Suitcase
Fuchs September 30, 1
U.S. patent number D285,879 [Application Number 06/584,247] was granted by the patent office on 1986-09-30 for suitcase. Invention is credited to Sheldon Fuchs.
| United States Patent | D285,879 |
| Fuchs | September 30, 1986 |
Suitcase
Claims
The ornamental design for suitcase, as shown.
| Inventors: | Fuchs; Sheldon (Agoura, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/584,247 |
| Filed: | February 27, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/279 |
| Field of Search: | ;D3/30.1,42,48,71,76,77 ;190/100-104,109,114,115 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D268381 | March 1983 | Cassini et al. |
| D277431 | February 1985 | Bomes et al. |
| D281650 | December 1985 | Bomes et al. |
Other References
|
Best Products Cat., 1981/1982, p. 263, item No. 4.. |
Primary Examiner: Word; George P.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Roberts and Quiogue
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a suitcase showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 