Garlic press
Harris November 9, 1
U.S. patent number D266,824 [Application Number 06/215,455] was granted by the patent office on 1982-11-09 for garlic press. Invention is credited to David P. Harris.
| United States Patent | D266,824 |
| Harris | November 9, 1982 |
Garlic press
Claims
The ornamental design for a garlic press, as shown.
| Inventors: | Harris; David P. (Denver, CO) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/215,455 |
| Filed: | December 11, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/665 |
| Current International Class: | D0704 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/99,48,101,47,53,54 ;100/234,125,112 ;241/168,169.1 ;99/495 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1744952 | January 1930 | Connor |
| 2389385 | November 1945 | Owen |
| 2602596 | July 1952 | Jones et al. |
| 3004340 | October 1961 | Collins |
| 3642045 | February 1972 | Buvelot |
| 857464 | Sep 1940 | FR | |||
| 603915 | Apr 1960 | IT | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Crandell; Ralph F.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a garlic press embodying my new design.
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof.
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
FIG. 5 is an exploded side elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 