U.S. patent number 8,861,055 [Application Number 13/502,281] was granted by the patent office on 2014-10-14 for security device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to De La Rue International Limited. The grantee listed for this patent is Lawrence George Commander, Brian William Holmes. Invention is credited to Lawrence George Commander, Brian William Holmes.
United States Patent |
8,861,055 |
Holmes , et al. |
October 14, 2014 |
Security device
Abstract
A security device having a lenticular device that includes an
array of lenticular focusing elements located over a corresponding
array of sets of image strips such that at different viewing
directions, a corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via
respective ones of the lenticular focusing elements wherein the
image strips are defined at least in part by a relief
structure.
Inventors: |
Holmes; Brian William (Fleet,
GB), Commander; Lawrence George (Tilehurst,
GB) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Holmes; Brian William
Commander; Lawrence George |
Fleet
Tilehurst |
N/A
N/A |
GB
GB |
|
|
Assignee: |
De La Rue International Limited
(Hampshire, GB)
|
Family
ID: |
41434968 |
Appl.
No.: |
13/502,281 |
Filed: |
October 27, 2010 |
PCT
Filed: |
October 27, 2010 |
PCT No.: |
PCT/GB2010/001995 |
371(c)(1),(2),(4) Date: |
June 28, 2012 |
PCT
Pub. No.: |
WO2011/051670 |
PCT
Pub. Date: |
May 05, 2011 |
Prior Publication Data
|
|
|
|
Document
Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20120274998 A1 |
Nov 1, 2012 |
|
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
61272773 |
Oct 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 30, 2009 [GB] |
|
|
0919108.1 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
359/2;
359/15 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B42D
25/24 (20141001); B42D 25/324 (20141001); B42D
25/29 (20141001); B42D 15/0073 (20130101); B42D
25/328 (20141001); B42D 25/23 (20141001); G02B
30/27 (20200101); B42D 2035/44 (20130101); B42D
2035/20 (20130101); Y10T 29/4913 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
G03H
1/00 (20060101); G02B 5/32 (20060101) |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 2006 029 852 |
|
Jan 2008 |
|
DE |
|
0 059 056 |
|
Sep 1982 |
|
EP |
|
0 723 501 |
|
Jul 1997 |
|
EP |
|
0 724 519 |
|
Jul 1997 |
|
EP |
|
0 860 298 |
|
Aug 1998 |
|
EP |
|
1 141 480 |
|
Feb 2004 |
|
EP |
|
1 398 174 |
|
Mar 2004 |
|
EP |
|
1 897 700 |
|
Mar 2008 |
|
EP |
|
1 953 002 |
|
Aug 2008 |
|
EP |
|
WO 83/00659 |
|
Mar 1983 |
|
WO |
|
WO 94/27254 |
|
Nov 1994 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/054297 |
|
Jul 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/061983 |
|
Jul 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/091952 |
|
Nov 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/091953 |
|
Nov 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/095188 |
|
Nov 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/052650 |
|
Jun 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/106601 |
|
Nov 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/115119 |
|
Dec 2005 |
|
WO |
|
Other References
May 30, 2011 International Search Report issued in International
Patent Application No. PCT/GB2010/001995. cited by
applicant.
|
Primary Examiner: Chwasz; Jade R
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Oliff PLC
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A security device having a lenticular device, the security
device comprising: an array of sets of image strips; an array of
lenticular focusing elements disposed over the array of sets of
image strips such that at different viewing directions, a
corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via respective
ones of the lenticular focusing elements, wherein: the image strips
are formed by a relief structure, and the relief structure includes
raised features provided with ink.
2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the raised features are
provided with the same colour ink.
3. The device according to claim 1, wherein some raised features
are provided with an ink different in colour from the ink provided
on other raised features.
4. The device according to claim 1, wherein pairs of raised
features are provided with the same ink, the ink varying between
adjacent pairs.
5. The device according to claim 1, wherein the lenticular focusing
elements comprise cylindrical lenses or micromirrors.
6. The device according to claim 1, wherein the image strip relief
structure is provided in a substrate which includes at least one
other relief structure separate from the lenticular device.
7. The device according to claim 6, wherein the at least one other
relief structure comprises a holographic structure.
8. An article provided with a security device according to claim
1.
9. The article according to claim 8, wherein the article is
selected from banknotes, cheques, passports, identity cards,
certificates of authenticity, fiscal stamps and other documents for
securing value or personal identity.
10. A security device having a lenticular device, the security
device comprising: an array of sets of image strips; an array of
lenticular focusing elements disposed over the array of sets of
image strips such that at different viewing directions, a
corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via respective
ones of the lenticular focusing elements, wherein: the image strips
are formed by a relief structure, and the image strip relief
structure is provided in a substrate which includes at least one
other relief structure separate from the lenticular device.
11. The device according to claim 10, wherein the relief structure
comprises diffractive grating structures.
12. The device according to claim 10, wherein the relief structure
is partially or completely metallised or has a high refractive
index layer provided thereover.
13. The device according to claim 10, wherein the relief structure
includes recesses filled with ink.
14. The device according to claim 13, wherein different ones of the
raised relief features or recesses are provided with different
coloured inks.
15. The device according to claim 10, wherein the relief structure
comprises raised features provided with ink.
16. The device according to claim 10, wherein the lenticular
focusing elements comprise cylindrical lenses or micromirrors.
17. The device according to claim 10, wherein the at least one
other relief structure comprises a holographic structure.
18. The device according to claim 10, wherein the at least one
other relief structure comprises microimages suitable for moire
magnification, the security device further comprising a moire
magnification lens array located over the microimages.
19. The device according claim 18, wherein the lenticular focusing
elements also provide the moire magnification lens array.
20. An article provided with a security device according to claim
10.
21. The article according to claim 20, wherein the article is
selected from banknotes, cheques, passports, identity cards,
certificates of authenticity, fiscal stamps and other documents for
securing value or personal identity.
22. The article according to claim 20, wherein the article
comprises a substrate with a transparent portion on opposite sides
of which the lenticular focusing elements and image strips
respectively are provided.
23. A method of manufacturing a security device, the method
comprising: providing an array of lenticular focusing elements on
one side of a transparent substrate; and providing a corresponding
array of sets of image strips on the other side of the transparent
substrate, the image strips and lenticular focusing elements
defining a lenticular device such that at different viewing
directions a corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via
respective lenticular focusing elements, wherein: the image strips
are formed by a relief structure, and the relief structure includes
raised features provided with ink.
