Endoscope
Takahashi July 25, 1
U.S. patent number D248,664 [Application Number 05/731,480] was granted by the patent office on 1978-07-25 for endoscope. Invention is credited to Nagashige Takahashi.
| United States Patent | D248,664 |
| Takahashi | July 25, 1978 |
Endoscope
Claims
The ornamental design for an endoscope, as shown.
| Inventors: | Takahashi; Nagashige (Tokiwadai, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, JP) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/731,480 |
| Filed: | October 12, 1976 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Apr 22, 1976 [JP] | 51-14809 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/138; 600/101 |
| Current International Class: | D2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;128/7,8,6 ;D24/18,17 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D177883 | May 1956 | Streifeneder |
| 3610231 | October 1971 | Takahashi |
| 3643653 | February 1972 | Takahashi et al. |
| 3859986 | January 1975 | Okada et al. |
| 3897775 | August 1975 | Furihata |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sughrue; Richard C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, top and right side perspective view of an endoscope showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear, bottom and left side perspective view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view; and
FIG. 4 is a front view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 