U.S. patent number D254,802 [Application Number 05/838,965] was granted by the patent office on 1980-04-22 for hose coupling collar. This patent grant is currently assigned to L. R. Nelson Corporation. Invention is credited to Jerry R. Hayes.
United States Patent | D254,802 |
Hayes | April 22, 1980 |
Inventors: | Hayes; Jerry R. (Peoria, IL) |
---|---|
Assignee: | L. R. Nelson Corporation
(Peoria, IL) |
Appl. No.: | 05/838,965 |
Filed: | October 3, 1977 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/262 |
Current International Class: | D2301 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/40-47 ;258/38,246-249,255,354,386,423 |
D33086 | August 1900 | Levering |
D121608 | July 1940 | Bedur |
D187578 | March 1960 | Moffatt |
D195540 | June 1963 | Knight |
1233401 | July 1917 | Reeve |
1266416 | May 1918 | Davis |
2414789 | January 1947 | Anderson |
2449916 | September 1948 | Tandet |
2833567 | May 1958 | Bacher et al. |
2853320 | September 1958 | Liebett et al. |
2973975 | March 1961 | Ramberg et al. |
2978262 | April 1961 | Franck |
3008736 | November 1961 | Samiran |
3177061 | April 1965 | Holngren |
3306637 | February 1967 | Press et al. |
1016478 | Jan 1966 | GB | |||
Hardware Age, Jan. 16, 1958, p. 51.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.