Method and system to connect consumers to information

Lauffer March 12, 2

Patent Grant 8396735

U.S. patent number 8,396,735 [Application Number 12/768,664] was granted by the patent office on 2013-03-12 for method and system to connect consumers to information. This patent grant is currently assigned to UTBK, LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is Randall B. Lauffer. Invention is credited to Randall B. Lauffer.


United States Patent 8,396,735
Lauffer March 12, 2013

Method and system to connect consumers to information

Abstract

This invention provides for a method of (or apparatus for) facilitating the delivery of advice to consumers using a server unit which can store and display the names and characteristics of experts and then rapidly assist in connecting the expert and consumer for real-time communication. The server can also have the ability to receive keywords from the consumer, match those keywords to one or more experts, and tell the consumer how to contact an expert.


Inventors: Lauffer; Randall B. (Brookline, MA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Lauffer; Randall B.

Brookline

MA

US
Assignee: UTBK, LLC (Dover, DE)
Family ID: 26823689
Appl. No.: 12/768,664
Filed: April 27, 2010

Prior Publication Data

Document Identifier Publication Date
US 20100208028 A1 Aug 19, 2010

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
11772525 Jul 2, 2007 7729938
10951502 Sep 27, 2004 7249045
10107743 Mar 26, 2002 6801899
09488130 Jan 20, 2000 6223165
60125557 Mar 22, 1999

Current U.S. Class: 705/7.14; 379/265.12
Current CPC Class: H01L 29/4908 (20130101); G06Q 10/0639 (20130101); G06Q 99/00 (20130101); G16H 40/67 (20180101); G06Q 30/0241 (20130101); G06Q 30/06 (20130101); H01L 29/66757 (20130101); H01L 29/78675 (20130101); G06Q 30/02 (20130101); G06Q 20/102 (20130101); H04W 4/021 (20130101); G06Q 30/0601 (20130101); H04W 4/029 (20180201); G06Q 10/06311 (20130101); G06Q 10/06398 (20130101); H04M 3/5191 (20130101); G06Q 10/0631 (20130101); G06Q 10/063112 (20130101); G06Q 30/0613 (20130101); G06Q 30/0206 (20130101)
Current International Class: G06Q 10/00 (20120101)
Field of Search: ;705/7.14 ;379/265.12

