Pet bed
James February 7, 1
U.S. patent number D299,769 [Application Number 07/185,924] was granted by the patent office on 1989-02-07 for pet bed. This patent grant is currently assigned to Flexi-Mat Corporation. Invention is credited to Betty James.
| United States Patent | D299,769 |
| James | February 7, 1989 |
Pet bed
Claims
The ornamental design for a pet bed, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | James; Betty (San Clemente, CA) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Flexi-Mat Corporation (Chicago,
IL) |
| Appl. No.: | 07/185,924 |
| Filed: | April 25, 1988 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D30/118 |
| Field of Search: | ;D30/109,118 ;119/1,19 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D172960 | September 1954 | Frazin |
| D205216 | July 1966 | Bell et al. |
| D289699 | May 1987 | Runion |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Laff, Whitesel, Conte & Saret
Description
FIG. 1 is a right side elevational view of a pet bed showing my new design, the left side being a mirror image of the right side shown;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 