Bottle
Beaver February 6, 1
U.S. patent number D250,995 [Application Number 05/720,794] was granted by the patent office on 1979-02-06 for bottle. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Clorox Company. Invention is credited to Theodore L. Beaver.
| United States Patent | D250,995 |
| Beaver | February 6, 1979 |
Bottle
Claims
The ornamental design of a bottle, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Beaver; Theodore L. (Roselle, IL) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Clorox Company (Oakland,
CA) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/720,794 |
| Filed: | September 7, 1976 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/528 |
| Current International Class: | D0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/38-53 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D204701 | May 1966 | Shepler |
| D221513 | August 1971 | Leary et al. |
| D244425 | May 1977 | Aldrich |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Majestic; Martin
Description
FIG. 1 is an elevational view of a bottle showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is an elevational view looking from the right of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is an elevational view looking from the left of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view;
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along lines 6--6 in FIG. 1.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 