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
4751669 June 1988 Sturgis et al.
4850007 July 1989 Marino et al.
4963995 October 1990 Lang
5057932 October 1991 Lang
5058152 October 1991 Solomon et al.
5148474 September 1992 Haralambopoulos et al.
5164839 November 1992 Lang
5262875 November 1993 Mincer et al.
5325424 June 1994 Grube
5347632 September 1994 Filepp et al.
5359508 October 1994 Rossides
5440334 August 1995 Walters et al.
5524146 June 1996 Morrisey et al.
5533103 July 1996 Peavey et al.
5539735 July 1996 Moskowitz
5555298 September 1996 Jonsson
5602905 February 1997 Mettke
5619991 April 1997 Sloane
5634012 May 1997 Stefik et al.
5638432 June 1997 Wille et al.
5694549 December 1997 Carlin et al.
5696965 December 1997 Dedrick
5710887 January 1998 Chelliah et al.
5710970 January 1998 Walters et al.
5718247 February 1998 Frankel
5721763 February 1998 Joseph et al.
5722418 March 1998 Bro
5724424 March 1998 Gifford
5751956 May 1998 Kirsch
5774534 June 1998 Mayer
5778367 July 1998 Wesinger, Jr. et al.
5793851 August 1998 Albertson
5794221 August 1998 Egendorf
5809119 September 1998 Tonomura et al.
5818836 October 1998 DuVal
5819092 October 1998 Ferguson et al.
5819267 October 1998 Uyama
5819271 October 1998 Mahoney et al.
5825869 October 1998 Brooks et al.
5825876 October 1998 Peterson, Jr.
5850433 December 1998 Rondeau
5862223 January 1999 Walker et al.
5864871 January 1999 Kitain et al.
RE36111 February 1999 Neville
5870546 February 1999 Kirsch
5870744 February 1999 Sprague
5884032 March 1999 Bateman et al.
5884272 March 1999 Walker et al.
5884282 March 1999 Robinson
5893077 April 1999 Griffin
5907677 May 1999 Glenn et al.
5911132 June 1999 Sloane
5914951 June 1999 Bentley et al.
5937390 August 1999 Hyodo
5940471 August 1999 Homayoun
5960069 September 1999 Felger
5963202 October 1999 Polish
5963861 October 1999 Hanson
5978567 November 1999 Rebane et al.
5982863 November 1999 Smiley et al.
5991394 November 1999 Dezonno et al.
5995705 November 1999 Lang
5999965 December 1999 Kelly
6026148 February 2000 Dworkin et al.
6029141 February 2000 Bezos et al.
6046762 April 2000 Sonesh et al.
6049779 April 2000 Berkson
6064978 May 2000 Gardner et al.
6108704 August 2000 Hutton et al.
6189030 February 2001 Kirsch et al.
6208713 March 2001 Rahrer et al.
6216111 April 2001 Walker et al.
6223165 April 2001 Lauffer
6230287 May 2001 Pinard et al.
6243684 June 2001 Stuart et al.
6269361 July 2001 Davis et al.
6275490 August 2001 Mattaway et al.
6327572 December 2001 Morton et al.
6445694 September 2002 Swartz
6466966 October 2002 Kirsch et al.
6470079 October 2002 Benson
6470181 October 2002 Maxwell
6510417 January 2003 Woods et al.
6516057 February 2003 Meek et al.
6523101 February 2003 Lauffer
6529878 March 2003 De Rafael et al.
6546372 April 2003 Lauffer
6549889 April 2003 Lauffer
6560576 May 2003 Cohen et al.
6731736 May 2004 Meek et al.
6760537 July 2004 Mankovitz
6769020 July 2004 Miyazaki et al.
6801899 October 2004 Lauffer
6826194 November 2004 Vered et al.
6850965 February 2005 Allen
6856809 February 2005 Fostick
6859833 February 2005 Kirsch et al.
6968174 November 2005 Trandal et al.
7076037 July 2006 Gonen et al.
7092901 August 2006 Davis et al.
7103010 September 2006 Melideo
7181415 February 2007 Blaser et al.
7187761 March 2007 Bookstaff
7200413 April 2007 Montemer
7212615 May 2007 Wolmuth
7227936 June 2007 Bookstaff
7231405 June 2007 Xia
7240110 July 2007 Haitsuka et al.
7240290 July 2007 Melideo
7249045 July 2007 Lauffer
7363254 April 2008 Skinner
7434175 October 2008 Melideo
7630919 December 2009 Obrecht
2001/0048737 December 2001 Goldberg et al.
2002/0003867 January 2002 Rothschild et al.
2002/0010608 January 2002 Faber et al.
2002/0010616 January 2002 Itzhaki
2002/0026457 February 2002 Jensen
2002/0057776 May 2002 Dyer
2002/0095331 July 2002 Osman et al.
2002/0107697 August 2002 Jensen
2002/0122547 September 2002 Hinchey et al.
2002/0193094 December 2002 Lawless et al.
2003/0026397 February 2003 McCroskey
2003/0046161 March 2003 Kamangar et al.
2003/0083042 May 2003 Abuhamdeh
2003/0105824 June 2003 Brechner et al.
2003/0195787 October 2003 Brunk et al.
2003/0212600 November 2003 Hood et al.
2003/0220866 November 2003 Pisaris-Henderson
2003/0223565 December 2003 Montemer
2003/0225682 December 2003 Montemer
2003/0231754 December 2003 Stein et al.
2004/0003041 January 2004 Moore et al.
2004/0006511 January 2004 Montemer
2004/0010518 January 2004 Montemer
2004/0076403 April 2004 Mankovitz
2004/0174965 September 2004 Brahm et al.
2004/0174974 September 2004 Meek et al.
2004/0193488 September 2004 Khoo et al.
2004/0234049 November 2004 Melideo
2004/0235524 November 2004 Abuhamdeh
2004/0247092 December 2004 Timmins et al.
2004/0249649 December 2004 Stratton et al.
2004/0254859 December 2004 Aslanian
2004/0260413 December 2004 Melideo
2005/0018829 January 2005 Baker
2005/0041647 February 2005 Stinnie
2005/0074100 April 2005 Lederman
2005/0076100 April 2005 Armstrong
2005/0080878 April 2005 Cunningham et al.
2005/0096980 May 2005 Koningstein
2005/0100153 May 2005 Pines et al.
2005/0105881 May 2005 Mankovitz
2005/0125416 June 2005 Kirsch et al.
2005/0135387 June 2005 Rychener et al.
2005/0209874 September 2005 Rossini
2005/0240432 October 2005 Jensen
2005/0245241 November 2005 Durand et al.
2005/0261964 November 2005 Fang
2005/0286688 December 2005 Scherer
2005/0289015 December 2005 Hunter et al.
2006/0003735 January 2006 Trandal et al.
2006/0004627 January 2006 Baluja
2006/0069610 March 2006 Rossini
2006/0106711 May 2006 Melideo
2006/0136310 June 2006 Gonen et al.
2006/0159063 July 2006 Kumar
2006/0166655 July 2006 Montemer
2006/0171520 August 2006 Kliger
2006/0173827 August 2006 Kliger
2006/0173915 August 2006 Kliger
2006/0182250 August 2006 Melideo
2006/0247999 November 2006 Gonen et al.
2007/0038507 February 2007 Kumer
2007/0100956 May 2007 Kumer
2007/0129054 June 2007 Andronikov et al.
2007/0269038 November 2007 Gonen et al.
2009/0006174 January 2009 Lauffer
Foreign Patent Documents
699785 May 1995 AU
2329046 Mar 1999 GB
09233441 Sep 1997 JP
09319812 Dec 1997 JP
9804061 Jan 1998 WO
9847295 Oct 1998 WO
0057326 Sep 2000 WO
0127825 Apr 2001 WO
0128141 Apr 2001 WO

