Toy figure
Effler January 23, 1
U.S. patent number D250,901 [Application Number 05/791,664] was granted by the patent office on 1979-01-23 for toy figure. This patent grant is currently assigned to General Mills Fun Group, Inc.. Invention is credited to Timothy A. Effler.
| United States Patent | D250,901 |
| Effler | January 23, 1979 |
Toy figure
Claims
The ornamental design for a toy figure, substantially as shown.
| Inventors: | Effler; Timothy A. (Cincinnati, OH) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | General Mills Fun Group, Inc.
(Minneapolis, MN) |
| Appl. No.: | 05/791,664 |
| Filed: | April 28, 1977 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D21/621; D21/597; D21/622 |
| Current International Class: | D2101 |
| Field of Search: | ;D34/4R,2R,15AD |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D209456 | December 1967 | Tsarnas |
Other References
|
Sears Xmas Cat., 1962, p. 450, middle right, Garloo.. |
Primary Examiner: Feifer; Melvin B.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Enockson; Gene O.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a toy figure illustrating my design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view thereof; and
FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 