Carpet cleaning machine
Pearman, Jr. January 27, 1
U.S. patent number D258,064 [Application Number 05/870,954] was granted by the patent office on 1981-01-27 for carpet cleaning machine. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Singer Company. Invention is credited to Fred E. Pearman, Jr..
| United States Patent | D258,064 |
| Pearman, Jr. | January 27, 1981 |
Carpet cleaning machine
Claims
The ornamental design for a carpet cleaning machine, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Pearman, Jr.; Fred E. (Anderson, SC) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Singer Company
(N/A) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/870,954 |
| Filed: | January 19, 1978 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D32/23 |
| Current International Class: | D1505 |
| Field of Search: | ;D15/52,53,54,55 ;15/320,323,325,326,327R,327D,327E,339,353 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D224624 | August 1972 | Walz et al. |
| D243574 | March 1977 | Bartlett |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Ruderman; Alan
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a carpet cleaning machine, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof; and
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 