24. The method according to claim 23, wherein the manufacturing
steps are carried out by passing the transparent substrate between
two rolls, one roll being adapted to impress the lenticular
focusing element array into one side of the substrate and the other
roll being adapted to impress the image strip relief structure into
the other side of the substrate simultaneously.
25. The method according to claim 23, further comprising providing
at least one other relief structure on the substrate separate from
the lenticular device.
26. A method of manufacturing a security device, the method
comprising: providing an array of lenticular focusing elements on
one side of a transparent substrate; and providing a corresponding
array of sets of image strips on the other side of the transparent
substrate, the image strips and lenticular focusing elements
defining a lenticular device such that at different viewing
directions a corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via
respective lenticular focusing elements, wherein: the image strips
are formed by a relief structure, and the image strip relief
structure is provided in a substrate which includes at least one
other relief structure separate from the lenticular device.
Description
The invention relates to a security device, for example for use on
articles of value such as banknotes, cheques, passports, identity
cards, certificates of authenticity, fiscal stamps and other
documents for securing value or personal identity.
Many different optical security devices are known of which the most
common are holograms and other diffractive devices which are often
found on credit cards and the like. It is also known to provide
security devices in the form of moire magnifiers as, for example,
described in EP-A-1695121 and WO-A-94/27254. A disadvantage of
moire magnifiers is that the artwork is more restricted, for
instance an animation effect would not be possible with a moire
magnifier.
It has also been known that so-called lenticular devices can be
used as security devices as, for example, described in U.S. Pat.
No. 4,892,336. However, these devices have never had much
commercial success as security devices because of practical
constraints on the thickness of substrates with which they must be
used. To understand the reasons for this, we refer to FIG. 1.
FIG. 1 shows a cross-section through a lenticular device which is
being used to view images A-G. An array of cylindrical lenses 2 is
arranged on a transparent substrate 4. Each image is segmented into
a number of strips, for example 7 and under each lens 2 of the
lenticular array, there is a set of image strips corresponding to a
particular segmented region of images A-G. Under the first lens the
strips will each correspond to the first segment of images A-G and
under the next lens the strips will each correspond to the second
segment of images A-G and so forth. Each lens 2 is arranged to
focus in the plane of the strips such that only one strip can be
viewed from one viewing position through each lens 2. At any
viewing angle, only the strips corresponding to one of the images
(A,B,C etc.) will be seen through the corresponding lenses. As
shown, each strip of image D will be seen from straight on whereas
on tilting a few degrees off-axis the strips from images C or E
will be seen.
The strips are arranged as slices of an image, i.e. the strips A
are all slices from one image, similarly for B, C etc. As a result,
as the device is tilted a series of images will be seen. The images
could be related or unrelated. The simplest device would have two
images that would flip between each other as the device is tilted.
Alternatively, the images could be a series of images that are
shifted laterally strip to strip so that the image appears to move
and thus give rise to parallax depth. Similarly, the change from
image to image could give rise to animations (parts of the image
change in a quasi-continuous fashion), morphing (one image
transforms in small steps to another image) or zooming (an image
gets larger or smaller in steps). These more sophisticated effects
require more images and thus more strips.
A practical problem with lenticular devices is that the thickness
is dependent on the width and number of the interlaced image
strips. Referring to FIG. 1 in order for the device to function the
back focal length, f, of the lenses 2 must be such that it focuses
on the image strips A,B,C,D,E,F,G and the repeating period, p, of
the image strips must be the same as the lens diameter, D. The back
focal length of the lens is defined as the distance from the back
surface of the lens to the focal point. As a general guide for
polymer films f.sub.min=1-1.5.times.D. Therefore for a device to be
30 um thick the lens diameter must be no greater than 30 um.
Consequently, the repeat period for the image strip would have to
be no more than 30 um. This is not practical with conventional
printing techniques such as gravure, lithography and intaglio which
can at best achieve resolutions of 20 um/pixel correlating to 1200
dpi. The need to register colours to each other and to the
lenticular place further demands on the printer. Commercially
available lenticular devices are therefore relatively thick
(>150 um) and this has prevented their use on/in flexible
security documents such as banknotes where devices typically have
thicknesses in the range 1-50 um.
To be integrated into a secure document, a lenticular device needs
to be thin. As a consequence, such a (micro-)lenticular device will
have some inherent security since the authenticator can check the
device thickness and flexibility. Paper (including banknote paper)
is typically .about.100 .mu.m thick and ideally a micro-lenticular
device incorporated into or onto the device will be less than half
the thickness--the thinner the micro-lenticular device, the more
integrated it will feel to the touch. As outlined above with
conventional printing techniques, however, it is not possible to
reduce the thickness sufficiently.
Examples of structures in which the image strips are formed by a
relief can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,417,784 and
US-A-2006/0290136. The relief structures described in
US-A-2006/0290136 are simple embossed or debossed structures and
provide little or no contrast to the flat background regions and
furthermore the use of colour is solely through the colour of the
substrate and is therefore limited. The relief structures described
in U.S. Pat. No. 4,417,784 are diffractive gratings which are
complex to produce and it is difficult for the authenticator to
differentiate between the lenticular optical effect and the
diffractive optical effect. In general the use of diffractive
structures in lenticular devices is limited as their brightness and
visibility is dependent on the lighting conditions and the
visibility will be significantly reduced in low lighting
conditions.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, a
security device has a lenticular device comprising an array of
lenticular focusing elements located over a corresponding array of
sets of image strips such that at different viewing directions, a
corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via respective
ones of the lenticular focusing elements wherein the image strips
are defined at least in part by a relief structure, characterised
in that the relief structure comprises raised features provided
with ink.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, a
security device has a lenticular device comprising an array of
lenticular focusing elements located over a corresponding array of
sets of image strips such that at different viewing directions, a
corresponding image strip from each set is viewed via respective
ones of the lenticular focusing elements wherein the image strips
are defined at least in part by a relief structure, characterised
in that the image strip relief structure is provided in a substrate
which is also provided with at least one other relief structure
separate from the lenticular device.
