Stool
De Boer November 15, 1
U.S. patent number D271,352 [Application Number 06/308,030] was granted by the patent office on 1983-11-15 for stool. This patent grant is currently assigned to Gispen and Staalmeubel B.V.. Invention is credited to Peter De Boer.
| United States Patent | D271,352 |
| De Boer | November 15, 1983 |
Stool
Claims
The ornamental design for a stool, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | De Boer; Peter (Amsterdam, NL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Gispen and Staalmeubel B.V.
(Stationssingel, NL) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/308,030 |
| Filed: | October 2, 1981 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D6/349 |
| Current International Class: | D0601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D6/20-26,28,29,30,31,47,17,42,200 ;248/371 ;297/461 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D231195 | April 1974 | Reynolds |
| D251098 | February 1979 | Diedrich et al. |
| 4130263 | December 1978 | Roericht |
Description
FIG. 1 is a front three-quarter perspective view of my design;
FIG. 2 is a plan view;
FIG. 3 is a view of front elevation;
FIG. 4 is a view in side elevation, being a view from the right aspect of FIG. 2;
FIG. 5 is a view in rear elevation;
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 