U.S. patent number 8,909,041 [Application Number 13/486,821] was granted by the patent office on 2014-12-09 for method and apparatus for determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio (osnr) penalty.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.. The grantee listed for this patent is Tong Wu, Yabin Ye, Sen Zhang. Invention is credited to Tong Wu, Yabin Ye, Sen Zhang.
United States Patent |
8,909,041 |
Ye , et al. |
December 9, 2014 |
Method and apparatus for determining an optical signal-to-noise
ratio (OSNR) penalty
Abstract
A method for determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty as a measure for a quality of an optical signal transmitted
via an optical link between a source optical node and a destination
optical node in an optical network, the method includes collecting
information of the optical link; determining a configuration
parameter P.sub.conf of the optical link based on the information
of the optical link; adjusting the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf
according to linear impairments in the optical link; and
determining the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty based on a
non-linear function of the adjusted configuration parameter
P'.sub.conf, the non-linear function accounting for non-linear
impairments in the optical link.
Inventors: |
Ye; Yabin (Munich,
DE), Wu; Tong (Shenzhen, CN), Zhang;
Sen (Shenzhen, CN) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Ye; Yabin
Wu; Tong
Zhang; Sen |
Munich
Shenzhen
Shenzhen |
N/A
N/A
N/A |
DE
CN
CN |
|
|
Assignee: |
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
(Shenzhen, CN)
|
Family
ID: |
46693830 |
Appl.
No.: |
13/486,821 |
Filed: |
June 1, 2012 |
Prior Publication Data
|
|
|
|
Document
Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20130028597 A1 |
Jan 31, 2013 |
|
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
PCT/CN2011/077672 |
Jul 27, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
398/26; 398/29;
398/158; 398/147; 398/28 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04B
10/07953 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H04B
10/00 (20130101) |
Field of
Search: |
;398/25-29,147,158 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1240944 |
|
Jan 2000 |
|
CN |
|
1567804 |
|
Jan 2005 |
|
CN |
|
1866794 |
|
Nov 2006 |
|
CN |
|
1 736 806 |
|
Dec 2006 |
|
EP |
|
Other References
English-language International Search Report and Notification of
Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written
Opinion of the International Search Authority, issued by the State
Intellectual Property Office, the P.R. China in International
Application No. PCT/CN2011/077672, mailed May 17, 2012, (9 pages).
cited by applicant .
Jean-Cristophe Antona et al., "Physical design and performance
estimation of heterogeneous optical transmission systems",
ScienceDirect, C.R. Physique 9, pp. 963-984 (2008). cited by
applicant .
Edouard Grellier et al., "Revisiting the evaluation of non-linear
propagation impairments in highly dispersive systems", ECOC Paper
10.4.2, Vienna, Austria (Sep. 2009). cited by applicant .
International Telecommunication Union, "Proposal of suggestions on
procedures to build physical impairments models for signal quality
evaluation in G.680", Telecommunication Standardization Sector,
Study Period 2009-2012, pp. 1-2 (2010). cited by applicant .
M. Yannuzzi et al., "Performance of translucent optical networks
under dynamic traffic and uncertain physical-layer information",
Technical University of Catalonia (Spain), Telecom Italia (Italy),
Politecnico di Milano (Italy), Pirelli Labs (Italy), CoreCom
(Italy), 6 pages (2009). cited by applicant .
Cardillo, Rocco, et al., "Considering Transmission Impairments in
Wavelength Routed Networks," Conference on Optical Network Design
and Modeling, Feb. 7-9, 2005, pp. 421-429. cited by applicant .
Extended European Search Report received on Application No.
11833582.7-1860, Applicant: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., mailed
Aug. 20, 2013, 8 pages. cited by applicant .
Pachnicke, Stephan et al., "Novel Physical-Layer Impairment-Aware
Routing Algorithm for Translucent Optical Networks with 43 Gb/s and
107 Gb/s Channels," Transparent Optical Networks, Jun. 28-Jul. 2,
2009, 4 pages. cited by applicant .
Roberts, Kim, et al., "Performance of Dual-Polarization QPSK for
Optical Transport Systems," Journal of Lighwave Technology, vol.
27, No. 16, Aug. 15, 2009, 14 pages. cited by applicant .
Saradhi, Chava Vijaya, et al., "Physical Layer Impairment Aware
Routing (PLIAR) in WDM Optical Networks; Issues and Challenges,"
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 11, No. 4, Fourth
Quarter 2009, pp. 109-130. cited by applicant.
|
Primary Examiner: Bello; Agustin
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Slater & Matsil, L.L.P.
Parent Case Text
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation of PCT Application No.
PCT/CN2011/077672, filed on Jul. 27, 2011, entitled "Method and
apparatus for determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR)
penalty", which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A method for determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty, the method comprising: collecting information of an
optical link between a source optical node and a destination
optical node in an optical network, the optical link transmitting
an optical signal; determining a configuration parameter P.sub.conf
of the optical link based on the information of the optical link;
adjusting the configuration parameter P.sub.conf to an adjusted
configuration parameter P'.sub.conf according to linear impairments
in the optical link; and determining the optical signal-to-noise
ratio penalty based on a non-linear function of the adjusted
configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, the non-linear function
accounting for non-linear impairments in the optical link.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf of the optical link corresponds to an accumulated power
along the optical link causing a predetermined degradation of the
optical signal.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the predetermined degradation of
the optical signal corresponds to a predetermined optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty at a predetermined bit error
rate.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty is determined as an additional optical signal-to-noise
ratio of the optical signal required after transmission of the
optical signal via the optical link compared to a back-to-back
transmission of the optical signal.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty is determined based on the non-linear function of the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf and based on the
linear impairments in the optical link.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the information of the optical
link comprises fiber parameters of optical fibers in the optical
link, a number of wavelength division multiplexed channels in the
optical link, a number of optical nodes in the optical link and
launching powers of the wavelength division multiplexed
channels.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the linear impairments comprise
at least one of: impairments due to filtering within the optical
link, impairments due to polarization mode dispersion along the
optical link, impairments due to chromatic dispersion along the
optical link, impairments due to insertion loss, impairments due to
amplified spontaneous emulation noise, impairments due to
crosstalk, or impairments due to polarization dependent loss.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-linear function of the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf accounts for at least
on of: non-linear impairments due to self-phase modulation,
non-linear impairments due to cross-phase modulation, non-linear
impairments due to four-wave mixing, non-linear impairments due to
stimulated Brillouin scattering, or non-linear impairments due to
stimulated Raman scattering.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical link comprises
optical fibers according to ITU-T recommendation G.652.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the optical link comprises
regenerators and spans which are portions of the optical link
between two regenerators; and wherein the non-linear function of
the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf depends on the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, on a number of the
spans N.sub.span and on a power level P.sub.i at a launching of the
optical signal.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the optical signal-to-noise
ratio penalty is determined according to a formula:
OSNR_Penalty=f(N.sub.spanP.sub.i,P'.sub.conf)+Penalty.sub.filters+Penalty-
.sub.PMD, wherein OSNR_Penalty defines the optical signal-to-noise
ratio penalty, f( ) the non-linear function, N.sub.span the number
of spans, P.sub.1 the power level at the launching of the optical
signal, P'.sub.conf the adjusted configuration parameter,
Penalty.sub.filters the linear impairments due to filtering within
the optical link and Penalty.sub.PMD the linear impairments due to
accumulated polarization mode dispersion.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjusting the configuration
parameter P.sub.conf comprises at least one of: subtracting an
adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.f related to filtering within the optical
link from the configuration parameter P.sub.conf, adding an
adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.PMD related to an accumulated polarization
mode dispersion along the optical link to the configuration
parameter P.sub.conf, or adding an adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.CD
related to an accumulated chromatic dispersion along the optical
link to the configuration parameter P.sub.conf.
13. A machine for determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty as a measure for a quality of an optical signal transmitted
via an optical link between a source optical node and a destination
optical node in an optical network, the machine comprising: a
processor coupled to a memory; wherein the processor is programmed
to: collect information of the optical link; determine a
configuration parameter P.sub.conf of the optical link based on the
information of the optical link; adjust the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf
according to linear impairments in the optical link; and determine
the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty based on a non-linear
function of the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, the
non-linear function accounting for non-linear impairments in the
optical link.
