Workman's vest
Viio October 27, 1
U.S. patent number D261,447 [Application Number 05/902,153] was granted by the patent office on 1981-10-27 for workman's vest. Invention is credited to Matti Viio.
| United States Patent | D261,447 |
| Viio | October 27, 1981 |
Workman's vest
Claims
The ornamental design for a workman's vest, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Viio; Matti (191 05 Sollentuna, SE) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/902,153 |
| Filed: | May 2, 1978 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Nov 2, 1977 [SE] | 2223 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/829 |
| Current International Class: | D0202 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/25,27,183,184,190,191,225,226,229,210 ;2/51,102 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2320783 | June 1943 | Lee |
| 3085250 | April 1963 | Finlay |
| 3105241 | October 1963 | Allen |
| 3266070 | August 1966 | O'Link |
| 976535 | Mar 1951 | FR | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hammond & Littell, Weissenberger and Muserlian
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of a workman's vest showing my new design; and
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view.
The bottom structure, below the top-stitched band, is symmetrical.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 