Other References

Greenblatt, Ellen, "Have You Ever Wondered . . . ," Datamation, p. 126, Oct. 1997. cited by applicant .
Kanellos, Michael, "Web Watch: Do You Want to Know the Meaning of Life?," Computer Reseller News, pp. 72-74, Mar. 3, 1997. cited by applicant .
"Applying Technology News," Accounting Technology, p. 14, Feb./Mar. 1997. cited by applicant .
Allexperts.com, company information retrieved from http://www.allexperts.com, available at least by Apr. 9, 2000. cited by applicant .
Answers.com, company information retrieved from http://www.answers.com, available at least by Aug. 8, 2000. cited by applicant .
EXP.com, Inc., company information retrieved from http://www.exp.com, available at least by Sep. 20, 2000. cited by applicant .
Experts Exchange, Inc., company information retrieved from http://www.experts-exchange.com, available at least by Apr. 9, 2000. cited by applicant .
University of Texas--Austin, information on the Electronic Emissary Project retrieved at www.tapr.org/emissary, available at least by Apr. 9, 2000. cited by applicant .
Wasik, Joann M., "Information for Sale: Commercial Digital Reference and AskA Services," Virtual Reference Desk, http://www.vrd.org/AskA/commAskA.html, Sep. 20, 1999. cited by applicant .
Angelo, Simon, "SurfBrains.com: Brains Online Save Time & Money," M2 Presswire, Jul. 11, 2000. cited by applicant .
Ek, Brian, "Walker Digital Issued Landmark U.S. Patent No. 5,862,223 for Global Internet Marketplace for Experts", Business Wire, Jan. 26, 1999. cited by applicant .
Hodgson, Cynthia, "Online Expert Databases & Services," Econtent, pp. 48-53, Dec. 1999. cited by applicant .
Information Markets Corp., company information retrieved from http://www.infomarkets.com, available at least by Aug. 8, 2000. cited by applicant .
Intellectexchange.com, Inc., company information retrieved from http://www.intellectexchange.com, available at least by Aug. 8, 2000. cited by applicant .
Kabeya, Kiyoshi et al., "A New Teleconsultation Terminal System Using ISDN," NTT Review, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 37-43, Jul. 1991. cited by applicant .
Ott, Chris, "Making Good on the Information Economy," Denver Business Journal, vol. 51, No. 17, p. 27A, Dec. 17, 1999. cited by applicant .
Qcircuit.com, company information retrieved from http://www.qcircuit.com, available at least by Aug. 8, 2000. cited by applicant .
Rogers, Michael et al, "Experts Abound at New Web Sites," Library Journal, pp. 22-24, Mar. 1, 2000. cited by applicant .
Dalton, Gregory, "Rent-An-Expert on the Web," Information Week, p. 75, Sep. 6, 1999. cited by applicant .
Expertcity.com, "About Us," company information retrieved from http://www.expertcity.com, available at least by Apr. 9, 2000. cited by applicant .
Wieland, Heidi et al., "Expertcity.com Launches Premier Online Marketplace for Expert Services," PR Newswire, Aug. 30, 1999. cited by applicant .
"TriNet's `Help Me, I'm Stuck` Internet Voice Button Services Pushes Web Pages to Online Users," Business Wire, Mar. 25, 1998. cited by applicant .
"Connecting to On-Line Car Shoppers: Auto Sellers Use Netcall Internet Call-Button Technology to Turn `Clicks` into Interactive Sales," Business Wire, p. 4089, Jul. 19, 1999. cited by applicant .
"NetCall Internet Call Buttons Enhance E-Commerce Customer Service and Sales," PR Newswire, p. 7431, Aug. 9, 1999. cited by applicant .
Broad, Doug et al., "Lucent Technology and Netscape Team to Deliver Lucent Ecommerce Solutions," Business Wire, Sep. 23, 1998. cited by applicant .
Collett, Stacey et al., "Why Online Browsers Don't Become Buyers," Computerworld, vol. 33, No. 48, p. 14, Nov. 29, 1999. cited by applicant .
Davey, Tom, "Wheeling and Dealing Online," PC Week, vol. 13, No. 45, pp. 1, 129, Nov. 11, 1996. cited by applicant .
Healey, John, "From A-Z: You Can Sell Advice Online," San Jose Mercury News, retrieved from http://www.mercurycenter.com on Oct. 24, 2001. cited by applicant .
Keen.com, company information retrieved from http://www.keen.com, available at least by 1999. cited by applicant .
Menn, Joseph, "An Expert? There's Now a Home for You on the Internet," Los Angeles Times, retrieved from http://www.denverpost.com on Oct. 24, 2001. cited by applicant .
Moore, Michael et al., "USA Global Link Brings Interactively to Internet Shopping," Business Wire, Oct. 7, 1998. cited by applicant .
Pelline, Jeff, "Net Firm to Connect Users by Phone," CNET News.com, Nov. 8, 1999. cited by applicant .
Tehran!, Rich, "e-Rip Van Winkle and the 60-second Nap," Call Center Solutions, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 16-18, Aug. 1999. cited by applicant .
Keen.com, "Keen.com Launches First Live Answer Community, Connects People with Information to Share Over Their Standard Telephone," company press release, Nov. 8, 1999. cited by applicant .
International Application No. PCT/US00/06849, International Search Report, May 16, 2000. cited by applicant .
Addeo, E.J. et al., "An Experimental Multi-Media Bridging System," Frontiers in Computer Communications Technology, Computer Communications Review, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 236-242, Aug. 11-13, 1987. cited by applicant .
Asthana, Abhaya et al., "A Small Domain Communications System for Personalized Shopping Assistance," IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications, Publication No. 0-7803-1996-6/94, pp. 199-203, Aug. 18, 1994. cited by applicant .
Becker, Ralph, "ISDN Tutorial: Definitions," retrieved from http://www.ralphb.net/ISDN/defs.html, available at least by Apr. 21, 2000. cited by applicant .
Hase, Masahiko et al., "Advanced Videophone System Using Synchronized Video Filing Equipment," NTT Review, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 29-36, Jul. 1991. cited by applicant .
Littleton, Linda, "HDD: A Helpdesk Database," Proceedings of the ACM SIGUCCS User Services Conference XXII, pp. 205-210, Oct. 16-19, 1994. cited by applicant .
Ludwig, L.F. et al., "Laboratory for Emulation and Study of Integrated and Coordinated Media Communication, " Conference on Office Information Systems, pp. 283-291, Mar. 23-25, 1988. cited by applicant .
Mercalli, Franco et al., "The ESSAI Teleshopping System: An Example of a Broadband Multimedia Application," IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pp. 572-576, Nov. 28, 1994. cited by applicant .
"Keen.com raises $60 Million from Prestigious Investors and Strategic Partners Just 60 Days After Launch of Its Live Answer Community," Business Wire, Jan. 11, 2000. cited by applicant .
International Application No. PCT/US00/10730, International Search Report, Jan. 3, 2001. cited by applicant .
Greenberg, Ken, "Jambo Launches to Connect People and Businesses from the Internet to the Phone," Market Wire, May 3, 2005. cited by applicant .
Greenberg, Ken, "Jambo Names Netzero Co-founder Stacy Haitsuka to New Post of Chief Information Officer," Business Wire, Jul. 5, 2005. cited by applicant .
Greenberg, Ken, "Jambo Receives $5 Million in Financing from Kline Hawkes & Co., Westlake Venture Partners, Others," Business Wire, Oct. 17, 2005. cited by applicant .
Jambo, "Welcome to Jambo--The Leader in Pay-Per-Call Solutions," company information retrieved from http://www.jambo.com, available at least by Oct. 17, 2005. cited by applicant .
Jingle Networks, Inc:, "Introducing 1-800 FREE411: First Nationwide Free Telephone Directory Assistance Service," Sep. 20, 2005. cited by applicant .
ADS-CLICK, "ADS-click Adds Skype-Based Pay-Per-Call Advertising Capabilities to Its Private-Labeled Solution, which will be Unveiled at ad:tech New York," Market Wire, Oct. 10, 2005. cited by applicant .
Jingle Networks, Inc., "1-800-FREE411 Provides Two Great Opportunities to Acquire New Customers," available at least by Oct. 20, 2005. cited by applicant .
"AtOnce Talks Up E-mail Marketing Campaigns with ITXC Push to Talk Service," Business Wire, Feb. 26, 2001. cited by applicant .
"ITXC Corp and Doubleclick Energize Banner Ads with Web Telephony; Companies Voice-Enable Banner Advertisements Using ITXC Push to Talk Service," Business Wire, Dec. 12, 2000. cited by applicant .
Ingenio, Inc., "FindWhat.com Enters Agreement with Ingenio to Offer Pay Per Call Advertising Platform," press release available at http://www.ingenio.com, Apr. 7, 2004. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 08/702,833, filed Aug. 23, 1996, entitled "Method for Establishing Anonymous Communication Links," now U.S. Patent Serial No. 5,907,677. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 09/414,710, filed Oct. 8, 1999, entitled "System for Providing Services in Real-Time Over the Internet." cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 09/488,130, filed Jan. 20, 2000, entitled "Method and Apparatus to Connect Consumer to Expert," now U.S. Patent Serial No. 6,223,165. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 09/733,872, filed Dec. 8, 2000, entitled "Assistance Method and Apparatus," now U.S. Patent Serial No. 6,523,010. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 09/782,925, filed Feb. 13, 2001, entitled "Assistance Method and Apparatus," now U.S. Patent Serial No. 6,549,889. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 09/782,984, filed Feb. 13, 2001, entitled "Assistance Method and Apparatus," now U.S. Patent Serial No. 6,546,372. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/107,743, filed Mar. 26, 2002, entitled "Assistance Method and Apparatus," now U.S. Patent Serial No. 6,801,899. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/951,502, filed Sep. 27, 2004, entitled "Method and System to Connect Consumers to Information," now U.S. Patent No. 7,249,045. cited by applicant .
USPTO Transaction History for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/772,525, filed Jul. 2, 2007, entitled "Method and System to Connect Consumers to Information." cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Meinecke Diaz; Susanna M
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Parent Case Text



CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/772,525, filed Jul. 2, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No.7,729,938 which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/951,502, filed Sep. 27, 2004 and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,249,045, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/107,743, filed Mar. 26, 2002 and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,801,899, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/488,130, filed Jan. 20, 2000 and now U.S. Pat.No. 6,223,165, which claims the benefit of Provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/125,557, filed Mar. 22, 1999, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Claims



The invention claimed is:

1. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having stored thereon a set of instructions, which when executed on a computing device causes the device to perform a method, the method comprising: providing to a user a visual display advertisement on a media channel on behalf of an advisor, wherein the visual display advertisement includes at least a user selectable reference to establish a real-time communication connection with the advisor, an indication of whether the advisor is currently available to communicate via real time communication at a time when the user is viewing the visual display advertisement, and a display of an item associated with the advisor selected from a group consisting of a compensation rate for the advisor and a quality score for the advisor, wherein the visual display advertisement advertises the advisor to the user at least partially based on an order relative to other advisors, the order at least partially based on one or both of the compensation rate and the quality score; while the advisor is currently available, receiving a user selection of the user selectable reference corresponding to the advisor, and a central controller using the user selection of the user selectable reference to establish a real-time communication connection between the advisor and the user prior to the user submitting a question for the advisor including the central controller using the user selection to establish a real-time communication connection with the advisor and with the user prior to the user submitting a question for the advisor, wherein the establishing the real-time communication connection comprises the central controller originating a first communication connection to the advisor and a second communication connection to the user; and charging an amount for the real-time communication connection established between the advisor and the user based at least in part on the compensation rate.

2. The medium of claim 1, wherein the first communication connection comprises a first telephonic connection, and the second communication connection comprises a second telephonic connection.

3. The medium of claim 1, wherein the media channel includes at least a portion of Internet.

4. The medium of claim 1, wherein the user selectable reference includes a hyper-link to be selected by the user.

5. The medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: providing visual display advertisements on a media channel on behalf of multiple advertisers, the visual display advertisements to include at least a reference to a telephonic connection with the respective advertisers; and charging an amount each time a telephonic connection is established between a respective advertiser and a customer.

6. The medium of claim 1, wherein the visual display advertisement is provided in response to a search submitted by the user.

7. The medium of claim 6, wherein the visual display advertisement is provided in response to a search submitted by the user for a geographic location.

8. The medium of claim 6, wherein the visual display advertisement is provided in response to a search submitted by the user for a subject matter.

9. The medium of claim 6, wherein the visual display advertisement is provided in response to a keyword search submitted by the user.

10. The medium of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: charging an amount for each telephonic connection established between the advisor and the user based on the visual display advertisement.

11. The medium of claim 1, wherein the charging of the amount comprises deducting the amount from an amount received from the user.

12. The medium of claim 1, wherein the charging of the amount comprises charging the user.

13. The medium of claim 1, wherein the amount charged is according to a price specified by the advisor.

14. The medium of claim 1, wherein the real-time communication connection includes a telephonic connection established between the advisor and the user according to the visual display advertisement and the telephonic connection is provided by Internet telephony.

15. The medium of claim 1, wherein the real-time communication connection includes a telephonic connection established between the advisor and the user according to the visual display advertisement and the telephonic connection includes video.