14. The machine of claim 13, providing configuration information
for configuring an optical link within the optical network by using
wavelength division multiplexed channels, optical fibers and
optical nodes of the optical network such that the optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty is below a threshold.
15. The machine of claim 14, wherein the optical signal-to-noise
ratio penalty is minimized when switching of optical cross connects
into the optical link and/or reconfiguration of reconfigurable
optical adds and drops within the optical link is based on the
configuration information.
16. A system comprising: an optical link between a source optical
node and a destination optical node; a management tool communicably
coupled to the optical link, wherein the management tool further
comprises: a collecting unit communicably coupled to the optical
link and configured to collect information from the optical link; a
first determining unit communicably coupled to the collecting unit,
the first determining unit configured to determine a configuration
parameter P.sub.conf of the optical link based on the information
from the optical link; an adjusting unit communicably coupled to
the first determining unit to receive the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf of the optical link and configured to adjust the
configuration parameter P.sub.conf of the optical link to an
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf according to linear
impairments in the optical link; and a second determining unit
communicably coupled to the adjusting unit and configured to
determine a signal-to-noise ratio penalty based on a non-linear
function of the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, the
non-linear function accounting for non-linear impairments in the
optical link.
17. The system of claim 16, providing configuration information for
configuring an optical link within the optical network by using
wavelength division multiplexed channels, optical fibers and
optical nodes of the optical network such that the optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty is below a threshold.
18. The system of claim 16, wherein the optical signal-to-noise
ratio penalty is minimized when switching of optical cross connects
into the optical link and/or reconfiguration of reconfigurable
optical adds and drops within the optical link is based on the
configuration information.
19. The system of claim 16, wherein the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf of the optical link corresponds to an accumulated power
along the optical link causing a predetermined degradation of the
optical signal.
20. The system of claim 16, wherein the information from the
optical link comprises fiber parameters of optical fibers in the
optical link, a number of wavelength division multiplexed channels
in the optical link, a number of optical nodes in the optical link
and launching powers of the wavelength division multiplexed
channels.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for
determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) penalty in an
optical network. The OSNR penalty serves as a measure for a quality
of an optical signal transmitted via an optical link between a
source optical node and a destination optical node
In transparent optical networks, the optical signal quality is
affected by different impairments like chromatic dispersion (CD),
amplifier stimulated emission (ASE) noise, crosstalk, polarization
mode dispersion (PMD), self-phase modulation (SPM), cross-phase
modulation (XPM), four wave mixing (FWM), etc. When optical
networks are designed, the operators need to have knowledge about
the network behavior, for example, dimension geographical positions
of network nodes, distance between network nodes, signal launching
powers, amplifier spans, number of amplifiers and further network
related parameters. Therefore, it is important to predict the
signal quality even before the signal is set up. In order to
evaluate the signal quality, there are generally two ways:
One way is based on full numerical simulation by solving the
nonlinear Schrodinger equations for signal transmission in optical
fibers. However, this method takes too much time, which cannot
fulfill the time requirements for fast network design and real time
signal quality evaluation.
The other way is to abstract some parameters for the transmission
link and to represent the signal quality by these parameters with
some functions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is the object of the invention to provide a method for assessing
the quality of an optical signal in high speed transmission
systems.
In general, the optical impairments affecting the signal quality
can be separated into two categories, which are linear impairments
and nonlinear impairments. Chromatic dispersion (CD), insertion
loss, amplified spontaneous emulation (ASE) noise, crosstalk,
polarization mode dispersion (PMD), polarization dependent loss
(PDL), etc. belong to the first category, while the self-phase
modulation (SPM), cross-phase modulation (XPM), four-wave mixing
(FWM), Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS), and Stimulated Raman
Scattering (SRS) belong to the second one. The International
Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Standardization Sector
(ITU-T) has defined in Recommendation G.680 some linear impairments
that need to be considered for signal quality evaluation. However,
to correctly evaluate the quality of an optical signal, not only
linear impairments should be included, but also the interactions
between linear and non-linear impairments have to be
considered.
For linear transmission where the launch power of the optical
signal is low enough that none of the nonlinear impairments in
optical fibers is taking effect, the impact of the linear
impairments on the signal quality is relatively easy to be
modelled. For example, the impact of Chromatic Dispersion (CD) can
be modelled by considering the total residual Chromatic Dispersion
at the end of the transmission link; analogously the impact of
Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD) can be modelled by considering
the total accumulated Polarization Mode Dispersion at the end of
the transmission link. However, in case of nonlinear transmission,
where the launch power of the optical signal is high enough that
some of the nonlinear impairments begin to have effect on the
signal quality, the models describing only the linear impairments
can no longer be applied for correctly evaluating the signal
quality.
The invention provides a fast method and apparatus for assessing
the quality of an optical signal by considering the interactions
between linear and non-linear impairments in the optical
transmission link. According to an embodiment, the invention is
directed to a method for determining an optical signal-to-noise
ratio (OSNR) penalty as a measure for a quality of an optical
signal transmitted via an optical link between a source optical
node and a destination optical node in an optical network. The
method comprises: collecting information of the optical link;
determining a configuration parameter P.sub.conf of the optical
link based on the information of the optical link; adjusting the
configuration parameter P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration
parameter P'.sub.conf according to linear impairments in the
optical link; and determining the optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty based on a non-linear function of the adjusted
configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, the non-linear function
accounting for non-linear impairments in the optical link.
The Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio (OSNR) is the ratio of the
optical signal power versus the noise power. Physical impairments,
both linear and non-linear degrade the Optical Signal-to-Noise
Ratio. When the impairments accumulated along a route are
excessively high, light-paths cannot be established, so connection
requests are blocked. Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio at the receiver
end is the most relevant parameter to characterize noise-related
system degradation: it refers to the ratio of the channel signal
power divided by the optical noise power (integrated over reference
bandwidth, usually 0.1 nm). OSNR is a cumulative parameter since
the inverses of the OSNR degradations of different parts of the
system can be added to get the inverse of the overall OSNR. When
the impairments accumulated along a route are excessively high, it
cannot be guaranteed that the signal detection at destination
occurs with a Bit Error Rate (BER) lower than a certain threshold.
When the Bit Error Rate lies above that threshold, light paths
cannot be established, so connection requests are blocked.
To account for non-noise system impairments, the notion of OSNR
penalty is used. For a reference Bit Error Rate (BER), it
represents the excess OSNR required after transmission to get this
reference BER, with respect to the requirements in the so-called
"back-to-back" configuration, i.e. when transmitter and receiver
are directly connected, without transmission. In other words, the
OSNR penalty is the difference in sensitivity (in dB scale) after
and before transmission for the same reference BER.
In order to describe the invention in detail, the following terms,
abbreviations and notations will be used:
ON: Optical Network, also called OTN: Optical Transport
Network.
WDM: Wavelength Division Multiplexing.
Transparent OTN: Transparent Optical Transport Network.
OSNR: Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio. Ratio of the optical signal
power versus the noise power. Physical impairments, both linear and
non-linear degrade the Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio (OSNR).
BER: Bit Error Rate.
Regenerator: Devices that regenerate the optical signal.
RWARP: Routing and Wavelength Assignment and Regenerator
Placement.
ASE: Amplified Spontaneous Emission.
OSNR penalty: measure for impairments of the OSNR due to non-noise
effects.
CD: Chromatic Dispersion.
GVD: Group Velocity Dispersion.
SMF: Single-Mode Fiber.
G.652 type according to ITU-T (International Telecommunication
Union-Telecommunication) standardization body)
LEAF: Large-Effective Area Fiber.
G.655 Non-Zero Dispersion Shifted Fiber type.
DCF: Dispersion Compensating Fibers.
Non-linear impairments:
Non-linear impairments can be divided into two categories, those
stemming from electronic non-linearities, namely the Kerr effect,
and those stemming from atomic/molecular/material non-linearities,
namely Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS), core
electrostriction, and inter-channel Self-Induced Stimulated Raman
Scattering (SI-SRS).
SBS: Stimulated Brillouin Scattering.
A non-linear impairment stemming from atomic/molecular/material
non-linearities.
SI-SRS: Self-Induced Stimulated Raman Scattering.