In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention, a
method of manufacturing a security device comprises providing an
array of lenticular focusing elements on one side of a transparent
substrate; and providing a corresponding array of sets of image
strips on the other side of the transparent substrate, the image
strips and lenticular focusing elements defining a lenticular
device such that at different viewing directions a corresponding
image strip from each set is viewed via respective lenticular
focusing elements, wherein the image strips are formed at least in
part as a relief structure, characterised in that the relief
structure comprises raised features provided with ink.
In accordance with a fourth aspect of the present invention, a
method of manufacturing a security device comprises providing an
array of lenticular focusing elements on one side of a transparent
substrate; and providing a corresponding array of sets of image
strips on the other side of the transparent substrate, the image
strips and lenticular focusing elements defining a lenticular
device such that at different viewing directions a corresponding
image strip from each set is viewed via respective lenticular
focusing elements, wherein the image strips are formed at least in
part as a relief structure, characterised in that the image strip
relief structure is provided in a substrate which is also provided
with at least one other relief structure separate from the
lenticular device.
We have realised that it is advantageous to take advantage of
forming the image strips wholly or partially as a relief structure
by inking the structures and/or providing another relief structure.
Cast-curing or embossing could be used to provide the relief
structure, cast-curing providing higher fidelity of
replication.
A variety of different relief structures can be used as will be
described in more detail below. However, the image strips could
simply be created by embossing/cast-curing the images as
diffraction grating areas. Differing parts of the image could be
differentiated by the use of differing pitches or different
orientations of grating. Alternative (and/or additional
differentiating) image structures are anti-reflection structures
such as moth-eye (see for example WO-A-2005/106601), zero-order
diffraction structures, stepped surface relief optical structures
known as Aztec structures (see for example WO-A-2005/115119) or
simple scattering structures. For most applications, these
structures could be partially or fully metallised to enhance
brightness and contrast.
Typically, the width of each image strip is less than 50 microns,
preferably less than 20 microns, most preferably in the range 5-10
microns.
Typical thicknesses of security devices according to the invention
are 2-100 microns, more preferably 20-50 microns with lens heights
of 1-50 microns, more preferably 5-25 microns. The periodicity and
therefore maximum base diameter for the lenticular focussing
elements is preferably in the range 5-200 .mu.m, more preferably
10-60 .mu.m and even more preferably 20-40 .mu.m. The f number for
the lenticular focussing elements is preferably in the range
0.25-16 and more preferably 0.5-2. The relief depth depends on the
method used to form the relief where the relief is provided by a
diffractive grating the depth would typically be in the range
0.05-1 .mu.m and where a coarser non diffractive relief structure
is used the relief depth is preferably in the range 0.5-10 .mu.m
and even more preferably 1-5 .mu.m
Typically, the lenticular focusing elements comprise cylindrical
lenses but it would also be possible to utilize lenticular
micromirrors.
In some cases of the second and fourth aspects of the invention,
the image strips will be uninked, typically when in the form of
gratings and the like. However, it is also possible to incorporate
ink either by filling recesses of the relief structure or onto
raised features of the relief structure. Relief structures could,
for example, be created by cast-curing or embossing and then the
recesses or pits filled by a liquid ink, the excess being removed
by a doctor blade or the like. The ink could be a gravure type or
ink jet type ink.
In the case of raised areas, in accordance with the first and third
aspects of the invention, these could be inked by methods analogous
to offset litho printing or flexographic printing. The inking of
raised areas has the advantage that it is better suited to multiple
colours since the doctoring process would inevitably mix different
inked areas. Multiple colours allow different coloured elements to
pass by each other in a movement type design. Particularly
attractive is to use a wet litho process to ink the raised areas
since this would allow some simple colour based effects (e.g. image
flip or a simple moire effect of moving lines produced by a pitch
of colours that doesn't quite match the lens pitch) with the higher
resolution raised image effects.
In the case of inking the raised areas the height of the raised
area must be greater than the thickness of ink applied to prevent
the ink entering the adjacent non-raised regions.
In some cases, the security device can comprise solely a lenticular
device. However, in particularly preferred examples, and according
to the second and fourth aspects of the invention, the image strip
relief structure is provided in a substrate which is also provided
with at least one other relief structure separate from the
lenticular device. The provision of at least one other relief
structure enables further security to be achieved. For example, the
at least one other relief structure may comprise a holographic
structure or microimages suitable for moire magnification, in the
latter case the security device further comprising a moire
magnification lens array located over the microimages. In the case
of 1D moire magnification devices both the lenticular device and
the moire magnifier can work with the same lenticular lens array
removing the requirement for a separate lens array.
It will be readily understood that particularly secure devices can
be achieved by linking the images viewed from the lenticular device
and other relief structure or by providing a contrast between them.
In some cases, the lenticular device may provide an apparently
moving image as the device is tipped while the other relief
structure is used to provide different effects such as a 3D
holographic effect or the like. It is particularly advantageous if
the other relief structure forms part of a moire magnification
device which also provides parallactic motion in one dimension, for
example parallel to that of the lenticular image, or in two
dimensions.
The security device can be manufactured in a variety of ways, for
example by embossing or cast-curing the lenticular focusing element
array on one side of the substrate at one forming station and the
relief structure on the other side of the substrate at another
forming location.
It is particularly convenient, however, if the manufacturing steps
are carried out by passing the transparent substrate between two
rolls, one roll being adapted to impress the lenticular focusing
element array into one side of the substrate and the other roll
being adapted to impress the image strip relief structure into the
other side of the substrate simultaneously. This then ensures that
there is registration between the focusing element array and the
image strips.
Another way to ensure registration is first to provide the
lenticular focusing element array and then to pass the substrate
between two rolls, one of which has a surface conforming to the
lenticular focusing element array and the other of which is used to
impart the image strip relief structure. In this way, the image
strip relief structure will be registered to the lenticular
focusing element array.
The security device may comprise a metallised layer either as part
of the image structures or as an additional layer. Preferably such
a layer is selectively demetallised at a number of locations. In
addition the device may further comprise a layer of resist upon the
metallised layer. The metallised layer and/or the layer of resist
is preferably arranged as indicia.
It is also preferred that the device is arranged to be
machine-readable. This may be achieved in a number of ways. For
example at least one layer of the device (optionally as a separate
layer) may further comprise machine-readable material. Preferably
the machine-readable material is a magnetic material, such as
magnetite. The machine-readable material may be responsive to an
external stimulus. Furthermore, when the machine-readable material
is formed into a layer, this layer may be transparent.
