Dual mail carrier bag
Biggs July 11, 1
U.S. patent number D302,073 [Application Number 06/862,548] was granted by the patent office on 1989-07-11 for dual mail carrier bag. Invention is credited to Robert K. Biggs.
| United States Patent | D302,073 |
| Biggs | July 11, 1989 |
Dual mail carrier bag
Claims
The ornamental design for a dual mail carrier bag, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Biggs; Robert K. (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Appl. No.: | 06/862,548 |
| Filed: | May 12, 1986 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D3/230; 224/260; D29/101.1; 224/266 |
| Field of Search: | ;224/226,228,153,160,188,209,260,266,190,202,204,205 ;D3/32 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1281822 | October 1918 | Orr |
| 1511259 | October 1924 | Braden |
| 4600134 | July 1986 | Colby |
Assistant Examiner: Brunot; Y.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kolisch, Hartwell & Dickinson
Description
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a dual mail carrier bag taken from the front and showing my design, the flap of the bag on the left being shown in an interior position; and
FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view taken from the rear and wherein the flaps of both bags are shown in exterior positions.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 