Temple for spectacles
Solomon December 4, 1
U.S. patent number D253,597 [Application Number 05/826,358] was granted by the patent office on 1979-12-04 for temple for spectacles. Invention is credited to Charles I. Solomon.
| United States Patent | D253,597 |
| Solomon | December 4, 1979 |
Temple for spectacles
Claims
The ornamental design for a temple for spectacles, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Solomon; Charles I. (San Antonio, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/826,358 |
| Filed: | August 22, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D16/335 |
| Current International Class: | D1606 |
| Field of Search: | ;D16/65,67,69,70,78,81 ;351/41,47,49,51,52,59,83,85-95,98,101-104,106,111,112,114,116,122,123 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2225625 | December 1940 | Ehlich |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lee; Ted D.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a temple for spectacles showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left end elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a right end elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The side opposite the side shown in FIG. 3 is a mirror image thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 