Riflescope mount
Bechtel April 24, 1
U.S. patent number D251,671 [Application Number 05/810,423] was granted by the patent office on 1979-04-24 for riflescope mount. Invention is credited to Daniel L. Bechtel.
| United States Patent | D251,671 |
| Bechtel | April 24, 1979 |
Riflescope mount
Claims
The ornamental design for a riflescope mount, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bechtel; Daniel L. (Fort Worth, TX) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/810,423 |
| Filed: | June 27, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D22/110 |
| Current International Class: | D2201 |
| Field of Search: | ;248/25R ;33/247,245,248 ;42/15 ;D22/6,7,8 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3724800 | April 1973 | Rubin et al. |
| 3734437 | May 1973 | Underwood |
| 3880389 | April 1975 | Burris |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McHugh; Charles W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the new riflescope mount showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIGS. 4 and 5 are elevational side views thereof, with the two views differing only in which end of a connecting bolt is visible;
FIG. 6 is a top view thereof; and
FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 