A non-linear impairment stemming from atomic/molecular/material
non-linearities.
Kerr effect: a non-linear impairment stemming from electronic
non-linearities.
SPM: Self-Phase Modulation. A type of Kerr non-linearity.
XPM: Cross-Phase Modulation. A type of Kerr non-linearity.
FWM: Four-Wave Mixing. A type of Kerr non-linearity.
Signal-Noise nonlinear interactions: A type of Kerr
non-linearity.
Also called Parametric-Gain or Modulation-Instability for
intensity-modulated systems.
Linear impairments:
Linear impairments result from filtering due to optical nodes,
chromatic dispersion (CD), insertion loss, amplified spontaneous
emulation (ASE) noise, crosstalk, polarization mode dispersion
(PMD), polarization dependent loss (PDL) etc.
PMD: Polarization Mode Dispersion. Is a linear impairment.
SOP: State of Polarization, polarization state.
The shape traced out in a fixed plane by the electric vector as
such a plane wave passes over it is a description of the
polarization state.
According to a first aspect, the invention relates to a method for
determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) penalty as a
measure for a quality of an optical signal transmitted via an
optical link between a source optical node and a destination
optical node in an optical network, the method comprising:
collecting information of the optical link; determining a
configuration parameter P.sub.conf of the optical link based on the
information of the optical link; adjusting the configuration
parameter P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration parameter
P'.sub.conf according to linear impairments in the optical link;
and determining the OSNR penalty based on a non-linear function of
the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, the non-linear
function accounting for non-linear impairments in the optical
link.
The quality measure of the optical signal is improved when not only
linear or non-linear impairments in the optical link are evaluated.
By considering the interaction between the linear and the
non-linear impairments, the quality measure is of higher accuracy.
Determining a configuration parameter P.sub.conf which is based on
information of the optical link makes the method simple and fast,
as optical link information is available to the operator when the
optical network is to be planned.
In a first possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect, the configuration parameter P.sub.conf of the
optical link corresponds to an accumulated power along the optical
link causing a predetermined degradation of the optical signal.
By transmission through an optical link the optical signal is
degraded. When the link parameters of the optical link are known,
the operator can predict the degradation of the optical signal. If
the accumulated power along the optical link is low, linear
impairments in the optical link mainly cause the degradation of the
optical signal. If the accumulated power along the optical link is
high, non-linear impairments in the optical will be responsible for
the degradation of the optical signal. The operator can control by
the configuration parameter whether the optical network runs in the
linear-impairment range or in the non-linear impairment range. In
the first case, the optical network can deliver information of high
precision. In the second case, the optical network can serve a
great number of communication links.
In a second possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to the first implementation
form of the first aspect, the predetermined degradation of the
optical signal corresponds to a predetermined optical
signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) penalty at a predetermined bit error
rate.
By choosing a predetermined or specified optical signal-to-noise
ratio (OSNR) penalty at a predetermined bit error rate, the quality
of one optical link can be compared to the quality of another
optical link in this network or in another network. The method
provides a reference for designing, testing and comparing optical
networks
In a third possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the optical
signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) penalty is determined as an additional
optical signal-to-noise ratio of the optical signal required after
transmission of the optical signal via the optical link compared to
a back-to-back transmission of the optical signal.
By this definition, only effects of the optical transmission link
are considered without the impacts on the optical signal in the
optical nodes which are for example pulse shaping and delaying due
to transmission, multiplexing, demultiplexing and reception.
In a fourth possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty is determined based on the non-linear
function of the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf and
based on the linear impairments in the optical link.
Signal quality degradation is due to linear and non-linear
impairments. An optical signal impaired by linear impairments in
the optical fiber is subject to non-linear impairments in a
succeeding section of the optical fiber in such a manner that
linear impairments and non-linear impairments interact with each
other. By adjusting the configuration parameter P.sub.conf to the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf according to the
linear impairments, these linear degradations are considered in the
determination of the non-linear impairments. Therefore, the method
determines the non-linear impairments interacting with the linear
impairments. By additionally determining the OSNR penalty based on
the linear impairments, not only the influence of non-linear
impairments but also the influence of the linear impairments is
considered. Thus, a precision of the method is improved with
respect to methods which concentrate on effects due to pure
non-linear impairments or due to pure linear impairments.
In a fifth possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the information of the
optical link comprises fiber parameters of optical fibers in the
optical link, a number of wavelength division multiplexed channels
in the optical link, a number of optical nodes in the optical link
and launching powers of the wavelength division multiplexed
channels.
The characteristics of an optical transmission system can be
described by the optical link parameters which are the fiber
parameters, the number of WDM channels, the number of optical nodes
in the link and the launching powers of the channels and others.
These parameters are configuration parameters which are known to
the operator when designing an optical network. The accuracy of the
quality measure mainly depends on the accuracy of the model on
which the calculations of the operator are based. When this model
considers non-linear impairments and linear impairments as well as
interactions between them, the precision of the quality measuring
is improved with respect to quality measures which are solely based
on linear or non-linear impairments.
In a sixth possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the linear impairments
comprise at least one of impairments due to filtering within the
optical link, impairments due to polarization mode dispersion along
the optical link, impairments due to chromatic dispersion along the
optical link, impairments due to insertion loss, impairments due to
amplified spontaneous emulation noise, impairments due to crosstalk
and impairments due to polarization dependent loss.
There are different types of linear impairments. The method
considers at least one of these impairments. When only one of the
linear impairments is considered, the method is easy and fast to
perform. Considering more than one of the linear impairments as
indicated above improves an accuracy of the quality measure
determined by the method. In an implementation form, the main
source/s of linear impairment is/are used.
In a seventh possible implementation form of the method according
to the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the non-linear function
of the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf accounts for at
least one of non-linear impairments due to self-phase modulation,
non-linear impairments due to cross-phase modulation, non-linear
impairments due to four-wave mixing, non-linear impairments due to
stimulated Brillouin scattering and non-linear impairments due to
stimulated Raman scattering.
There are different types of non-linear impairments. The method
considers at least one of these impairments. When only one of the
non-linear impairments is considered, the method is easy and fast
to perform. Considering more than one of the non-linear impairments
as indicated above improves an accuracy of the quality measure
determined by the method. In an implementation form, the main
source/s of non-linear impairment is/are used.
In an eighth possible implementation form of the method according
to the seventh implementation form of the first aspect, the optical
link comprises optical fibers according to ITU-T recommendation
G.652.
Optical fibers according to ITU-T recommendation G.652 are
standardized and so information of the optical link is easy to
collect by reading from the standard. The OSNR penalty of one
optical link of an optical network supporting G.652 fibers may be
compared to the OSNR penalty of another optical link of the same or
another optical network supporting G.652 fibers. When the method is
implemented in optical networks supporting G.652 fibers, the OSNR
penalty can be accurately determined, because configuration
parameters for G.652 fibers are well known from the ITU-T
standardization documents.
In a ninth possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the optical link
comprises regenerators and spans which are portions of the optical
link between two regenerators; and wherein the non-linear function
of the adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf depends on the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf, on a number of the
spans N.sub.span and on a power level P.sub.i at a launching of the
optical signal.
The number of spans and the launching power levels are design
parameters of the optical link and can thus be easily provided.
Therefore, the method is simple to perform and requires only little
computation resources.
In a tenth possible implementation form of the method according to
the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty is determined according to a formula:
OSNR_Penalty=f(N.sub.span, P.sub.i,
P'.sub.conf)+Penalty.sub.filters+Penalty.sub.PMD, wherein
OSNR_Penalty defines the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty, f(
) the non-linear function, N.sub.span the number of spans, P.sub.i
the power level at the launching of the optical signal, P'.sub.conf
the adjusted configuration parameter, Penalty.sub.filters the
linear impairments due to filtering within the optical link and
Penalty.sub.PMD the linear impairments due to accumulated
polarization mode dispersion.
The formula may be applied to different kinds of non-linear
impairments, wherein the non-linear function characterizes the
non-linear impairment. When the non-linear impairment is due to
self-phase modulation (SPM), a non-linear function describing the
SPM is applied. When the non-linear impairment is due to
cross-phase modulation (XPM), a non-linear function describing the
XPM is applied. When the non-linear impairment is due to another
kind of non-linear effect, a non-linear function describing that
effect is applied.
