, Worm-drive Circular Saw Model No. 3051, center panel. . Ski Power Tools, Catalog, p. 18, upper right corner, Worm-drive Saws Model Nos. 367, 77 and 825. . Milwaukee Heavy Duty Electric Tools, Catalog #184, p. 64 Heavy Duty Worm-drive Saws. . Skil Corp., Ltd. 1982 Catalog, p. 17, Under "Super Duty Worm Drive Saws".. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.