The security device may be used in many different applications, for
example by attachment to objects of value. Preferably, the security
devices are adhered to or substantially contained within a security
document. The security device may therefore be attached to a
surface of such a document or it may be partially embedded within
the document. The security device may take various different forms
for use with security documents, these including a security thread,
a security fibre, a security patch, a security strip, a security
stripe or a security foil as non-limiting examples.
Some examples of security devices and methods according to the
invention will now be described and contrasted with a known device
with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:--
FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-section through a known lenticular
device;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view from above of a modified form of the
known lenticular device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 illustrates the appearance of the device of FIG. 2 at
different tilt angles;
FIGS. 4A-4I illustrate different examples of relief structures
defining image strips according to the invention;
FIG. 5A is a plan view of a first example of a security device
according to the invention;
FIG. 5B illustrates integrated holographic and lenticular
devices;
FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate sections on the lines A-A and B-B
respectively in FIG. 5A;
FIG. 7 illustrates a lenticular device having four image
strips;
FIG. 8 is a plan view of a second example of a security device
according to the invention;
FIG. 9 illustrates a third example of a security device according
to the invention in the form of a security strip;
FIG. 10 illustrates the components of a moire magnification
system;
FIG. 11 illustrates successive stages in a first example of a
method of manufacturing a security device according to the
invention;
FIG. 12 illustrates a modification of the method of FIG. 11;
FIG. 13 illustrates successive steps for manufacturing a security
device according to a another example of the invention;
FIG. 14 illustrates schematically part of apparatus for
manufacturing a security device according to the invention;
FIG. 15 illustrates schematically a second example of part of
apparatus for manufacturing a security device according to the
invention;
FIGS. 16 and 17 are optical diagrams illustrating the differences
between a lens and a micromirror;
FIG. 18 is a view similar to FIG. 7 but utilizing micromirrors
instead of cylindrical lenses;
FIGS. 19a and 19b illustrate a further example of a security device
according to the invention in plan and cross-sectional form
respectively; and
FIGS. 20 to 22 illustrate further lenticular effects.
A known lenticular device is shown in FIGS. 1-3. FIG. 1 has already
been described above while FIG. 2 shows the lenticular device in
perspective view although for simplicity only two image strips per
lens are shown labelled A,B respectively. The appearance of the
device shown in FIG. 2 to the observer is illustrated in FIG. 3.
Thus, when the device is arranged with its top tilted forward (view
TTF), the image strips A will be seen while when the device is
arranged with its bottom tilted forward (view BTF) then the image
strips B will be seen.
In a lenticular device, the strips are arranged as slices or
segments of an image e.g strips A,B etc where A and B represent
either different images or different views of the same image. Each
individual strip will comprise image and non-image areas. In the
known lenticular devices the image regions of the strips are
printed onto the substrate or carrier layer 4. In the present
invention, however, the image regions of the strips are formed as a
relief structure and a variety of different relief structures
suitable for this are shown in FIG. 4.
Thus, FIG. 4A illustrates image regions of the strips (IM) in the
form of embossed or recessed lines while the non-embossed lines
correspond to the non-imaged regions of the strips (NI). FIG. 4B
illustrates image regions of the strips in the form of debossed
lines or bumps.
In another approach, the relief structures can be in the form of
diffraction gratings (FIG. 4C) or moth-eye/fine pitch gratings
(FIG. 4D).
The recesses or bumps of FIGS. 4A and 4B can be further provided
with gratings as shown in FIGS. 4E and 4F respectively.
FIG. 4G illustrates the use of a simple scattering structure
providing an achromatic effect.
Further, as explained above, in some cases the recesses of FIG. 4A
could be provided with an ink or the debossed regions or bumps
could be provided with an ink. The latter is a particularly
important feature of the first aspect of the invention and is shown
in FIG. 4H where ink layers 10 are provided on bumps 11.
FIG. 4I illustrates the use of an Aztec structure.
Additionally, image and non-image areas could be defined by
combinations of different elements types, e.g. the image areas
could be formed from moth-eye structures whilst the non-image areas
could be formed from a grating. Or even the image and non-image
areas could be formed by gratings of different pitch or
orientation.
The height or depth of the bumps/recesses is preferably in the
range 0.5-10 .mu.m and more preferably in the range 1-5 .mu.m.
Typical widths of the bumps/recesses will be defined by the nature
of the artwork but would typically be less than 100 .mu.m, more
preferably less than 50 .mu.m and even more preferably less than 25
microns. The width of the image strip and therefore the width of
the bumps or recesses will be dependent on the type of optical
effect required for example if the diameter of the focussing
elements is 30 .mu.m then a simple switch effects between two views
A and B could be achieved using 15 .mu.m wide image strips.
Alternatively for a smooth animation effect it is preferable to
have as many views as possible typically at least three but ideally
as many as 30, in this case the width of the image strips (and
associated bumps or recesses) should be in the range 0.1-6
.mu.m.
These lenticular devices according to the invention can be used to
form labels which are then adhered to an article such as a document
of value to provide security. In other cases, however, the security
device can be integrally formed with the article. Thus, the carrier
4 shown in FIG. 2 could in fact be the substrate of an article of
value such as a banknote or ID card. The portion of the substrate
provided with the security device needs to be transparent and
therefore could be a transparent window or other transparent region
in the article.
In other examples, the security device could be in the form of a
security thread or strip as will be described later.
In particularly preferred examples, the security device also
includes one or more other optical security features. An example of
this is shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. In this example, a lenticular
device 27 is formed by a sequence of cylindrical lenses 20 located
in a line extending centrally across the security device, which in
this case is a label 22. The microlenses 20 are embossed or
cast-cured into a resin or polymer layer 21 and are formed on a
substrate 24 or transparent polymeric spacer layer on which is also
provided a transparent lacquer layer 26 into which sets of image
strips A-C are embossed in register with the cylindrical lenses 20.
The layer 24 is a supporting or substrate layer made of a
transparent polymer such as biaxial PET or biaxial polypropylene.
The thickness of this supporting layer 24 will depend upon the
focal length of the lenses 20 but will typically be in the range
6-50 microns. The thickness of the polymeric layer 21 will
typically be in the range 1-100 .mu.m, more preferably 1-50 .mu.m
and even more preferably 5-30 .mu.m.
In addition to the lenticular device 27 shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the
security device 22 includes a number of holographic image
generating structures 28 embossed into the lacquer layer 26, as an
example of the second aspect of the invention.