In an eleventh possible implementation form of the method according
to the first aspect as such or according to any of the preceding
implementation forms of the first aspect, the adjusting the
configuration parameter P.sub.conf comprises at least one of
subtracting an adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.f related to filtering
within the optical link from the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf, adding an adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.PMD related to an
accumulated polarization mode dispersion along the optical link to
the configuration parameter P.sub.conf, and adding an adjustment
.DELTA.P.sub.CD related to an accumulated chromatic dispersion
along the optical link to the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf.
As the configuration parameter P.sub.conf can be defined as the
accumulated power along the optical link causing a predetermined
degradation of the optical signal, adjusting the configuration
parameter according to linear impairments can easily performed by
adding adjustments related to the linear impairments. The
adjustments can be independently added, i.e. subtracting an
adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.f related to filtering within the optical
link is independent from adding an adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.PMD
related to accumulated polarization mode dispersion (PMD) and
adding an adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.CD related to accumulated
chromatic dispersion (CD). Only one of these adjustments can be
considered or depending on their impairment strength more than one
of those adjustments due to linear impairments can be applied.
Both, the accumulated polarization mode dispersion (PMD) and the
accumulated chromatic dispersion (CD) along the optical link cause
a broadening of the optical pulse. Therefore, the adjustments
.DELTA.P.sub.PMD related to PMD and .DELTA.P.sub.CD related to CD
are added to the configuration parameter P.sub.conf in order to
model the correct behavior of the optical link. In contrast, the
adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.f related to filtering within the optical
link causes a reduction of the optical pulse due to windowing
effects of the linear filters. Therefore, the adjustment
.DELTA.P.sub.f related to filtering is subtracted from the
configuration parameter P.sub.conf in order to model the correct
behavior of the optical link.
According to a second aspect, the invention relates to an apparatus
for determining an optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty as a
measure for a quality of an optical signal transmitted via an
optical link between a source optical node and a destination
optical node in an optical network, comprising a collecting unit
configured for collecting information of the optical link; a first
determining unit configured for determining a configuration
parameter P.sub.conf of the optical link based on the information
of the optical link; an adjusting unit configured for adjusting the
configuration parameter P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration
parameter P'.sub.conf according to linear impairments in the
optical link; and a second determining unit configured for
determining the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty based on a
non-linear function of the adjusted configuration parameter
P'.sub.conf, the non-linear function accounting for non-linear
impairments in the optical link.
The quality measure of the optical signal is improved when not only
linear or non-linear impairments in the optical link are evaluated.
By considering the interaction between the linear and the
non-linear impairments, the quality measure is of higher accuracy.
Determining a configuration parameter P.sub.conf which is based on
information of the optical link makes the method simple and fast,
as optical link information is available to the operator when the
optical network is to be planned. The apparatus can be applied as a
separate device before enrollment of an optical network, for
example as a planning or management unit to help the operator
designing the optical network. Alternatively or additionally, the
apparatus can be a part of the optical network, for example in a
qualification unit for supervising the quality of the optical
network or of individual optical links in the network.
In a first possible implementation form of the apparatus according
to the second aspect, the apparatus provides configuration
information for configuring an optical link within the optical
network by using wavelength division multiplexed channels, optical
fibers and optical nodes of the optical network such that the
optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty is below a threshold.
By applying the apparatus for designing an optical network, the
apparatus can provide information how to design the optical network
and the optical links including information about number of WDM
channels, kind of optical fibers, number and position of optical
nodes. When following the configuration information, the optical
network is designed such that an OSNR penalty is below a
configurable threshold, e.g. a threshold for detecting the minimum
OSNR penalty. The configuration information can also be used for
reconfiguring the network components, for example when an existing
network is enhanced due to a new generation of fiber cables,
regenerators or optical nodes. In such a case, the optical links
can be reconfigured in such a manner that the OSNR penalty remains
as low as desired, at least below a predetermined or configurable
threshold.
In a second possible implementation form of the apparatus according
to the first implementation form of the second aspect, the optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty is minimized when switching of
optical cross connects into the optical link and/or reconfiguration
of reconfigurable optical add and drops within the optical link is
based on the configuration information.
Switching of optical cross connects into the optical link and/or
reconfiguration of reconfigurable optical add and drops within the
optical link can be performed in the field. The configuration
information can be used for controlling the reconfiguration and/or
switching such that quality of the optical signal remains as high
as desired. Switching and reconfiguration can also be performed
offline, i.e. during simulations and/or during planning of the
optical network.
The invention can be applied to fixed networks. The invention can
further be used for interconnecting network nodes by optical
fibers, e.g. base stations, radio network controllers and network
management units in fixed or/and mobile networks.
The invention can be used for optical network design and for
optical channel signal power adjustment. The invention can be
implemented in the optical network control plane.
The invention can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry,
or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations
thereof.
General purpose computers may implement the foregoing methods, in
which the computer housing may house a CPU (central processing
unit), memory such as DRAM (dynamic random access memory), ROM
(read only memory), EPROM (erasable programmable read only memory),
EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read only memory), SRAM
(static random access memory), SDRAM (synchronous dynamic random
access memory), and Flash RAM (random access memory), and other
special purpose logic devices such as ASICs (application specific
integrated circuits) or configurable logic devices such GAL
(generic array logic) and reprogrammable FPGAs (field programmable
gate arrays).
Each computer may also include plural input devices (for example,
keyboard, microphone and mouse), and a display controller for
controlling a monitor. Additionally, the computer may include a
floppy disk drive; other removable media magneto optical media);
and a hard disk or other fixed high-density media drives, connected
using an appropriate device bus such as a SCSI (small computer
system interface) bus, and Enhanced IDE (integrated drive
electronics) bus, or an Ultra DMA (direct memory access) bus. The
computer may also include a compact disk reader, a compact disk
reader/writer unit, or a compact disc jukebox, which may be
connected to the same device bus or to another device bus.
The invention envisions at least one computer readable medium.
Examples of computer readable media include compact discs, hard
disks, floppy disks, tape, magneto optical disks, PROMs, for
example, EPROM, EEPROM, Flash EPROM, DRAM, SRAM, SDRAM. Stored on
any one or on a combination of computer readable media is software
for controlling both the hardware of the computer and for enabling
the computer to interact with other elements, to perform the
functions described above. Such software may include, but is not
limited to, user applications, device drivers, operating systems,
development tools, and so forth. Such computer readable media
further include a computer program product including computer
executable code or computer executable instructions that, when
executed, causes a computer to perform the methods disclosed above.
The computer code may be any interpreted or executable code,
including but not limited to scripts, interpreters, dynamic link
libraries, Java classes, complete executable programs, and the
like.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Further embodiments of the invention will be described with respect
to the following figures, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a method for determining an optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty in an optical network according to an
implementation form;
FIG. 2 shows a diagram and a formula illustrating a non-linear
function with respect to non-linear phase shift effects according
to an implementation form;
FIG. 3 shows a diagram and a formula illustrating linear
impairments with respect to PMD effects according to an
implementation form;
FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an optical link comprising multiple
optical nodes and optical amplifiers and a non-linear function
describing non-linear transmission effects according to an
implementation form;
FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a method for determining an optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty in an optical network according to an
implementation form; and
FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a apparatus for determining an
optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty in an optical network
according to an implementation form.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a method for determining an optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty in an optical network according to an
implementation form. The optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty is a
measure for a quality of an optical signal transmitted via an
optical link between a source optical node and a destination
optical node in an optical network 200.
The optical network 200 comprises a plurality of N optical
transmitters 201_1, . . . , 201_N generating N individual optical
signals which are multiplexed in a multiplexer 203 into a single
multiplexed optical signal. The multiplexed optical signal passes
an optical transmission link 205 comprising an exemplary number of
three amplifier spans 205_1, 205_2 and 205_3 including optical
amplifiers 207_1, 207_2 and 207_3 and optical fibers 209_1, 209_2
and 209_3. At the receiving end a demultiplexer 211 demultiplexes
the received multiplexed optical signal into N individual optical
receive signals which are switched to a plurality of N optical
receivers 213_1, 213_2 and 213_3.