16. An apparatus, comprising: a server unit to provide a visual display advertisement to a user on a media channel, the visual display advertisement advertising availability of an advisor to provide advice, wherein the visual display advertisement includes at least a user selectable reference to establish a real-time communication connection with the advisor, an indication of whether the advisor is currently available to communicate via real time communication at a time when the user is viewing the visual display advertisement, wherein the visual display advertisement advertises the advisor to the user at least partially based on an order relative to other advisors, the order at least partially based on one or both of a compensation rate and a quality score; and a central controller coupled with the server unit to receive a user selection of the user selectable reference corresponding to the advisor while the advisor is currently available, and to, prior to the user submitting a question for the advisor, establish a real-time communication connection with the advisor and with the user using the selection from the user prior to the user submitting a question for the advisor, wherein the establishing the real-time communication connection comprises the central controller originating a first communication connection to the advisor and a second communication connection to the user; wherein an amount is charged for the real-time communication connection established between the advisor and the user, by one or both of the server unit and the central controller, based at least in part on the compensation rate.

17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the real-time communication connection includes a telephonic connection established between the advisor and the user according to the visual display advertisement and the telephonic connection is provided by Internet telephony.

18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the telephonic connection includes video.

19. A method, comprising: providing to a user a visual display advertisement on a media channel, the visual display advertisement advertising availability of an advisor to provide advice, wherein the visual display advertisement includes at least a user selectable reference to establish a real-time communication connection with the advisor, an indication of whether the advisor is currently available to communicate via real time communication at a time when the user is viewing the visual display advertisement, wherein the visual display advertisement advertises the advisor to the user at least partially based on an order relative to other advisors, the order at least partially based on one or both of a compensation rate and a quality score; while the advisor is currently available, receiving a user selection of the user selectable reference corresponding to the advisor, and a central controller using the user selection of the user selectable reference to establish a real-time communication connection between the advisor and the user prior to the user submitting a question for the advisor including the central controller establishing a real-time communication connection with the advisor and with the user prior to the user submitting a question for the advisor, wherein the establishing the real-time communication connection comprises the central controller originating a first communication connection to the advisor and a second communication connection to the user; and charging an amount for the real-time communication connection established between the advisor and the user based at least in part on the compensation rate.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the real-time communication connection includes a telephonic connection established between the advisor and the user according to the visual display advertisement and the telephonic connection is provided by Internet telephony.
Description



FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to techniques for delivering information electronically, more particularly, for delivering advice to consumers from a diverse set of experts. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to systems and methods for matching consumers questions with experts, displaying available experts for consumer viewing and selection, providing for compensation from consumers to experts, and providing for the connection between consumer and experts.

DEFINITIONS

Advice: Any needs of the consumer which can be provided for by an expert, including but not limited to conversation, entertainment, sounds or pictures of any kind, text, video, audio. This advice is not limited to that provided by agents regarding company products; it can include medical, legal, educational, travel, entertainment, religious, and other forms of advice. In addition, herein "advice" is meant broadly to include any type of information, comfort, or communication a consumer desires.

Consumers: Individuals, companies, organizations, governments, or devices which have one or more questions or needs for advice.

Experts: Individuals, companies, organizations, governments, or devices which are able to provide advice to consumers, provided that experts' initial means to contact consumers is via the server in the Advice Router. Experts' compensation, which may be zero, can come from either consumers directly or from the Advice Router. Collectively, experts represent a broader range of knowledge and experience than do agents which work for a single company. Much as the word "advice" is used broadly, "expert" is meant broadly-since-many types of information can be given by human beings.

Agents: Individuals, companies, organizations, governments, or devices who, as part of their relationship/employment at that institution, answers questions when connected to his institution's telephone or server, provided that the agent is paid by the institution for that function. The advice provided for by agents is generally restricted to that regarding products offered by their respective company.

Server: any device, network or software which connects consumers and experts.

Query: an action initiated by a consumer which includes keywords or other means to summarize their question or need for advice.

Expert characteristics: used for matching with consumers queries. Including, but not limited to one or more of the following: a code name which does not include his real name; keywords of expertise; number of years experience in each area of expertise; degrees earned; number of years of school after completion of high school or college; companies worked for or schools/training programs attended in the past or present; age; language; neighborhood, city, state, and/or country of residence; quality score as judged by previous consumer interactions; compensation rate for consumer advice; and whether the expert is available at the actual moment of consumers query or within 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes.

Matching: a process for scoring and putting in an order of relevance a list or selected list of experts who are likely to be able to answer a consumer's query. Can involve any method of assignment of numbers to the number of keyword matches or matches between ranges of characteristics desired by the consumer with the actual expert characteristics.

Logged in, or on-line: detectable means of communication between server and expert, including but not limited to telephone, Internet telephony, email, audio, and/or video.

Means to contact: any method, information, or technology used to bring together the consumer with one or more experts, including but not limited to telephone, Internet telephony, email, audio, and/or video. Means to contact includes telephone numbers (including toll-free and pay-per-call numbers), email addresses, Internet web pages or sites, video-conferencing details. More preferably, the means of contact includes telephone, Internet telephony, audio, and/or video, and even more preferably Internet telephony, audio and/or video, and even more preferably video. The technology to be used for any of the above includes TVs, TVs with set-top web browsers, PCs, telephones, and satellite connections.

Time-to-connect: the period of time between the transmission of the means of contact and the actual connection between expert and consumer. In the case where the consumer selects an expert, the time-to-connect is the period of time beginning when at the consumer's last action (e.g., clicking on the symbol for an expert or his telephone number) and ending when the actual connection is made. In the case where the server makes both connections, the time-to-connect is the period of time beginning when the server indicates to the consumer that it is beginning to contact the expert and ending when the actual connection is made.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1.a shows the most common arrangement today of the advice business, known as Centralized Advice Sources, where there are a large number of consumers and few agents to help them at each company; this has the general shape of a funnel with too many questions going to too few agents.

FIG. 1.b shows a fundamentally new advice technology structure, Diverse Advice Sources, wherein the actual companies selling products are not involved or only peripherally involved. Diverse Advice Sources more evenly equalizes the number of questions in the world at a given point in time with the number of experts who are likely to be able to answer their questions. This technology is in an hourglass shape where a large number of experts is available rather than the small number of agents at each company. In the middle is a new form of information company, the Advice Router, which rapidly facilitates the matching of and connection between consumers and experts.

