Broom
Sartori April 14, 1
U.S. patent number D289,338 [Application Number 06/663,751] was granted by the patent office on 1987-04-14 for broom. Invention is credited to Francesco Sartori.
| United States Patent | D289,338 |
| Sartori | April 14, 1987 |
Broom
Claims
The ornamental design for a broom, as above described.
| Inventors: | Sartori; Francesco (40122 Bologna, IT) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/663,751 |
| Filed: | October 23, 1984 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| May 4, 1984 [IT] | 4885B/84 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D32/50 |
| Field of Search: | ;D32/50-52 ;D4/130-135,138 ;15/159R,159A,160,191-200 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D99109 | March 1936 | Bickel |
| 632748 | September 1899 | Raymond et al. |
| 2262961 | November 1941 | Otto |
| 4384383 | May 1983 | Bryant |
| 756581 | Sep 1956 | GB | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Laff, Whitesel, Conte & Saret
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a broom, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is an end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a top plan view thereof.
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 