U.S. patent number D269,546 [Application Number 06/197,764] was granted by the patent office on 1983-06-28 for physiologic monitor or the like. This patent grant is currently assigned to DNA Medical, Inc.. Invention is credited to F. Gordon Mackay, Spencer L. Mackay, Robert K. Rogers, Robert R. Steuer.
United States Patent | D269,546 |
Rogers , et al. | June 28, 1983 |
Inventors: | Rogers; Robert K. (Salt Lake City, UT), Steuer; Robert R. (Salt Lake City, UT), Mackay; F. Gordon (Tarzana, CA), Mackay; Spencer L. (Canoga Park, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | DNA Medical, Inc. (Salt Lake
City, UT) |
Appl. No.: | 06/197,764 |
Filed: | October 16, 1980 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/186; D10/30; D10/38; D24/166; D24/167 |
Current International Class: | D2402; D1002 |
Field of Search: | ;128/690,706,710,689 ;D10/30,37,38 ;D24/1.1,8,17,21 |
D238660 | February 1976 | Ruefli |
D257004 | September 1980 | Ohie |
D257005 | September 1980 | Ruth |
D257236 | October 1980 | Link |
4009708 | March 1977 | Fay, Jr. |
4086916 | May 1978 | Freeman et al. |
4120294 | October 1978 | Wolfe |
4195642 | April 1980 | Price et al. |
4224948 | September 1980 | Cramer et al. |
4230127 | October 1980 | Larson |
4312358 | January 1982 | Barney |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.