BACKGROUND

Problems with Customer Service and General Advice

As more technology (videorecorders, personal computers, Internet, TV web boxes, cell phones, etc.) enters peoples' lives, there is greater and greater demand for help in choosing devices and solutions and in setting them up and correcting problems. Even more generally, there is greater need for assistance in daily life, whether it is for medical, legal, family, or entertainment reasons.

At the same time that more information is required to conduct our lives, available effective sources of that information have not grown sufficiency in number or efficiency.

Companies selling products often have web pages or telephone support lines, but these are either too restricted in information, or the consumer must wait for long periods for live help.

To help with the routing of calls to available agents in a company, Cave (WO9813765) has devised a real-time system wherein a queuing manager routes calls to an agent who is free at the time. The system still involves automated answering systems which many consumers find frustrating, and it requires the hiring of not only agents but the queuing manager.

In the future, streaming audio and video capabilities on the web will make it possible for company agents to speak directly to consumers. However, this will be very costly to operate and the consumer will probably have to wait for long times to speak to one of the agents.

For general advice, the Internet is far too inefficient for many uses. Search engines return many hits, requiring the consumer to try many web sites and hope that the answer is available.

1-900 phone numbers (pay-per-call) are limited in scope and consumers hesitate to use them due to high per-minute rates, lack of trust in the billing, and generally perceived notions that the 900 numbers are for less-than-serious concerns such as astrology or sex chat. In addition, 900 services are small and narrowly focused, without the benefits of the Diverse Advice Sources arrangement, and they did not include matching and/or display technologies.

As shown in FIG. 1.a, the fundamental problem with current advice technologies is that there are a large number of consumers and few agents to help them at each company; this is known as Centralized Advice Sources, and the has the general shape of a funnel with too many questions going to too few agents. This leads to high cost (to pay agents and purchase systems), slow response time (long hold times on telephone), and lack of personal service (live agents). In addition, the agents often can only answer a limited range of questions regarding the companies products. Thus, the participation and control of the consumer advice function by each company is fundamentally hurting the company by frustrating consumers and by requiring it to staff, manage, and pay for a vast and complex undertaking which is, outside of its main expertise (making widgets, providing a narrow service, etc.).

Previous solutions have not adequately filled the need, particularly for immediate advice or connection between appropriate people.

The American Information Exchange (AMIX) was a central exchange that attempted to mediate between buyers and sellers of information. But the complexity and lack of immediacy, among other problems, limited its ability to efficiently solve the buyer's problem.

Walker (U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,223) envisioned a similarly complex exchange, often involving several lengthy steps where a user request is submitted; a search of experts, even beyond its members, is undertaken; a portion of the user request (question) is transmitted to the computer-selected expert, etc. until the request if fulfilled. Walker (col 8, line 49; col 24, line 67) allows the user himself to select the expert from a general list, but there is no provision for seeing which expert is available at that instant to talk, and there is no provision to make the process of connecting the expert and user quickly, say within 1 min or 10 seconds. In addition the user must submit a portion of his question (end user request).

In the complex process described by Walker, the expert and user can communicate in real-time (col 9, line 1; col 26, line 49), but only after the process of submitting the end user request to the expert.

In another embodiment of Walker (col 28, line 66), the end user calls the central controller and eventually is put in touch with an expert for a real-time connection. No allowance is made for the central controller to make two separate calls (thus connecting the expert and user) after the user selects the expert.

In addition, there are no constraints in Walker on how fast the time-to-connect process needs to be to be useful. Timely information is more highly valued than delayed information.

Moreover, the detailed lists of experts and their characteristics (resumes, etc.) that are displayed in Walker (col 25, line 35) are not suitable for a system that fills the need for rapid selection and connection between parties; as the number of experts grows, there will be simply too many pages of text to scroll through. There is needed a new display system where users can rapidly survey the available experts via information-rich graphics.

Walker does not take into account the use of experts as a workforce for customer support. No mention is made of product or service companies issuing certification for experts, and, in turn, those certifications listed or displayed explicitly by the central controller/server.

DESCRIPTION

In one embodiment, this invention provides for a fundamentally new advice technology structure, Diverse Advice Sources, wherein the actual companies selling products are not involved or only peripherally involved. Diverse Advice Sources more evenly equalizes the number of questions in the world at a given point in time with the number of experts who are likely to be able to answer their questions. As shown in FIG. 1.b this technology is in an hourglass shape where a large number of experts is available rather than the small number of agents at each company. In the middle is a new form of information company, the Advice Router, which rapidly facilitates the matching of and connection between consumers and experts.

The sheer number of experts available in Diverse Advice Sources solves the arithmatic (funnel) problem of Centralized Advice Sources, leading to the two most important benefits: fast response and the routine availability of live experts. In addition the diversity of sources raises the likelihood that the consumer will get more holistic advice, not limited to the tools available from any one company.

In another embodiment, this invention provides for a method of (or apparatus for) facilitating the delivery of advice to consumers, comprising:

providing a server unit with the ability to store the names or identification of two or more experts, said experts coded by one or more expert characteristics, said server having the ability to detect which experts are online;

said server having the ability to display at least one of said expert characteristics with information-rich graphics or symbols;

said server having the ability to respond to a consumer's selection of expert by either sending the consumer a means to contact expert or by connecting the consumer and expert for real-time communication;

wherein the time-to-connect between consumer and expert is 30 minutes or less.

In another embodiment, this invention provides for a method of (or apparatus for) facilitating the delivery of advice to consumers, comprising:

providing a server unit with the ability to store the names or identification of two or more experts, said experts coded by one or more expert characteristics, said server having the ability to detect which experts are online;

said server unit having the ability to receive one or more keywords from a consumer;

said server unit having the ability to match those keywords to one or more experts and send the consumer a means to contact;

wherein the time-to-connect between consumer and expert is 30 minutes or less.

Certification

In the transition from central to diverse advice sources, companies will find that it is economical to broaden its customer support workforce to non-employees. While these non-employees may not have as detailed or as frequent training, they can answer many of the questions consumers have. Thus a company can offer simple tests and, optionally, transmit the results of those tests to the server, which maintains an up-to-date status of each expert. Alternatively, the company can simply give the certification to the expert who transmits the results to the server.

