Food processor
Levin August 12, 1
U.S. patent number D256,318 [Application Number 05/866,468] was granted by the patent office on 1980-08-12 for food processor. Invention is credited to Monte L. Levin.
| United States Patent | D256,318 |
| Levin | August 12, 1980 |
| **Please see images for: ( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Food processor
Claims
The ornamental design for a food processor, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Levin; Monte L. (New York, NY) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/866,468 |
| Filed: | December 30, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/384 |
| Current International Class: | D0704 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/159,158,157,156,155,154,153 ;D15/98,99,92 ;241/37.5,92,282.1,282.2 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D191152 | August 1961 | Rawson, Jr. et al. |
| D201116 | May 1965 | Hauptli |
| 314595 | Jun 1956 | CH | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Hoopes; Dallett
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a food processor showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view;
FIG. 5 is a right side elevational view; and
FIG. 6 is a left side elevational view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 