The source optical node comprises the plurality of N optical
transmitters 201_1, . . . , 201_N and the multiplexer 203. The
destination optical node comprises the demultiplexer 211 and the
plurality of N optical receivers 213_1, 213_2 and 213_3.
The optical network 200 consists of the optoelectronic transmitters
201_1, . . . , 201_N followed by the optical transmission link, and
by the optoelectronic receivers 213_1, 213_2 and 213_3. The
transmitters 201_1, . . . , 201_N convert binary data into a
modulated optical signal at a given bit-rate on a given optical
carrier wavelength, usually denoted as a channel, that is sent into
an optical transmission link. The transmission link is primarily
composed of a concatenation of sections 205_1, 205_2, 205_3 of
single-mode optical fibers 209_1, 209_2, 209_3 and optical
amplifiers 207_1, 207_2, 207_3, and conveys the signal to an
optoelectronic receiver 213_1, . . . , 213_N, which recovers the
binary information after photo-detection around the carrier
wavelength and signal sampling.
In an implementation form, the optical network 200 comprises
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) channels. The WDM technique
is based upon combining (multiplexing) into the same fiber N
modulated channels, each being at a different carrier wavelength.
The total throughput is the sum of the individual channel bit
rates, which are usually identical, e.g. throughput=N.times.10
Gb/s. At the receiver side, each channel is filtered and recovered
separately, so that any limitations on fiber propagation arising
from linear effects in the fiber, such as noise sensitivity, Group
Velocity Dispersion and Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD), are
only related to the bit rate of each individual channel. WDM is
therefore a very efficient and common way to exploit the large
fiber bandwidth, and allow high-capacity and distance transmission
of up to 164 channels modulated at 100 Gb/s over 2550 km, which
corresponds to a capacity.times.distance product of 41.8 Pbit/s
km.
In an implementation form, the optical network 200 is a Transparent
Optical Transport Network. In transparent Optical Transport
Networks (OTNs), the optical signal from a source to a destination
is handled entirely in the optical domain meaning that
Optical-Electrical-Optical (O-E-O) conversions are never performed
at transit nodes. Full transparency, however, is not always
achievable in long distance networks due to physical impairments,
both linear and non-linear that degrade the Optical Signal-to-Noise
Ratio (OSNR) as optical signals propagate transparently through the
network.
In an implementation form, the optical network 200 comprises
regenerators which are devices that regenerate the optical signal.
In order to geographically expand a transparent OTN, an operator
might need to install one or more regenerators along some paths, so
as to provide sufficient end-to-end quality to optical connections.
Clearly, regenerators break up the optical continuity, but allow
improving the OSNR hence reducing the bit error rate (BER). The
deployment of regenerators turns a transparent OTN into a
translucent network.
In an implementation form, the optical network 200 comprises a
Routing and Wavelength Assignment and Regenerator Placement (RWARP)
mechanism. During the dimensioning of an OTN, the Routing and
Wavelength Assignment and Regenerator Placement (RWARP) process
requires an effective method for estimating the potential
degradation of an optical signal along the candidate paths, which
is typically achieved by integrating physical-layer information
into the RWARP process. Once the regenerators are placed and the
dimensioning phase has concluded, the role of the RWA process is to
route the forecasted traffic demands according to the planning.
In an implementation form, the amplifiers 207_1, 207_2, 207_3 are
inline optical amplifiers, in particular Erbium Doped Fiber
Amplifiers. One limitation to system reach comes from fiber
attenuation. Despite very low values of attenuation for
wave-lengths around 1550 nm, about 0.2 dB/km, long-haul
transmission, over a few hundreds of kilometers or more, is not
feasible without optical amplification or regeneration. Therefore,
inline optical amplifiers, mostly Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers,
are generally deployed along the transmission link, on average
every 80 km for terrestrial systems. They can amplify an optical
field over a wide waveband such as the C-band (between 1530 and
1565 nm), without optoelectronic regeneration, and therefore allow
much longer transmission reach for all the transmitted channels in
the amplified waveband.
In an implementation form, the amplifiers 207_1, 207_2, 207_3
generate Amplified Spontaneous Emission (ASE) noise. After
transmission over an amplified link, the accumulated ASE becomes
the dominant source of noise.
In an implementation form, the optical fibers 209_1, 209_2, 209_3
are Single-Mode Fibers (SMF) according to the G.652 type of ITU-T
(International Telecommunication Union-Telecommunication)
standardization body.
In an implementation form, the optical fibers 209_1, 209_2, 209_3
are Large-Effective Area Fibers (LEAF) according to the G.655
Non-Zero Dispersion Shifted Fiber type of ITU-T.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 comprises
Dispersion Compensating Fibers (DCFs). Dispersion compensation is
required, and is generally achieved with specific fiber sections
called DCFs (Dispersion Compensating Fibers) exhibiting an opposite
dispersion sign to the one of transmission fiber sections (also
referred to as fiber spans) in the propagation waveband, so that
the accumulated dispersion remains close to zero, thus enabling to
minimize signal distortions. Those DCFs have typical dispersions of
[-100; -250] ps/(nm/km) at 1550 nm and are located regularly along
the line, within the inline amplifiers. The optical pulses carrying
the digital information tend to broaden but the succession of
fibers with different dispersion signs limits the broadening, and
then the resulting inter-symbol interference at the receiver
side.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
non-linear impairments. Non-linear impairments can be divided into
two categories, those stemming from electronic non-linearities,
namely the Kerr effect, and those stemming from
atomic/molecular/material non-linearities, namely Stimulated
Brillouin Scattering (SBS), core electrostriction, and
inter-channel Self-Induced Stimulated Raman Scattering
(SI-SRS).
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to the
Kerr effect. The Kerr effect translates the dependence of the
instantaneous fiber refractive index n(z,t) on the signal intensity
I(z,t). The intensity is related to the instantaneous power profile
P(z,t) via I(z,t)=P(z,t)/A.sub.eff. A.sub.eff is the effective area
of the fiber, which is fiber-type specific (80 .mu.m.sup.2 for SMF,
72 .mu.m.sup.2 for LEAF, 15-20 .mu.m.sup.2 for DCFs around 1550
nm). The magnitude of this effect is determined by the non-linear
coefficient n.sub.2, according to the relation
n(z,t)=n.sub.0+n.sub.2P(z,t)/A.sub.eff, where n.sub.o is the linear
part of the refractive index, while n.sub.2 is expressed in
m.sup.2/W. The non-linear index ranges between
n.sub.2=2.5.times.10.sup.-20 and 3.0.times.10.sup.-20 m.sup.2/W.
Kerr non-linearities can be categorized into four types of physical
phenomena which are Self-Phase Modulation (SPM), Cross-Phase
Modulation (XPM), Four-Wave Mixing (FWM) and Signal-Noise nonlinear
interactions. For 10/40G nonlinear transmission in G.652 fiber
systems, since G.652 fibres have large chromatic dispersion and
effective area, the FWM impairment can be neglected. According to
Recommendation G. 663, the effects of SBS and SRS can also be
neglected. SPM/XPM nonlinear impairments, however, have to be
considered. In an implementation form, the fibers 209_1, 209_2,
209_3 are G.652 fibers according to ITU-T Recommendation G.652. In
an implementation form, the effects of SBS and SRS are neglectable
according to ITU-T G.663. In an implementation form, the optical
network 200 comprises a G.652 fiber system.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to SPM
effects. The Self-Phase Modulation (SPM) describes the signal phase
of a given channel being modulated proportionally to its own power.