The image strips A-C associated with the lenticular structure 27
are arranged so as to give the appearance of moving chevron images
30,32 as the device is tilted about the axis B-B in FIG. 5A. This
provides a primary security effect due to the lenticular animation.
In addition to this, however, the holographic generating structures
28 cause the generation of holographic images which exhibit strong
attractive and distinctive colour changes. It should be noted that
although FIG. 5A only shows three image strips, this is for ease of
illustration only and it is preferable to have more image strips
especially when creating a movement effect.
The holographic generating structures 28 can be in the form of
holograms or DOVID image elements. In the label construction 22
shown in FIG. 5A, the lenticular device 26 is located in a central
horizontal band or region of the label whilst the holographic
generating structures 28 are located on either side. However, it
should be understood that this example is purely illustrative and
for example the holographic generating structures 28 could be
located in a central band or strip and the lenticular device being
provided in one or more regions on either side. Alternatively the
image provided by the lenticular device and the image provided by
the holographic generating structures could be integrated into a
single image by each providing components of a single image. FIG.
5b illustrates an example of such an integrated design where the
holographic generating structures form a scroll 170 and in the
middle of the scroll the holographic structures are replaced with
the relief structures used in the lenticular image 180 to create a
strong lenticular animation in this case of moving chevrons in the
middle of the scroll.
In the examples in FIG. 5 it should be appreciated that the
lenticular animation occurs only when the security device is tilted
around an axis which is perpendicular to the direction the
cylindrical lens-lets 20 exhibit their periodic variations in
curvature. In this case the lenticular animation of the chevrons
will occur along the line A-A when the device is tilted around the
line B-B.
Conversely if the cylindrical lens system and associated image
strips are rotated by 90 degrees then the lenticular animation
occurs only when the security device is tilted around the line A-A.
The animation itself can take place in any direction and is purely
dependent on the artwork.
In a preferred embodiment the cylindrical microlens array and the
microimage strips are arranged such that the direction the
cylindrical lens-lets exhibit their periodic variations in
curvature lies at 45 degrees to the x-axis (line A-A in FIG. 5A) or
y-axis (line B-B in FIG. 5A) or any angle in between which may be
deemed advantageous. In some devices the 45 degree angle is
particularly advantageous--since documents tend to be tilted only
north-south or east-west, the device can appear to move with all
tilts. An additional security benefit is that the conventional
thick lenticular devices are only made with the lenticular in a
north-south or east-west orientation which provide an additional
defence against a crude, thick counterfeit.
A particular advantage of the example as just described is that the
image strips A-C and the surface relief forming the holographic
image generating structures 28 are each embossed into the same
substrate leading to a particularly convenient manufacturing
process and the ability to achieve exact register between the image
strips and holographic image generating structures.
FIG. 7 illustrates an example lenticular device comprising four
image strips A-D which are different views of the same image in
order to create a lenticular animation effect. In this example the
image areas of the strips are creating by creating a series of
raised regions or bumps in a resin layer 26 provided on a PET
spacer layer 24. A resin layer 21 is provided on the opposite
surface of the layer 24 into which a lens array 20 is embossed or
cast cured. A coloured ink is then transferred onto the raised
regions typically using a lithographic, flexographic or gravure
process. In the example shown in FIG. 7 image strips A and B are
printed with one colour 27 and image strips C and D are printed
with a second colour 28. In this manner when the device is tilted
to create the lenticular animation effect the image will also be
seen to change colour as the observer moves from view B to view C.
In a different example all of the strips A-D in one region of the
device would be one colour and then all a different colour in a
second region of the device. Alternatively images strips A,B,C and
D could all be different colours.
In a further embodiment image strips A could represent a
multicoloured version of one view of the image and image strips C-D
could each represent a differently coloured multi-coloured version
of the same image.
Preferably the relief structures suitable for inking are not highly
reflective and are not structures which prior to being inked will
give differing chrominance/luminance since that will confuse the
viewer from the printed ink colours. The advantage of raised inked
structures when compared to non-inked diffractive relief structures
is that coloured inks structures provide an enhanced contrast with
both the non-inked regions and other differently coloured inked
regions. The visibility of the images formed by the raised-ink
structures will not significantly change under different lighting
conditions. This is contrast to diffractive structures where
visibility will be significantly reduced in poor lighting
conditions. Furthermore the colours and the opacity of the inks are
easily controllable using conventional ink production techniques.
In contrast the use of diffraction gratings is more complex and
expensive to generate and in practice gratings require multiple
periods to diffract effectively and it would therefore be difficult
to provide a strong coloured effect over the width of an image
strip.
In a further embodiment when the image elements of the strips are
formed from diffraction gratings then different image elements
within one strip or in different strips can be formed by different
gratings. The difference may be in the pitch of the grating or
rotation. This can be used to achieve a multicoloured diffractive
image which will also exhibit a lenticular optical effect such as
an animation. For example if the image strips creating the chevrons
in the example illustrated in FIG. 5 had been created by writing
different diffraction tracks for each strip then as the device in
FIG. 5 is tilted around the line B-B lenticular animation of the
chevrons will occur during which the colour of the chevrons will
progressively change due to the different diffraction gratings. A
preferred method for writing such a grating would be to use
electron beam writing techniques or dot matrix techniques.
FIG. 8 illustrates a further arrangement, similar to FIG. 5A, in
which there are two sets of cylindrical microlens 20 arrays which
are oriented at 90.degree. to each other. In this embodiment
lenticular devices 32 which, on east-west tilting, provide images
of chevrons 34 moving towards and away from each other along line
A-A and lenticular devices 32' which, on north-south tilting,
provide images of chevrons moving towards and away from each other
along line B-B. In addition five surface relief holographic
generating structures 28 are located in the spaces defined between
the lenticular devices.
In the case of the holographic structures 28, these can have any
conventional form and can be fully or partially metallised.
Alternatively the reflection enhancing metallised layer can be
replaced with a substantially transparent inorganic high refractive
index layer.
Whatever arrangement is defined, it is advantageous if the
individual regions allocated to the holographic or lenticular
devices are sufficiently large to facilitate clear visualisation of
the respective holographic and lenticular animation effects.
