Flamingo bag
Senitt January 8, 1
U.S. patent number D313,503 [Application Number 07/230,268] was granted by the patent office on 1991-01-08 for flamingo bag. Invention is credited to Catherine M. Senitt.
| United States Patent | D313,503 |
| Senitt | January 8, 1991 |
Flamingo bag
Claims
The ornamental design for a flamingo bag, as shown.
| Inventors: | Senitt; Catherine M. (Carnarvon, Ontario, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 07/230,268 |
| Filed: | August 9, 1988 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Apr 7, 1988 [CA] | 07-04-88-19 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/235; D21/606 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/41-54,66 ;D21/148,152,153,160 ;446/327 ;150/103-105,107 ;206/457 ;383/907,3 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D73619 | October 1927 | Myers |
| D73729 | October 1927 | Williams |
| D77365 | January 1929 | Mitchell |
| D247125 | January 1978 | Corbett et al. |
| D295270 | April 1988 | Chang et al. |
| 1756048 | April 1930 | Williams |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Rogers, Bereski & Parr
Description
FIG. 1 is a front right perspective view of a flamingo bag showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear left perspective view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 