Certification tests can take many forms, including but not limited to web-based questionnaires, phone, Internet, or face-to-face interviews, live video connections, etc. Optionally, a company can use authentication procedures (fingerprint, voiceprint, "cookies" the expert's computer, passwords, etc.) to ensure the expert's identity. Optionally, the test and results can be cryptographically transmitted between the company and expert; or between the company and server.

Certification can also come from organizations or schools or governments.

Matching

In another embodiment, this invention provides for a matching system or relevance scoring method which finds the best expert to answer a consumer's question. This can involve any method of assignment of numbers to the number of keyword matches or matches between ranges of characteristics desired by the consumer with the actual expert characteristics. This technology is well known for search engines like Yahoo! for finding matches between a consumer's keywords and web pages as well as eBay for finding matches for merchandise.

However, a system and method does not currently exist that allows one to match a wide array of features, including, but not limited to, two or more of the following expert characteristics: a code name which does not include his real name; keywords of expertise; number of years experience in each area of expertise; degrees earned; number of years of school after completion of high school or college; companies worked for or schools/training programs attended in the past or present; age; language; neighborhood, city, state, and/or country of residence; quality score as judged by previous consumer interactions; compensation rate for consumer advice; and whether the expert is available at the actual moment of consumers query or within 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes.

It is preferred that the number of categories in the list of expert characteristics used for matching be at least four, such as code name, keywords, compensation rate, and time availability. More preferably, the number of categories should be at least six. Even more preferably, the number of categories should be at least eight. Most preferred, the number of categories should be at least ten.

In another embodiment, this invention provides for a system for and method of displaying selected experts to the consumer. This includes, at a minimum, conveying, through means that include but are not limited to telephone, Internet telephony, email, audio, and/or video, a way for the consumer to contact the expert (the means of contact). It is more preferred for that conveyance to be performed by Internet telephony, email, audio, and/or video. It is most preferred for that conveyance to be performed by audio, and/or video.

The number of experts presented to the consumer can be at least one. It is more preferred that the number of experts presented to the consumer is at least two. It is even more preferred that the number of experts presented to the consumer is at least five. It is even more preferred that the number of experts presented to the consumer is at least ten. It is even more preferred that the number of experts presented to the consumer is at least 20. It is most preferred that the number of experts presented to the consumer is over 100.

In another embodiment, this invention provides for a system for and method of protecting the privacy and identity of both the expert and the consumer. If the expert prefers, his actual name, address and other information will be withheld from the consumer. Also, individual entries in the expert characteristics list can be shielded from view by the consumer. The consumer likewise can be protected. While privacy has been provided for in commercial/advertising technologies (see Goldhaber, U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,008), the shielding but still utilizing detailed expert characteristic lists has not been provided for.

Display

In addition to the mere conveyance of the means of contact, it is more preferred for the consumer to be presented with a visual display of available experts. Systems and methods have been used by Yahoo! and others for displaying game-playing individuals, with information related to availability for a game now, skill level, and code name. No such system or method exists for displaying expert characteristics.

Display methods include but are not limited to information-rich graphics such as objects with varying color or density, bar graphs, line graphs, 3-D graphs, icons, pictures, photographs, video. All of the above can include animation or motion to attract attention. Words and numbers can be added on or near any of the above to give further expert characteristics. Any of the above can be addressable by mouse/cursor location so that the consumer can easily select which expert to choose or which set of experts to zoom in on and view more closely. Optionally, zoom (magnification) and/or rotation functions can also be used. The zoom function can allow new and more detailed expert characteristics to appear with each increase in magnification. Similarly rotations of objects can reveal more detailed expert characteristics.

Useful expert characteristics that can be displayed visually include, but are not limited to: the expert's quality (rating) score, whether the expert is online now, or how long until he will be; whether the expert has a separate phone line, and whether it is busy or not.

A legend can optionally be provided when abstract symbols or colors are used so that consumers can tell what each symbol or color means.

In another embodiment, experts can select their own symbol, pictures, logos, etc. to advertise themselves (as advertisers). These include all of the above options. Optionally, they can use online avatars to represent themselves, with the additional option of the voice and facial expression of the expert transmitted to the consumer via this avatar.

In another embodiment, a special symbol/notation is displayed next to or as part of an experts symbol if he has been certified by selected companies or organizations. The symbol/notation can optionally expire, disappear, or change its characteristics (color, etc.) after a certain length of time so that the expert is forced to take tests to maintain certification.

In another embodiment, the display is a map either of geography, system or building architecture or any type of display where experts are, at that time, located or qualified in. The map and expert symbols on it is continually updated to see who is online and/or their exact or general location. The size of the symbol used for each expert is adjusted as the number of experts online increases so each can be displayed. Optionally the zoom function allows better viewing of crowded regions of the map.

This display method can be useful in cases where a consumer only wants information from someone at a particular location, e.g., to determine weather, sport conditions (ski, surf, etc), traffic, delivery/pickup truck availability, nature (animal sightings), entertainment (club-hopping), state or city laws, or any kind of location-dependent information.

Other types of non-geographical maps or diagrams can also be used, including but not limited to software architecture, flow charts, graphs, etc. Here the location of the expert's symbol is determined by their expertise in a particular subject within that map.

In some cases, if the expert is qualified in more than one area, two or more of his symbols may appear in a given map or diagram.

Graphical displays (line or scatter plots, etc) can be used by the consumer to weigh different features of the experts before making a selection. The consumer can be given a choice of 2- or 3-dimensional, and what the axis of the graph represent: quality score, compensation rate, distance from the consumer, etc. The symbols for the available experts in a particular subject area are placed in their appropriate position of the graph and the consumer can see, for example a scattergram and pick a well-rated expert who is not too expensive.