At the receiver end, the photodiode is phase-insensitive, but Group
Velocity Dispersion (GVD) converts some of the phase modulation
into intensity modulation, causing signal distortions. After
propagation along a length L of fiber with attenuation .alpha., the
phase of a channel with power P(z,t) impaired by SPM can be derived
from the propagation equation according to the formula:
.PHI..function..times..pi..lamda..times..intg..times..function..function.-
.times..function..times.d ##EQU00001##
For typical WDM systems, the presence of amplifiers leads to an
accumulation of SPM effects and phase shifts along the link. SPM
causes a broadening of the optical spectrum.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
cross-phase modulation. The Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM) describes
the signal phase of a given channel being modulated proportionally
to the power of the other channels, especially the close neighbors
of this channel. Group Velocity Dispersion (GVD) converts some of
the phase modulation into intensity modulation, causing signal
distortions.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
Four-Wave Mixing. The Four-Wave Mixing describes the interaction
between three WDM channels at three different wavelengths results
into the generation of an intermodulation product at a fourth
wavelength, which can fall on top of an existing fourth channel,
producing detrimental crosstalk.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
Signal-Noise nonlinear interactions. The Signal-Noise nonlinear
interactions, also called Parametric-Gain or Modulation-Instability
for intensity-modulated systems, describe non-linear phase noise
for phase-modulated systems, which strengthens or reduces the
impact of amplifier noise, depending on the chromatic
dispersion.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
linear impairments. Linear impairments result from filtering due to
optical nodes, chromatic dispersion (CD), insertion loss, amplified
spontaneous emulation (ASE) noise, crosstalk, polarization mode
dispersion (PMD), polarization dependent loss (PDL). For linear
transmission, i.e. the launch power of the optical signal is low
enough that none of the non-linear impairments in optical fibers is
taking effect, the impact of the linear impairments on the signal
quality is relatively easy to be modelled. For example, the impact
of CD can be modelled by considering the total residual CD at the
end of the transmission link; the impact of PMD can also be
modelled by considering the total accumulated PMD at the end of the
transmission link.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
linear impairments by filtering effects. For linear transmission,
the concatenation of the filters in the network results in a
narrower transmission window and therefore causes transmission
penalty, also called linear impairments by filtering effects. For
non-linear transmission, the nonlinear effects SPM/XPM can broaden
the optical spectrum of the transmitted signal, the transmission
penalty is enlarged because more part of the optical spectrum is
filtered out.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD). Polarization Mode Dispersion is
a linear impairment. PMD causes the pulse broadening and induces
signal penalty. The effects of SPM/XPM differ for different
polarizations. Usually, if one channel keeps its polarization state
(e.g. linear polarization), then it incurs the largest SPM effect.
For WDM transmission, if all the channels have the same linear
polarization states, then the multi-channel nonlinear effects XPM
will also have the largest impact. However, in a real fiber, the
polarization states of the optical signals change randomly due to
PMD, therefore the strength of the nonlinear effects is reduced and
then the signal degrades less.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to
Chromatic Dispersion (CD). Chromatic Dispersion stems from Group
Velocity Dispersion (GVD). The effect of the total residual CD at
the end of the transmission link depends on the accumulated
nonlinear effects along the transmission link. In general, the CD
tolerance after transmission is smaller than the one of back to
back. The deviation of the CD can be represented by the difference
between the actual CD and the targeted (ideal) CD of each span. Due
to the interplay of CD and nonlinear effects along the transmission
link, their effects vary.
In an implementation form, the optical link 205 is subject to Group
Velocity Dispersion (GVD). Group Velocity Dispersion characterizes
wavelength dependence of fiber refractive index n(.lamda.). It is
the linear phenomenon by which the spectral components of a signal
are carried by guided modes which have different speeds. They
therefore arrive delayed with respect to each other at the receiver
end, thus distorting the original signal waveform and increasing
the number of decision errors. Fiber GVD is usually characterized
with the dispersion parameter per unit length expressed in
ps/(nm/km). The typical dispersion characteristics of the two most
widely available fiber types are 17 ps/(nm/km) at 1550 nm for
standard SMF (Single-Mode Fiber, G.652 type according to ITU-T
(International Telecommunication Union-Telecommunication)
standardization body) and 4 ps/(nm/km) at 1550 nm (2.6 ps/(nm/km)
at 1530 nm) for LEAF.TM. fiber (Large-Effective Area Fiber, G.655
Non-Zero Dispersion Shifted Fiber type). The net impact of
chromatic dispersion after propagation naturally depends on the
accumulated dispersion (ps/nm) along all fiber sections.
The method comprises collecting 101 information of the optical
link; determining 103 a configuration parameter P.sub.conf of the
optical link based on the information of the optical link;
adjusting 105 the configuration parameter P.sub.conf to an adjusted
configuration parameter P'.sub.conf according to linear impairments
in the optical link; and determining 107 the optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty based on a non-linear function of the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf accounting for
non-linear impairments in the optical link.
Depending on the real system, for example, dispersion compensated
or dispersion un-compensated links, modulation formats, bit rates,
etc., and its implementation, the non-linear function of the
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf accounting for
non-linear impairments in the optical link will be different. In an
implementation form, the non-linear function reads: f(N.sub.span,
P.sub.i, P'.sub.conf), depending on a number N.sub.span of spans
between two amplifiers, a signal launching power P.sub.i and an
adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf.
In an implementation form, the optical network comprises a
100GPDM-QPSK dispersion uncompensated WDM system, in which the
non-linear function reads:
f(N.sub.span,P.sub.i,P'.sub.conf)=0.05(.SIGMA..sub.NPi-P'conf).sup-
.2+0.4347*(.SIGMA..sub.NPi-P'conf)+1.
With the exemplary values of N=20, P.sub.i=1 dBm, P'conf=16 dBm,
the OSNR penalty is 0.33 dB.
The value of P.sub.conf is depending on multiple factors like fiber
type, number of channels, channel spacing, etc. For a given set up,
the P.sub.conf can be measured or simulated based on the
definition. In an exemplary embodiment, in G.652 fiber, for 40G
DQPSK WDM system with 50 GHz spacing, the P.sub.conf value is about
16.6 dBm.
The method comprises adjusting the configuration parameter
P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration parameter P'.sub.conf
according to linear impairments in the optical link. In an
implementation form, the adjusting .DELTA.P.sub.f is related to the
filtering within the optical link. The adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.f is
system setup related. In practice, the relationship of
.DELTA.P.sub.f with the filtering bandwidth can be measured or
simulated. In an exemplary implementation form, in G.652 fiber, 40G
DQPSK WDM system with 50 GHz spacing, including a ROADM composed of
2WSS with 45 GHz FWHM (full width at half maximum), the
.DELTA.P.sub.f is 0.5 dB.
In an implementation form, the adjusting .DELTA.P.sub.PMD is
related to the accumulated polarization mode dispersion along the
optical link. The adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.PMD is also system setup
related. In practice, the relationship of .DELTA.P.sub.PMD with the
accumulated PMD can be measured or simulated. In an exemplary
implementation form, in G.652 fiber, 40G DQPSK WDM system with 50
GHz spacing, the total accumulated PMD is 5 ps and the
.DELTA.P.sub.PMD is 0.7 dB.
In an implementation form, the adjusting .DELTA.P.sub.CD is related
to the accumulated chromatic dispersion along the optical link. The
adjustment .DELTA.P.sub.CD is especially depending on the total
accumulated dispersion of the link. For compensated link, since the
total accumulated dispersion is usually compensated to close to 0,
then .DELTA.P.sub.CD usually is 0. However, in the uncompensated
link, .DELTA.P.sub.CD needs to be measured or simulated based on
the system setup. In general, higher accumulated dispersion and
larger number of spans will have higher P.sub.conf. In an exemplary
implementation form, in G.652 fiber, 100G PDM-QPSK coherent WDM
system with 50 GHz spacing, span length is 80 km, when the number
of spans is 10, P.sub.conf is 11.6 dBm, when the number of spans is
20, then P.sub.conf is 13.1 dBm, and the .DELTA.P.sub.CD is 1.5
dB.
FIG. 2 shows a diagram and a formula illustrating a non-linear
function with respect to non-linear phase shift effects according
to an implementation form. The diagram illustrates the relation
between the non-linear phase of an optical link impaired by Self
Phase Modulation (SPM) effects and the OSNR penalty according to an
implementation form.
After propagation along a length L of the fiber with attenuation
.alpha., the phase of a channel with power P(z,t) impaired by SPM
can be derived from the propagation equation according to the
formula:
.PHI..function..times..pi..lamda..times..intg..times..function..function.-
.times..function..times.d ##EQU00002##
The accumulated nonlinear phase shift and its variation is used as
an effective parameter for signal quality prediction. For example,
if a transmission link is spanned of a number of i standard single
mode fibers (SSMF) and dispersion compensation fibers (DCF), the
accumulated nonlinear phase shift is
.PHI..function..times..times..pi..lamda..times..times..times..times..time-
s..times..times. ##EQU00003## where .lamda. is the wavelength,
P.sub.i is the launch power, n.sub.2 is the nonlinear coefficient,
A.sub.eff is the fiber effective area, and L.sub.eff is the fiber
effective length. Then the signal quality Q penalty can be
represented by the curves shown in FIG. 2.
