Jewelry pendant
Spiegel May 16, 1
U.S. patent number D301,123 [Application Number 06/905,947] was granted by the patent office on 1989-05-16 for jewelry pendant. Invention is credited to H. Jay Spiegel.
| United States Patent | D301,123 |
| Spiegel | May 16, 1989 |
Jewelry pendant
Claims
The ornamental design for a jewelry pendant, as shown.
| Inventors: | Spiegel; H. Jay (Alexandria, VA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/905,947 |
| Filed: | September 9, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D11/81; D11/104; D11/54; D11/83 |
| Field of Search: | ;D11/2,40-45,47,48,61,53-56,83,79-81,85,102,104,116 ;63/1.1,2,23,18-21 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D35406 | December 1901 | Robbins |
| D36239 | February 1903 | Twiss |
| D49577 | August 1916 | Jones |
| D141130 | May 1945 | Tanzi |
| D260380 | August 1981 | Dickerson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Spiegel; H. Jay
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a jewelry pendant showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a left side elevational view;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevational view;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 