Cosmetic container
Kingsford April 13, 1
U.S. patent number D263,807 [Application Number 06/128,699] was granted by the patent office on 1982-04-13 for cosmetic container. This patent grant is currently assigned to Plough, Inc.. Invention is credited to Ted I. Kingsford.
| United States Patent | D263,807 |
| Kingsford | April 13, 1982 |
Cosmetic container
Claims
The ornamental design for a cosmetic container, as shown.
| Inventors: | Kingsford; Ted I. (Memphis, TN) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Plough, Inc. (Memphis,
TN) |
| Appl. No.: | 06/128,699 |
| Filed: | March 10, 1980 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D9/504 |
| Current International Class: | D0901 |
| Field of Search: | ;D9/349,355,390,399,389,377,405 ;215/1R,1C |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D99572 | May 1936 | Ganz |
| D138278 | July 1944 | Grunberg |
| D139381 | November 1944 | Harris |
| D155043 | August 1949 | Serra |
| D189374 | November 1960 | Harris |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Gifford; Vincent H. Eisen; Bruce M.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a cosmetic container showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a rear view;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view;
FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 