For typical WDM systems, the presence of amplifiers leads to an
accumulation of SPM effects and phase shifts along the link. SPM
causes a broadening of the optical spectrum, since optical
frequency shifts are generated on the pulse leading and trailing
edges. Since this effect primarily concerns the signal phase, it
does not affect intensity detection when chromatic dispersion is
close to zero. In the case of non-zero chromatic dispersion, the
interplay between SPM and chromatic dispersion results in a
complicated phase-to-intensity conversion during signal
propagation. Depending upon the chromatic dispersion sign, SPM is
either beneficial, i.e. leading to pulse compression, or
detrimental, i.e. leading to pulse broadening, distortion and
irreversible breakup. The interplay between SPM and chromatic
dispersion is of complex nature, as SPM generates phase modulation
of the signal in the temporal domain, while chromatic dispersion
meanwhile leads to phase modulation of the signal, but in the
frequency domain. Consequently, the outcome of the interaction
between non-linear and dispersive effects strongly depends on the
distribution of dispersion compensation and signal power along a
transmission link. In presence of non-linearities, Dispersion
Management consists in the clever distribution of dispersive
elements along the link, so as to mitigate as much as possible
non-linear and dispersive effects at the same time.
In order to determine a quality of the link, a management tool
collects the link information that the signal transmits including
fiber parameters, number of channels, channel launching powers,
number of optical nodes, etc. From the collected link information,
a parameter P.sub.conf (in dB), corresponding to the accumulated
power along the link which causes a predetermined OSNR penalty at a
predetermined bit error rate, for example 1 dB OSNR penalty at a
bit error rate (BER) 1e-3, can be decided. The OSNR penalty,
defined as the additional optical signal to noise ratio (OSNR)
required after transmission compared with back to back (BtB) for
the BER 1e-3, can be represented as the function of N.sub.span,
number of spans, and P.sub.i, the channel launch power at i.sup.th
fiber, and P.sub.conf. i.e. OSNR_Penalty=f(N.sub.span, P.sub.i,
P.sub.conf). FIG. 2 shows a diagram of the OSNR penalty according
to the formula:
.times..function..times..function..lamda. ##EQU00004## where
N.sub.span=i is the number of spans, P.sub.i is the launch power
and P.sub.conf describes the link parameters including .lamda.
which is the wavelength, n.sub.2 which is the nonlinear
coefficient, A.sub.eff which is the fiber effective area, and
L.sub.eff which is the fiber effective length.
Due to PMD effects in the fibers or optical components, or optical
nodes in the transmission link, linear and nonlinear impairments
interact. According to the accumulated PMD and final filtering
bandwidth from the optical nodes, P.sub.conf is adjusted to
P'.sub.conf.
Depending on the number of reconfigurable optical add and drops
(ROADMs) and/or optical cross connects (OXCs) and their types, the
management tool calculates the corresponding equivalent final
filtering bandwidth, and then the parameter P.sub.conf is adjusted
to P'.sub.conf=P.sub.conf-.DELTA.P.sub.f, where .DELTA.P.sub.f is
the adjustment related to the final filtering bandwidth.
Depending on the accumulated PMD in the transmission link, the
management tool adjusts the parameter P.sub.conf to
P'.sub.conf=P.sub.conf+.DELTA.P.sub.PMD, where .DELTA.P.sub.PMD is
the adjustment related to the accumulated PMD in the link.
Then the final OSNR Penalty is represented as
.times..function.'.times..times..function..lamda..times.
##EQU00005##
Penalty.sub.filters and Penalty.sub.PMD are the linear OSNR
penalties caused by cascaded filters and accumulated PMD along the
link, respectively, and they can be measured beforehand. In an
implementation form, Penalty.sub.PMD is determined according to the
description below with respect to FIG. 3. In an implementation
form, Penalty.sub.filters is determined according to the
specifications in ITU-T Recommendation G.680.
FIG. 3 shows a diagram and a formula illustrating linear
impairments with respect to PMD effects according to an
implementation form. The diagram and the formula illustrate the
relation between a state of polarization (SOP) string length of an
optical link and an OSNR penalty (Penalty.sub.PMD).
PMD can be characterized by the PMD vector .tau.(.omega.), which
may be expanded in a Taylor series about the signal's center
frequency. The first term of the expansion, known as first order
PMD is the differential group delay (DGD) between the two principal
states of polarization (PSPs). DGD is considered to be the dominant
mechanism for PMD induced system impairment.
The PMD-induced OSNR penalty is approximated to the first order by
the following equation:
.function..tau..fwdarw..times..times..gamma..function..gamma..times..tau.
##EQU00006## wherein .epsilon. is the PMD-induced OSNR penalty,
also denoted as Penalty.sub.PMD, vector .tau. is the PMD vector at
the input, A.sub.0 is a modulation format specific constant,
.gamma. is the splitting ratio between the two PSPs, .tau. is the
differential group delay (DGD) and T is the bit period.
The PMD-induced OSNR penalty can be rewritten in terms of the
length of an SOP trace on the Poincare sphere as the frequency
moves across the modulation bandwidth 1/T. This string is a
measurable quantity which represents the depolarization of a
signal, and can be separated from other impairments affecting the
signal performance. The first order approximation for this string
length is given by L.sub.1=(.tau./T)sin .THETA. in which .theta. is
the angle between the PSP and the launch SOP. This first order
approximation can be rewritten to show that the penalty .epsilon.
is related to the string length L.sub.1 through a quadratic
relationship:
.times. ##EQU00007##
Since the string length L1 can be determined either directly from
spectrally resolved polarimetry, or by measuring .theta. and .tau.,
FIG. 3 compares the results for the two first order PMD fibers,
with DGDs of 26 ps and 60 ps. The coefficient A.sub.0 was extracted
from the lower bound of the 26 ps data and found to be
A.sub.0=49.6. The corresponding penalty is shown as a dashed line.
While the fit is good at small string lengths, the 60 ps results at
higher string lengths show a strong deviation. Instead, this data
is well fitted by the quartic polynomial:
.epsilon.=AL.sub.1.sup.2/4+BL.sub.1.sup.4
The quartic polynomial includes a higher order term. A best fit for
the lower bound may be obtained with A=40 and B=36.
In an implementation form, the Penalty.sub.PMD caused by
accumulated PMD along the link is expressed according to a first
approximation as Penalty.sub.PMD=A.sub.0/4L.sub.1.sup.2. 1.
In an implementation form, the Penalty.sub.PMD caused by
accumulated PMD along the link is expressed according to a second
approximation which is more precise than the first approximation as
Penalty.sub.PMD=A/4L.sub.1.sup.2+BL.sub.1.sup.4. 1.
Both approximations may be used as the term for the PMD induced
system penalty Penalty.sub.PMD in the equations described with
respect to FIGS. 2 and 4.
FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an optical link comprising multiple
optical nodes and optical amplifiers and a formula for calculating
the quality of the optical link according to an implementation
form.
An exemplary optical link comprises four optical nodes A, B, C and
D and multiple numbers of amplifiers in the signal paths between
the nodes. The first path L.sub.1 between optical nodes A and B has
a length of 128 km, the second path L.sub.2 between optical nodes B
and C has a length of 298 km, the third path L.sub.3 between
optical nodes C and D has a length of 580 km. Each optical node
comprises a pre-amplifier (PA) and a booster (BO) for amplifying
the optical signal. Line amplifiers (LA) are arranged between the
optical nodes. When a maximum span length of 85 km is specified
corresponding to a maximum amplifier distance, the first path
L.sub.1 requires two spans and one line amplifier (LA) between the
two spans. Accordingly, the second path L.sub.2 requires four spans
and three line amplifier (LA) between the four spans and the third
path L.sub.3 requires seven spans and six line amplifier (LA)
between the seven spans. In total, a number of spans
N.sub.SPAN=2+4+7=13 results from this configuration.
A quality factor Q.sub.end can be evaluated as a function of the
transmission system parameters and the transmission impairments.