Of course, although the lenticular devices are described as
providing animation effects, they could also provide other effects
such as image morphing or image switching and the like. Examples of
the different types of effects are illustrated in FIGS. 20, 21 and
22. FIG. 20 shows a device where the different views represent
different sizes of the same image, in this case the numeral 100,
such that the image is observed to progressively increase in size
on tilting (zoom effect). FIG. 21 illustrates a further variant in
this case a star is seen to expand as the device is tilted through
the different views (expansion effects). FIG. 22 illustrates an
example of a switching device in which a dollar sign in a first
colour and numerals `40` in a second colour reverse in colour as
the device is tilted (switch effect). The zoom and expansion
effects can of course be further enhanced by the image changing
colour through the use of raised inked structures.
The security devices shown in FIGS. 5-8 are suitable to be applied
as labels which will typically require the application of a heat or
pressure sensitive adhesive to the outer surface containing the
relief structures. In addition an optional protective
coating/varnish could be applied to the outer surface containing
the cylindrical lenses. The function of the protective
coating/varnish is to increase the durability of the device during
transfer onto the security substrate and in circulation. The
protective coating must have a significantly lower refractive index
than the refractive index of the cylindrical lenses.
In the case of a transfer element rather than a label the security
device is preferably prefabricated on a carrier substrate and
transferred to the substrate in a subsequent working step. The
security device can be applied to the document using an adhesive
layer. The adhesive layer is applied either to the security device
or the surface of the secure document to which the device is to be
applied. After transfer the carrier strip can be removed leaving
the security device as the exposed layer or alternatively the
carrier layer can remain as part of the structure acting as an
outer protective layer. A suitable method for transferring security
devices based on cast cure devices comprising micro-optical
structures is described in EP1897700,
FIG. 9 illustrates a security device in the form of a security
strip or thread. Security threads are now present in many of the
world's currencies as well as vouchers, passports, travellers'
cheques and other documents. In many cases the thread is provided
in a partially embedded or windowed fashion where the thread
appears to weave in and out of the paper. One method for producing
paper with so-called windowed threads can be found in EP0059056.
EP0860298 and WO03095188 describe different approaches for the
embedding of wider partially exposed threads into a paper
substrate. Wide threads, typically with a width of 2-6 mm, are
particularly useful as the additional exposed area allows for
better use of optically variable devices such as the current
invention. The device structure shown in FIG. 5 could be used as a
thread by the application of a layer of transparent colourless
adhesive to the outer surface containing the microlens array and/or
the microimage array.
Careful selection of the optical properties of the adhesive in
contact with the microlenses is important. The adhesive must have a
lower refractive index than the microlens material and the greater
the difference in the refractive index between the microlenses and
the adhesive the shorter the back focal length of the lenses and
therefore the thinner the final security device.
The thread or strip in FIG. 9 comprises alternating holographic and
lenticular devices 40,42 made in a similar manner to previous
examples. For example, both the holographic and lenticular devices
could be defined by surface relief structures while the image
strips of the lenticular devices could be defined by embossed
features carrying ink. Within this design the expanding stars
represent the hologram elements and the chevrons represent the
lenticular animation. When the thread is rotated about its elongate
axis, the lenticular device 42 illustrates an image motion effect,
whereas the stars could be recorded to expand from small to large
on horizontal tilting and change colour on vertical tilting and the
chevrons move in a diagonal direction across the thread.
In an alternative embodiment to that shown in FIG. 9 the spatially
separate lenticular regions could exhibit different optical effects
for example one set could exhibit image switching and one set could
exhibit a lenticular animation effect.
In other examples (not shown), one or more of the holographic
generating structures could be replaced by moire magnification
structures which could be either 2-dimensional (2D) or
1-dimensional (1D) structures. 2D moire magnification structures
are described in more detail in EP-A-1695121 and WO-A-94/27254. A
moire magnification device is constructed through a combination of
microlenses and microimages. In the simplest case of a small pitch
mismatch between the lens arrays and image arrays, an array of
magnified images of constant magnification is observed with motion
resulting from the normal parallax of a lens. In a 10 moire
magnification structure the 2D spherical lens array used in a
conventional 2D moire magnification structure is replaced with a
repeating arrangement of cylindrical lens-lets. The result of this
is that the micro-image elements are subject to moire magnification
in one axis only which is the axis along which the lenses exhibit
their periodic variations in curvature or relief. Consequently the
micro-images are strongly compressed or de-magnified along the
magnification axis whilst the size or dimension of the micro image
elements along the axis orthogonal to the magnification axis is
substantially the same as they appear to the observer--i.e. no
magnification or enlargement takes place. The microimages could be
printed or formed as relief structures with or without ink.
For example, and with reference to FIG. 10, consider a very simple
scenario wherein we require the moire magnified image to be
comprised of an array of circles 2 mm in diameter. Further suppose
we arrange the periodicity and alignment of the micro image array
relative to the micro-lens array to provide a moire magnification
of .times.50. If for convenience we choose the axis of lens
curvature of the lenses to be the x-axis it then follows that the
micro image array will be comprised of a matrix of elliptical image
elements wherein the minor axis of the ellipse (coinciding with the
x-axis) will have a width of 0.04 mm and a height of 2 mm.
It should be appreciated that in a 1-D moire system parallactic
motion occurs only along the axis in which the cylindrical
lens-lets exhibit their periodic variations in curvature. Thus in
the example just described, parallax motion of the circular images
(as well as magnification) will occur along the x-axis on east-west
tilting of the device. It should be noted that on north-south
tilting of the device no parallax motion will be exhibited.
Conversely if the cylindrical lens system and micro-image array are
rotated by 90 degrees then parallax motion will take place along
the y-axis on north south tilting of the device.
It is of course possible to arrange the microlens array and
microimage array such that the axis of parallax lies at 45 degrees
to the x or y-axis or any angle in between which may be deemed
advantageous.
The combination of a 1D moire magnification device with a
lenticular structure is particularly advantageous because they both
comprise a lenticular lens array and therefore the same lens array
can be used for both regions of the device. In a typical example
combination of a lenticular structure with a 1D moire magnification
structure the lenticular structure could exhibit a simple image
switch and the 1D moire magnifier will exhibit a parallax motion
effect.
Some examples of methods for manufacturing the devices described
above will now be described. In the first example (FIG. 11), a
carrier layer 24 such as a PET layer is coated with a cast-cure or
thermoforming resin 21 (step 1). This resin 21 is then (step 2)
cast or embossed into a cylindrical lens array 20.
