Combined bottle and cap
Douglas May 10, 1
U.S. patent number D268,898 [Application Number 06/209,252] was granted by the patent office on 1983-05-10 for combined bottle and cap. This patent grant is currently assigned to Colgate Palmolive Company. Invention is credited to Livingston C. Douglas.
| United States Patent | D268,898 |
| Douglas | May 10, 1983 |
Combined bottle and cap
Claims
The ornamental design for a combined bottle and cap, substantially as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Douglas; Livingston C. (Leonia, NJ) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Colgate Palmolive Company (New
York, NY) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/209,252 |
| Filed: | November 21, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/531 |
| Current International Class: | D0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/376,378,383,453 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D194807 | March 1963 | Vanderhyde |
| D207349 | April 1967 | Swayze |
| D247347 | February 1978 | Klingaman |
Description
FIG. 1 is an elevational view of a combined bottle and cap embodying my new design, the opposite side being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 2 is an elevational view looking from the right of FIG. 2; and
FIG. 3 is a top plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 