Tweezer or similar article
Rainin November 24, 1
U.S. patent number D262,064 [Application Number 06/077,163] was granted by the patent office on 1981-11-24 for tweezer or similar article. Invention is credited to Edgar A. Rainin.
| United States Patent | D262,064 |
| Rainin | November 24, 1981 |
Tweezer or similar article
Claims
The ornamental design for a tweezer or similar article, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Rainin; Edgar A. (Danville, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/077,163 |
| Filed: | September 17, 1979 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D28/55 |
| Current International Class: | D2803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/27 ;D28/55 ;15/244R ;81/43 ;128/354,355 ;132/1R,5R |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D55487 | June 1920 | Rozenske |
| 2546526 | March 1951 | Shirley |
| 3906957 | September 1975 | Weston |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bielen and Peterson
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a tweezer or similar article showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a top plan vithereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom view, thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 