Decalcomania for china dinnerware or similar articles
Shoreman , et al. March 28, 1
U.S. patent number D300,401 [Application Number 06/786,524] was granted by the patent office on 1989-03-28 for decalcomania for china dinnerware or similar articles. This patent grant is currently assigned to Syracuse China Corporation. Invention is credited to Helen Z. Shoreman, Steve A. Unger.
| United States Patent | D300,401 |
| Shoreman , et al. | March 28, 1989 |
Decalcomania for china dinnerware or similar articles
Claims
The ornamental design for decalcomania for china dinnerware or similar articles, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Shoreman; Helen Z. (Washington, DC), Unger; Steve A. (Manilus, NY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Syracuse China Corporation
(Syracuse, NY) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/786,524 |
| Filed: | October 11, 1985 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/396.5; D20/11; D5/37; D7/576 |
| Field of Search: | ;D20/11 ;D7/39,33-36,29-32,23,1,3,12 ;D5/32,37,66,6,16 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D42816 | July 1912 | Loomis |
| D161243 | December 1950 | Bourne |
| D291955 | September 1987 | Durand |
| D293187 | December 1987 | Mattson |
| D293406 | December 1987 | Mattson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cushman, Darby & Cushman
Description
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a first embodiment of our new design for decalcomania for use on china dinnerware or similar articles, the fragmentary broken line showing of chinaware being illustrative of environmental structure only. The decalcomania is of no substantial thickness. The stippling represents shading of color.
FIG. 2 is a plan view of another embodiment of our new design for decalcomania for use on china dinnerware or similar articles, the fragmentary broken line showing of chinaware being illustrative of environmental structure only. The decalcomania is of no substantial thickness. The stippling represents shading of color.
FIG. 3 is a plan view of another embodiment of our new design for decalcomania for use on china dinnerware or similar articles, the fragmentary broken line showing of chinaware being illustrative of environmental structure only. The decalcomania is of no substantial thickness. The stippling represents shading of color.
FIG. 4 is a plan view of another embodiment of our new design for decalcomania for use on china dinnerware or similar articles, the fragmentary broken line showing of chinaware being illustrative of environmental structure only. The decalcomania is of no substantial thickness. The stippling represents shading of color.
FIG. 5 is a plan view of another embodiment of our new design for decalcomania for use on china dinnerware or similar articles, the fragmentary broken line showing of chinaware being illustrative of environmental structure only. The decalcomania is of no substantial thickness. The stippling represents shading of color.
FIG. 6 is a plan view of another embodiment of our new design for decalcomania for use on china dinnerware or similar articles, the fragmentary broken line showing of chinaware being illustrative of environmental structure only. The decalcomania is of no substantial thickness. The stippling represents shading of color.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 