U.S. patent number D266,549 [Application Number 06/173,323] was granted by the patent office on 1982-10-19 for prenatal support pillow. Invention is credited to Richard G. Lund, III.
United States Patent | D266,549 |
Lund, III | October 19, 1982 |
Inventors: | Lund, III; Richard G. (Brooklyn Park, MN) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | 06/173,323 |
Filed: | July 29, 1980 |
Current U.S. Class: | D6/601; 5/930 |
Current International Class: | D0609 |
Field of Search: | ;D6/197,200,201 ;5/434-436,441,431 ;D21/108 ;D25/80 |
D222349 | October 1971 | Sorensen |
D236062 | July 1975 | Winston |
D241700 | October 1976 | Wattie |
D242388 | November 1976 | Castleberry |
D248141 | June 1978 | Forsland |
D250985 | February 1979 | Armstrong |
D254029 | January 1980 | Barbagallo |
D259458 | June 1981 | Fuller et al. |
2314080 | July 1940 | Dine et al. |
2336707 | December 1943 | Thompson |
2562725 | July 1951 | Leto et al. |
2835905 | May 1958 | To'masson |
3118152 | January 1964 | Talley, Jr. |
3287747 | November 1966 | Ellsworth |
3333286 | August 1967 | Biolik |
3639927 | February 1972 | Munch |
3762404 | October 1973 | Sakita |
4193150 | March 1980 | Vineberg |
4214326 | July 1980 | Spann |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.