Water pipe casing
Grihalva Fe
U.S. patent number D243,256 [Application Number 05/525,488] was granted by the patent office on 1977-02-01 for water pipe casing. Invention is credited to George F. Grihalva.
| United States Patent | D243,256 |
| Grihalva | February 1, 1977 |
Water pipe casing
Claims
The new and ornamental design for a water pipe casing, as shown.
| Inventors: | Grihalva; George F. (Santa Ana, CA) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 05/525,488 |
| Filed: | November 20, 1974 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D27/162 |
| Current International Class: | D2702 |
| Field of Search: | ;D27/2,3,5 ;D7/62,63 ;131/17R,17A,171R,171A,173-176,178,179,200,211,221-222,226 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 55321 | June 1866 | Masson |
| 58072 | September 1866 | Coppuck |
| D156147 | November 1949 | Muller-Munk |
| D230099 | January 1974 | Orr |
| 809325 | January 1906 | Probyn |
Assistant Examiner: Zarfas; Louis S.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Miketta; C. A.
Description
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of a water pipe casing showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 