Toy zoo
Argandona January 28, 1
U.S. patent number D282,385 [Application Number 06/578,583] was granted by the patent office on 1986-01-28 for toy zoo. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Quaker Oats Company. Invention is credited to Augusto Argandona.
| United States Patent | D282,385 |
| Argandona | January 28, 1986 |
Toy zoo
Claims
The ornamental design for a toy zoo, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Argandona; Augusto (East Aurora, NY) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Quaker Oats Company
(Chicago, IL) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/578,583 |
| Filed: | February 9, 1984 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/507 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/114-119 ;446/476,477,478 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D205351 | July 1966 | Hrabrick |
| D208096 | July 1967 | Ostrander |
| D208237 | August 1967 | Gare |
| D261906 | November 1981 | Sato |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cumpston & Shaw
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the top, front and left side of a toy zoo showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a right-side elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 