Embossed tissue or similar article
Peddada November 22, 1
U.S. patent number D298,587 [Application Number 06/833,446] was granted by the patent office on 1988-11-22 for embossed tissue or similar article. This patent grant is currently assigned to Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Invention is credited to Raju B. Peddada.
| United States Patent | D298,587 |
| Peddada | November 22, 1988 |
Embossed tissue or similar article
Claims
The ornamental design for an embossed tissue or similar article, as shown.
| Inventors: | Peddada; Raju B. (Menasha, WI) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Kimberly-Clark Corporation
(Neenah, WI) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/833,446 |
| Filed: | February 12, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D5/53; D5/60 |
| Field of Search: | ;D5/27,32,37,53,54,56,59-62,65,99 ;428/187 ;D24/49,50,51 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D62316 | May 1923 | Bunting |
| D126020 | March 1941 | Sobel |
| D166911 | June 1952 | Gould |
| D267361 | December 1982 | Schultz |
Assistant Examiner: Shooman; Theodore M.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Croft; Gregory E.
Description
The single FIGURE is a plan view of an embossed tissue or similar article showing my new design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 