Exercise board
Spisak November 23, 1
U.S. patent number D267,028 [Application Number 06/133,301] was granted by the patent office on 1982-11-23 for exercise board. Invention is credited to Mathew V. Spisak.
| United States Patent | D267,028 |
| Spisak | November 23, 1982 |
Exercise board
Claims
The ornamental design for an exercise board, as shown.
| Inventors: | Spisak; Mathew V. (St. Clair Shores, MI) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/133,301 |
| Filed: | March 24, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/686 |
| Current International Class: | D2102 |
| Field of Search: | ;D21/191-199,235 ;272/144,109,145 ;5/431,434,436,443,448 ;D6/9 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 33385 | October 1861 | Frodsham et al. |
| D247209 | February 1978 | Woog |
| 4210322 | July 1980 | Pritchard |
| 2357267 | May 1975 | DE | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Basile, Weintraub & Hanlon
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of an exercise board showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a left-end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right-end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a side perspective view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 