The other side of the carrier 24 is then coated with a cast-cure or
thermoforming resin 26 (step 3) and recesses 50 corresponding to
the image elements in strips A and B are formed by casting or
embossing in the resin layer (step 4) in register with the lenses
20.
For example a roll of clear polymeric film of PET or the like 24 is
coated on its first surface with a layer of UV curable polymer 21.
Suitable UV curable polymers include photopolymer NOA61 available
from Norland Products, Inc. New Jersey, Xymara OVD primer from Ciba
or UV9206 from Akzo-Nobel. The film is then brought into contact
with the first embossing roller that contains the negative of a
master structure for the microlens array 20. On contacting the
embossing roller the microlens array structure 20 is replicated in
the UV curable polymer layer 21. Once the structure is replicated
the UV curable polymer layer is cured by application of UV
radiation and the coated film is then released from the embossing
roller. A layer of UV curable polymer 26 such as NOA61 is then
coated onto the opposite second surface of the film 24. The second
surface of the film 24 is then brought into contact with a second
embossing roller that contains the negative of a master structure
for the image elements of the image strips. On contacting the
embossing roller the image structure is replicated in the UV
curable polymer layer on the second surface of the clear polymeric
film. Once the structure is replicated the UV curable polymer layer
is cured by application of UV radiation and the coated film is then
released from the embossing roller.
A uniform pigmented or dyed coating is applied to the embossed
surface of the layer 26 using a first opaque colorant 52 such as
pigmented version of the casting resins above or for example a
gravure ink such as 60473G from Luminescence which will fill the
recesses 50 and provide a coating over the entire layer 26 (step
5). The coating method is typically by gravure, litho or
flexographic printing or by using an anilox roller.
In step 6, excess first colorant 52 is removed using a doctor blade
process so as to leave the first colorant only in the recesses 50
which form the image elements within the strips.
Optionally in step 7, a second colorant 54 in the form of a
pigmented or dyed coating such as pigmented version of the casting
resins above or for example a gravure ink such as 60473G from
Luminescence is coated over the resin layer 26 typically using a
litho, flexographic or gravure process so that in the non-image
regions of the strip the second colorant 54 will be visible through
the lenses 20 while in the image regions first colorant 52 will be
visible. The observer will therefore see a coloured image against a
differently coloured background. It should be noted that the
lenticular device in FIG. 11 is a simple switching device with only
two image strips present under each lens and of course the same
method can be used for lenticular devices comprising more image
strips which would be needed to provide the lenticular animation
effects.
FIG. 12 illustrates a modified form of the method. In this case,
steps 1-4 are as previously described with reference to FIG. 11.
However, in step 5A, instead of step 5, a first colorant 52 is
transferred onto the raised (non-recessed) linear regions of the
layer 26 which form the image elements within the strips using an
offset transfer method from an anilox roller or litho blanket, or
by litho, flexographic or gravure printing.
In a variant, the overall inking is built up from different colours
in different areas of the device such that some elements are inked
with blue say whereas other elements are inked with a red ink.
Ideally, this colour pattern is built up on one transfer roller
before transferred all at once onto the relief structure. This
simultaneous transfer allowing perfect register of the colours to
each other.
An additional non-essential step is step 6A where, instead of step
6, a second colorant 54 is uniformly coated onto the layer 26 so
that it also fills the recesses 50 (step 6A). This can be carried
out using a gravure or offset litho process, etc. In this case, the
second colorant 50 will define the image elements and the first
colorant 52 will define the non-image elements and therefore form
the coloured background region.
It will readily be understood that the methods described above
relate solely to the lenticular device. When a lenticular device is
to be combined with another relief structure such as a hologram or
the like then the surface relief defining that device will be also
embossed into the layer 26.
FIG. 13 illustrates an alternative method in which the image strips
are formed by diffractive surface reliefs.
In step 1, a carrier layer 24 is coated with cast-cure or
thermoforming resin layer 26 (step 1).
Strips A and B, representing views A and B of a lenticular
switching device, comprise image and non-image regions. In Strips A
the image regions are defined by one grating structure X and in
Strips B the image regions are defined by a second different
grating structure Y. The grating structures X,Y which have been
previously originated are then simultaneously formed by embossing
into the exposed surfaces of the resin layer 26 (step 2). The use
of two different grating structures for the image regions of A and
B provides a visual contrast due to the different diffractive
colour effects. This difference is not essential and the image
regions could be defined by the same diffractive grating structure.
The non-image regions could also be defined by a grating structure
which is different to that of the image regions. The grating
structures could differ for example by rotation and pitch.
A reflection coating layer 60 is then provided over the grating
surface relief structure (step 3). This reflection coating can be a
metallisation or a high refractive index layer. The use of high
refractive index materials, typically inorganic, are well known in
the art and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,856,857. Typical examples
of materials suitable for the high refractive index layer include
zinc sulphide, titanium dioxide & zirconium dioxide. Replacing
the vapour deposited metal reflection enhancing layer with a
transparent hri layer is particularly beneficial when the security
device of the current invention is applied over transparent regions
(typically known as apertures or windows) of secure documents.
The other side of the carrier layer 24 is then coated with a
cast-cure or thermoforming resin 21 (step 4) and then a set of
cylindrical lenses 20 are embossed into the layer 21 (step 5) so as
to be in register with the strips A and B.
There are a number of ways in which the embossing steps can be
achieved.
In FIG. 14, a substrate 64 comprising layers 21,24,26 has already
been provided with cylindrical lenses 20. It is then passed between
two rollers 68,70. The roller 68 has a surface which is
complementary to the lenses 20 so that each lens 20 will be
received in a corresponding recess in the surface of the roller 68.
The roller 70 has a surface which is complementary to the relief
structure which is to be embossed into the layer 26. This surface
will typically be irregular although it is shown as a regular
relief for simplicity. The recesses in the roller 68 then ensure
that the substrate 64 is correctly located relative to the surface
of the roller 70.
FIG. 15 illustrates an alternative example in which the substrate,
shown generally at 62 (and equivalent to layers 21,24,26 before any
embossing), is fed between two embossing rollers 64,66. Embossing
roller 64 has a surface which is complementary to the cylindrical
lens set 20 which is to be embossed while the surface of the
embossing roller 66 has a surface which is complementary to the
relief structure which is to be embossed into the other side of the
substrate 62. This surface will typically be irregular although it
is shown as a regular relief for simplicity. With this arrangement,
it can be ensured that there is registration between the
cylindrical lenses 20 and the relief structure.