Without any error correction mechanism on the digital signal at the
receiver, a quality factor Q.sub.end=16.9 dB corresponds to a BER
of approximately 1.times.10.sup.-12. Typically, the requirements
for the minimum value of Q.sub.end of a signal at the receiver are
about 17 dB without error correction, and 12 dB in case of error
correction. The expression used for evaluating the quality factor
Q.sub.end at the endpoint of a transparent path (or sub-path) is
given as
Q.sub.end=a.sub.0+a.sub.1OSNR.sub.end+a.sub.2N.sub.SPAN+a.sub.3(P.sub.0N.-
sub.SPAN).sup.B
The quality factor Q.sub.end depends both on linear and non-linear
effects. The OSNR.sub.end factor is the optical signal to noise
ratio expressed in dB at the receiver. The output lightpath (or
sub-path) OSNR can be calculated considering the OSNR across each
of its elementary components and then combining the partial
results. The elementary components include all the spans and the
nodes along the (sub-) path. The terms a.sub.2N.sub.SPAN and
a.sub.3(P.sub.0N.sub.SPAN).sup.B take into account the non-linear
effects, considering all amplifiers along an optical link (booster
at the beginning of the line and line amplifiers at intermediate
sites on the lines). N.sub.SPAN is the number of spans of the
transparent path (a span is the portion of a link between two
amplifiers), and P.sub.0 [dBm] is the power level at the signal
launch (typically 3 dBm). The coefficients a.sub.0, a.sub.1,
a.sub.2, a.sub.3, and B, on the other hand, depend on the type of
line systems used and should be timed by an on-field measurement
campaign. Typical values are suggested as: a.sub.0=0,4, a.sub.1=1,
a.sub.2=0,04, a.sub.3=0,02 and B=0,2.
In order to determine the quality of the link, a management tool
collects the link information that the signal transmits including
fiber parameters, number of channels, channel launching powers,
number of optical nodes, etc. From the collected link information,
a parameter P.sub.conf(in dB), corresponding to the accumulated
power along the link which causes a predetermined OSNR penalty at a
predetermined bit error rate, for example 1 dB OSNR penalty at a
bit error rate (BER) 1e-3, can be decided. The OSNR penalty,
defined as the additional optical signal to noise ratio (OSNR)
required after transmission compared with back to back (BtB) for
the BER 1e-3, can be represented as the function of N.sub.spam,
number of spans, and P.sub.i, the channel launch power at i.sup.th
fiber, and P.sub.conf. i.e. OSNR_Penalty=f(N.sub.span, P.sub.i,
P.sub.conf). FIG. 4 shows a diagram of the OSNR penalty according
to the formula:
.times..function..times..function. ##EQU00008## where N.sub.spam=i
is the number of spans, P.sub.0 is the launch power and P.sub.conf
describes the link parameters including a.sub.0, a.sub.1, a.sub.2,
a.sub.3, and B, which depend on the type of line systems used and
should be tuned by off-line on-field measurements. Exemplary values
are a.sub.0=0,4, a.sub.1=1, a.sub.2=0,04, a.sub.3=0,02 and
B=0,2.
Due to PMD effects in the fibers or optical components, or optical
nodes in the transmission link, linear and nonlinear impairments
interact. According to the accumulated PMD and final filtering
bandwidth from the optical nodes, P.sub.conf is adjusted to
P'.sub.conf.
Depending on the number of reconfigurable optical add and drops
(ROADMs) and/or optical cross connects (OXCs) and their types, the
management tool calculates the corresponding equivalent final
filtering bandwidth, and then the parameter P.sub.conf is adjusted
to P'.sub.conf=P.sub.conf-.DELTA.P.sub.f, where .DELTA.P.sub.f is
the adjustment related to the final filtering bandwidth.
Depending on the accumulated PMD in the transmission link, the
management tool adjusts the parameter P.sub.conf to
P'.sub.conf+.DELTA.P.sub.PMD, where .DELTA.P.sub.PMD is the
adjustment related to the accumulated PMD in the link.
Then the final OSNR Penalty is represented as
.times..function..times..times..times..function..times..times.
##EQU00009##
Penalty.sub.filters and Penalty.sub.PMD are the linear OSNR
penalties caused by cascaded filters and accumulated PMD along the
link, respectively, and they can be measured beforehand. The
resulting OSNR_Penalty is a measure for the quality of the optical
link.
FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a method for determining an optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty in an optical network according to an
implementation form.
The method comprises a collecting 501 of link information, a
deciding 503 of configuration parameters P.sub.conf based on the
link information, an adjusting 505 of the configuration parameters
P.sub.conf based on filtering and PMD information and a calculating
507 of the final OSNR Penalty. Then the method ends 509.
The collecting 501 may correspond to a collecting 101 as described
with respect to FIG. 1, the deciding 503 may correspond to a
determining 103 as described with respect to FIG. 1, the adjusting
505 may correspond to an adjusting 105 as described with respect to
FIG. 1 and the calculating 507 may correspond to a determining 107
as described with respect to FIG. 1,
FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a apparatus 600 for determining an
optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty (OSNR penalty) in an optical
network 200 according to an implementation form. The optical
signal-to-noise ratio penalty is a measure for a quality of an
optical signal transmitted via an optical link 205 between a source
optical node and a destination optical node in an optical network
200. The optical network 200 corresponds to the optical network 200
described with reference to FIG. 1.
The apparatus 600 comprises a collecting unit 601, a first
determining unit 603, an adjusting unit 605 and a second
determining unit 607. The collecting unit 201 is configured for
collecting information of the optical link. The first determining
unit 203 is configured for determining a configuration parameter
P.sub.conf of the optical link based on the information of the
optical link. The adjusting unit 205 is configured for adjusting
the configuration parameter P.sub.conf to an adjusted configuration
parameter P'.sub.conf according to linear impairments in the
optical link. The second determining unit 207 is configured for
determining the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty (OSNR
penalty) based on a non-linear function of the adjusted
configuration parameter P'.sub.conf accounting for non-linear
impairments in the optical link.
In an implementation form, the collecting unit 601 performs a
collecting according to the collecting 101 described with respect
one of the previous figures. In an implementation form, the first
determining unit 603 performs a determining according to the
determining 103 described with respect one of the previous figures.
In an implementation form, the adjusting unit 605 performs an
adjusting according to the adjusting 105 described with respect one
of the previous figures.
In an implementation form, the second determining unit 607 performs
a determining according to the determining 107 described with
respect one of the previous figures.
In an implementation form, the apparatus 600 provides configuration
information 609 for configuring an optical link 205 within the
optical network 200 by using wavelength division multiplexed
channels, optical fibers and optical nodes of the optical network
200 such that the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty is below a
threshold. In an implementation form, the threshold is such that
the optical signal-to-noise ratio penalty corresponds to a minimum
OSNR penalty.
To account for non-noise system impairments, the notion of OSNR
penalty is used. For a reference Bit Error Rate (BER), it
represents the excess OSNR required after transmission to get this
reference BER, with respect to the requirements in the so-called
"back-to-back" configuration, i.e. when transmitter and receiver
are directly connected, without transmission. In other words, the
OSNR penalty is the difference in sensitivity (in dB scale) after
and before transmission for the same reference BER.
In an implementation form, the optical signal-to-noise ratio
penalty is minimized when switching of optical cross connects into
the optical link 205 and/or reconfiguration of reconfigurable
optical add and drops within the optical link 205 is based on the
configuration information 609. The configuration information 609 is
such that an operator can design the optical network 200 in order
to provide a minimum OSNR penalty.
From the foregoing, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art
that a variety of methods, systems, computer programs on recording
media, and the like, are provided.
The present disclosure also supports a computer program product
including computer executable code or computer executable
instructions that, when executed, causes at least one computer to
execute the performing and computing steps described herein.
The present disclosure also supports a system configured to execute
the performing and computing steps described herein.
Many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent
to those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. Of
course, those skilled in the art readily recognize that there are
numerous applications of the invention beyond those described
herein. While the present inventions has been described with
reference to one or more particular embodiments, those skilled in
the art recognize that many changes may be made thereto without
departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is
therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended
claims and their equivalents, the inventions may be practiced
otherwise than as specifically described herein.
* * * * *