Rotary cutting head for mower
Proulx February 12, 1
U.S. patent number D254,173 [Application Number 05/849,456] was granted by the patent office on 1980-02-12 for rotary cutting head for mower. Invention is credited to Raymond E. Proulx.
| United States Patent | D254,173 |
| Proulx | February 12, 1980 |
Rotary cutting head for mower
Claims
The ornamental design for a rotary cutting head for mower, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Proulx; Raymond E. (Alta Loma, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/849,456 |
| Filed: | November 7, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D8/8 |
| Current International Class: | D0803 |
| Field of Search: | ;D15/17 ;D8/8 ;56/12.7,295 ;30/276,347 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4097991 | July 1978 | Proulx |
| 4104797 | August 1978 | Ballas |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Brown; Boniard I.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a rotary cutting head for mower showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is an end elevational view thereof opposite to that shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view thereof, the opposite side being substantially a mirror image of the side shown; and
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 