In the examples described so far, the cylindrical lenses have been
used to provide focusing power. Other lenticular focusing elements
could be used including micromirrors. There are some advantages to
the use of micromirrors as will now be described.
The back focal length of a lens, f, is (to a 1.sup.st
approximation) restricted to being no shorter than the diameter, D
(see FIG. 16).
Or mathematically: f.gtoreq.D
Fundamentally, the limit is driven by the amount of deflection
achievable by refraction according to Snell's law. The deflection
possible is determined by the topology of the lens and refractive
indices of the material(s). The lens topology determines what angle
the edge of lens makes to the surface. The refraction imparted is
determined the surface angle plus the refractive index difference
between the lens and the air in front of it.
With a mirror, the deflection angle is not determined by Snell's
law but by the law of reflection (angle of reflection equals angle
of incidence). This is much more powerful than refraction--a curved
mirror which at its edge forms an angle of 45.degree. to the
surface will deflect the light by 90.degree. overall, i.e. parallel
to the surface (FIG. 17). For the mirrored surface: f.gtoreq.0
There are other benefits: The height (or depth) of mirror surface
itself will be less for a given focal length Because the mirror is
metallised, both the mirror and images can be overcoated with
adhesive
The fact that the focal length (and hence thickness) is not
restricted by the diameter of the micro-mirror means that the
lenticular device can have a thickness which is independent of the
minimum printable line width. Thus, in practice, it is possible to
combine conventional litho printing (200 um high characters) with a
micro-mirror to make a lenticular device with a 30 um
thickness.
FIG. 18 illustrates a typical cross-section of the security device
based on the FIG. 7 example but using the same colour ink on each
bump A-D but which utilises micro-mirrors as the focussing
elements. In this example a series of micro-mirrors 200 are formed
in thermoforming resin 21 by casting a set of cylindrical lenses as
described previously and then vapour depositing a layer of metal on
the back surface. The lenticular device comprises four image strips
A-D formed on the top surface of the device where the image regions
of these strips are creating by printing on raised regions
(bumps).
The security device of the current invention can be made machine
readable by the introduction of detectable materials in any of the
layers or by the introduction of separate machine-readable layers.
Detectable materials that react to an external stimulus include but
are not limited to fluorescent, phosphorescent, infrared absorbing,
thermochromic, photochromic, magnetic, electrochromic, conductive
and piezochromic materials.
The security device of the current invention may also comprise
additional security features such as any desired printed images,
metallic layers which may be opaque, semitransparent or screened.
Such metallic layers may contain negative or positive indicia
created by known demetallisation processes.
Additional optically variable materials can be included in the
security device such as thin film interference elements, liquid
crystal material and photonic crystal materials. Such materials may
be in the form of filmic layers or as pigmented materials suitable
for application by printing.
FIGS. 19a and b show a second security feature in the form of a
demetallised image 250 incorporated within a security device of the
current invention. The image strips associated with the lenticular
structure 260 are formed from raised inked structures and arranged
so as to give the appearance of moving chevron images as the device
is tilted about the axis B-B in FIG. 19a. This provides a primary
security effect due to the strong lenticular animation. As can be
seen in FIG. 19b, the structure of the feature shown in FIG. 19a
comprises a PET spacer layer 300 on the upper surface of which is
provided a cylindrical lenslet array 310 forming part of the
lenticular structure 260. This will have been formed by cast curing
or embossing into a resin layer as in the previous examples.
The other surface of the layer 300 is provided with an embossing
layer 320 into which has been embossed a relief structure defining
the image strips of the lenticular structure 260. A coloured ink
layer is applied onto the raised regions as described previously
(not shown in the figure for simplicity). A metallic layer 330 is
coated over the embossed structure. As can be seen in the section
along B-B of FIG. 19b, parts of the metal layer 330 are
demetallised to define the demetallised images 250.
The metallised layer is either not applied over the layer
comprising the image forming relief structures or is subsequently
removed using a known demetallisation process. The metallised layer
allows the creation of demetallised indicia which can be viewed in
reflective but more preferably transmitted light.
One way to produce partially metallised/demetallised films in which
no metal is present in controlled and clearly defined areas, is to
selectively demetallise regions using a resist and etch technique
such as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,652,015. Other techniques
for achieving similar effects are for example aluminium can be
vacuum deposited through a mask, or aluminium can be selectively
removed from a composite strip of a plastic carrier and aluminium
using an excimer laser. The metallic regions may be alternatively
provided by printing a metal effect ink having a metallic
appearance such as Metalstar.RTM. inks sold by Eckart.
The presence of a metallic layer can be used to conceal the
presence of a machine readable dark magnetic layer. When a magnetic
material is incorporated into the device the magnetic material can
be applied in any design but common examples include the use of
magnetic tramlines or the use of magnetic blocks to form a coded
structure. Suitable magnetic materials include iron oxide pigments
(Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 or Fe.sub.3O.sub.4), barium or strontium ferrites,
iron, nickel, cobalt and alloys of these. In this context the term
"alloy" includes materials such as Nickel:Cobalt,
Iron:Aluminium:Nickel:Cobalt and the like. Flake Nickel materials
can be used; in addition Iron flake materials are suitable. Typical
nickel flakes have lateral dimensions in the range 5-50 microns and
a thickness less than 2 microns. Typical iron flakes have lateral
dimensions in the range 10-30 microns and a thickness less than 2
microns.
In an alternative machine-readable embodiment a transparent
magnetic layer can be incorporated at any position within the
device structure. Suitable transparent magnetic layers containing a
distribution of particles of a magnetic material of a size and
distributed in a concentration at which the magnetic layer remains
transparent are described in WO03091953 and WO03091952.
In a further example the security device of the current invention
may be incorporated in a security document such that the device is
incorporated in a transparent region of the document. The security
document may have a substrate formed from any conventional material
including paper and polymer. Techniques are known in the art for
forming transparent regions in each of these types of substrate.
For example, WO8300659 describes a polymer banknote formed from a
transparent substrate comprising an opacifying coating on both
sides of the substrate. The opacifying coating is omitted in
localised regions on both sides of the substrate to form a
transparent region.
EP1141480 describes a method of making a transparent region in a
paper substrate. Other methods for forming transparent regions in
paper substrates are described in EP0723501, EP0724519, EP1398174
and WO03054297.
* * * * *