It is more preferred that the display method graphically show at least the following two items: relevance score or order of preference of experts on the one hand, and the time availability of the expert on the other. The latter refers to whether the expert is available at the actual moment of consumers query or within 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes. It is even more preferred that the display method graphically show at least the following three items: relevance score or order of preference of expert, the time availability of the expert, and the compensation rate for consumer advice with that expert. It is even more preferred that the display method graphically show at least the following four items: relevance score or order of preference of expert, the time availability of the expert, the compensation rate for consumer advice with that expert and the quality score as judged by previous consumer interactions. It is most preferred that the display method graphically show at least the following five items: relevance score or order of preference of expert, the time availability of the expert, the compensation rate for consumer advice with that expert, the quality score as judged by previous consumer interactions, and one item selected from the following list: number of years experience in each area of expertise; degrees earned; number of years of school after completion of high school or college; companies worked for or schools/training programs attended in the past or present; age; language; neighborhood, city, state, and/or country of residence.

Compensation

Diverse Advice Sources fundamentally changes the economics of the consumer advice business. As shown in FIG. 1, Diverse Advice Sources replaces the awkward arrangement in Centralized Advice Sources wherein individual companies are expected to pay for consumer advice (by paying their hired agents) when it is the consumer who is benefiting from the advice. Of course consumers had in the past expected companies to pay for this advice, to encourage the consumer to use their product and not products from competing companies. The companies respond by establishing limited consumer advice groups which are highly inefficient and costly to the company. In Diverse Advice Sources, the consumer pays for the advice information packet directly, to either or both of the expert and the Advice Router.

This invention also includes an alternative case where the consumer does not directly pay either the expert or the Advice Router. In this special case, general advertisements are used to fund the Advice Router, and the Advice Router either compensates the expert for his time, or the expert receives no direct compensation and instead gains some other value (e.g., advertising).

Unique payment systems and methods used by the Advice Router include but are not limited to the following:

a) credit card or (cyber-money) accounts for one or both of the consumer and expert; proper deductions and credits are made to each account after each transaction.

b) the means of contact can include a 900 number (or similar per-per-call/pay-per-view technology for the Internet); in this case, the consumer simply dials the 900 number given by and controlled or contracted for by the Advice Router, and the expert is paid according to well-known 900 number technology. This 900 number technology has been used in the past to provide advice from individual groups, but these activities did not include matching and/or display technologies, nor did they have the benefits of the Diverse Advice Sources arrangement.

c) other phone or media accounts.

Various payment schemes can be optimized to meet consumer and expert expectations. For example, rather that a flat per-hour, per-minute, or per-session rate, a number of schemes can be used to compensate for the consumer ensuring that the expert is adequate (for example, the first two minutes free), etc.

In all of these cases, the Advice Router can receive a fee for conveying the means of contact, and/or the connection.

Also, the Advice Router can pay or rebate a portion of the consumer charge if the consumer take some additional action, such as rating the quality of the expert, etc.

Connection

This invention provides for a system and method whereby the server used by the Advice Router can be used for providing for or aiding rapid connections and monitoring of interactions between consumers and experts.

Regarding the connection, it is preferred that the server provide for or facilitate a connection within 30 minutes after the means of contact has been conveyed to the consumer. It is more preferred that the time-to-connect is 10 minutes or less. It is even more preferred that the time-to-connect is 5 minutes or less. It is even more preferred that the time-to-connect is 2 minutes or less. It is even more preferred that the time-to-connect is 1 minute or less. It is even more preferred that the time-to-connect is 30 seconds or less. It is even more preferred that the time-to-connect is 20 seconds or less. It is most preferred that the time-to-connect is 10 seconds or less.

The connection can include any method or technology used to bring together the consumer with one or more experts, including but not limited to telephone, Internet telephony, email, audio, and/or video. More preferably, the connection involves telephone, Internet telephony, audio, and/or video, and even more preferably Internet telephony, audio and/or video, and even more preferably video. The technology to be used for any of the above includes TVs, TVs with set-top web browsers, PCs, telephones, and satellite connections.

In the case where the consumer selects an expert on the Internet, the server can connect both using a two-step procedure wherein two separate and independent transmissions (e.g., telephone calls) are placed and then the two transmissions are joined together. This allows the server to store the expert addresses/phone numbers anonymously and control the connection.

The server should be able to monitor the interactions to provide for quality control and/or exact payment.

EXAMPLE

Two experts, Joe and Bill, connect to the Advice Router and fill out forms describing their expertise. Joe is expert in Microsoft's Word and Powerpoint programs, and Bill is expert in the Word and Excel programs. The server detects that they are both logged on. Later that evening, Bill is busy with a consumer for a period he estimates will be 15 more minutes. Joe is free. At that moment, David, a consumer, logs on and fills out a keyword query list that best suits his question: how to turn off the automatic spellchecker in Microsoft Word. He also gives his VISA credit card number via a secure link. A second after he finishes his entry, a display on his PC shows two color-coded boxes coinciding with the current list of available experts, Joe and Bill (only their code names are used, however). The relevance score for both is 1.0 (optimal) since both are experts in Microsoft Word. Both experts also charge the same rate, $1.00 per minute. However, a small box in Joe's area is clearly green and easy to read--this box corresponds to the fact that Joe is available at this instant to speak to David. (David does not select Bill since the red color in his box corresponds to a 15 min. wait or more.) David clicks an icon in Joe's box and a second or two later, a streaming real-time video of Joe appears on David's PC, and if David's PC is so enabled, Joe sees David in his PC. They spend five minutes solving David's problem and log out. Prior to logging out, however, David receives a $0.50 rebate on the cost of the connection by rating the quality of Joe's help, from 0 for "awful" to 10 for "great" The cost of David's call is $5.00 minus $0.50 or $4.50; in his case, this is added to his monthly $50-$100 phone/Internet bill.

For maintaining the site, the Advice Router deducts $1.00 from the net $4.50 received and remits $3.50 to Joe. If David had not elected to receive the $0.50 rebate, the Advice Router would have made $1.50 on the call.

For most of its experts, the Advice Router takes out 30% before paying the experts.

Those skilled in the art will know that this example is illustrative only and does not in any way limit the range of applications of the present invention.

* * * * *

References


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed