U.S. patent number 8,093,359 [Application Number 11/981,822] was granted by the patent office on 2012-01-10 for optimized fc variants and methods for their generation.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Xencor, Inc.. Invention is credited to Arthur J. Chirino, Wei Dang, John R. Desjarlais, Stephen K. Doberstein, Robert J. Hayes, Sher Bahadur Karki, Gregory Alan Lazar, Omid Vafa.
United States Patent |
8,093,359 |
Lazar , et al. |
January 10, 2012 |
Optimized Fc variants and methods for their generation
Abstract
The present invention relates to optimized Fc variants, methods
for their generation, and antibodies and Fc fusions comprising
optimized Fc variants.
Inventors: |
Lazar; Gregory Alan (Alhambra,
CA), Chirino; Arthur J. (Camarillo, CA), Dang; Wei
(Pasadena, CA), Desjarlais; John R. (Pasadena, CA),
Doberstein; Stephen K. (San Francisco, CA), Hayes; Robert
J. (Radnor, PA), Karki; Sher Bahadur (Pasadena, CA),
Vafa; Omid (Monrovia, CA) |
Assignee: |
Xencor, Inc. (Monrovia,
CA)
|
Family
ID: |
33437072 |
Appl.
No.: |
11/981,822 |
Filed: |
October 31, 2007 |
Prior Publication Data
|
|
|
|
Document
Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20090068177 A1 |
Mar 12, 2009 |
|
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
10672280 |
Sep 26, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
60477839 |
Jun 12, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
60467606 |
May 2, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
60442301 |
Jan 23, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
60414433 |
Sep 27, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
530/387.1;
530/388.15; 530/388.1; 530/350; 530/387.3 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61K
39/39566 (20130101); G16C 20/60 (20190201); C07K
16/22 (20130101); A61K 39/395 (20130101); C07K
16/32 (20130101); G16B 15/00 (20190201); A61P
37/04 (20180101); C07K 16/2893 (20130101); G16B
35/00 (20190201); A61P 35/00 (20180101); G16B
30/00 (20190201); C07K 16/283 (20130101); C12P
21/005 (20130101); G16B 5/00 (20190201); C07K
16/2896 (20130101); C07K 16/00 (20130101); A61P
25/00 (20180101); C07K 16/2875 (20130101); A61P
37/02 (20180101); A61P 9/00 (20180101); A61P
29/00 (20180101); C07K 16/2863 (20130101); C07K
16/2887 (20130101); C07K 16/4291 (20130101); A61K
39/3955 (20130101); C07K 2319/30 (20130101); C07K
2317/41 (20130101); C07K 2317/526 (20130101); C07K
2317/24 (20130101); C07K 2317/21 (20130101); A61K
2039/505 (20130101); C07K 2317/34 (20130101); C07K
2317/732 (20130101); C07K 2317/76 (20130101); C07K
2317/51 (20130101); C07K 2317/71 (20130101); C07K
2317/56 (20130101); C07K 2317/524 (20130101); C07K
2317/72 (20130101); C07K 2317/734 (20130101); C07K
2317/52 (20130101); C07K 2317/33 (20130101); C07K
2317/522 (20130101); C07K 2317/14 (20130101); C07K
2317/77 (20130101); C07K 2317/92 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C07K
16/00 (20060101); C07K 14/00 (20060101); C12P
21/08 (20060101) |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 255 826 |
|
2002 |
|
EP |
|
0 268 636 |
|
Jan 1997 |
|
EP |
|
1 176 195 |
|
Jan 2002 |
|
EP |
|
1 229 125 |
|
Aug 2002 |
|
EP |
|
1 255 209 |
|
Nov 2002 |
|
EP |
|
0 753 065 |
|
May 2003 |
|
EP |
|
0 805 628 61 |
|
May 2003 |
|
EP |
|
1 323 346 |
|
Nov 2003 |
|
EP |
|
1 323 346 |
|
Nov 2003 |
|
EP |
|
0 888 125 |
|
May 2004 |
|
EP |
|
0 904 107 |
|
Oct 2004 |
|
EP |
|
0 383 799 |
|
Feb 2005 |
|
EP |
|
WO 88/07089 |
|
Sep 1988 |
|
WO |
|
WO 91/06305 |
|
May 1991 |
|
WO |
|
WO 91/19515 |
|
Dec 1991 |
|
WO |
|
WO 92/04053 |
|
Mar 1992 |
|
WO |
|
WO 92/16562 |
|
Oct 1992 |
|
WO |
|
WO 92/22324 |
|
Dec 1992 |
|
WO |
|
WO 94/29351 |
|
Dec 1994 |
|
WO |
|
WO 94/29351 |
|
Dec 1994 |
|
WO |
|
WO 95/05468 |
|
Feb 1995 |
|
WO |
|
WO 96/22024 |
|
Jul 1996 |
|
WO |
|
WO 97/28267 |
|
Aug 1997 |
|
WO |
|
WO 97/34631 |
|
Sep 1997 |
|
WO |
|
WO 98/02462 |
|
Jan 1998 |
|
WO |
|
WO 98/05787 |
|
Feb 1998 |
|
WO |
|
WO 98/23289 |
|
Jun 1998 |
|
WO |
|
WO 98/47089 |
|
Nov 1998 |
|
WO |
|
WO 99/04813 |
|
Feb 1999 |
|
WO |
|
WO 99/51642 |
|
Oct 1999 |
|
WO |
|
WO 99/54342 |
|
Oct 1999 |
|
WO |
|
WO99/54484 |
|
Oct 1999 |
|
WO |
|
WO 99/58572 |
|
Nov 1999 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/09560 |
|
Feb 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/09560 |
|
Feb 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/23564 |
|
Apr 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/23564 |
|
Apr 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/24782 |
|
May 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/24782 |
|
May 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/42072 |
|
Jul 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/42072 |
|
Jul 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 00/61739 |
|
Oct 2000 |
|
WO |
|
WO 01/29246 |
|
Apr 2001 |
|
WO |
|
WO 01/38490 |
|
May 2001 |
|
WO |
|
WO 01/57088 |
|
Aug 2001 |
|
WO |
|
WO 01/59066 |
|
Aug 2001 |
|
WO |
|
WO 01/59066 |
|
Aug 2001 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/30954 |
|
Apr 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/31140 |
|
Apr 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/44215 |
|
Jun 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/060919 |
|
Aug 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/060919 |
|
Aug 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/061090 |
|
Aug 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 02/061093 |
|
Aug 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO02/066514 |
|
Aug 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO02/079232 |
|
Oct 2002 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/014325 |
|
Feb 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/014325 |
|
Feb 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/016470 |
|
Feb 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/035835 |
|
May 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/035835 |
|
May 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/054213 |
|
Jul 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/059282 |
|
Jul 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/074679 |
|
Sep 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 03/089624 |
|
Oct 2003 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/004662 |
|
Jan 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/004798 |
|
Jan 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/004798 |
|
Jan 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/016750 |
|
Feb 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/022717 |
|
Mar 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/022717 |
|
Mar 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/024871 |
|
Mar 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/024889 |
|
Mar 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO/2004/02907 |
|
Apr 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/035752 |
|
Apr 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/056312 |
|
Jul 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/063351 |
|
Jul 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/063351 |
|
Jul 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO2004/063963 |
|
Jul 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/074455 |
|
Sep 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/074455 |
|
Sep 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/092219 |
|
Oct 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO2004/099249 |
|
Nov 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/103404 |
|
Dec 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2004/110472 |
|
Dec 2004 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/000899 |
|
Jan 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/001025 |
|
Jan 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/007809 |
|
Jan 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/011376 |
|
Feb 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/012877 |
|
Feb 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/013090 |
|
Feb 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/018572 |
|
Mar 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/023866 |
|
Mar 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/027966 |
|
Mar 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO2005/102387 |
|
Mar 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/037867 |
|
Apr 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/040217 |
|
May 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/047327 |
|
May 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/056606 |
|
Jun 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/056759 |
|
Jun 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/060642 |
|
Jul 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/063815 |
|
Jul 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/070963 |
|
Aug 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/116078 |
|
Dec 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2005/123780 |
|
Dec 2005 |
|
WO |
|
WO 2006/012500 |
|
Feb 2006 |
|
WO |
|
Other References
Algre, et al., "A non-activating "humanized" anti-CD3 monoclonal
antibody retains immunosuppressive properties in vivo,"
Transplantation, 57:1537-1543 (1994). cited by other .
Armour, et al., "Recombinant human IgG molecules lacking Fcgamma
receptor I binding and monocyte triggering activities," Eur. J
lmmunol, 29:2613-2624 (1999). cited by other .
Ashkenazi, et al., "Immunoadhesins as research tools and
therapeutic agents," Curr Opin Immunol. 9:195-200 (1997). cited by
other .
Chamow, et al., "Immunoadhesins: principles and applications,"
Trends Biotechnol, 14:52-60 (1996). cited by other .
Davies, et al. "Expression of GnTIII in a recombinant anti-CD20 CHO
production cell line: Expression of antibodies with altered
glycoforms leads to an increase in ADCC through higher affinity for
FC gamma Rill," Biotechnol Bioeng, 74:288-294 (2001). cited by
other .
Hutchins, et al., "Improved biodistribution, tumor targeting, and
reduced immunogenicity in mice with a gamma 4 variant of
Campath-1H," PNAS USA, 92:11980-11984 (1995). cited by other .
Jefferies, et al., Immunol Lett, 54:101-104 (1996). cited by other
.
Krapp, et al., "Structural analysis of human IgG-Fc glycoforms
reveals a correlation between glycosylation and structural
integrity," J Mol Biol, 325:979-989 (2003). cited by other .
Lehrnbecher, et al., "Variant Genotypes of the Low-Affinity
Fc.gamma. Receptors in Two Control Populations and a Review of
Low-Affinity Fc.gamma. Receptor Polymorphisms in Control and
Disease Populations," Blood, 94:4220-4232 (1999). cited by other
.
Lund, et al., "Human Fc gamma RI and Fc gamma RII interact with
distinct but overlapping sites on human IgG," J Immunol,
147:2657-2662 (1991). cited by other .
Lund, et al., "Multiple binding sites on the CH2 domain of IgG for
mouse Fc gamma R11," Mol Immunol, 29:53-59 (1992). cited by other
.
Lund, et al., "Multiple interactions of IgG with its core
oligosaccharide can modulate recognition by complement and human Fc
gamma receptor I and influence the synthesis of its oligosaccharide
chains," J lmmunol, t54:4963-4969 ( t996). cited by other .
Lund, et al., "Oligosaccharide-protein interactions in IgG can
modulate recognition by Fc gamma receptors," Faseb J, 9:115-119
(1995). cited by other .
White, et al., "Antibody-targeted immunotherapy for treatment of
malignancy," Annu Rev Med, 52:125-145 (2001). cited by other .
Aase, a. et al. "The extended hinge region of IgG3 is not required
for high phogocytic capacity mediated by Fc gamma receptors, but
the heavy chains must be disulfide bonded," Eur J Immunol.,
23(7):1546-1551 (Jul. 1993). cited by other .
Abadeh, S., et al., "Remodelling the oligosaccharide of human IgG
antibodies: effects on biological activities," Biochem Sec Trans.,
25(4):S661 (Nov. 1997). cited by other .
Akewanlop, C., et al., "Phagocytosis of Breast Cancer Cells
Mediated by Anti-MUC-1 Monoclonal antibody, DF3, and Its Bispecific
Antibody" Cancer Research, 61:4061-4065 (May 15, 2001). cited by
other .
Alegre, M., et al., "Effect of a Single Amino Acid Mutation on the
Activating and Immunosuppressive Properties of a "Humanised" OKT3
Monoclonal Antibody," J. Immunology, 148:3461-3468 (Jun. 1992).
cited by other .
Amigorena, S., et al., "Fc receptors for IgG and antigen
presentation on MHC class I and class II molecules" Immunology,
11:385-390 (t999). cited by other .
Armour, K. L., et al., "Differential binding to human Fc.gamma.RIIa
and Fc.gamma.RIIb receptors by human IgG wildtype and mutant
antibodies," Molecular Immunology, 40:585-593 (2003). cited by
other .
Ashkenazi, A., et al., "Mapping the CD4 binding site for human
immunodeficiency virus by alanine-scanning mutagenesis," PNAS, USA,
87:7150-7154 (Sep. 1990). cited by other .
Bolland, S. "A Newly Discovered Fc Receptor tha Explains
IgG-Isotype Disparities in Effector Responses," J. Immunity, 23:2-4
(Jul. 2005). cited by other .
Boruchov, A. M., et al., "Activating and inhibitory IgG Fc
receptors on human DCs mediate opposing functions" J. Clin. Invest.
doi:10.1172!JC124772 (Sep. t6, 2005). cited by other .
Bowles, J. A., et al., "CD16 polymorphisms and Nk activation
induced by monoclonal antibody-coated target cells," Journal of
Immunological Methods, pp. 1-12 (2005). cited by other .
Brekke, O. H., et al., "Human IgG isotype-specific amino acid
residues affecting complement-mediated cell lysis and
phogocytosis," Eur J. Immunl., 24(10):2542-5247 (Oct. 1994). cited
by other .
Brekke, O. H., et al , "Human IgG3 can adopt the disulfide bond
pattern characteristic for IgG1 without resembling it in complement
mediated cell lysis," Mol. lmmunol. 30(16):1419-1425 (Nov. 1993).
cited by other .
Bruggeman, M., et al., "Comparison of the Effector Functions of
Human Immunoglobulins Using a Matched Set of Chimeric Antibodies,"
J. Exp. Med., 166:1351-1361 (Nov. 1987). cited by other .
Bruggemann, M., et al., "A matched set of rat/mouse chimeric
antibodies. Identification and biological properties of rat H chain
constant regions mu, gamma 1, gamma 2a, gamma 2b, gamma 2c,
epsilon, and alpha," J. Immunol., t42(9):3145-3150 (May 1989).
cited by other .
Burmeister, W. P., et al., "Crystal structure of the complex of rat
neonatal Fc receptor with Fc" Nature, 372:379-383 (Nov. 24, 1994).
cited by other .
Canfield, S. M., et al., "The Binding Affinity of Human IgG for its
High Affinity Fc Receptor is Determined by Multiple Amino Acids in
the CH2 Domain and Is Modulated by the Hinge Region," J. Exp. Med.,
173:1483-149t (Jun. 1991). cited by other .
Caron, P. C., et al., "Engineered Humanized Dimeric Forms of IgG
Are More Effective Antibodies," J. Exp. Med., 176:1191-1195 (Oct.
1992). cited by other .
Caron, P. C., et al., "Murine and humanized constructs of
monoclonal antibody M19 (anti-CD33) for the therapy of acute
myelogenous leukemia," Cancer, 73(3 Supp):1049-1056 (Feb. 1994).
cited by other .
Carpenter, P.A., et al., "Non-Fc Receptor-Binding Humanized
Anti-CD3 Antibodies Induce Apoptosis of Activated Human T Cells,"
Journal of Immunology, 165:6205-6213 (2000). cited by other .
Carter, P., et al., "Humanization of an anti-p185.sup.HER2 antibody
for human cancer therapy" PNAS, 89:4285-4289 (May 1992). cited by
other .
Cartron, G., et al., "Therapeutic activity of humanized anit-Cd20
monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor
Fc.gamma.RIIIa gene," Blood, 99(3):754-758 (Feb. 1, 2002). cited by
other .
Chapman, P. B., "T-Cell Chauvinists Versus Antibody
Advocates--Can't We All Just Get Along?" J. Clin. Oncology,
22(22):4446-4448 (Nov. 15, 2004). cited by other .
Chappel, M. S., et al., "Identification of a Secondary Fc.gamma. RI
Binding Site within a Genetically Engineered Human IgG Actibody,"
J. Biol. Chem., 268(33):25124-25131 (Nov. 1993). cited by other
.
Chappel, M. S., et al., "Identification of the Fc.gamma. receptor
class I binding site in human IgG through the use of recombinant
IgG1/IgG2 hybrid and point-mutated antibodies," PNAS, USA,
88:9036-9040 (Oct. 1991). cited by other .
Chintalacharuvu, K. R., et al., "Hybrid IgA2/IgG1 Antibodies with
Tailor-Made Effector Functions," Clinical Immunology, 101(1):21-31-
(Oct. 2001). cited by other .
Clark, M. R., "Chemical Immunology Antibody Engineering IgG
Effector Mechanisms," Dissertation submitted to Immunology Division
of Department of Pathology at Cambridge University, UK (No Date).
cited by other .
Clynes, R. A. et al., "Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo
cytoxicity against tumor targets," Nature Medicine, 6(4):443-446
(Apr. 2000). cited by other .
Clynes, R., et al., "Modulation of Immune complex-induced
Inflammation In Vivo by the Coordinate Expression of Activation and
Inhibitory Fc Receptors," J. Exp. Med., 189(1):179-185 (Jan. 4,
1999). cited by other .
Clynes, R., "Immune complexes as therapy for autoimmunity" J. Clin.
Invest., 115:25-27 (2005). cited by other .
Clynes, R., et al., "Fc receptors are required in passive and
active immunity to melanoma," PNAS USA, 95:652-656 (Jan. 1998).
cited by other .
Cohen-Sodal, J. FG., et al., "Review: Fc .gamma. receptors"
Immunology Letts, 92:199-205 (2004). cited by other .
Cole, M. S., et al., "Human IgG2 variants of chimeric anti-CD3 are
nonmitogenic to T cells," J. Immunol., 159(7):36 t3-3621 (Oct. 1,
1997). cited by other .
Coloma, M. J., et al., "The hinge as a spacer contributes to
convalent assembly and is required for function of IgG," J.
Immunol., 158(2):733-740 (Jan. 15, 1997). cited by other .
D'Uscio, C. H., et al., "Cellular cytotoxicity mediated by
isotype-switch variants of a monoclonal antibody to human
neuroblastoma," Br. J. Cancer, 64(3):445-450 (Sep. 1991). cited by
other .
Da Silveira, S. A., et al., "Complement Activation Selectively
Potentiates the Pathogenicity of the IgG2 b and IgG3 Isotypes of a
High Affinity Anti-Erythrocyte Autoantibody," J. Exp. Med.,
195(6):665-672 (Mar. 18, 2002). cited by other .
Dall'Acqua, D. F., et al., "Increasing the Affinity of a Human IgG1
for the Neonatal Fc Receptor: Biological Consequences," Joumal of
Immunology, 169:5171-5180 (2002). cited by other .
Davis, R. S., et al., "Fc receptor homologs: newest members of a
remarkably diverse Fc receptor gene family," Imm. Revs, 190:123-136
(2002). cited by other .
Davis, R. S., et al., "Identification of a family of Fc receptor
homologs with preferential B cell expression," PNAS, USA,
98(17):9772-9777 (Aug. 2001). cited by other .
Delano, W. L., et al., "Convergent Solutions to Binding at a
Protein-Protein Interface" Science, 287:1279-1283 (Feb. 18, 2000).
cited by other .
Dhodapkar, K.M., et al., "Antitumor Monoclonal Antibodies Enhance
Cross-Presentation of Cellular Antigens and the Generation of
Myeloma-specific Killer T-Cells by Dendritic Cells" J. Exp Med.,
195(1):125-133 (Jan. 7, 2002). cited by other .
Dhodapkar, K.M., et al., "Recruiting dendritic cells to improve
antibody therapy of cancer" PNAS, 102(18):6243-6244 (May 3, 2005).
cited by other .
Dhodapkar, K.M., et al., "Selective blockade of inhibitory
Fc.gamma. receptor enables human dendritic cell maturation with
IL-12p70 production and immunity to antibody-coated tumor cells"
PNAS, 102(8):2910-2915 (Feb. 22, 2005). cited by other .
Dhodapkar, M. V., el al., "T cells from the tumor microenvironment
of patients with progressive myeloma can generate strong,
tumor-specific cytolytic responses to autologous, tumor-loaded
dendritic cells" PNAS, 99(20):13009-13013 (Oct. 1, 2002). cited by
other .
Duncan, A. R., et al., "Localization of the binding site for the
human high-affinity Fc receptor on IgG," Nature, 332:563-564 (Apr.
7, 1988). cited by other .
Duncan, A. R., et al., "The binding site for C1q on IgG," Nature
332:738-740 (Apr. 21, 1988). cited by other .
Edelman, G. M., el al., "The Covalent Structure of an Entire
.gamma.G Immunoglobulin Molecule," PNAS, 63:78-85 (1969). cited by
other .
Ehrhardt, G. R. A., et al., "Th inhibitory potential of Fc receptor
homolog 4 on memory B cells," PNAS, USA, 100(23):13489-13494 (Nov.
2003). cited by other .
Ellison, J. W., et al., "The nucleotide sequence of a human
immunoglobulin C.gamma. .sub.t gene" Nucleic Acids Research,
10(13):4071-4079(1982). cited by other .
Ernst, L. K., et al., "Molecular characterization of six variant
Fc.gamma. receptor class I (CD64) transcripts," Molecular
Immunology, 35:943-954 (1998). cited by other .
Facchetti, F., et al., "An unusual Fc receptor-related protein
expressed in human centroblasts," PNAS, USA, 99(6):3776-3781 (Mar.
19, 2002). cited by other .
Gaboriaud, C., et al., "The Crystal Structure of the Globular Head
of Complement Protein C1q Provides a Basis for Its Versatile
Recognition Properties," J. Biol. Chem., 278(47):46974-46982
(2003). cited by other .
Garman, S. C., et al., "Structure of the Fc fragment of human IgG
bound to its high-affinity receptor Fc.epsilon.RIa," Nature,
406:259-266 (2000). cited by other .
Getahun, A., et al., "IgG2a-Mediated Enhancement of Antibody and T
Cell Responses and Its Relation 1o Inhibitory and Activating
Fc.gamma. Receptors," J. of Immunology, 172:5269-5276 (2004). cited
by other .
Ghazizadeh, S., et al., "Physical and Functional Association of
Src-related Protein Tyrosine Kinases with FcRII in Monocytic THP-1
Cells," J. Biol. Chem., 269(12):8878-8884 (Mar. 25, 1994). cited by
other .
Ghetie, V., et al., "FcRn: the MHC class I-related receptor that is
more than an IgG transporter" Immunology Today, t8(t2):592-598
(Dec. 1997). cited by other .
Ghetie, V., et al., "Increasing the serum persistence of an IgG
fragment random mutagenesis," Nat. Biotechol., 15(7):637-640 (Jul.
1997). cited by other .
Ghetie, V., et al., "Multiple Roles for the Major
Histocompatibility Complex Class I-Related Receptor FcRn," Annu.
Rev. Immunol. 18:739-766 (2000). cited by other .
Gonzales, N. R., el al., "SDR grafting of a murine antibody using
multiple human germline templates to minimize its immunogenicity,"
Molecular Immunology, 41:863-872 (2004). cited by other .
Greenwood, J. "Molecular Recognition in the Structure and Assembly
of Filamentous Bacteriphages," Dissertation submitted to the
University of Cambridge (Oct. 1989). cited by other .
Greenwood, J., et al., "Structural motifs involved in human IgG
antibody effector functions," Eur. J. Immunol., 23(5):1098-1104
(May 1993). cited by other .
Greenwood, J., et al., "Dual Importance of Positive Charge in the
C-Terminal Region of Filamentous Bacteriophage Coat Protein for
Membrane Insertion and DNA-Protein Interaction in Virus Assembly,"
Virology, 171:444-452 (1989). cited by other .
Greenwood, J., et al., "Effector functions of matched sets of
recombinant human IgG subclass antibodies," Dissertation submitted
to Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK (Feb. 1993). cited by other
.
Greenwood, J., et al., "Engineering multiple-domain forms of the
therapeutic antibody CAMPATH-1H: effects on complement lysis," Ther
Immunol., 1(5):247-255 (Oct. 1994). cited by other .
Groh, V., el al., "Efficient cross-priming of tumor antigen
specific T cells by dendritic cells sensitized with diverse
anti-MICA opsonized tumor cells" PNAS, t02(18):6461-6466 (May 3,
2005). cited by other .
Harrison, P. T., et al., "Domain swap chimeras to study the binding
of IgG by Fc gamm RI, the high affinity receptor for IgG," Biochem
Soc Trans., 24(1):144S (Feb. 1996). cited by other .
Hazenbos, W.L., et al., "Murine IgG1 complexes Trigger Immune
Effector Functions Predominately via Fc.gamma.RIII (CD16)," J. of
Immunology, 161:3026-3032 (1998). cited by other .
Henry, A. J., et al., "Participation of the N-Terminal of
C.epsilon.3 in the Binding of Human IgE to Its High-Affinity
Receptor Fc.epsilon.RI," Biochemistry, 36:15568-15578 (1997). cited
by other .
Hezareh, M., et al., "Effector Function Activities of a Panel of
Mutants of a Broadly Neutralizing Antibody against Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Type I," Journal of Virology,
75(24):12161-12168 (2001). cited by other .
Hinton, P. R., et al., "Engineered human IgG Antibodies with Longer
Serum Half-Lives in Primates," J. Biol Chem., 279(8):6213-6216
(Feb. 20, 2004). cited by other .
Idusogie, E. E., et al., "Engineered Antibodies with Increased
Activity to Recruit Complement," J. of Immunology, 166:2571-2575
(2001). cited by other .
Idusogie, E.E., et al., "Mapping of the C1q Binding Site on
Rituxan, a Chimeric Antibody with a Human IgG1 Fc," J. of
Immunology, 164:4178-4184 (2000). cited by other .
Isaacs, J. D., "Improving Serotherapy with Monoclonal Antibodies"
dissertation submitted to the University of Cambridge (Mar. 1991).
cited by other .
Isaacs, J. D., et al., "From bench to bedside: discovering rules
for antibody design, and improving serotherapy with monoclonal
antibodies," Rheumatology, 40:724-738 (2001). cited by other .
Issacs, J. D., et al., "Therapy with Monoclonal Antibodies, II. The
contribution of Fc.gamma. Receptor binding and the Influenece of
C.sub.H1 and C.sub.H3 Domains on in Vivo Effector Function," J. of
Immunology, 161:3862-3869 (1998). cited by other .
Issacs, J. D., et al., "Therapy with Monoclonal Anlibodies: an in
vivo model for the assessment of therapeutic potential," J.
Immunol., 148(10):3062-3071 (May 15, 1992). cited by other .
Jefferis, R. et al., "Recognition sites on human IgG for Fc gamma
receptors: the role of glycosylatin," Immunol Letters,
44(2-3):111-117 (Jan. 1995). cited by other .
Jefferis, R., et al., "Interaction sites on human IgG-Fc for
Fc.gamma.R: current models," Immunology Letts., 82:57-65 (2002).
cited by other .
Jefferis, R., et al., "Modulation of Fc.gamma.R and human
complement activation by IgG3-core oligosaccharide interactions,"
Immunology Letters, 54:101-104 (1996) and errata at Immunology
Letters, 58:67 (1997). cited by other .
Jefferis, R., et al., "Molecular definition of interaction sites on
human IgG for Fc receptors (huFc gamma R)," Mol Immunol.,
27(12):1237-1240 (Dec. 1990). cited by other .
Jendeberg, L., et al., "Engineering of Fc.sub.1 and Fc.sub.3 from
human immunoglobulin G 1o analyse subclass specificity for
staphylococcal protein A," Journal of Immunological Methods,
201:25-34 (1997). cited by other .
Junghans, R. P., el al., "The protection receptor for IgG
catabolism is the .beta..sub.2-microglobulin-containing neonatal
intestinal transport receptor," PNAS, 93:5512-5516 (May 1996).
cited by other .
Kalergis, A.M., et al., "Inducing Tumor Immunity through the
Selective Engagement of Activating Fc.gamma. Receptors on Dendritic
Cells" J. Exp. Med. 195(12):1653-t659 (Jun. 17, 2002). cited by
other .
Kan, K. S., et al., "Thioether-Bonded Constructs of Fab.gamma. and
Fc.gamma. Modules Utilizing Differential Reduction of Interchain
Disulfide Bonds," Journal of Immunology, 166:1320-1326 (2001).
cited by other .
Karassa, F. B., et al., "The role of Fc.gamma.RIIA and IIIA
polymorphisms in autoimmune diseases," Biomedicine &
Pharmacotherapy, 58:286-291 (2004). cited by other .
Kim, J. et al., "Mapping the site on human IgG for binding of the
MHC class I-related receptor, FcRn" Eur. J. Immunol., 29:2819-2825
(1999). cited by other .
Kim, J. K. et al., "Localization of the site of the murine IgG1
molecule that is involved in binding to the murine intestinal Fc
receptor," Eur J Immunol., 24(10):2429-2439 (Oct. 1994). cited by
other .
Kim, J.K., et al., "Identifying amino acid residues lhat influence
plasma clearance of murine IgG t fragments by site-directed
mutagenesis," Eur J. Immunol, 24(3):542-548 (Mar. 1994). cited by
other .
Kim, T. D., et al., "Analysis of Fc.gamma.RIII and IgG Fc
Polymorphism Reveals Functional and Evolutionary Implications of
Protein-Protein Interaction," J. Mol. Evol., 53:1-9 (2001). cited
by other .
Kurucz, I., et al., "Bacterially expressed human Fc.gamma.RIIb is
soluble and functionally active after in vitro refolding"
Immunology Lefts., 75:33-40 (2000). cited by other .
Lund, J., et al., "A protein structural change in aglycosylated
IgG3 correlates with loss of huFc gamma R1 and huFc gamma R111
binding and/or activation," Mol. Immunol., 27(11):1145-1153 (Nov.
1990). cited by other .
Lund, J., et al., "Control of IgG/Fc glycosylation: a comparision
of oligosaccharides from chimeric human/mouse and mouse subclass
immunoglobulin Gs," Mol Immunol., 30(8):741-748 (Jun. 1993). cited
by other .
Maenaka, K., et al., "The Human Low Affinity Fc.gamma. Receptors
IIa, IIb and III Bind IgG with Fast Kinetics and Distinct
Thermodynamic Properties" J. Biol. Chem.276(48):44898-44904 (2001).
cited by other .
Martin, W. L., et al., "Characterization of the 2:1 Complex between
the Class I MHC-Related Fc Receptor and Its Fc Ligand in Solution,"
Biochemistry, 38:12639-12647 (1999). cited by other .
Martin, W. L., et al., "Crystal Structure at 2.8 .ANG. of an
FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex: Mechanism of pH-Dependent Binding"
Molecular Cell, 7:867-877 (Apr. 2000). cited by other .
Masztalerz, A., et al., "Mechanisms of macrophage cytotoxicity in
IL-2 and IL-12 mediated tumor regression," Cancer Immunol
Immunother, 52:235-242 (2003). cited by other .
Maxwell, K.F., et al., "Crystal structure of the human leukocyte Fc
receptor, FcRIIa." Nature Structural Biology, 6(5):437-442 (May
1999). cited by other .
Mayfield, S. P., et al., "Expression and assembly of a fully active
antibody algae," PNAS, 100(2):438-442 (Jan. 21, 2003). cited by
other .
Mechetina, L. V., et al., "Identification of CD16-2, a novel mouse
receptor homologous to CD16/Fc.gamma.RIII," Immunogenetics,
4:463-468 (2002). cited by other .
Merchant, A. M. et al., "An efficient route to human bispecific
IgG," Nat Biotechnol., 16(7):677-681 (1998). cited by other .
Metes. D., et al., "Expression of Functional CD32 Molecules on
Human NK Cells Is Determined by and Allelic Polymorphism of the
Fc.gamma. RIIC Gene," Blood, 91(7):2369-2380 (Apr. 1, 1998). cited
by other .
Michaelson, T. E., et al., "Antibody Dependent Cell-Mediated
Cytotoxicity Induced by Chimeric Mouse-Human IgG Subclass and IgG3
Antibodies with Altered Hinge Region," Molecular Immunology,
29(3):319-326 (1992). cited by other .
Michaelson, T. E., et al., "One disulfide bond in front of the
second heavy chain constant region is necessary and sufficient for
effector functions of human 1gG3 without a genetic hinge," PNAS,
91:9243-9247 (Sep. 1994). cited by other .
Michaelson, T. E., et al., "Primary Structure of the `Hinge` Region
of Human IgG3,"J. Biol. Chem., 252(3):883-889 (Feb. 1977). cited by
other .
Miller, I., et al., "ITRAs: a new family of immunoglobulinlike
receptors differentially expressed in B cells," Blood,
99(8):2662-2669 (Apr. 15, 2002). cited by other .
Mimura, Y., et al., "Role of Oligosaccharide Residues of IgG1-Fc in
Fc.gamma. RIIb Binding," J. Biol. Chem., 276(49):45539-45547 (Dec.
7, 2001). cited by other .
Morgan, A., et al., "The N-terminal end of the CH2 domain of
chimeric human IgG1 anti-HLA-DR is necessary for C1q, Fc gamma R1
and Fc gamma RIII binding," Immunology, 86(2):319-324 (Oct. 1995).
cited by other .
Nakamura, K., et al., "Dissection and optimization of immune
effector functions of humanized anti-ganglioside GM2 monoclonal
antibody," Molecular Immunology, 37:1035-1046 (2000). cited by
other .
Neidhardt-Berard, E., et al., "Dendritic cells loaded with killed
breast cells induce differentiation of tumor-specific cytoxic T
lymphocytes" Breast Cancer Res., 6R322-R328 (Apr. 30, 2004). cited
by other .
Nimmerjahn, F. et al., "Divergent Immunoglobulin-G Subclass
Activity Through Selective Fc Receptor Binding" Science, 310:1510
(2005). cited by other .
Nimmerjahn, F., et al., "FC.gamma. RIV: A Novel FcR with Distinct
IgG Subclass Specificity," Immunity, 23:41-51 (Jul. 2005). cited by
other .
Nimmerjahn, F., et al., "Supporting Online Material for: Divergent
Immunoglobulin G Subclass Activity Through Selective Fc Receptor
Binding" Science, 310:1510 (2005). cited by other .
Niwa, R., et al. "Defucosylated Chimeric Anti-CC Chemokine Receptor
4 IgG1 with Enhanced Antibody-Dependnent Cellular cytotoxicity
Shows Potent Therapeutic Activity to T-Cell Leukemia and Lymphoma,"
Cancer Research, 64:2127-2133 (Mar. 15, 2004). cited by other .
Norderhaug, L., et al., "Chimeric mouse human IgG3 antibodies with
an IgG4-like hinge region induce complement-mediated lysis more
efficiently than IgG3 with normal hinge," Eur J immunol.,
21(10):2379-2384 (Oct. 1991). cited by other .
O'Connor, S. J., et al., "Humanization of an antibody against human
protein C and calcium-dependence involving framework residues,"
Protein Engineering, 11(4):321-328 (1998). cited by other .
Ober, R. J. , et al., "Differences in promiscuity for antibody-FcRn
interactions across species: implications for therapeutic
antibodies," International Immunology, 13(12):1551-1559 (2001).
cited by other .
Ober, R. J., et al., "Exocytosis of IgG as mediated by the
receptor, FcRn: An analysis at the single-molecule level" PNAS,
101(30)11076-t1081 (Jul. 27, 2004). cited by other .
Okazaki, A., et al., "Fucose Depletion from Human IgG1
Oligosaccharide Enhances Binding Enthalpy and Association Rate
Between IgG1 and Fc.gamma. Rine," J. Mol. Biol., 336:1239-1249
(2004). cited by other .
Parren, P. W., et al., "Characterization of IgG FcR-mediated
proliferation of human T-cells induced by mouse and human anti-CD3
monoclonal antibodies. Identification of a functional polymorphism
to human IgG2 anti-CD3," J. Immunol., 148(3):695-701 (Feb. 1992).
cited by other .
Parren, P. W., et al., "On the interaction of IgG subclasses with
the low affinity Fc gamma RIIa (CD32) on human monocytes,
neutrophils, and platelets. Analysis of a functional polymorphism
to human IgG2," J Clin Invest., 90(4):1537-1546 (Oct. 1992). cited
by other .
Pearce, K. H., et al., "Mutational Analysis of Thrombopoietin for
Identification of Receptor and Neutralizing Antibody Sites," J.
Biol. Chem., 272(33):20595-20602 (t997). cited by other .
Preithner, S., et al., "High concentrations of therapeutic Igg1
antibodies are needed to compensate for inhibition of
antibody-dependnent cellular cytotoxicity by excess endogenous
immunoglobulin G," Molecular Immunology, (2005). cited by other
.
Presta, L.G., et al., "Engineering therapeutic antibodies for
improved function," Biochemical Society Transactions, 30(part
4):487-490 (2002). cited by other .
Radaev, S., et al., "Recognition of IgG by Fc.gamma. Receptor," J.
Biol. Chem., 276(19):16478-16483 (May 11, 2001). cited by other
.
Radaev, S., et al., "Review: Recognition of immunoglobulins by
Fc.gamma. recptors," Molecular Immunology, 38:1073-1083 (2001).
cited by other .
Radaev, S., et al., "The Structure of Human Type III Fc.gamma.
Receptor in Complex with Fc," J. Biol. Chem., 276(19):16469-16477
(May 11, 2001). cited by other .
Rafiq, K., et al., "Immune complex-mediated antigen presentation
induces tumor immunity" J. Clin. Invest. 110:71-79 (2002). cited by
other .
Raghavan, M., et al., "Fc Receptors and Their Interactions with
Immunoglobulins" Annu. Rev. Cell Div. Biol., 12:181-220 (1996).
cited by other .
Ravetch, J. V., et al., "IgG Fc Receptors" Annu. Rev. Immunol.,
19:275-290 (2001). cited by other .
Ravetch, J. V., et al., "Immune Inhibitory Receptors," Science,
290:84-89 (Oct. 6, 2000). cited by other .
Ravetch, J.V., et al., "Fc Receptors," Annu. Rev. Immunol.,
9:457-492 ( t991). cited by other .
Reddy, P. R., et al., "Elimination of Fc Receptor-Dependent
Effector Functions of a Modified IgG4 Monoclonal Antibody to Human
CD4" J. Immunol., 164:1925-1933 (2000). cited by other .
Redpath, S., et al., "The Influence of the Hinge Region Length in
Binding of Human IgGto Human Fc.gamma. Receptors," Human
Immunology, 59:720-727 (1998). cited by other .
Rozsnyay, Z., et al., "Distinctive role of IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes
in FcR-mediated functions," Immunology, 66(4):491-498 (Apr. 1989).
cited by other .
Sandlie, A.A., "The extended hinge region of IgG3 is not required
for high phogocytic capacity mediated by Fc gamma receptors, but
the heavy chains must be disulfide bonded," Eur J. Immunol.
23(7):1546-1551 (Jul. 1993). cited by other .
Sarmay, G., et al., "Mapping and Comparison of the Interaction
Sites on the Fc Region of IgG Responsible for Triggering Antibody
Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) Through Different Types of
Human Fc.gamma. Receptor," Molecular Immunology, 29(5):633-639
(1992). cited by other .
Sautes-Fridman, C., et al., "Fc Gamma Receptors: A Magic Link with
the Outside World," ASHI Quarterly, 148-151, (Fourth Quarter 2003).
cited by other .
Sensel, M. G., et al., "Amino Acid Differences in the N-Teminus of
C.sub.H2 Influence the Relative abilities of IgG2 and IgG3 to
Activate Complement" Mol. Immunol., 34(14):1019-1029 (1997). cited
by other .
Shields, R. L., et al., "High Resolution Mapping of the Binding
Site on Human IgG1 for Fc.gamma. RI, Fc.gamma. RII, Fc.gamma. RIII,
and FcRn and Design of IgG1 Varients with Improved Binding to the
Fc.gamma. R" J. Biol. Chem., 276(9):6591-6604 (2001). cited by
other .
Shields, R. L., et al., "Lack of Fucose on human IgG1 N-Linked
Oligodaccharide Improves Binding to Human Fc.gamma. RIII and
Antibody-dependent Cellular Toxicity" J. Biol. Chem.,
277(30)26733-26740 (2002). cited by other .
Shinkawa, T., et al., "The Absence of Fucose but Not the Presence
of Galactose or Bisecting N-Acetylglucosamine of Human IgG1
complex-type Oligosaccharides Shows the Critical Role of Enhancing
Antibody-dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity" J. Biol. Chem.,
278(5):3466-3473 (2003). cited by other .
Shopes, B., "A genetically engineered human IgG mutant with
enhanced cytolytic activity," J Immunol., 148(9):2918-2922 (May
1992). cited by other .
Shopes, B., et al., "Recombinant human IgG1-murine IgE chimeric lg.
Construction, expression, and binding to human Fc gamma receptors,"
J. Immunol., 145(11):3842-3848 (Dec. 1, 1990). cited by other .
Simmons, L. C., et al., "Expression of full-length immunoglobulins
in Esherichia coli: rapid and efficient production of a
glycosylated antibodies" J. Immunol. Methods, 263:133-147 (2002).
cited by other .
Smith, I. F. R., et al., "Addition of a .mu.-Tai(piece to IgG
Results in Polymeric Antibodies with Enhanced Effector Functions
Including Complement-Mediated Cytolysis by IgG4," J. Immunology,
pp. 2226-2236 (1995). cited by other .
Smith, K.G., et al., "T cell activation by anti-T3 antibodies:
comparison of IgG1 and IgG2b switch variants and direct evidence
for accessory function of macrophage Fc receptors," Eur J Immunol.,
16(5):478-486 (May 1986). cited by other .
Sonderman, P. et al., "Crystal structure of the soluble form of the
human Fc.gamma. -receptor IIb: a new member of the immunoglobulin
superfamily at 1.7.ANG. resolution" EMBO Journal, 18(5):1095-1103
(1999). cited by other .
Sonderman, P., et al. "Human Fc.gamma. Receptor IIb Expressed in
Escherichia coli Reveals IgG Binding Capability" Biol. Chem.
380:717-721 (Jun. 1999). cited by other .
Sonderman, P., et al., "Molecular Basis for Immune Complex
Recognition: A comparison of Fc-Receptor Structures" J. Mol. Biol.,
309:737-749 (200 t). cited by other .
Sonderman, P., et al., "The 3.2 -.ANG. crystal structure of the
human IgG1 Fc fragment--Fc.gamma.RIII complex" Nature, 406:267-273
(Jul. 20, 2000). cited by other .
Sorenson, V., et al., "Effect of the IgM and IgA secretory
tailpieces on polymerization and secretion of IgM and IgG," J
Immunol., 156(8):2858-2865 (Apr. 1996). cited by other .
Steplewski, Z., et al., "Biological activity of human-mouse IgG t,
IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 chimeric monoclonal antibodies with antitumor
specificity," PNAS USA, 85:4852-4856 (Jul. 1988). cited by other
.
Stevenson, G. T., et al., "Preparation of Fc.gamma. for addition to
sulfhydryl-expressing ligands with minimal disturbance of the
hinge," J. of Immunological Methods, 231:169-175 (1999). cited by
other .
Tao, M., et al., "Structural Features of Human immunoglobulin G
that Determine Isotype-specific Differences in Complement
Activation," J. Exp. Med. 178:661-667 (Aug. 1993). cited by other
.
Tao, M., et al., "The Differential Ability of Human IgG1 and IgG4
to Activate Complement Is Determined by the COOH-terminal Sequence
of the C.sub.H2 domain" J. Exp. Med, 173:1025-1028 (Apr. 199 t).
cited by other .
Thommesen, J. E., et al., "Lysine 322 in the human IgG3 C.sub.H2
domain is crucial for antibody dependent complement activation"
Molecular Immunology, 37:995-1014 (2000). cited by other .
Tuijnman W. B., et al., "A flow cytometric rosetting assay for the
analysis of IgG-Fc receptor interactions," J Immunol Methods,
127(2):207-214 (Mar. 1990). cited by other .
Uchide, J. et al., "The Innate Mononuclear Phagocyte Network
Depletes B Lymphocytes through Fc Receptor-dependent mechanisms
during Anti-CD20 Antibody Immunotherapy" J. Exp. Med.
199(12):1659-1669 (Jun. 21, 2004). cited by other .
Umana, P., et al., "Engineered glycoforms of an antineuroblastoma
IgG1 with optimized antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxic
activity," Nature Biotechnology, 17:176-180 (1999). cited by other
.
Van Royen-Kerkhof, A, et al., "Flow cytometric determination of
Fc.gamma. RIIa (CD32) polymorphism," J. Immunol. Methods,
294:135-144 (2004). cited by other .
Van Schie, R.C.A.A., et al., "Evaluation of Human Fc.gamma. RIIA
(CD32) and Fc.gamma. RIIIB (CD16) Polymorphisms in Caucasians and
African-Americans Using Salivary DNA," Clinical and Diagnostic
Laboratory Immunology, 7(4):676-681 (Jul. 2000). cited by other
.
Van Sorge, N. M., et al., "Fc.gamma. R polymorphisms: Implications
for function, disease and susceptibility and immunotherapy" Tissue
Antigens, 63:189-202 (2003). cited by other .
Vidarte, L., et al., "Serine 132 Is the C3 Covalent Attachment
Point of the CH1 domain of Human IgG1" J. Biol. Chem.,
276(41):38217-38223 (2001). cited by other .
Ward, E. S., et al., "Evidence to support the cellular mechanism
involved in serum IgG homeostatis in humans" International
Immunology, 15(2):187-195 (2003). cited by other .
Warmerdam, P. A., et al., "Interaction of a human Fc gamma RIIb1
(CD32) isoform with murine and human IgG subclasses," Int Immunol.,
5(3):239-247 (Mar. 1993). cited by other .
Wawrzynczak, E. J., et al., "Recombinant mouse monoclonal
antibodies with single amino acid substitutions affecting Clq and
high affinity Fc receptor binding have identical serum half-lives
in the BALB/c mouse," Mol. Immunol., 29(2):221-227 (Feb. 1992).
cited by other .
Weiner, L. M., et al., "Tunable antibodies," Nature Biotechnology,
23(5):556-557 (May 2005). cited by other .
Weng, W., et al., "Clinical Outcome of Lymphoma Patients After
Idiotype Vaccination Is Correlated With Humoral Immune Response and
Immunoglobulin G Fc Receptor Genotype," J. Clin Oncol., 22(23):1-8
(2004). cited by other .
Weng, W., et al., "Two Immunoglobulin G Fragment C Receptor
Polymorphisms Independently Predict Response to Rituximab in
Patients With Follicular Lymphoma," Journal of Clinical Oncology,
21(21):3940-3947 (Nov. 1, 2003). cited by other .
West, A. P., et al., "Crystal Structure and immunoglobulin G
Binding Properties of the Human Major Histocompatibility
Complex-Related Fc Receptor," Biochemistry, 39:9698-9708 (2000).
cited by other .
Wing, M. G., et al., "Mechanism of First-Dose Cytokine-Release
Syndrome of CAMPATH 1-H:Involvement of CD16 (Fc.gamma.RIII) and
CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1)on NK Cells," J. Clin. Invest., 98(12):2819-2826
(Dec. 1996). cited by other .
Wolff, E.A., et al., "Monoclonal antibody homodimers: enhanced
antitumor activity in nude mice," Cancer Res., 53(11):2560-2565
(Jun. 1, 1993). cited by other .
Wright, A., et al., "Effect of C2-Associated carbohydrate Structure
on Ig Effector Function: Studies with Chimeric Mouse-Human IgG1
Antibodies in Glycosylation Mutants of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells"
J. of Immunology, 160:3393-3402 (1998). cited by other .
Wright, A., et al., "In vivo trafficking and catabolism of IgG1
antibodies with Fc associated carbohydrates of differing
structure," Glycobiology, 10(12):1347-1355 (2000). cited by other
.
Xu, D., et al., "In Vitro Characterization of Five Humanized OKT3
Effector Function Varient Antibodies," Cellular Immunology,
200:16-26 (2000). cited by other .
Xu, M., et al., "Molecular Cloning and Characterization of SPAP1,
an Inhibitory Receptor," Biochemical and Biophysical Research
Communications, 280:768-775 (2001). cited by other .
Xu, Y., et al., "Residue at Position 331 in the IgG1 and IgG4
C.sub.H2 Domains Contributes to Their Differential Ability to Bind
and Activate Complement" J. Biol. Chem. 269(5):3469-3474 (1994).
cited by other .
Yamane-Ohnuki N., et al., "Establishment of FUT8 Knockout Chinese
Hamster Ovary Cells: An Ideal Host Cell Line for Producing
Completely Dufucosylated Antibodies and Enhanced Antibody-Dependent
Cellular Cytoxicity," Biotechnology and bioengineering Interscience
Publishers, London, GB, vol. 87, No. 5, (Sep. 5, 2004). cited by
other .
Zelaschi, D., et al., "Human immunoglobulin allotypes: previously
unrecognized determinants and alleles defined with monoclonal
antibodies," PNAS, USA, 80:3762-3766 (Jun. 1983). cited by other
.
Zhou, H., et al., "DNA-based vaccines activate innate and adaptive
antitumor immunity by engaging the NKG2D receptor" PNAS,
102(31):10846-10851 (Aug. 2, 2005). cited by other .
Zhou, J., et al., "Generation of Mutated Variants of the Human Form
of the MHC Class I-related Receptor, FcRn, with Increased Affinity
for Mouse Immunoglobulin G, " J. Mol. Biol., 332(4):901-13 (Sep.
2003). cited by other .
Zhu, D., et al., "A novel human immunoglobulin Fc gamma Fc epsilon
bifunctional fusion protein inhibits Fc epsilon RI-mediated
degranulation," Nat Med., 8(5):518-521 (May 2002). cited by other
.
Andreakos, E., et al., "Monoclonal antibodies in immune and
inflammatory diseases," Curr. Opin. Biotech., 13:615-620 (2002).
cited by other .
Carter, P., "Improving the Efficacy of Antibody-Based Cancer
Therapies," Nature Reviews, 1:118-129 (2001). cited by other .
Chadd, H., et al., "Therapeutic antibody expression technology,"
Curr. Opin. Biotech., 12:188-194 (2001). cited by other .
Clark, M. "Antibody humanization: a case of the `Emperor's new
clothes?`" Immunol. Today, 21(8):397-402 (2000). cited by other
.
Cragg, M., et al., "Signaling antibodies in cancer therapy," Curr.
Opin. Immunol., 11:541-547 (1999). cited by other .
Dall'Acqua, W., et al., "Antibody Engineering," Curr. Opin
Structural Biol., 8:443-450 (1998). cited by other .
Glennie, M., et al., "Clinical trials of antibody therapy," Immun.
Today, 21(8):403-410 (2000). cited by other .
Glennie, M., et al., "Renaissance of cancer therapeutic
antibodies," Drug Discovery Today, 8(11):503-510 (2003). cited by
other .
Hayhurst, A., et al., "High-throughput antibody isolation," Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol., 5:683-689 (2001). cited by other .
Hogarth, P., "Fc receptors ale major mediators of antibody based
inflammation in autoimmunity," Curr. Opin. Immun., 14:798-802
(2002). cited by other .
Holliger, P., et al., "Antibodies come back from the brink," Nature
Biotechnology, 16:1015-1016 (1998). cited by other .
Hudson, P., "Recombinant antibody constructs in cancer therapy,"
Curr. Opin. Immunology, 11:548-557 (1999). cited by other .
Hudson, P., "Recombinant antibody fragments," Curr. Opin in
Biotechnology, 9:395-402 (1998). cited by other .
Johnson, G., et al., "Kabat Database and its applications: 30 years
after the first variability plot," Nucleic Acids Research,
28(1):214-218 (2000). cited by other .
Johnson, G., et al., "Kabat Database and its applications: future
directions," Nucleic Acids Research, 29(1):205-206 (2001). cited by
other .
Maynard, J., et al., "Antibody Engineering," Annu. Rev. Biomed.
Eng., 2:339-376 (2000). cited by other .
Morea, V., et al., "Antibody Modeling: Implications for Engineering
and Design," Methods, 20:267-279 (2000). cited by other .
Penichet, M., et al., "Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins for the
therapy of cancer," Journal of Immunological Methods, 248:91-1010
(2001). cited by other .
Reichert, J., "Monoclonal antibodies in the clinic," Nature
Biotechnology, 19:819-822 (2001). cited by other .
Thrush, G., et al., "Immunotoxins: An Update," Ann. Rev. Immunol.,
14:49-71 (1996). cited by other .
Torphy, T., et al., "Pharmaceutical biotechnology Monoclonal
antibodies: boundless potential, daunting challenges--Editorial
Overview," Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 13:589-591 (2002). cited by
other .
Trail, P. et al., "Monoclonal antibody drug conjugates in the
treatment of cancer" Curr. Opin. Immunol., 11:584-588 (1999). cited
by other .
Trikha, M., "Monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics in oncology,"
Curr. Opin. Biotech., 13:609-614 (2002). cited by other .
Van Dijk, M., et al., "Human antibodies as next generation
therapeutics," Curr Opin. Chem. Biol., 5:368-374 (2001). cited by
other .
Van Sorge, N., et al., "Fc.gamma. R polymorphisms: Implications for
function, disease susceptibility and immunotherapy," Tissue
Antigens, 61:189-202 (2003). cited by other .
Vasserot, A., et al., "Optimization of protein therapeutics by
directed evolution," Drug Discovery Today, 8(3):118-126 (2003).
cited by other .
Waldmann, T., et al., "Emerging Therapies: Spectrum of Application
of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy," Hemotology, 394-408 (2000). cited
by other .
Burton, et al., "Antibody Effector Function," Advances in
Immunology, 51:1-84 (1992). cited by other .
Bastida-Corcuera, et al., "Differential complement activation by
bovine IgG2 allotypes" Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology,
1999, vol. 71 No. 2, 115-123. cited by other .
Burton, et al. "Immunoglobulin G: Functional sites", Molecular
Immunology, vol. 22, No. 3, (Mar. 1985). cited by other .
Chan, et al. "Variable Region Domain Exchange in Human IgGs
promotes antibody complex formation with accompanying structural
changes and altered effector functions" Molecular Immunology 2004,
21:527-538. cited by other .
Chirino, A.J. et al."Minimizing the immunogenicity of protein
therapeutics", Drug Discovery Today, 2004, vol. 9, No. 2, pp.
82-90. cited by other .
Cole, M.S., et al., "HUM291, a Humanized Anti-CD3 Antibody, is
immunosuppressive to T cells while exhibiting reduced mitogenicity
in vitro", Transplantation, vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 563-571 (1999).
cited by other .
Dahiyat, B. I. et al. "Protein Design Automation", Protein Science,
1996, vol. 5, No. 5, p. 895-903. cited by other .
Dall'Acqua, W. et al. "Modulation of the Effector Functions of a
Human IgG1 through Engineering of Its Hinge Region", 2006, J.
Immunology, 177:1129-1138. cited by other .
Kabat et al., NIH Pub. No. 91/3242, p. 679-687 (1991). cited by
other .
Kato, K. et al., "Analysis of IgG-FcgammaR interactions in
solution: Mapping of the FcgammaR binding site and evidence for a
conformational change occurring in the Fc region", Immunology
Letters, vol. 73, No. 2-3 (2000). cited by other .
Lazar, et al. "Engineered antibody Fc variants with enhanced
effector function" PNAS, 2006, 4005-4010. cited by other .
Morrison, et al. "Variable Region Domain Exchange Influences the
Functional Properties of IgG.sup.1"The Journal of Immunology 1998,
160:2802-2808. cited by other .
Natsume, A. et al. "Engineered Antibodies of IgG1/IgG3 Mixed
Isotype with Enhanced Cytotoxic Activities", 2008, Cancer Research,
68:(10) pp. 3863-3871. cited by other .
Pendley C. et al., "Immunogencity of therapeutic monoclonal
antibodies", Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics, 2003, vol.
5, No. 2, pp. 172-179. cited by other .
Shitara et al. "A new vector for the high level expression of
chimeric antibodies in myeloma cells" J. of Immunological Methods,
1994, 167: 271-278. cited by other .
Tamm, A. et al., "IgG Binding Sites on Human Fc.gamma. Receptors"
1997, International Reviews of Immunology, 16:1,57-85. cited by
other .
Valerius, T. et al., "Fcalpha RI (CD89) as a Novel Trigger Molecule
for Bispecific Antibody Therapy" Blood, 1997, 90:4485-4492. cited
by other .
Vitetta, E., et al., "Considering Therapeutic Antibodies", Science,
2006, vol. 313, pp. 308-309. cited by other .
WHO Review of the notation for the allotypic and related markers of
human immunoglobulins. J Immunogen 1976, 3:357-362. cited by other
.
WHO Review of the notation for the allotypic and related markers of
human immunoglobulins. 1976, Eur. J. Immunol. 6, 599-601. cited by
other .
Woof, J.M. et al. "Localisation of the Monocyte-Binding Region on
Human Immunoglobulin G" Molecular Immunology, 1986, vol. 23, No. 3,
pp. 319-330. cited by other .
Janin & Chothia, 1990, "The Structure of Protein-Protein
Recognition Sites", J. Bio. Chem, 16207-16030. cited by other .
Jones & Thorton, 1996, "Principles of protein-protein
interactions", PNAS, vol. 93, pp. 13-20. cited by other .
Lo Conte et al., 1999, "The Atomic Structure of Protein-Protein
Recognition Sites", J. Mol. Biol. , vol. 285, p. 2177-2198. cited
by other .
Reichmann et al., 2007, "The molecular architecture of
protein-protein binding sites", Curr. Opn. Structc. Biol., vol. 17,
pp. 67-76. cited by other .
Cunningham & Wells, 1989, "High-Resolution Epitope Mapping of
hGH-Receptor Interactions by Alanine--Scanning Mutagenesisi", Dept.
of Biomolecular Chemistry, Genentech--Science vol. 244, pp.
1081-1085. cited by other .
Clarkson & Wells, 1995, "A Hot Spot of Binding Energy in a
Hormone-Receptor Interface", Science vol. 267, pp. 383-386. cited
by other .
Schreiber & Fersht, 1995, "Energetics of Protein-Protein
Interactions: Analysis of the Barnase-Barstar Interface by Single
Mutations and Double Mutant Cycles", J. Biol. Mol., vol. 248, pp.
478-486. cited by other .
Young et al., 1997, "Characterization of the receptor binding
determinants of granulocyte colony stimulating factor", Protein
Science, vol. 6, pp. 1228-1236. cited by other .
Bogan & Thorn, 1998, "Anatomy of Hot Spots in Protein
Interfaces", J. Mol. Biol., vol. 280, pp. 1-9. cited by other .
Otzen & Fersht, 1999, "Anlaysis of protein-protein interactions
by mutagenesis: direct versus indirect effects", Protein
Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 41-45. cited by other .
Guerois et al., 2002, Predicting Changes in the Stability of
Proteins and Protein Complexes: A Study of More than 1000
Mutations, J. Biol. Mol. vol. 320, pp. 369-387. cited by other
.
Reichmann et al., 2007, "Binding Hot Spots in the TEM1-BLIP
Interface in Light of its Modular Architecture", J. Mol. Biol.,
vol. 365, 663-679. cited by other.
|
Primary Examiner: Dahle; Chun
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
Silva, Esq.; Robin M. Wong, Esq.; Ada O.
Parent Case Text
This application is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No.
10/672,280, filed Sep. 26, 2003, pending, which claims the benefit
under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119(e) to U.S. Ser. Nos. 60/477,839, filed
Jun. 12, 2003, 60/467,606, filed May 2, 2003, 60/442,301, filed
Jan. 23, 2003, and U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/414,433, filed Sep.
27, 2002, all of which are expressly incorporated by reference in
their entirety.
Claims
We claim:
1. A protein comprising an Fc variant of a parent Fc polypeptide,
said Fc variant comprising amino acid substitutions 239D and 332E,
wherein numbering is according to the EU index.
2. A protein according to claim 1, wherein said protein is an
antibody.
3. A protein according to claim 2, wherein said antibody is
selected from the group consisting of a human antibody, a humanized
antibody, and a monoclonal antibody.
4. A protein according to claim 1, wherein said Fc variant
increases Fc.gamma.RIIIa binding as compared to said parent Fc
polypeptide.
5. A protein according to claim 1, wherein said Fc variant
increases Fc.gamma.RIIa binding as compared to said parent Fc
polypeptidc.
6. A protein according to claim 4, wherein said Fc variant
increases ADCC as compared to said parent Fc polypeptide.
7. A protein comprising an Fc variant of a parent Fc polypeptide,
said Fc variant comprising amino acid substitutions 239D and 332E,
wherein said Fc variant increases binding affinity to an Fc.gamma.R
as compared to said parent Fc polypeptide and wherein numbering is
according to the EU index.
8. A protein according to claim 7, wherein said protein is an
antibody.
9. A protein according to claim 8, wherein said antibody is
selected from the group consisting of a human antibody, a humanized
antibody, and a monoclonal antibody.
10. A protein according to claim 7, wherein said Fc.gamma.R is
Fc.gamma.RIIIa.
11. A protein according to claim 7, wherein said Fc.gamma.R is
Fc.gamma.RIIa.
12. A protein according to claim 10, wherein said Fc variant
increases ADCC as compared to said parent Fc polypeptide.
13. An antibody or immunoadhesin, wherein said antibody or
immunoadhesin comprises amino acid substitutions 239D and 332E in
the Fc region, wherein numbering is according to the EU index.
14. An antibody or immunoadhesin according to claim 13, wherein
said antibody or immunoadhesin is an antibody.
15. An antibody or immunoadhesin according to claim 14, wherein
said antibody is selected from the group consisting of a human
antibody, a humanized antibody, and a monoclonal antibody.
16. An antibody or immunoadhesin according to claim 13, wherein
said antibody or immunoadhesin has increased binding affinity for
an Fc.gamma.R as compared to the antibody or immunoadhesin without
said amino acid substitutions.
17. An antibody or immunoadhesin according to claim 16, wherein
said Fc.gamma.R is Fc.gamma.RIIIa.
18. An antibody or immunoadhesin according to claim 16, wherein
said Fc.gamma.R is Fc.gamma.RIIa.
19. An antibody or immunoadhesin according to claim 17, wherein
said antibody or immunoadhesin increases ADCC as compared to said
parent Fc polypeptide.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to novel optimized Fc variants,
engineering methods for their generation, and their application,
particularly for therapeutic purposes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Antibodies are immunological proteins that bind a specific antigen.
In most mammals, including humans and mice, antibodies are
constructed from paired heavy and light polypeptide chains. Each
chain is made up of individual immunoglobulin (Ig) domains, and
thus the generic term immunoglobulin is used for such proteins.
Each chain is made up of two distinct regions, referred to as the
variable and constant regions. The light and heavy chain variable
regions show significant sequence diversity between antibodies, and
are responsible for binding the target antigen. The constant
regions show less sequence diversity, and are responsible for
binding a number of natural proteins to elicit important
biochemical events. In humans there are five different classes of
antibodies including IgA (which includes subclasses IgA1 and IgA2),
IgD, IgE, IgG (which includes subclasses IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and
IgG4), and IgM. The distinguishing features between these antibody
classes are their constant regions, although subtler differences
may exist in the V region. FIG. 1 shows an IgG1 antibody, used here
as an example to describe the general structural features of
immunoglobulins. IgG antibodies are tetrameric proteins composed of
two heavy chains and two light chains. The IgG heavy chain is
composed of four immunoglobulin domains linked from N- to
C-terminus in the order V.sub.H-C.gamma.1-C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3,
referring to the heavy chain variable domain, constant gamma 1
domain, constant gamma 2 domain, and constant gamma 3 domain
respectively. The IgG light chain is composed of two immunoglobulin
domains linked from N- to C-terminus in the order V.sub.L-C.sub.L,
referring to the light chain variable domain and the light chain
constant domain respectively.
The variable region of an antibody contains the antigen binding
determinants of the molecule, and thus determines the specificity
of an antibody for its target antigen. The variable region is so
named because it is the most distinct in sequence from other
antibodies within the same class. The majority of sequence
variability occurs in the complementarity determining regions
(CDRs). There are 6 CDRs total, three each per heavy and light
chain, designated V.sub.H CDR1, V.sub.H CDR2, V.sub.H CDR3, V.sub.L
CDR1, V.sub.L CDR2, and V.sub.L CDR3. The variable region outside
of the CDRs is referred to as the framework (FR) region. Although
not as diverse as the CDRs, sequence variability does occur in the
FR region between different antibodies. Overall, this
characteristic architecture of antibodies provides a stable
scaffold (the FR region) upon which substantial antigen binding
diversity (the CDRs) can be explored by the immune system to obtain
specificity for a broad array of antigens. A number of
high-resolution structures are available for a variety of variable
region fragments from different organisms, some unbound and some in
complex with antigen. The sequence and structural features of
antibody variable regions are well characterized (Morea et al.,
1997, Biophys Chem 68:9-16; Morea et al., 2000, Methods
20:267-279), and the conserved features of antibodies have enabled
the development of a wealth of antibody engineering techniques
(Maynard et al., 2000, Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:339-376). For example,
it is possible to graft the CDRs from one antibody, for example a
murine antibody, onto the framework region of another antibody, for
example a human antibody. This process, referred to in the art as
"humanization", enables generation of less immunogenic antibody
therapeutics from nonhuman antibodies. Fragments comprising the
variable region can exist in the absence of other regions of the
antibody, including for example the antigen binding fragment (Fab)
comprising V.sub.H-C.gamma.1 and V.sub.H-C.sub.L, the variable
fragment (Fv) comprising V.sub.H and V.sub.L, the single chain
variable fragment (scFv) comprising V.sub.H and V.sub.L linked
together in the same chain, as well as a variety of other variable
region fragments (Little et al., 2000, Immunol Today
21:364-370).
The Fc region of an antibody interacts with a number of Fc
receptors and ligands, imparting an array of important functional
capabilities referred to as effector functions. For IgG the Fc
region, as shown in FIG. 1, comprises Ig domains C.gamma.2 and
C.gamma.3 and the N-terminal hinge leading into C.gamma.2. An
important family of Fc receptors for the IgG class are the Fc gamma
receptors (Fc.gamma.Rs). These receptors mediate communication
between antibodies and the cellular arm of the immune system
(Raghavan et al., 1996, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12:181-220; Ravetch
et al., 2001, Annu Rev Immunol 19:275-290). In humans this protein
family includes Fc.gamma.RI (CD64), including isoforms
Fc.gamma.RIa, Fc.gamma.RIb, and Fc.gamma.RIc; Fc.gamma.RII (CD32),
including isoforms Fc.gamma.RIIa (including allotypes H131 and
R131), Fc.gamma.RIIb (including Fc.gamma.RIIb-1 and
Fc.gamma.RIIb-2), and Fc.gamma.RIIc; and Fc.gamma.RIII (CD16),
including isoforms Fc.gamma.RIIIa (including allotypes V158 and
F158) and Fc.gamma.RIIb (including allotypes Fc.gamma.RIIIb-NA1 and
Fc.gamma.RIIb-NA2) (Jefferis et al., 2002, Immunol Lett 82:57-65).
These receptors typically have an extracellular domain that
mediates binding to Fc, a membrane spanning region, and an
intracellular domain that may mediate some signaling event within
the cell. These receptors are expressed in a variety of immune
cells including monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic
cells, eosinophils, mast cells, platelets, B cells, large granular
lymphocytes, Langerhans' cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and
.gamma..gamma. T cells. Formation of the Fc/Fc.gamma.R complex
recruits these effector cells to sites of bound antigen, typically
resulting in signaling events within the cells and important
subsequent immune responses such as release of inflammation
mediators, B cell activation, endocytosis, phagocytosis, and
cytotoxic attack. The ability to mediate cytotoxic and phagocytic
effector functions is a potential mechanism by which antibodies
destroy targeted cells. The cell-mediated reaction wherein
nonspecific cytotoxic cells that express Fc.gamma.Rs recognize
bound antibody on a target cell and subsequently cause lysis of the
target cell is referred to as antibody dependent cell-mediated
cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Raghavan et al., 1996, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
12:181-220; Ghetie et al., 2000, Annu Rev Immunol 18:739-766;
Ravetch et al., 2001, Annu Rev Immunol 19:275-290). The
cell-mediated reaction wherein nonspecific cytotoxic cells that
express Fc.gamma.Rs recognize bound antibody on a target cell and
subsequently cause phagocytosis of the target cell is referred to
as antibody dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP). A number
of structures have been solved of the extracellular domains of
human Fc.gamma.Rs, including Fc.gamma.RIIa (pdb accession code
1H9V) (Sondermann et al., 2001, J Mol Biol 309:737-749) (pdb
accession code 1FCG)(Maxwell et al., 1999, Nat Struct Biol
6:437-442), Fc.gamma.RIIb (pdb accession code 2FCB)(Sondermann et
al., 1999, Embo J 18:1095-1103); and Fc.gamma.RIIIb (pdb accession
code 1E4J)(Sondermann et al., 2000, Nature 406:267-273.). All
Fc.gamma.Rs bind the same region on Fc, at the N-terminal end of
the C.gamma.2 domain and the preceding hinge, shown in FIG. 2. This
interaction is well characterized structurally (Sondermann et al.,
2001, J Mol Biol 309:737-749), and several structures of the human
Fc bound to the extracellular domain of human Fc.gamma.RIIIb have
been solved (pdb accession code 1E4K)(Sondermann et al., 2000,
Nature 406:267-273.) (pdb accession codes 1IIS and 1IIX)(Radaev et
al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:16469-16477), as well as has the
structure of the human IgE Fc/Fc.epsilon.RI.alpha. complex (pdb
accession code 1F6A)(Garman et al., 2000, Nature 406:259-266).
The different IgG subclasses have different affinities for the
Fc.gamma.Rs, with IgG1 and IgG3 typically binding substantially
better to the receptors than IgG2 and IgG4 (Jefferis et al., 2002,
Immunol Lett 82:57-65). All Fc.gamma.Rs bind the same region on IgG
Fc, yet with different affinities: the high affinity binder
Fc.gamma.RI has a Kd for IgG1 of 10.sup.-8 M.sup.-1, whereas the
low affinity receptors Fc.gamma.RII and Fc.gamma.RIII generally
bind at 10.sup.-6 and 10.sup.-5 respectively. The extracellular
domains of Fc.gamma.RIIIa and Fc.gamma.RIIIb are 96% identical,
however Fc.gamma.RIIIb does not have a intracellular signaling
domain. Furthermore, whereas Fc.gamma.RI, Fc.gamma.RIIa/c, and
Fc.gamma.RIIIa are positive regulators of immune complex-triggered
activation, characterized by having an intracellular domain that
has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM),
Fc.gamma.RIIb has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif
(ITIM) and is therefore inhibitory. Thus the former are referred to
as activation receptors, and Fc.gamma.RIIb is referred to as an
inhibitory receptor. The receptors also differ in expression
pattern and levels on different immune cells. Yet another level of
complexity is the existence of a number of Fc.gamma.R polymorphisms
in the human proteome. A particularly relevant polymorphism with
clinical significance is V158/F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. Human IgG1 binds
with greater affinity to the V158 allotype than to the F158
allotype. This difference in affinity, and presumably its effect on
ADCC and/or ADCP, has been shown to be a significant determinant of
the efficacy of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (Rituxan.RTM., a
registered trademark of IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation). Patients
with the V158 allotype respond favorably to rituximab treatment;
however, patients with the lower affinity F158 allotype respond
poorly (Cartron et al., 2002, Blood 99:754-758). Approximately
10-20% of humans are V158/V158 homozygous, 45% are V158/F158
heterozygous, and 35-45% of humans are F158/F158 homozygous
(Lehrnbecher et al., 1999, Blood 94:4220-4232; Cartron et al.,
2002, Blood 99:754-758). Thus 80-90% of humans are poor responders,
that is they have at least one allele of the F158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa.
An overlapping but separate site on Fc, shown in FIG. 1, serves as
the interface for the complement protein C1q. In the same way that
Fc/Fc.gamma.R binding mediates ADCC, Fc/C1q binding mediates
complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). C1q forms a complex with
the serine proteases C1r and C1s to form the C1 complex. C1q is
capable of binding six antibodies, although binding to two IgGs is
sufficient to activate the complement cascade. Similar to Fc
interaction with Fc.gamma.Rs, different IgG subclasses have
different affinity for C1q, with IgG1 and IgG3 typically binding
substantially better to the Fc.gamma.Rs than IgG2 and IgG4
(Jefferis et al., 2002, Immunol Lett 82:57-65). There is currently
no structure available for the Fc/C1q complex; however, mutagenesis
studies have mapped the binding site on human IgG for C1q to a
region involving residues D270, K322, K326, P329, and P331, and
E333 (Idusogie et al., 2000, J Immunol 164:4178-4184; Idusogie et
al., 2001, J Immunol 166:2571-2575).
A site on Fc between the C.gamma.2 and C.gamma.3 domains, shown in
FIG. 1, mediates interaction with the neonatal receptor FcRn, the
binding of which recycles endocytosed antibody from the endosome
back to the bloodstream (Raghavan et al., 1996, Annu Rev Cell Dov
Biol 12:181-220; Ghetie etat, 2000, Annu Rev Immunol 18:739-766).
This process, coupled with preclusion of kidney filtration due to
the large size of the full length molecule, results in favorable
antibody serum half-lives ranging from one to three weeks. Binding
of Fc to FcRn also plays a key role in antibody transport. The
binding site for FcRn on Fc is also the site at which the bacterial
proteins A and G bind. The tight binding by these proteins is
typically exploited as a means to purify antibodies by employing
protein A or protein G affinity chromatography during protein
purification. Thus the fidelity of this region on Fc is important
for both the clinical properties of antibodies and their
purification. Available structures of the rat Fc/FcRn complex
(Martin et al., 2001, Mol Cell 7:867-877), and of the complexes of
Fc with proteins A and G (Deisenhofer, 1981, Biochemistry
20:2361-2370; Sauer-Eriksson et al., 1995, Structure 3:265-278;
Tashiro et al., 1995, Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:471-481) provide
insight into the interaction of Fc with these proteins.
A key feature of the Fc region is the conserved N-linked
glycosylation that occurs at N297, shown in FIG. 1. This
carbohydrate, or oligosaccharide as it is sometimes referred, plays
a critical structural and functional role for the antibody, and is
one of the principle reasons that antibodies must be produced using
mammalian expression systems. While not wanting to be limited to
one theory, it is believed that the structural purpose of this
carbohydrate may be to stabilize or solubilize Fc, determine a
specific angle or level of flexibility between the C.gamma.3 and
C.gamma.2 domains, keep the two C.gamma.2 domains from aggregating
with one another across the central axis, or a combination of
these. Efficient Fc binding to Fc.gamma.R and C1q requires this
modification, and alterations in the composition of the N297
carbohydrate or its elimination affect binding to these proteins
(Umana et al., 1999, Nat Biotechnol 17:176-180; Davies et al.,
2001, Biotechnol Bioeng 74:288-294; Mimura et al., 2001, J Biol
Chem 276:45539-45547.; Radaev et al., 2001, J Biol Chem
276:16478-16483; Shields at al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:6591-6604;
Shields et al., 2002, J Biol Chem 277:26733-26740; Simmons et al.,
2002, J Immunol Methods 263:133-147). Yet the carbohydrate makes
little if any specific contact with Fc.gamma.Rs (Radaev et al.,
2001, J Bol Chem 276:16469-16477), indicating that the functional
role of the N297 carbohydrate in mediating Fc/Fc.gamma.R binding
may be via the structural role it plays in determining the Fc
conformation. This is supported by a collection of crystal
structures of four different Fc glycoforms, which show that the
composition of the oligosaccharide impacts the conformation of
C.gamma.2 and as a result the Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface (Krapp at
al., 2003, J Mol Biol 325:979-989).
The features of antibodies discussed above--specificity for target,
ability to mediate immune effector mechanisms, and long half-life
in serum--make antibodies powerful therapeutics. Monoclonal
antibodies are used therapeutically for the treatment of a variety
of conditions including cancer, inflammation, and cardiovascular
disease. There are currently over ten antibody products on the
market and hundreds in development. In addition to antibodies, an
antibody-like protein that is finding an expanding role in research
and therapy is the Fc fusion (Charnow et al, 1996, Trends
Biotechnol 14:52-60; Ashkenazi et al., 1997, Curr Opin Immunol
9:195-200). An Fc fusion is a protein wherein one or more
polypeptides is operably linked to Fc. An Fc fusion combines the Fc
region of an antibody, and thus its favorable effector functions
and pharmacokinetics, with the target-binding region of a receptor,
ligand, or some other protein or protein domain. The role of the
latter is to mediate target recognition, and thus it is
functionally analogous to the antibody variable region. Because of
the structural and functional overlap of Fc fusions with
antibodies, the discussion on antibodies in the present invention
extends directly to Fc fusions.
Despite such widespread use, antibodies are not optimized for
clinical use. Two significant deficiencies of antibodies are their
suboptimal anticancer potency and their demanding production
requirements. These deficiencies are addressed by the present
invention
There are a number of possible mechanisms by which antibodies
destroy tumor cells, including anti-proliferation via blockage of
needed growth pathways, intracellular signaling leading to
apoptosis, enhanced down regulation and/or turnover of receptors,
CDC, ADCC, ADCP, and promotion of an adaptive immune response
(Cragg et al., 1999, Curr Opin Immunol 11:541-547; Glennie et al.,
2000, Immunol Today 21:403-410). Anti-tumor efficacy may be due to
a combination of these mechanisms, and their relative importance in
clinical therapy appears to be cancer dependent. Despite this
arsenal of anti-tumor weapons, the potency of antibodies as
anti-cancer agents is unsatisfactory, particularly given their high
cost. Patient tumor response data show that monoclonal antibodies
provide only a small improvement in therapeutic success over normal
single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. For example, just half of
all relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients respond to
the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (McLaughlin et al., 1998, J Clin
Oncol 16:2825-2833). Of 166 clinical patients, 6% showed a complete
response and 42% showed a partial response, with median response
duration of approximately 12 months. Trastuzumab (Herceptin.RTM., a
registered trademark of Genentech), an anti-HER2/neu antibody for
treatment of metastatic breast cancer, has less efficacy. The
overall response rate using trastuzumab for the 222 patients tested
was only 15%, with 8 complete and 26 partial responses and a median
response duration and survival of 9 to 13 months (Cobleigh et al.,
1999, J Clin Oncol 17:2639-2648). Currently for anticancer therapy,
any small improvement in mortality rate defines success. Thus there
is a significant need to enhance the capacity of antibodies to
destroy targeted cancer cells.
A promising means for enhancing the anti-tumor potency of
antibodies is via enhancement of their ability to mediate cytotoxic
effector functions such as ADCC, ADCP, and CDC. The importance of
Fc.gamma.R-mediated effector functions for the anti-cancer activity
of antibodies has been demonstrated in mice (Clynes et al., 1998,
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:652-656; Clynes et al., 2000, Nat Med
6:443-446), and the affinity of interaction between Fc and certain
Fc.gamma.Rs correlates with targeted cytotoxicity in cell-based
assays (Shields et al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:6591-6604; Presta et
al., 2002, Biochem Soc Trans 30:487-490; Shields et al., 2002, J
Biol Chem 277:26733-25740). Additionally, a correlation has been
observed between clinical efficacy in humans and their allotype of
high (V158) or low (F158) affinity polymorphic forms of
Fc.gamma.RIIIa (Cartron et al., 2002, Blood 99:754-758). Together
these data suggest that an antibody with an Fc region optimized for
binding to certain Fc.gamma.Rs may better mediate effector
functions and thereby destroy cancer cells more effectively in
patients. The balance between activating and inhibiting receptors
is an important consideration, and optimal effector function may
result from an Fc with enhanced affinity for activation receptors,
for example Fc.gamma.RI, Fc.gamma.RIIa/c, and Fc.gamma.RIIIa, yet
reduced affinity for the inhibitory receptor Fc.gamma.RIIb.
Furthermore, because Fc.gamma.Rs can mediate antigen uptake and
processing by antigen presenting cells, enhanced Fc/Fc.gamma.R
affinity may also improve the capacity of antibody therapeutics to
elicit an adaptive immune response.
Mutagenesis studies have been carried out on Fc towards various
goals, with substitutions typically made to alanine (referred to as
alanine scanning) or guided by sequence homology substitutions
(Duncan et al, 1988, Nature 332:563-564; Lund et al., 1991, J
Immunol 147:2657-2662; Lund et al., 1992, Mol Immunol 29:53-59;
Jefferis et al., 1995, Immunol Lett 44: 111-117; Lund et al., 1995,
Faseb J 9:115-119; Jefferis et al., 1996, Immunol Lett 54:101-104;
Lund et al., 1996, J Immunol 157:4963-4969; Armour et al., 1999,
Eur J Immunol 29:2613-2624; Shields et al., 2001, J Biol Chem
276:6591-6604; Jefferis et al., 2002, Immunol Lett 82:57-65) (U.S.
Pat. Nos. 5,624,821; 5,885,573; PCT WO 00/42072; PCT WO 99/58572).
The majority of substitutions reduce or ablate binding with
Fc.gamma.Rs. However some success has been achieved at obtaining Fc
variants with higher Fc.gamma.R affinity. (See for example U.S.
Pat. No. 5,624,821, and PCT WO 00/42072). For example, Winter and
colleagues substituted the human amino acid at position 235 of
mouse IgG2b antibody (a glutamic acid to leucine mutation) that
increased binding of the mouse antibody to human Fc.gamma.RI by
100-fold (Duncan et al., 1988, Nature 332:563-564) (U.S. Pat. No.
5,624,821). Shields et al., used alanine scanning mutagenesis to
map Fc residues important to Fc.gamma.R binding, followed by
substitution of select residues with non-alanine mutations (Shields
et al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:6591-6604; Presta et al., 2002,
Biochem Soc Trans 30:487-490) (PCT WO 00/42072). Several mutations
disclosed in this study, including S298A, E333A, and K334A, show
enhanced binding to the activating receptor Fc.gamma.RIIIa and
reduced binding to the inhibitory receptor Fc.gamma.RIIb. These
mutations were combined to obtain double and triple mutation
variants that show additive improvements in binding. The best
variant disclosed in this study is a S298A/E333A/K334A triple
mutant with approximately a 1.7-fold increase in binding to F158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa, a 5-fold decrease in binding to Fc.gamma.RIIb, and
a 2.1-fold enhancement in ADCC.
Enhanced affinity of Fc for Fc.gamma.R has also been achieved using
engineered glycoforms generated by expression of antibodies in
engineered or variant cell lines (Umana et al., 1999, Nat
Biotechnol 17:176-180; Davies et al., 2001, Biotechnol Bioeng
74:288-294; Shields et al., 2002, J Biol Chem 277:26733-26740;
Shinkawa et al., 2003, J Biol Chem 278:3466-3473). This approach
has generated substantial enhancements of the capacity of
antibodies to bind Fc.gamma.RIIIa and to mediate ADCC. Although
there are practical limitations such as the growth efficiency of
the expression strains under large scale production conditions,
this approach for enhancing Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity and effector
function is promising. Indeed, coupling of these alternate
glycoform technologies with the Fc variants of the present
invention may provide additive or synergistic effects for optimal
effector function.
Although there is a need for greater effector function, for some
antibody therapeutics reduced or eliminated effector function may
be desired. This is often the case for therapeutic antibodies whose
mechanism of action involves blocking or antagonism but not killing
of the cells bearing target antigen. In these cases depletion of
target cells is undesirable and can be considered a side effect.
For example, the ability of anti-CD4 antibodies to block CD4
receptors on T cells makes them effective anti-inflammatories, yet
their ability to recruit Fc.gamma.R receptors also directs immune
attack against the target cells, resulting in T cell depletion
(Reddy et al., 2000, J Immunol 164:1925-1933). Effector function
can also be a problem for radiolabeled antibodies, referred to as
radioconjugates, and antibodies conjugated to toxins, referred to
as immunotoxins. These drugs can be used to destroy cancer cells,
but the recruitment of immune cells via Fc interaction with
Fc.gamma.Rs brings healthy immune cells in proximity to the deadly
payload (radiation or toxin), resulting in depletion of normal
lymphoid tissue along with targeted cancer cells (Hutchins et al,
1995, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:11980-11984; White et al., 2001,
Annu Rev Med 52:125-145). This problem can potentially be
circumvented by using IgG isotypes that poorly recruit complement
or effector cells, for example IgG2 and IgG4. An alternate solution
is to develop Fc variants that reduce or ablate binding (Alegre et
al., 1994, Transplantation 57:1537-1543; Hutchins et al, 1995, Proc
Natl Aced Sci USA 92:11980-11984; Armour et al., 1999, Eur J
Immunol 29:2613-2624; Reddy et al., 2000, J Immunol 164:1925-1933;
Xu et al., 2000, Cell Immunol 200:16-26; Shields et al., 2001, J
Biol Chem 276:6591-6604) (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,551; 5,885,573; PCT
WO 99/58572). A critical consideration for the reduction or
elimination of effector function is that other important antibody
properties not be perturbed. Fc variants should be engineered that
not only ablate binding to Fc.gamma.Rs and/or C1q, but also
maintain antibody stability, solubility, and structural integrity,
as well as ability to interact with other important Fc ligands such
as FcRn and proteins A and G.
The present invention addresses another major shortcoming of
antibodies, namely their demanding production requirements (Garber,
2001, Nat Biotechnol 19:184-185; Dove, 2002, Nat Biotechnol
20:777-779). Antibodies must be expressed in mammalian cells, and
the currently marketed antibodies together with other high-demand
biotherapeutics consume essentially all of the available
manufacturing capacity. With hundreds of biologics in development,
the majority of which are antibodies, there is an urgent need for
more efficient and cheaper methods of production. The downstream
effects of insufficient antibody manufacturing capacity are
three-fold. First, it dramatically raises the cost of goods to the
producer, a cost that is passed on to the patient. Second, it
hinders industrial production of approved antibody products,
limiting availability of high demand therapeutics to patients.
Finally, because clinical trials require large amounts of a protein
that is not yet profitable, the insufficient supply impedes
progress of the growing antibody pipeline to market.
Alternative production methods have been explored in attempts at
alleviating this problem. Transgenic plants and animals are being
pursued as potentially cheaper and higher capacity production
systems (Chadd et al., 2001, Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:188-194). Such
expression systems, however, can generate glycosylation patterns
significantly different from human glycoproteins. This may result
in reduced or even lack of effector function because, as discussed
above, the carbohydrate structure can significantly impact
Fc.gamma.R and complement binding. A potentially greater problem
with nonhuman glycoforms may be immunogenicity; carbohydrates are a
key source of antigenicity for the immune system, and the presence
of nonhuman glycoforms has a significant chance of eliciting
antibodies that neutralize the therapeutic, or worse cause adverse
immune reactions. Thus the efficacy and safety of antibodies
produced by transgenic plants and animals remains uncertain.
Bacterial expression is another attractive solution to the antibody
production problem. Expression in bacteria, for example E. coli,
provides a cost-effective and high capacity method for producing
proteins. For complex proteins such as antibodies there are a
number of obstacles to bacterial expression, including folding and
assembly of these complex molecules, proper disulfide formation,
and solubility, stability, and functionality in the absence of
glycosylation because proteins expressed in bacteria are not
glycosylated. Full length unglycosylated antibodies that bind
antigen have been successfully expressed in E. coli (Simmons et
al., 2002, J Immunol Methods 263:133-147), and thus, folding,
assembly, and proper disulfide formation of bacterially expressed
antibodies are possible in the absence of the eukaryotic chaperone
machinery. However the ultimate utility of bacterially expressed
antibodies as therapeutics remains hindered by the lack of
glycosylation, which results in lack effector function and may
result in poor stability and solubility. This will likely be more
problematic for formulation at the high concentrations for the
prolonged periods demanded by clinical use.
An aglycosylated Fc with favorable solution properties and the
capacity to mediate effector functions would be significantly
enabling for the alternate production methods described above. By
overcoming the structural and functional shortcomings of
aglycosylated Fc, antibodies can be produced in bacteria and
transgenic plants and animals with reduced risk of immunogenicity,
and with effector function for clinical applications in which
cytotoxicity is desired such as cancer. The present invention
describes the utilization of protein engineering methods to develop
stable, soluble Fc variants with effector function. Currently, such
Fc variants do not exist in the art.
In summary, there is a need for antibodies with enhanced
therapeutic properties. Engineering of optimized or enhanced Fc
variants is a promising approach to meeting this need. Yet a
substantial obstacle to engineering Fc variants with the desired
properties is the difficulty in predicting what amino acid
modifications, out of the enormous number of possibilities, will
achieve the desired goals, coupled with the inefficient production
and screening methods for antibodies. Indeed one of the principle
reasons for the incomplete success of the prior art is that
approaches to Fc engineering have thus far involved hit-or-miss
methods such as alanine scans or production of glycoforms using
different expression strains. In these studies, the Fc
modifications that were made were fully or partly random in hopes
of obtaining variants with favorable properties. The present
invention provides a variety of engineering methods, many of which
are based on more sophisticated and efficient techniques, which may
be used to overcome these obstacles in order to develop Fc variants
that are optimized for the desired properties. The described
engineering methods provide design strategies to guide Fc
modification, computational screening methods to design favorable
Fc variants, library generation approaches for determining
promising variants for experimental investigation, and an array of
experimental production and screening methods for determining the
Fc variants with favorable properties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides Fc variants that are optimized for a
number of therapeutically relevant properties.
It is an object of the present invention to provide novel Fc
positions at which amino acid modifications may be made to generate
optimized Fc variants. Said Fc positions include 240, 244, 245,
247, 262, 263, 266, 299, 313, 325, 328, and 332, wherein the
numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index
as in Kabat. The present invention describes any amino acid
modification at any of said novel Fc positions in order to generate
an optimized Fc variant.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that have been screened computationally. A computationally
screened Fc variant is one that is predicted by the computational
screening calculations described herein as having a significantly
greater potential than random for being optimized for a desired
property. In this way, computational screening serves as a prelude
to or surrogate for experimental screening, and thus said
computationally screened Fc variants are considered novel.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that have been characterized using one or more of the
experimental methods described herein. In one embodiment, said Fc
variants comprise at least one amino acid substitution at a
position selected from the group consisting of: 234, 235, 239, 240,
241, 243, 244, 245, 247, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 269, 296,
297, 298, 299, 313, 325, 327, 328, 329, 330, and 332, wherein the
numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index
as in Kabat. In a preferred embodiment, said Fc variants comprise
at least one substitution selected from the group consisting of
L234D, L234E, L234N, L234Q, L234T, L234H, L234Y, L234I, L234V,
L234F, L235D, L235S, L235N, L235Q, L235T, L235H, L235Y, L2351,
L235V, L235F, S239D, S239E, S239N, S239Q, S239F, S239T, S239H,
S239Y, V240I, V240A, V240T, V240M, F241W, F241L, F241Y, F241E,
F241R, F243W, F243L F243Y, F243R, F243Q, P244H, P245A, P247V,
P247G, V2621, V262A, V262T, V262E, V2631, V263A, V263T, V263M,
V264L, V2641, V264W, V264T, V264R, V264F, V264M, V264Y, V264E,
D265G, D265N, D2650, D265Y, D265F, D265V, D2651, D265L, D265H,
D265T, V2661, V266A, V266T, V266M, S2670, S267L, E269H, E269Y,
E269F, E269R, Y296E, Y296Q, Y296D, Y296N, Y296S, Y296T, Y296L,
Y2961, Y296H, N297S, N297D, N297E, A298H, T2991, T299L, T299A,
T299S, T299V, T299H, T299F, T299E, W313F, N325Q, N325L, N3251,
N325D, N325E, N325A, N325T, N325V, N325H, A327N, A327L, L328M,
L328D, L328E, L328N, L328Q, L328F, L328I, L328V, L328T, L328H,
L328A, P329F, A330L, A330Y, A330V, A3301, A330F, A330R, A330H,
I332D, I332E, I332N, I332Q, I332T, I332H, I332Y, and I332A, wherein
the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU
index as in Kabat. In a mostly preferred embodiment, said Fc
variants are selected from the group consisting of V264L, V264I,
F241W, F241L, F243W, F243L, F241L/F243L/V262I/V264I, F241W/F243W,
F241W/F243W/V262A/V264A, F241L/V2621, F243L/V2641,
F243L/V262I/V264W, F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T,
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R, F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E,
F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R, F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R, L328M, L328E,
L328F, I332E, L328M/I332E, P244H, P245A, P247V, W313F,
P244H/P245A/P247V, P247G, V264I/I332E,
F241E/F243RN262E/V264R/I332E, F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E/I332E,
F241R/F243QN262T/V264R/I332E, F241E/F243Y/V262TN264R/I332E,
S298A/I332E, S239E/I332E, S239Q/I332E, S239E, D265G, D265N,
S239E1D265G, S239E/D265N, S239E/D265Q, Y296E, Y296Q, T2991, A327N,
S267Q/A327S, S267UA327S, A327L, P329F, A330L, A330Y, I332D, N297S,
N297D, N297S/I332E, N297D/I332E, N297E/I332E, D265Y/N297D/I332E,
D265Y/N297D/T299L/I332E, D265F/N297E/I332E, L328I/I332E,
L328Q/I332E, I332N, I332Q, V264T, V264F, V2401, V2631, V2661,
T299A, T299S, T299V, N325Q, N325L, N3251, S239D, S239N, S239F,
S239D/I332D, S239D/I332E, S239D/I332N, S239D/I332Q, S239E/I332D,
S239E/I332N, S239E/I332Q, S239N/I332D, S239N/I332E, S239N/I332N,
S239N/I332Q, S239Q/I332D, S239Q/I332N, S239Q/I332Q, Y296D, Y296N,
F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T/N297D/I332E, A330Y/I332E,
V264I/A330Y/I332E, A330L/I332E, V26411A330L/I332E, L234D, L234E,
L234N, L234Q, L234T, L234H, L234Y, L2341, L234V, L234F, L235D,
L235S, L235N, L2350, L235T, L235H, L235Y, L2351, L235V, L235F,
S239T, S239H, S239Y, V240A, V240T, V240M, V263A, V263T, V263M,
V264M, V264Y, V266A, V266T, V266M, E269H, E269Y, E269F, E269R,
Y296S, Y296T, Y296L, Y296I, A298H, T299H, A330V, A3301, A330F,
A330R, A330H, N325D, N325E, N325A, N325T, N325V, N325H,
L328D/I332E, L328E/I332E, L328N/I332E, L328Q/I332E, L328V/I332E,
L328T/I332E, L328H/I332E, L328I/I332E, L328A, I332T, I332H, I332Y,
I332A, S239E/V264I/I332E, S239Q/V264I/I332E,
S239E/V264I/A330Y/I332E, S239E/V2641/S298A/A330Y/I332E,
S239D/N297D/I332E, S239E/N297D/I332E, S239D/V265V/N297D/I332E,
S239D/D255I/N297D/I332 E, S239D/D265V/N297D/I332E,
S239D/D265F/N297D/I332 E, S239D/D265Y/N297D/I332E,
S239D/D265V/N297D/I332E, S239D/D265T/N297D/I332E,
V264E/N297D/I332E, Y296D/N297D/I332E, Y296E/N297D/I332E,
Y296N/N297D/I332E, Y296Q/N297D/I332E, Y296H/N297D/I332E,
Y296T/N297D/I332E, N297D/T299V/I332E, N297D/T299E/I332E,
N297D/T299L/I332E, N297D/T299F/I332E, N297D/T299H/I332E,
N297D/T299E/I332E, N297D/A330Y/I332E, N297D/S298A/A330Y/I332E,
S239D/A330Y/I332E, S239N/A330Y/I332E, S239D/A330L/I332E,
S239N/A330L/I332E, V26411S298A/I332E, S239D/S298A/I332E,
S239N/S298A/I332E, S239D/V264I/I332E, S239D/V264I/S298A/I332E, and
S239D/V2641/A330L/I332E, wherein the numbering of the residues in
the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an Fc
variant that binds with greater affinity to one or more
Fc.gamma.Rs. In one embodiment, said Fc variants have affinity for
an Fc.gamma.R that is more than 1-fold greater than that of the
parent Fc polypeptide. In an alternate embodiment, said Fc variants
have affinity for an Fc.gamma.R that is more than 5-fold greater
than that of the parent Fc polypeptide. In a preferred embodiment,
said Fc variants have affinity for an Fc.gamma.R that is between
5-fold and 300-fold greater than that of the parent Fc polypeptide.
In one embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least one amino
acid substitution at a position selected from the group consisting
of: 234, 235, 239, 240, 243, 264, 266, 328, 330, 332, and 325,
wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of
the EU index as in Kabat. In a preferred embodiment, said Fc
variants comprise at least one amino acid substitution selected
from the group consisting of: L234E, L234Y, L234I, L235D, L235S,
L235Y, L2351, S239D, S239E, S239N, S239Q, S239T, V2401, V240M,
F243L, V2641, V264T, V264Y, V2661, L328M, L3281, L328Q, L328D,
L328V, L328T, A330Y, A330L, A330I, I332D, I332E, I332N, I332Q, and
N325T, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is
that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a mostly preferred embodiment,
said Fc variants are selected from the group consisting of V264I,
F243L/V264I, L328M, I332E, L328M/I332E, V264I/I332E, S298A/I332E,
S239E/I332E, S239Q/I332E, S239E, A330Y, I332D, L328I/I332E,
L328Q/I332E, V264T, V2401, V2661, S239D, S239D/I332D, S239D/I332E,
S239D/I332N, S239D/I332Q, S239E/I332D, S239E/I332N, S239E/I332Q,
S239N/I332D, S239N/I332E, S239Q/I332D, A330Y/I332E,
V2641/A330Y/I332E, A330L/I332E, V2641/A330L/I332E, L234E, L234Y,
L2341, L235D, L235S, L235Y, L2351, S239T, V240M, V264Y, A3301,
N325T, L328D/I332E, L328V/I332E, L328T/I332E, L328I/I332E,
S239E/V264I/I332E, S239Q/N264I/I332E, S239E/V264I/A330Y/I332E,
S239D/A330Y/I332E, S239N/A330Y/I332E, S239D/A330L/I332E,
S239N/A330L/I332E, V264I/S298A/I332E, S239D/S298A/I332E,
S239N/S298A/I332E, S239D/V264I/I332E, S239D/V264I/S298A/I332E, and
S239D/V264I/A330L/I332E, wherein the numbering of the residues in
the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that have a Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold ratio
greater than 1:1. In one embodiment, said Fc variants have a
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold ratio greater than 11:1. In
a preferred embodiment, said Fc variants have a
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold ratio between 11:1 and 86.1.
In one embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least one amino
acid substitution at a position selected from the group consisting
of: 234, 235, 239, 240, 264, 296, 330, and I332, wherein the
numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index
as in Kabat. In a preferred embodiment, said Fc variants comprise
at least one amino acid substitution selected from the group
consisting of: L234Y, L234I, L235I, S239D, S239E, S239N, S239Q,
V240A, V240M, V264I, V264Y, Y296Q, A330L, A330Y, A330I, I332D, and
I332E, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is
that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a mostly preferred embodiment,
said Fc variants are selected from the group consisting of: I332E,
V264I/I332E, S239E/I332E, S239Q/I332E, Y296Q, A330L, A330Y, I332D,
S239D, S239D/I332E, A330Y/I332E, V264I/A330Y/I332E, A330L/I332E,
V264I/A303L/I332E, L234Y, L234I, L235I, V240A, V240M, V264Y, A330I,
S239D/A330L/I332E, S239D/S298A/I332E, S239N/S298A/I332E,
S239D/V264I/I332E, S239D/V264I/S298A/I332E, and
S239D/V264I/A330L/I332E, wherein the numbering of the residues in
the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that mediate effector function more effectively in the
presence of effector cells. In one embodiment, said Fc variants
mediate ADCC that is greater than that mediated by the parent Fc
polypeptide. In a preferred embodiment, said Fc variants mediate
ADCC that is more than 5-fold greater than that mediated by the
parent Fc polypeptide. In a mostly preferred embodiment, said Fc
variants mediate ADCC that is between 5-fold and 50-fold greater
than that mediated by the parent Fc polypeptide. In one embodiment,
said Fc variants comprise at least one amino acid substitution at a
position selected from the group consisting of: 234, 235, 239, 240,
243, 264, 266, 328, 330, 332, and 325, wherein the numbering of the
residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a
preferred embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least one amino
acid substitutions selected from the group consisting of: L234E,
L234Y, L2341, L235D, L235S, L235Y, L2351, S239D, S239E, S239N,
S239Q, S239T, V240I, V240M, F243L, V264I, V264T, V264Y, V2661,
L328M, L328I, L328Q, L328D, L328V, L328T, A330Y, A330L, A330I,
I332D, I332E, I332N, I332Q, and N325T, wherein the numbering of the
residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a
mostly preferred embodiment, said Fc variants are selected from the
group consisting of: V264I, F243L/V264I, L328M, I332E, L328M/I332E,
V264I/I332E, S298A/I332E, S239E/I332E, S239Q/I332E, S239E, A330Y,
I332D, L328I/I332E, L328Q/I332E, V264T, V2401, V2661, S239D,
S239D/I332D, S239D/I332E, S239D/I332N, S239D/I332Q, S239E/I332D,
S239E/I332N, S239E/I332Q, S239N/I332D, S239N/I332E, S239Q/I332D,
A330Y/I332E, V2641/A330Y/I332E, A330L/I332E, V2641/A330L/I332E,
L234E, L234Y, L2341, L235D, L235S, L235Y, L2351, S239T, V240M,
V264Y, A3301, N325T, L328D/I332E, L328V/I332E, L328T/I332E,
L328I/I332E, S239E/V264I/I332E, S239Q/V264I/I332E,
S239E/V2641/A330Y/I332E, S239D/A330Y/I332E, S239N/A330Y/I332E,
S239D/A330L/I332E, S239N/A330L/I332E, V26411S298A/I332E,
S239D/S298A/I332E, S239N/S298A/I332E, S239D/V264I/I332E,
S239D/V264I/S298A/I332E, and S239D/V2641/A330L/I332E, wherein the
numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index
as in Kabat.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that bind with weaker affinity to one or more Fc.gamma.Rs.
In one embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least one amino
acid substitution at a position selected from the group consisting
of: 234, 235, 239, 240, 241, 243, 244, 245, 247, 262, 263, 264,
265, 266, 267, 269, 296, 297, 298, 299, 313, 325, 327, 328, 329,
330, and 332, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc
region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a preferred
embodiment, said Fc variants comprise an amino acid substitution at
a position selected from the group consisting of: L234D, L234N,
L2340, L234T, L234H, L234V, L234F, L235N, L235Q, L235T, L235H,
L235V, L235F, S239E, S239N, S239Q, S239F, S239H, S239Y, V240A,
V240T, F241W, F241L, F241Y, F241E, F241R, F243W, F243L F243Y,
F243R, F243Q, P244H, P245A, P247V, P247G, V2621, V262A, V262T,
V262E, V2631, V263A, V263T, V263M, V264L, V2641, V264W, V264T,
V264R, V264F, V264M, V264E, D265G, D265N, D265Q, D265Y, D265F,
D265V, D2651, D265L, D265H, D265T, V266A, V266T, V266M, S267Q,
S267L, E269H, E269Y, E269F, E269R, Y296E, Y296Q, Y296D, Y296N,
Y296S, Y296T, Y296L, Y296I, Y296H, N297S, N297D, N297E, A298H,
T2991, T299L, T299A, T299S, T299V, T299H, T299F, T299E, W313F,
N325Q, N325L, N3251, N325D, N325E, N325A, N325V, N325H, A327N,
A327L, L328M, 328E, L328N, L328Q, L328F, L328H, L328A, P329F,
A330L, A330V, A330F, A330R, A330H, I332N, I332Q, I332T, I332H,
I332Y, and I332A, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc
region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a mostly preferred
embodiment, said Fc variants are selected from the group consisting
of: V264L, F241W, F241L, F243W, F243L, F241L/F243LV2621N2641,
F241W/F243W, F241W/F243W/V262A/V264A, F241L/V262I,
F243L/V262I/N264W, F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T,
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R, F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E,
F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R, F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R, L328M, L328E,
L328F, P244H, P245A, P247V, W313F, P244H/P245A/P247V, P247G,
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R/I332E, F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R/I332E,
D265G, D265N, S239E/D265G, S239E/D265N, S239E/0265Q, Y296E, Y296Q,
T2991, A327N, S267Q/A327S, S267UA327S, A327L, P329F, A330L, N297S,
N297D, N297S/I332E, I332N, I332Q, V264F, V2631, T299A, T299S,
T299V, N325Q, N325L, N3251, S239N, S239F, S239N/I332N, S239N/I3320,
S239Q/I332N, S239Q/I332Q, Y296D, Y296N, L234D, L234N, L234Q, L234T,
L234H, L234V, L234F, L235N, L235Q, L235T, L235H, L235V, L235F,
S239H, S239Y, V240A, V263T, V263M, V264M, V266A, V266T, V266M,
E269H, E269Y, E269F, E269R, Y296S, Y296T, Y296L, Y2961, A298H,
T299H, A330V, A330F, A330R, A330H, N325D, N325E, N325A, N325V,
N325H, L328E/I332E, L328N/I332E, L328Q/I332E, L328H/I332E, L328A,
I332T, I332H, I332Y, and I332A, wherein the numbering of the
residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that mediate ADCC in the presence of effector cells less
effectively. In one embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least
one amino acid substitution at a position selected from the group
consisting of: 234, 235, 239, 240, 241, 243, 244, 245, 247, 262,
263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 269, 296, 297, 298, 299, 313, 325, 327,
328, 329, 330, and 332, wherein the numbering of the residues in
the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a preferred
embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least one amino acid
substitution at a position selected from the group consisting of:
L234D, L234N, L234Q, L234T, L234H, L234V, L234F, L235N, L235Q,
L235T, L235H, L235V, L235F, S239E, S239N, S239Q, S239F, S239H,
S239Y, V240A, V240T, F241W, F241L, F241Y, F241E, F241R, F243W,
F243L F243Y, F243R, F243Q, P244H, P245A, P247V, P247G, V2621,
V262A, V262T, V262E, V2631, V263A, V263T, V263M, V264L, V2641,
V264W, V264T, V264R, V264F, V264M, V264E, D265G, D265N, D2650,
D265Y, D265F, D265V, D2651, D265L, D265H, D265T, V266A, V266T,
V266M, S267Q, S267L, E269H, E269Y, E269F, E269R, Y296E, Y296Q,
Y296D, Y296N, Y296S, Y296T, Y296L, Y296I, Y296H, N297S, N297D,
N297E, A298H, T2991, T299L, T299A, T299S, T299V, T299H, T299F,
T299E, W313F, N325Q, N325L, N3251, N325D, N325E, N325A, N325V,
N325H, A327N, A327L, L328M, 328E, L328N, L328Q, L328F, L328H,
L328A, P329F, A330L, A330V, A330F, A330R, A330H, I332N, I332Q,
I332T, I332H, I332Y, and I332A, wherein the numbering of the
residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat. In a
mostly preferred embodiment, said Fc variants are selected from the
group consisting of: V264L, F241W, F241L, F243W, F243L,
F241L/F243L/V262I/V264I, F241W/F243W, F241W/F243W/V262A/V264A,
F241L/V262I, F243L/V262I/V264W, F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T,
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R, F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E,
F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R, F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R, L328M, L328E,
L328F, P244H, P245A, P247V, W313F, P244H/P245A/P247V, P247G,
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R/I332E, F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R/I332E,
D265G, D265N, S239E/D265G, S239E/D265N, S239E/D265Q, Y296E, Y2960,
T2991, A327N, S267Q/A327S, S267L/A327S, A327L, P329F, A330L, N297S,
N297D, N297S/I332E, I332N, I332Q, V264F, V2631, T299A, T299S,
T299V, N325Q, N325L, N325I, S239N, S239F, S239N/I332N, S239N/I332Q,
S239Q/I332N, S239Q/I332Q, Y296D, Y296N, L234D, L234N, L234Q, L234T,
L234H, L234V, L234F, L235N, L235Q, L235T, L235H, L235V, L235F,
S239H, S239Y, V240A, V263T, V263M, V264M, V266A, V266T, V266M,
E269H, E269Y, E269F, E269R, Y296S, Y296T, Y296L, Y2961, A298H,
T299H, A330V, A330F, A330R, A330H, N325D, N325E, N325A, N325V,
N325H, L328E/I332E, L328N/I332E, L328Q/I332E, L328H/I332E, L328A,
I332T, I332H, I332Y, and I332A, wherein the numbering of the
residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide Fc
variants that have improved function and/or solution properties as
compared to the aglycosylated form of the parent Fc polypeptide.
Improved functionality herein includes but is not limited to
binding affinity to an Fc ligand. Improved solution properties
herein includes but is not limited to stability and solubility. In
one embodiment, said aglycosylated Fc variants bind to an
Fc.gamma.R with an affinity that is comparable to or better than
the glycosylated parent Fc polypeptide. In an alternate embodiment,
said Fc variants bind to an Fc.gamma.R with an affinity that is
within 0.4-fold of the glycosylated form of the parent Fc
polypeptide. In one embodiment, said Fc variants comprise at least
one amino acid substitution at a position selected from the group
consisting of: 239, 241, 243, 262, 264, 265, 296, 297, 330, and
332, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that
of the EU index as in Kabat. In a preferred embodiment, said Fc
variants comprise an amino acid substitution selected from the
group consisting of: S239D, S239E, F241Y, F243Y, V262T, V264T,
V264E, D265Y, D265H, Y296N/N297D, A330Y, and I332E, wherein the
numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of the EU index
as in Kabat. In a mostly preferred embodiment, said Fc variants are
selected from the group consisting of: N297D/I332E,
F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T/N297D/I332E, S239D/N297D/I332E,
S239E/N297D/I332E, S239D/D265Y/N297D/I332E,
S239D/D265H/N297D/I332E, V264E/N297D/I332E, Y296N/N297D/I332E, and
N297D/A330Y/I332E, wherein the numbering of the residues in the Fc
region is that of the EU index as in Kabat.
The present invention also provides methods for engineering
optimized Fc variants. It is an object of the present invention to
provide design strategies that may be used to guide Fc
optimization. It is a further object of the present invention to
provide computational screening methods that may be used to design
Fc variants. It is a further object of the present invention to
provide methods for generating libraries for experimental testing.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide
experimental production and screening methods for obtaining
optimized Fc variants.
The present invention provides isolated nucleic acids encoding the
Fc variants described herein. The present invention provides
vectors comprising said nucleic acids, optionally, operably linked
to control sequences. The present invention provides host cells
containing the vectors, and methods for producing and optionally
recovering the Fc variants.
The present invention provides novel antibodies and Fc fusions that
comprise the Fc variants disclosed herein. Said novel antibodies
and Fc fusions may find use in a therapeutic product.
The present invention provides compositions comprising antibodies
and Fc fusions that comprise the Fc variants described herein, and
a physiologically or pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or
diluent.
The present invention contemplates therapeutic and diagnostic uses
for antibodies and Fc fusions that comprise the Fc variants
disclosed herein.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1. Antibody structure and function. Shown is a model of a full
length human IgG1 antibody, modeled using a humanized Fab structure
from pdb accession code 1CE1 (James et al., 1999, J Mol Biol
289:293-301) and a human IgG1 Fc structure from pdb accession code
1DN2 (DeLano et al., 2000, Science 287:1279-1283). The flexible
hinge that links the Fab and Fc regions is not shown. IgG1 is a
homodimer of heterodimers, made up of two light chains and two
heavy chains. The Ig domains that comprise the antibody are
labeled, and include V.sub.L and C.sub.L for the light chain, and
V.sub.H, Cgamma1 (C.gamma.1), Cgamma2 (C.gamma.2), and Cgamma3
(C.gamma.3) for the heavy chain. The Fc region is labeled. Binding
sites for relevant proteins are labeled, including the antigen
binding site in the variable region, and the binding sites for
Fc.gamma.Rs, FcRn, C1q, and proteins A and G in the Fc region.
FIG. 2. The FcFc.gamma.RIIb complex structure 1IIS. Fc is shown as
a gray ribbon diagram, and Fc.gamma.RIIb is shown as a black
ribbon. The N297 carbohydrate is shown as black sticks.
FIG. 3. FIG. 3 depicts SEQ ID NO: 1. The amino acid sequence of the
heavy chain of the antibody alemtuzumab (Campath.RTM., a registered
trademark of Ilex Pharmaceuticals LP), illustrating positions
numbered sequentially (2 lines above the amino acid sequence) and
positions numbered according to the EU index as in Kabat (2 lines
below the amino acid sequence. The approximate beginnings of 1g
domains VH1, C.gamma.1, the hinge, C.gamma.2, and C.gamma.3 are
also labeled above the sequential numbering. Polymorphisms have
been observed at a number of Fc positions, including but not
limited to Kabat 270, 272, 312, 315, 356, and 358, and thus slight
differences between the presented sequence and sequences in the
prior art may exist.
FIG. 4. Experimental library residues mapped onto the
Fc/Fc.gamma.RIIIb complex structure 1IIS. Fc is shown as a gray
ribbon diagram, and Fc.gamma.RIIIb is shown as a black ribbon.
Experimental library residues are shown as black ball and slicks.
The N297 carbohydrate is shown as black sticks.
FIG. 5. FIG. 5 depicts SEQ ID NO: 2. The human IgG1 Fc sequence
showing positions relevant to the design of the Fc variant
experimental library. The sequence includes the hinge region,
domain C.gamma.2, and domain C.gamma.3. Residue numbers are
according to the EU index as in Kabat. Positions relevant to the
experimental library are underlined. Because of observed
polymorphic mutations at a number of Fc positions, slight
differences between the presented sequence and sequences in the
literature may exist.
FIG. 6. Expression of Fc variant and wild type (WT) proteins of
alemtuzumab in 293T cells. Plasmids containing alemtuzumab heavy
chain genes (WT or variants) were co-transfected with plasmid
containing the alemtuzumab light chain gene. Media were harvested 5
days after transfection. For each transfected sample, 10 ul medium
was loaded on a SDS-PAGE gel for Western analysis. The probe for
Western was peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti human IgG (Jackson
Immuno-Research, catalog #109-035-088). WT: wild type alemtuzumab;
1-10: alemtuzumab variants. H and L indicate antibody heavy chain
and light chain, respectively.
FIG. 7. Purification of alemtuzumab using protein A chromatography.
WT alemtuzumab proteins was expressed in 293T cells and the media
was harvested 5 days after transfection. The media were diluted 1:1
with PBS and purified with protein A (Pierce, Catalog #20334). O:
original sample before purification; FT: flow through; E: elution;
C: concentrated final sample. The left picture shows a Simple
Blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel, and the right shows a western blot
labeled using peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti human IgG.
FIG. 8. Production of deglycosylated antibodies. Wild type and
variants of alemtuzumab were expressed in 293T cells and purified
with protein A chromatography. Antibodies were incubated with
peptide-N-glycosidase (PNGase F) at 37.degree. C. for 24 h. For
each antibody, a mock treated sample (-PNGase F) was done in
parallel. WT: wild-type alemtuzumab; #15, #16, #17, #18, #22:
alemtuzumab variants F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R,
F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E, F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R,
F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R, and I332E respectively. The faster
migration of the PNGase F treated versus the mock treated samples
represents the deglycosylated heavy chains.
FIG. 9. Alemtuzumab expressed from 293T cells binds its antigen.
The antigenic CD52 peptide, fused to GST, was expressed in E. coli
BL21 (DE3) under IPTG induction. Both uninduced and induced samples
were run on a SDS-PAGE gel, and transferred to PVDF membrane. For
western analysis, either alemtuzumab from Sotec (.alpha.-CD52,
Sotec) (final concentration 2.5 ng/ul) or media of transfected 293T
cells (Campath, Xencor) (final alemtuzumab concentration
approximately 0.1-0.2 ng/ul) were used as primary antibody, and
peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti human IgG was used as secondary
antibody. M: pre-stained marker; U: un-induced sample for GST-CD52;
I. induced sample for GST-CD52.
FIG. 10. Expression and purification of extracellular region of
human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. Tagged Fc.gamma.RIIa was transfected in
293T cells, and media containing secreted Fc.gamma.RIIIa were
harvested 3 days later and purified using affinity chromatography.
1: media; 2: flow through; 3: wash; 4-8: serial elutions. Both
simple blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel and western result are shown. For
the western blot, membrane was probed with anti-GST antibody.
FIG. 11. Binding to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa by select alemtuzumab
Fc variants from the experimental library as determined by the
AlphaScreen.TM. assay, described in Example 2. In the presence of
competitor antibody (Fc variant or WT alemtuzumab) a characteristic
inhibition curve is observed as a decrease in luminescence signal.
Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) alone was used as the negative
control. These data were normalized to the maximum and minimum
luminescence signal provided by the baselines at low and high
concentrations of competitor antibody respectively. The curves
represent the fits of the data to a one site competition model
using nonlinear regression. These fits provide IC50s for each
antibody, illustrated for WT and S239D by the dotted lines.
FIG. 12. AlphaScreen.TM. assay showing binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to human Fc.gamma.RIIb. The data were
normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the data to a one
site competition model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIG. 13. AlphaScreen.TM. assay showing binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to human Val158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The data
were normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the data to a
one site competition model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIG. 14. AlphaScreen.TM. assay measuring binding to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa by select Fc variants in the context of rituximab.
The data were normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the
data to a one site competition model. PBS was used as a negative
control.
FIG. 15. AlphaScreen.TM. assay measuring binding to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa by select Fc variants in the context of trastuzumab.
The data were normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the
data to a one site competition model. PBS was used as a negative
control.
FIGS. 16a-16b. AlphaScreen.TM. assay comparing binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa (FIG. 16a) and
human Fc.gamma.RIIb (FIG. 16b). The data were normalized, and the
curves represent the fits of the data to a one site competition
model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIG. 17. AlphaScreen.TM. assay measuring binding to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa by select Fc variants in the context of trastuzumab.
The data were normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the
data to a one site competition model.
FIG. 18. AlphaScreen.TM. assay showing binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to human R131Fc.gamma.RIIa. The data were
normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the data to a one
site competition model.
FIGS. 19a and 19b. AlphaScreen.TM. assay showing binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The data were
normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the data to a one
site competition model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIG. 20. AlphaScreen.TM. assay showing binding of aglycosylated
alemtuzumab Fc variants to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The data were
normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the data to a one
site competition model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIG. 21. AlphaScreen.TM. assay comparing human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa
binding by select alemtuzumab Fc variants in glycosylated (solid
symbols, solid lines) and deglycosylated (open symbols, dotted
lines). The data were normalized, and the curves represent the fits
of the data to a one site competition model.
FIGS. 22a-22b. AlphaScreen.TM. assay showing binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to the V158 (FIG. 22a) and F158 (FIG. 22b)
allotypes of human Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The data were normalized, and
the curves represent the fits of the data to a one site competition
model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIGS. 23a-23d. FIGS. 23a and 23b show the correlation between SPR
Kd's and AlphaScreen.TM. IC50's from binding of select alemtuzumab
Fc variants to V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa (FIG. 23a) and F158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa (FIG. 23b). FIGS. 23c and 23d show the correlation
between SPR and AlphaScreen.TM. fold-improvements over WT for
binding of select alemtuzumab Fc variants to V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa
(FIG. 23c) and F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa (FIG. 23d). Binding data are
presented in Table 62. The lines through the data represent the
linear fits of the data, and the r.sup.2 values indicate the
significance of these fits.
FIGS. 24a-24b. Cell-based ADCC assays of select Fc variants in the
context of alemtuzumab. ADCC was measured using the DELFIA.RTM.
EuTDA-based cytotoxicity assay (Perkin Elmer, Mass.), as described
in Example 7, using DoHH-2 lymphoma target cells and 50-fold excess
human PBMCs. FIG. 24a is a bar graph showing the raw fluorescence
data for the indicated alemtuzumab antibodies at 10 ng/ml. The PBMC
bar indicates basal levels of cytotoxicity in the absence of
antibody. FIG. 24b shows the dose-dependence of ADCC on antibody
concentration for the indicated alemtuzumab antibodies, normalized
to the minimum and maximum fluorescence signal provided by the
baselines at low and high concentrations of antibody respectively.
The curves represent the fits of the data to a sigmoidal
dose-response model using nonlinear regression.
FIGS. 25a-25b. Cell-based ADCC assays of select Fc variants in the
context of rituximab. ADCC was measured using the DELFIA.RTM.
EuTDA-based cytotoxicity assay, as described in Example 7, using
WIL2-S lymphoma target cells and 50-fold excess human PBMCS. FIG.
25a is a bar graph showing the raw fluorescence data for the
indicated rituximab antibodies at 1 ng/ml. The PBMC bar indicates
basal levels of cytotoxicity in the absence of antibody. FIG. 25b
shows the dose-dependence of ADCC on antibody concentration for the
indicated rituximab antibodies, normalized to the minimum and
maximum fluorescence signal provided by the baselines at low and
high concentrations of antibody respectively. The curves represent
the fits of the data to a sigmoidal dose-response model using
nonlinear regression.
FIGS. 26a-26c. Cell-based ADCC assays of select Fc variants in the
context of trastuzumab. ADCC was measured using the DELFIA.RTM.
EuTDA-based cytotoxicity assay, as described in Example 7, using
BT474 and Sk-Br-3 breast carcinoma target cells and 50-fold excess
human PBMCs. FIG. 26a is a bar graph showing the raw fluorescence
data for the indicated trastuzumab antibodies at 1 ng/ml. The PBMC
bar indicates basal levels of cytotoxicity in the absence of
antibody. FIGS. 26b and 26c show the dose-dependence of ADCC on
antibody concentration for the indicated trastuzumab antibodies,
normalized to the minimum and maximum fluorescence signal provided
by the baselines at low and high concentrations of antibody
respectively. The curves represent the fits of the data to a
sigmoidal dose-response model using nonlinear regression.
FIGS. 27a-27b. Capacity of select Fc variants to mediate binding
and activation of complement. FIG. 27a shows an AlphaScreen.TM.
assay measuring binding of select alemtuzumab Fc variants to C1q.
The data were normalized to the maximum and minimum luminescence
signal provided by the baselines at low and high concentrations of
competitor antibody respectively. The curves represent the fits of
the data to a one site competition model using nonlinear
regression. FIG. 27b shows a cell-based assay measuring capacity of
select rituximab Fc variants to mediate CDC. CDC assays were
performed using Amar Blue to monitor lysis of Fc variant and WT
rituximab--opsonized WIL2-S lymphoma cells by human serum
complement (Quidel, San Diego, Calif.). The dose-dependence on
antibody concentration of complement-mediated lysis is shown for
the indicated rituximab antibodies, normalized to the minimum and
maximum fluorescence signal provided by the baselines at low and
high concentrations of antibody respectively. The curves represent
the fits of the data to a sigmoidal dose-response model using
nonlinear regression.
FIG. 28. AlphaScreen.TM. assay measuring binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to bacterial protein A, as described in
Example 9. The data were normalized, and the curves represent the
fits of the data to a one site competition model. PBS was used as a
negative control.
FIG. 29. AlphaScreen.TM. assay measuring binding of select
alemtuzumab Fc variants to mouse Fc.gamma.RIII, as described in
Example 10. The data were normalized, and the curves represent the
fits of the data to a one site competition model. PBS was used as a
negative control.
FIG. 30. AlphaScreen.TM. assay measuring binding to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa by select trastuzumab Fc variants expressed in 293T
and CHO cells, as described in Example 11. The data were
normalized, and the curves represent the fits of the data to a one
site competition model. PBS was used as a negative control.
FIGS. 31a-31c. FIG. 31a depicts SEQ ID NO: 3. FIG. 31b depicts SEQ
ID NO: 4. FIG. 31c depicts SEQ ID NO: 5. Sequences showing improved
anti-CD20 antibodies. The light and heavy chain sequences of
rituximab are presented in FIG. 31a (SEQ ID NO: 2) and FIG. 31b
(SEQ ID NO: 4) respectively, and are taken from translated Sequence
3 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137. Relevant positions in FIG. 31b (SEQ
ID NO: 4) are bolded, including S239, V240, V2641, N297, S298,
A330, and I332. FIG. 31c (SEQ ID NO: 5) shows the improved
anti-CD20 antibody heavy chain sequences, with variable positions
designated in bold as X.sub.1, X.sub.2, X.sub.3, X.sub.4, X.sub.5,
X.sub.6, and Z.sub.1. The table below the sequence provides
possible substitutions for these positions. The improved anti-CD20
antibody sequences comprise at least one non-WT amino acid selected
from the group of possible substitutions for X.sub.1, X.sub.2,
X.sub.3, X.sub.4, X.sub.5, and X.sub.6. These improved anti-CD20
antibody sequences may also comprise a substitution Z.sub.1. These
positions are numbered according to the EU index as in Kabat, and
thus do not correspond to the sequential order in the sequence.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In order that the invention may be more completely understood,
several definitions are set forth below. Such definitions are meant
to encompass grammatical equivalents.
By "ADCC" or "antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity" as
used herein is meant the cell-mediated reaction wherein nonspecific
cytotoxic cells that express Fc.gamma.Rs recognize bound antibody
on a target cell and subsequently cause lysis of the target
cell.
By "ADCP" or antibody dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis as used
herein is meant the cell-mediated reaction wherein nonspecific
cytotoxic cells that express Fc.gamma.Rs recognize bound antibody
on a target cell and subsequently cause phagocytosis of the target
cell.
By "amino acid modification" herein is meant an amino acid
substitution, insertion, and/or deletion in a polypeptide sequence.
The preferred amino acid modification herein is a substitution.
By "antibody" herein is meant a protein consisting of one or more
polypeptides substantially encoded by all or part of the recognized
immunoglobulin genes. The recognized immunoglobulin genes, for
example in humans, include the kappa (.kappa.), lambda (.lamda.),
and heavy chain genetic loci, which together comprise the myriad
variable region genes, and the constant region genes mu (.mu.),
delta (.delta.), gamma (.gamma.), sigma (.epsilon.), and alpha
(.alpha.) which encode the IgM, IgD, IgG, IgE, and IgA isotypes
respectively. Antibody herein is meant to include full length
antibodies and antibody fragments, and may refer to a natural
antibody from any organism, an engineered antibody, or an antibody
generated recombinantly for experimental, therapeutic, or other
purposes as further defined below. Thus, "antibody" includes both
polyclonal and monoclonal antibody (mAb). Methods of preparation
and purification of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies are known
in the art and e.g., are described in Harlow and Lane, Antibodies:
A Laboratory Manual (New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,
1988). As outlined herein, "antibody" specifically includes Fc
variants described herein, "full length" antibodies including the
Fc variant fragments described herein, and Fc variant fusions to
other proteins as described herein.
In some embodiments, antibodies can be neutralizing or inhibitory,
or stimulatory, and in preferred embodiments, as described herein,
the stimulatory activity is measured by an increase in affinity of
a variant antibody to a receptor, as compared to either the parent
antibody (e.g. when a non-naturally occurring variant is used as
the starting point for the computation analysis herein), or to the
original wild-type antibody. Accordingly, by "neutralization,"
"neutralize," "neutralizing" and grammatical equivalents herein is
meant to inhibit or lessen the biological effect of the antibody,
in some cases by binding (e.g. competitively) to a antigen and
avoiding or decreasing the biological effect of binding, or by
binding that results in decreasing the biological effect of
binding.
The term "antibody" include antibody fragments, as are known in the
art, such as Fab, Fab', F(ab')2, Fcs or other antigen-binding
subsequences of antibodies, such as, single chain antibodies (Fv
for example), chimeric antibodies, etc., either produced by the
modification of whole antibodies or those synthesized de novo using
recombinant DNA technologies. Particularly preferred are Fc
variants as described herein. The term "antibody" further comprises
polyclonal antibodies and mAbs which can be agonist or antagonist
antibodies.
The antibodies of the invention specifically bind to Fc receptors,
as outlined herein. By "specifically bind" herein is meant that the
LC antibodies have a binding constant in the range of at least
10.sup.-4-10.sup.-6 M.sup.-1, with a preferred range being
10.sup.-7-10.sup.-9 M.sup.-1.
In a preferred embodiment, the antibodies of the invention are
humanized. Using current monoclonal antibody technology one can
produce a humanized antibody to virtually any target antigen that
can be identified [Stein, Trends Biotechnol. 15:88-90 (1997)].
Humanized forms of non-human (e.g., murine) antibodies are chimeric
molecules of immunoglobulins, immunoglobulin chains or fragments
thereof (such as Fv, Fc, Fab, Fab', F(ab')2 or other
antigen-binding subsequences of antibodies) which contain minimal
sequence derived from non-human immunoglobulin. Humanized
antibodies include human immunoglobulins (recipient antibody) in
which residues form a complementary determining region (CDR) of the
recipient are replaced by residues from a CDR of a non-human
species (donor antibody) such as mouse, rat or rabbit having the
desired specificity, affinity and capacity. In some instances, Fv
framework residues of the human immunoglobulin are replaced by
corresponding non-human residues. Humanized antibodies may also
comprise residues which are found neither in the recipient antibody
nor in the imported CDR or framework sequences. In general, the
humanized antibody will comprise substantially all of at least one,
and typically two, variable domains, in which all or substantially
all of the CDR regions correspond to those of a non-human
immunoglobulin and all or substantially all of the FR regions are
those of a human immunoglobulin consensus sequence. The humanized
antibody optimally also will comprise at least a portion of an
immunoglobulin constant region (Fc), typically that of a human
immunoglobulin [Jones et al., Nature 321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann
et al., Nature 332:323-329 (1988); and Presta, Curr. Op. Struct.
Biol. 2:593-596 (1992)]. Methods for humanizing non-human
antibodies are well known in the art. Generally, a humanized
antibody has one or more amino acid residues introduced into it
from a source which is non-human. These non-human amino acid
residues are often referred to as import residues, which are
typically taken from an import variable domain. Humanization can be
essentially performed following the method of Winter and co-workers
[Jones et al., supra; Riechmann et al., supra; and Verhoeyen et
al., Science, 239:1534-1536 (1988)], by substituting rodent CDRs or
CDR sequences for the corresponding sequences of a human antibody.
Additional examples of humanized murine monoclonal antibodies are
also known in the art, e.g., antibodies binding human protein C
[O'Connor et al., Protein Eng. 11:321-8 (1998)], interleukin 2
receptor [Queen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 86:10029-33
(1989]), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [Carter et
al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89:4285-9 (1992)]. Accordingly,
such humanized antibodies are chimeric antibodies (U.S. Pat. No.
4,816,567), wherein substantially less than an intact human
variable domain has been substituted by the corresponding sequence
from a non-human species. In practice, humanized antibodies are
typically human antibodies in which some CDR residues and possibly
some FR residues are substituted by residues from analogous sites
in rodent antibodies.
In a preferred embodiment, the antibodies of the invention are
based on human sequences, and are thus human sequences are used as
the "base" sequences, against which other sequences, such as rat,
mouse and monkey sequences. In order to establish homology to
primary sequence or structure, the amino acid sequence of a
precursor or parent Fc is directly compared to the human Fc
sequence outlined herein. After aligning the sequences, using one
or more of the homology alignment programs described herein (for
example using conserved residues as between species), allowing for
necessary insertions and deletions in order to maintain alignment
(i.e., avoiding the elimination of conserved residues through
arbitrary deletion and insertion), the residues equivalent to
particular amino acids in the primary sequence of human Fc are
defined. Alignment of conserved residues preferably should conserve
100% of such residues. However, alignment of greater than 75% or as
little as 50% of conserved residues is also adequate to define
equivalent residues (sometimes referred to herein as "corresponding
residues").
Equivalent residues may also be defined by determining homology at
the level of tertiary structure for an Fc fragment whose tertiary
structure has been determined by x-ray crystallography. Equivalent
residues are defined as those for which the atomic coordinates of
two or more of the main chain atoms of a particular amino acid
residue of the parent or precursor (N on N, CA on CA, C on C and O
on O) are within 0.13 nm and preferably 0.1 nm after alignment.
Alignment is achieved after the best model has been oriented and
positioned to give the maximum overlap of atomic coordinates of
non-hydrogen protein atoms of the Fc variant fragment.
Specifically included within the definition of "antibody" are
aglycosylated antibodies. By "aglycosylated antibody" as used
herein is meant an antibody that lacks carbohydrate attached at
position 297 of the Fc region, wherein numbering is according to
the EU system as in Kabat. The aglycosylated antibody may be a
deglycosylated antibody, that is an antibody for which the Fc
carbohydrate has been removed, for example chemically or
enzymatically. Alternatively, the aglycosylated antibody may be a
nonglycosylated or unglycosylated antibody, that is an antibody
that was expressed without Fc carbohydrate, for example by mutation
of one or residues that encode the glycosylation pattern or by
expression in an organism that does not attach carbohydrates to
proteins, for example bacteria.
Specifically included within the definition of "antibody" are
full-length antibodies that contain an Fc variant portion. By "full
length antibody" herein is meant the structure that constitutes the
natural biological form of an antibody, Including variable and
constant regions. For example, in most mammals, including humans
and mice, the full length antibody of the IgG class is a tetramer
and consists of two identical pairs of two immunoglobulin chains,
each pair having one light and one heavy chain, each light chain
comprising immunoglobulin domains V.sub.L and C.sub.L, and each
heavy chain comprising immunoglobulin domains V.sub.H, C.gamma.1,
C.gamma.2, and C.gamma.3. In some mammals, for example in camels
and llamas, IgG antibodies may consist of only two heavy chains,
each heavy chain comprising a variable domain attached to the Fc
region. By "IgG" as used herein is meant a polypeptide belonging to
the class of antibodies that are substantially encoded by a
recognized immunoglobulin gamma gene. In humans this class
comprises IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. In mice this class comprises
IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3.
By "amino acid" and "amino acid identity" as used herein is meant
one of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids or any non-natural
analogues that may be present at a specific, defined position. By
"protein" herein is meant at least two covalently attached amino
acids, which includes proteins, polypeptides, oligopeptides and
peptides. The protein may be made up of naturally occurring amino
acids and peptide bonds, or synthetic peptidomimetic structures,
i.e. "analogs", such as peptoids (see Simon et al., PNAS USA
89(20):9367 (1992)) particularly when LC peptides are to be
administered to a patient. Thus "amino acid", or "peptide residue",
as used herein means both naturally occurring and synthetic amino
acids. For example, homophenylalanine, citrulline and noreleucine
are considered amino acids for the purposes of the invention.
"Amino acid" also includes imino acid residues such as proline and
hydroxyproline. The side chain may be in either the (R) or the (S)
configuration. In the preferred embodiment, the amino acids are in
the (S) or L-configuration. If non-naturally occurring side chains
are used, non-amino acid substituents may be used, for example to
prevent or retard in vivo degradation.
By "computational screening method" herein is meant any method for
designing one or more mutations in a protein, wherein said method
utilizes a computer to evaluate the energies of the interactions of
potential amino acid side chain substitutions with each other
and/or with the rest of the protein. As will be appreciated by
those skilled in the art, evaluation of energies, referred to as
energy calculation, refers to some method of scoring one or more
amino acid modifications. Said method may involve a physical or
chemical energy term, or may involve knowledge-, statistical,
sequence-based energy terms, and the like. The calculations that
compose a computational screening method are herein referred to as
"computational screening calculations".
By "effector function" as used herein is meant a biochemical event
that results from the interaction of an antibody Fc region with an
Fc receptor or ligand. Effector functions include but are not
limited to ADCC, ADCP, and CDC. By "effector cell" as used herein
is meant a cell of the immune system that expresses one or more Fc
receptors and mediates one or more effector functions. Effector
cells include but are not limited to monocytes, macrophages,
neutrophils, dendritc cells, eosinophils, mast cells, platelets, B
cells, large granular lymphocytes, Langerhans' cells, natural
killer (NK) cells, and .gamma..gamma. T cells, and may be from any
organism including but not limited to humans, mice, rats, rabbits,
and monkeys. By "library" herein is meant a set of Fc variants in
any form, including but not limited to a list of nucleic acid or
amino acid sequences, a list of nucleic acid or amino acid
substitutions at variable positions, a physical library comprising
nucleic acids that encode the library sequences, or a physical
library comprising the Fc variant proteins, either in purified or
unpurified form.
By "Fc", "Fc region", FC polypeptide", etc. as used herein is meant
an antibody as defined herein that includes the polypeptides
comprising the constant region of an antibody excluding the first
constant region immunoglobulin domain. Thus Fc refers to the last
two constant region immunoglobulin domains of IgA, IgD, and IgG,
and the last three constant region immunoglobulin domains of IgE
and IgM, and the flexible hinge N-terminal to these domains. For
IgA and IgM Fc may include the J chain. For IgG, as illustrated in
FIG. 1, Fc comprises immunoglobulin domains Cgamma2 and Cgamma3
(C.gamma.2 and C.gamma.3) and the hinge between Cgamma1 (C.gamma.1)
and Cgamma2 (C.gamma.2). Although the boundaries of the Fc region
may vary, the human IgG heavy chain Fc region is usually defined to
comprise residues C226 or P230 to its carboxyl-terminus, wherein
the numbering is according to the EU index as in Kabat. Fc may
refer to this region in isolation, or this region in the context of
an antibody, antibody fragment, or Fc fusion. An Fc may be an
antibody, Fc fusion, or an protein or protein domain that comprises
Fc. Particularly preferred are Fc variants, which are non-naturally
occurring variants of an Fc.
By "Fc fusion" as used herein is meant a protein wherein one or
more polypeptides is operably linked to Fc. Fc fusion is herein
meant to be synonymous with the terms "immunoadhesin", "Ig fusion",
"Ig chimera", and "receptor globulin" (sometimes with dashes) as
used in the prior art (Chamow et al., 1996, Trends Biotechnol
14:52-60; Ashkenazi et al., 1997, Curr Opin Immunol 9:195-200). An
Fc fusion combines the Fc region of an immunoglobulin with a fusion
partner, which in general can be any protein, including, but not
limited to, the target-binding region of a receptor, an adhesion
molecule, a ligand, an enzyme, or some other protein or protein
domain. The role of the non-Fc part of an Fc fusion is to mediate
target binding, and thus it is functionally analogous to the
variable regions of an antibody.
By "Fc gamma receptor" or "Fc.gamma.R" as used herein is meant any
member of the family of proteins that bind the IgG antibody Fc
region and are substantially encoded by the Fc.gamma.R genes. In
humans this family includes but is not limited to Fc.gamma.RI
(CD64), including isoforms Fc.gamma.RIa, Fc.gamma.RIb, and
Fc.gamma.RIc; Fc.gamma.RII (CD32), including isoforms Fc.gamma.RIIa
(including allotypes H131 and R131), Fc.gamma.RIIb (including
Fc.gamma.RIIb-1 and Fc.gamma.RIIb-2), and Fc.gamma.RIIc; and
Fc.gamma.RIII (CD16), including isoforms Fc.gamma.RIIIa (including
allotypes V158 and F158) and Fc.gamma.RIIIb (including allotypes
Fc.gamma.RIIIb-NA1 and Fc.gamma.RIIb-NA2) (Jefferis et al., 2002,
Immunol Lett 82:57-65), as well as any undiscovered human
Fc.gamma.Rs or Fc.gamma.R isoforms or allotypes. An Fc.gamma.R may
be from any organism, including but not limited to humans, mice,
rats, rabbits, and monkeys. Mouse Fc.gamma.Rs include but are not
limited to Fc.gamma.RI (CD64), Fc.gamma.RII (CD32), Fc.gamma.RIII
(CD16), and Fc.gamma.RIII-2 (CD16-2), as well as any undiscovered
mouse Fc.gamma.Rs or Fc.gamma.R isoforms or allotypes.
By "Fc ligand" as used herein is meant a molecule, preferably a
polypeptide, from any organism that binds to the Fc region of an
antibody to form an Fc-ligand complex. Fc ligands include but are
not limited to Fc.gamma.Rs, Fc.gamma.Rs, Fc.gamma.Rs, FcRn, C1q,
C3, mannan binding lectin, mannose receptor, staphylococcal protein
A, streptococcal protein G, and viral Fc.gamma.R. Fc ligands may
include undiscovered molecules that bind Fc
By "IgG" as used herein is mean1 a polypeptide belonging to the
class of antibodies that are substantially encoded by a recognized
immunoglobulin gamma gene. In humans this class comprises IgG1,
IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. In mice this class comprises IgG1, IgG2a,
IgG2b, IgG3. By "immunoglobulin (Ig)" herein is meant a protein
consisting of one or more polypeptides substantially encoded by
immunoglobulin genes. Immunoglobulins include but are not limited
to antibodies. Immunoglobulins may have a number of structural
forms, including but not limited to full length antibodies,
antibody fragments, and individual immunoglobulin domains. By
"immunoglobulin (Ig) domain" herein is meant a region of an
immunoglobulin that exists as a distinct structural entity as
ascertained by one skilled in the art of protein structure. Ig
domains typically have a characteristic .quadrature.-sandwich
folding topology. The known Ig domains in the IgG class of
antibodies are V.sub.H, C.gamma.1, C.gamma.2, C.gamma.3, V.sub.L,
and C.sub.L.
By "parent polypeptide" or "precursor polypetide" (including Fc
parent or precursors) as used herein is meant a polypeptide that is
subsequently modified to generate a variant. Said parent
polypeptide may be a naturally occurring polypeptide, or a variant
or engineered version of a naturally occurring polypeptide. Parent
polypeptide may refer to the polypeptide itself, compositions that
comprise the parent polypeptide, or the amino acid sequence that
encodes it. Accordingly, by "parent Fc polypeptide" as used herein
is meant an unmodified Fc polypeptide that is modified to generate
a variant, and by "parent antibody" as used herein is meant an
unmodified antibody that is modified to generate a variant
antibody.
As outlined above, certain positions of the Fc molecule can be
altered. By "Position" as used herein is meant a location in the
sequence of a protein. Positions may be numbered sequentially, or
according to an established format, for example the EU index as in
Kabat. For example, position 297 is a position in the human
antibody IgG1. Corresponding positions are determined as outlined
above, generally through alignment with other parent sequences.
By "residue" as used herein is meant a position in a protein and
its associated amino acid identity. For example, Daragine 297 (also
referred to as N297, also referred to as N297) is a residue in the
human antibody IgG1.
By "target antigen" as used herein is meant the molecule that is
bound specifically by the variable region of a given antibody. A
target antigen may be a protein, carbohydrate, lipid, or other
chemical compound.
By "target cell" as used herein is meant a cell that expresses a
target antigen.
By "variable region" as used herein is meant the region of an
immunoglobulin that comprises one or more Ig domains substantially
encoded by any of the V.kappa., V.lamda., and/or V.sub.H genes that
make up the kappa, lambda, and heavy chain immunoglobulin genetic
loci respectively.
By "variant polypeptide" as used herein is meant a polypeptide
sequence that differs from that of a parent polypeptide sequence by
virtue of at least one amino acid modification. Variant polypeptide
may refer to the polypeptide itself, a composition comprising the
polypeptide, or the amino sequence that encodes it. Preferably, the
variant polypeptide has at least one amino acid modification
compared to the parent polypeptide, e.g. from about one to about
ten amino acid modifications, and preferably from about one to
about five amino acid modifications compared to the parent. The
variant polypeptide sequence herein will preferably possess at
least about 80% homology with a parent polypeptide sequence, and
most preferably at least about 90% homology, more preferably at
least about 95% homology. Accordingly, by "Fc variant" as used
herein is meant an Fc sequence that differs from that of a parent
Fc sequence by virtue of at least one amino acid modification. An
Fc variant may only encompass an Fc region, or may exist in the
context of an antibody, Fc fusion, or other polypeptide that is
substantially encoded by Fc. Fc variant may refer to the Fc
polypeptide itself, compositions comprising the Fc variant
polypeptide, or the amino acid sequence that encodes it.
For all positions discussed in the present invention, numbering of
an immunoglobulin heavy chain is according to the EU index (Kabat
et al., 1991, Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th
Ed., United States Public Health Svice, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda). The "EU index as in Kabat" refers to the residue
numbering of the human IgG1 EU antibody.
The Fc variants of the present invention may be optimized for a
variety of properties. Properties that may be optimized include but
are not limited to enhanced or reduced affinity for an Fc.gamma.R.
In a preferred embodiment, the Fc variants of the present invention
are optimized to possess enhanced affinity for a human activating
Fc.gamma.R, preferably Fc.gamma.RI, Fc.gamma.RIIa, Fc.gamma.RIIc,
Fc.gamma.RIIIa, and Fc.gamma.RIIIb, most preferably Fc.gamma.RIIIa.
In an alternately preferred embodiment, the Fc variants are
optimized to possess reduced affinity for the human inhibitory
receptor Fc.gamma.RIIb. These preferred embodiments are anticipated
to provide antibodies and Fc fusions with enhanced therapeutic
properties in humans, for example enhanced effector function and
greater anti-cancer potency. In an alternate embodiment, the Fc
variants of the present invention are optimized to have reduced or
ablated affinity for a human Fc.gamma.R, including but not limited
to Fc.gamma.RI, FC.gamma.RIIa, Fc.gamma.RIIb, Fc.gamma.RIIc,
Fc.gamma.RIIIa, and Fc.gamma.RIIIb. These embodiments are
anticipated to provide antibodies and Fc fusions with enhanced
therapeutic properties in humans, for example reduced effector
function and reduced toxicity. Preferred embodiments comprise
optimization of Fc binding to a human Fc.gamma.R, however in
alternate embodiments the Fc variants of the present invention
possess enhanced or reduced affinity for Fc.gamma.Rs from nonhuman
organisms, including but not limited to mice, rats, rabbits, and
monkeys. Fc variants that are optimized for binding to a nonhuman
Fc.gamma.R may find use in experimentation. For example, mouse
models are available for a variety of diseases that enable testing
of properties such as efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics for
a given drug candidate. As is known in the art, cancer cells can be
grafted or injected into mice to mimic a human cancer, a process
referred to as xenografting. Testing of antibodies or Fc fusions
that comprise Fc variants that are optimized for one or more mouse
Fc.gamma.Rs, may provide valuable information with regard to the
efficacy of the antibody or Fc fusion, its mechanism of action, and
the like. The Fc variants of the present invention may also be
optimized for enhanced functionality and/or solution properties in
aglycosylated form. In a preferred embodiment, the aglycosylated Fc
variants of the present invention bind an Fc ligand with greater
affinity than the aglycosylated form of the parent Fc polypeptide.
Said Fc ligands include but are not limited to Fc.gamma.Rs, C1q,
FcRn, and proteins A and G, and may be from any source including
but not limited to human, mouse, rat, rabbit, or monkey, preferably
human. In an alternately preferred embodiment, the Fc variants are
optimized to be more stable and/or more soluble than the
aglycosylated form of the parent Fc polypeptide. An Fc variant that
is engineered or predicted to display any of the aforementioned
optimized properties is herein referred to as an "optimized Fc
variant".
The Fc variants of the present invention may be derived from parent
Fc polypeptides that are themselves from a wide range of sources.
The parent Fc polypeptide may be substantially encoded by one or
more Fc genes from any organism, including but not limited to
humans, mice, rats, rabbits, camels, llamas, dromedaries, monkeys,
preferably mammals and most preferably humans and mice. In a
preferred embodiment, the parent Fc polypeptide composes an
antibody, referred to as the parent antibody. The parent antibody
may be fully human, obtained for example using transgenic mice
(Bruggemann et al., 1997, Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:455-458) or human
antibody libraries coupled with selection methods (Griffiths at
al., 1998, Curr Opin Biotechnol 9:102-108). The parent antibody
need not be naturally occurring. For example, the parent antibody
may be an engineered antibody, including but not limited to
chimeric antibodies and humanized antibodies (Clark, 2000, Immunol
Today 21:397-402). The parent antibody may be an engineered variant
of an antibody that is substantially encoded by one or more natural
antibody genes. In one embodiment, the parent antibody has been
affinity matured, as is known in the art. Alternatively, the
antibody has been modified in some other way, for example as
described in U.S. Ser. No 10/339,788, filed on Mar. 3, 2003.
The Fc variants of the present invention may be substantially
encoded by immunoglobulin genes belonging to any of the antibody
classes. In a preferred embodiment, the Fc variants of the present
invention find use in antibodies or Fc fusions that comprise
sequences belonging to the IgG class of antibodies, including IgG1,
IgG2, IgG3, or IgG4. In an alternate embodiment the Fc variants of
the present invention find use in antibodies or Fc fusions that
comprise sequences belonging to the IgA (including subclasses IgA1
and IgA2), IgD, IgE, IgG, or IgM classes of antibodies. The Fc
variants of the present invention may comprise more than one
protein chain. That is, the present invention may find use in an
antibody or Fc fusion that is a monomer or an oligomer, including a
homo- or hetero-oligomer.
The Fc variants of the present invention may be combined with other
Fc modifications, including but not limited to modifications that
alter effector function. Such combination may provide additive,
synergistic, or novel properties in antibodies or Fc fusions. In
one embodiment, the Fc variants of the present invention may be
combined with other known Fc variants (Duncan et al., 1988, Nature
332:563-564; Lund et al., 1991, J Immunol 147:2657-2662; Lund et
al., 1992, Mol Immunol 29:53-59; Alegre et al., 1994,
Transplantation 57:1537-1543; Hutchins et al., 1995, Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 92:11980-11984; Jefferis et al., 1995, Immunol Lett
44:111-117; Lund et al., 1995, FasebJ 9:115-119; Jefferis et al.,
1996, Immunol Lett 54:10'-104; Lund et al., 1996, J Immunol
157:4963-4969; Armour et al., 1999, Eur J Immunol 29:2613-2624;
Idusogie et al., 2000, J Immunol 164:4178-4184; Reddy et al., 2000,
J Immunol 164:1925-1933; Xu et al, 2000, Cell Immunol 200:16-26;
Idusogie et al., 2001, J Immunol 166:2571-2575; Shields et al.,
2001, J Biol Chem 276:6591-6604; Jefferis et al., 2002, Immunol
Lett 82:57-65; Presta et al., 2002, Biochem Soc Trans 30:487-490)
(U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,624,821; 5,885,573; 6,194,551; PCT WO 00/42072;
PCT WO 99/58572). In an alternate embodiment, the Fc variants of
the present invention are incorporated into an antibody or Fc
fusion that comprises one or more engineered glycoforms. By
"engineered glycoform" as used herein is meant a carbohydrate
composition that is covalently attached to an Fc polypeptide,
wherein said carbohydrate composition differs chemically from that
of a parent Fc polypeptide. Engineered glycoforms may be useful for
a variety of purposes, including but not limited to enhancing or
reducing effector function. Engineered glycoforms may be generated
by any method, for example by using engineered or variant
expression strains, by co-expression with one or more enzymes, for
example .beta.1-4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnTIII), by
expressing an Fc polypeptide in various organisms or cell lines
from various organisms, or by modifying carbohydrate(s) after the
Fc polypeptide has been expressed. Methods for generating
engineered glycoforms are known in the art, and include but are not
limited to (Umana et al., 1999, Nat Biotechnol 17:176-180; Davies
et al., 2001, Biotechnol Bioeng 74:288-294; Shields et al., 2002, J
Biol Chem 277:26733-26740; Shinkawa et al., 2003, J Biol Chem
278:3466-3473) U.S. Pat. No. 6,602,684; U.S. Ser. Nos. 10/277,370;
10/113,929; PCT WO 00/61739A1; PCT WO 01/29246A1; PCT WO
02/31140A1; PCT WO 02/30954A1; Potelligent.TM. technology (Biowa,
Inc., Princeton, N.J.); GlycoMAb.TM. glycosylation engineering
technology (GLYCART biotechnology AG, Zurich, Switzerland)).
Engineered glycoform typically refers to the different carbohydrate
or oligosaccharide; thus an Fc polypeptide, for example an antibody
or Fc fusion, may comprise an engineered glycoform. Alternatively,
engineered glycoform may refer to the Fc polypeptide that comprises
the different carbohydrate or oligosaccharide. Thus combinations of
the Fc variants of the present invention with other Fc
modifications, as well as undiscovered Fc modifications, are
contemplated with the goal of generating novel antibodies or Fc
fusions with optimized properties.
The Fc variants of the present invention may find use in an
antibody. By "antibody of the present invention" as used herein is
meant an antibody that comprises an Fc variant of the present
invention. The present invention may, in fact, find use in any
protein that comprises Fc, and thus application of the Fc variants
of the present invention is not limited to antibodies. The Fc
variants of the present invention may find use in an Fc fusion. By
"Fc fusion of the present invention" as used herein refers to an Fc
fusion that comprises an Fc variant of the present invention. Fc
fusions may comprise an Fc variant of the present invention
operably linked to a cytokine, soluble receptor domain, adhesion
molecule, ligand, enzyme, peptide, or other protein or protein
domain, and include but are not limited to Fc fusions described in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,843,725; 6,018,026; 6,291,212; 6,291,646;
6,300,099; 6,323,323; PCT WO 00/24782; and in (Chamow et al., 1996,
Trends Biotechnol 14:52-60; Ashkenazi et al., 1997, Curr Opin
Immunol 9:195-200).
Virtually any antigen may be targeted by the antibodies and fusions
of the present invention, including but are not limited to the
following list of proteins, subunits, domains, motifs, and epitopes
belonging to the following list of proteins: CD2; CD3, CD3E, CD4,
CD11, CD11a, CD14, CD16, CD18, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD25, CD28,
CD29, CD30, CD32, CD33 (p67 protein), CD38, CD40, CD40L, CD52,
CD54, CD56, CD80, CD147, GD3, IL-1, IL-1R, IL-2, IL-2R, IL-4, IL-5,
IL-6, IL-6R, IL-8, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, IL-23, interferon alpha,
interferon beta, interferon gamma; TNF-alpha, TNFbeta2, TNFc,
TNFalphabeta, TNF-RI, TNF-RII, FasL, CD27L, CD30L, 4-1BBL, TRAIL,
RANKL, TWEAK, APRIL, BAFF, LIGHT, VEG1, OX40L, TRAIL Receptor-1, A1
Adenosine Receptor, Lymphotoxin Beta Receptor, TACI, BAFF-R, EPO;
LFA-3, ICAM-1, ICAM-3, EpCAM, integrin beta1, integrin beta2,
integrin alpha4/beta7, integrin alpha2, integrin alpha3, integrin
alpha4, integrin alpha5, integrin alpha6, integrin alphav,
alphaVbeta3 integrin, FGFR-3, Keratinocyte Growth Factor, VLA-1,
VLA-4, L-selectin, anti-id, E-selectin, HLA, HLA-DR, CTLA-4, T cell
receptor, B7-1, B7-2, VNRintegrin, TGFbeta1, TGFbeta2, eotaxin1,
BLyS (B-lymphocyte Stimulator), complement C5, IgE, factor VII,
CD64, CBL, NCA 90, EGFR (ErbB-1), Her2/neu (ErbB-2), Her3 (ErbB-3),
Her4 (ErbB-4), Tissue Factor, VEGF, VEGFR, endothelin receptor,
VLA-4, Hapten NP-cap or NIP-cap, T cell receptor alpha/beta,
E-selectin, digoxin, placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) and
testicular PLAP-like alkaline phosphatase, transferrin receptor,
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CEACAM5, HMFG PEM, mucin MUC1,
MUC18, Heparanase I, human cardiac myosin, tumor-associated
glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72), tumor-associated antigen CA 125, Prostate
specific membrane antigen (PSMA), High molecular weight
melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA), carcinoma-associated
antigen, Gcoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa), tumor-associated antigen
expressing Lewis Y related carbohydrate, human cytomegalovirus
(HCMV) gH envelope glycoprotein, HIV gp120, HCMV, respiratory
syncital virus RSV F, RSVF Fgp, VNRintegrin, IL-8, cytokeratin
tumor-associated antigen, Hep B gp120, CMV, gpllbllla, HIV IIIB
gp120 V3 loop, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) Fgp, Herpes
simplex virus (HSV) gD glycoprotein, HSV gB glycoprotein, HCMV gB
envelope glycoprotein, and Clostridium perfringens toxin.
One skilled in the art will appreciate that the aforementioned list
of targets refers not only to specific proteins and biomolecules,
but the biochemical pathway or pathways that comprise them. For
example, reference to CTLA-4 as a target antigen implies that the
ligands and receptors that make up the T cell co-stimulatory
pathway, including CTLA-4, B7-1, B7-2, CD28, and any other
undiscovered ligands or receptors that bind these proteins, are
also targets. Thus target as used herein refers not only to a
specific biomolecule, but the set of proteins that interact with
said target and the members of the biochemical pathway to which
said target belongs. One skilled in the art will further appreciate
that any of the aforementioned target antigens, the ligands or
receptors that bind them, or other members of their corresponding
biochemical pathway, may be operably linked to the Fc variants of
the present invention in order to generate an Fc fusion. Thus for
example, an Fc fusion that targets EGFR could be constructed by
operably linking an Fc variant to EGF, TGF.alpha., or any other
ligand, discovered or undiscovered, that binds EGFR. Accordingly,
an Fc variant of the present invention could be operably linked to
EGFR in order to generate an Fc fusion that binds EGF, TGF.alpha.,
or any other ligand, discovered or undiscovered, that binds EGFR.
Thus virtually any polypeptide, whether a ligand, receptor, or some
other protein or protein domain, including but not limited to the
aforementioned targets and the proteins that compose their
corresponding biochemical pathways, may be operably linked to the
Fc variants of the present invention to develop an Fc fusion.
A number of antibodies and Fc fusions that are approved for use, in
clinical trials, or in development may benefit from the Fc variants
of the present invention. Said antibodies and Fc fusions are herein
referred to as "clinical products and candidates". Thus in a
preferred embodiment, the Fc variants of the present invention may
find use in a range of clinical products and candidates. For
example, a number of antibodies that target CD20 may benefit from
the Fc variants of the present invention. For example the Fc
variants of the present invention may find use in an antibody that
is substantially similar to rituximab (Rituxan.RTM.,
IDEC/Genentech/Roche) (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137), a
chimeric anti-CD20 antibody approved to treat Non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma; HuMax-CD20, an anti-CD20 currently being developed by
Genmab, an anti-CD20 antibody described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,362,
AME-133 (Applied Molecular Evoluton), hA20 (Immunomedics, Inc.),
and HumaLYM (Intracel). A number of antibodies that target members
of the family of epidermal growth factor receptors, including EGFR
(ErbB-1), Her2/neu (ErbB-2), Her3 (ErbB-3), Her4 (ErbB-4), may
benefit from the Fc variants of the present invention. For example
the Fc variants of the present invention may find use in an
antibody that is substantially similar to trastuzumab
(Herceptin.RTM., Genentech) (see for example U.S. Pat. No.
5,677,171), a humanized anti-Her2/neu antibody approved to treat
breast cancer; pertuzumab (rhuMab-2C4, Omnitarg.TM.), currently
being developed by Genentech; an anti-Her2 antibody described in
U.S. Pat. No. 4,753,894; cetuximab (Erbitux.RTM., Imclone) (U.S.
Pat. No. 4,943,533; PCT WO 96/40210), a chimeric anti-EGFR antibody
in clinical trials for a variety of cancers; ABX-EGF (U.S. Pat. No.
6,235,883), currently being developed by Abgenix/Immunex/Amgen;
HuMax-EGFr (U.S. Ser. No. 10/172,317), currently being developed by
Genmab; 425, EMD55900, EMD62000, and EMD72000 (Merck KGaA) (U.S.
Pat. No. 5,558,864; Murthy et al. 1987, Arch Biochem Biophys.
252(2):549-60; Rodeck et al., 1987, J Cell Blochem. 35(4):315-20;
Kettleborough et al., 1991, Protein Eng. 4(7):773-83); ICR62
(Institute of Cancer Research) (PCT WO 95/20045; Modjtahedi et al.,
1993, J. Cell Biophys. 1993, 22(1-3):129-46; Modjtahedi et al.,
1993, Br J Cancer. 1993, 67(2):247-53; Modjtahedi et al, 1996, Br J
Cancer, 73(2):228-35; Modjtahedi et al, 2003, Int J Cancer,
105(2):273-80); TheraCIM hR3 (YM Biosciences, Canada and Centro de
Immunologia Molecular, Cuba (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,891,996; 6,506,883;
Mateo et al, 1997, Immunotechnology, 3(1):71-81); mAb-806 (Ludwig
Institue for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan-Kettering) (Jungbluth
et al. 2003, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100(2):639-44); KSB-102 (KS
Biomedix); MR1-1 (IVAX, National Cancer Institute) (PCT WO
0162931A2); and SC100 (Scancell) (PCT WO 01/88138). In another
preferred embodiment, the Fc variants of the present invention may
find use in alemtuzumab (Campath.RTM., Millenium), a humanized
monoclonal antibody currently approved for treatment of B-cell
chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The Fc variants of the present
invention may find use in a variety of antibodies or Fc fusions
that are substantially similar to other clinical products and
candidates, including but not limited to muromonab-CD3 (Orthoclone
OKT3.RTM.), an anti-CD3 antibody developed by Ortho Biotech/Johnson
& Johnson, ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin.RTM.), an anti-CD20
antibody developed by IDEC/Schering AG, gemtuzumab ozogamicin
(Mylotarg.RTM.), an anti-CD33 (p67 protein) antibody developed by
Celltech/Wyeth, alefacept (Amevive.RTM.), an anti-LFA-3 Fc fusion
developed by Biogen), abciximab (ReoPro.RTM.), developed by
Centocor/Lilly, basiliximab (Simulect.RTM.), developed by Novartis,
palivizumab (Synagis.RTM.), developed by Medimmune, infliximab
(Remicade.RTM.), an anti-TNFalpha antibody developed by Centocor,
adalimumab (Humira.RTM., an anti-TNFalpha antibody developed by
Abbott, Humicade.TM., an anti-TNFalpha antibody developed by
Celltech, etanercept (Enbrel.RTM.), an anti-TNFalpha Fc fusion
developed by Immunex/Amgen, ABX-CBL, an anti-CD147 antibody being
developed by Abgenix, ABX-IL8, an anti-IL8 antibody being developed
by Abgenix, ABX-MA1, an anti-MUC18 antibody being developed by
Abgenix, Pemtumomab (R1549, .sup.90Y-muHMFG1), an anti-MUC1 In
development by Antisoma, Therex (R1550), an anti-MUC1 antibody
being developed by Antisoma, AngioMab (AS1405), being developed by
Antisoma, HuBC-1, being developed by Antisoma, Thioplatin (AS1407)
being developed by Antisoma, Antegren.RTM. (natalizumab), an
anti-alpha-4-beta-1 (VLA-4) and alpha4-beta-7 antibody being
developed by Biogen, VLA-1 mAb, an anti-VLA-1 integrin antibody
being developed by Biogen, LTBR mAb, an anti-lymphotoxin beta
receptor (LTBR) antibody being developed by Biogen, CAT-152, an
anti-TGF.quadrature.2 antibody being developed by Cambridge
Antibody Technology, J695, an anti-IL-12 antibody being developed
by Cambridge Antibody Technology and Abbott, CAT-192, an
anti-TGF.quadrature.1 antibody being developed by Cambridge
Antibody Technology and Genzyme, CAT-213, an anti-Eotaxin1 antibody
being developed by Cambridge Antibody Technology, LymphoStat-B.TM.
an anti-Blys antibody being developed by Cambridge Antibody
Technology and Human Genome Sciences Inc., TRAIL-R1mAb, an
anti-TRAIL-R1 antibody being developed by Cambridge Antibody
Technology and Human Genome Sciences, Inc., Avastin.TM.
(bevacizumab, rhuMAb-VEGF), an anti-VEGF antibody being developed
by Genentech, an anti-HER receptor family antibody being developed
by Genentech, Anti-Tissue Factor (ATF), an anti-Tissue Factor
antibody being developed by Genentech, Xolair.TM. (Omalizumab), an
anti-IgE antibody being developed by Genentech, Raptiva.TM.
(Efalizumab), an anti-CD11a antibody being developed by Genentech
and Xoma, MLN-02 Antibody (formerly LDP-02), being developed by
Genentech and Millenium Pharmaceuticals, HuMax CD4, an anti-CD4
antibody being developed by Genmab, HuMax-IL15, an anti-IL15
antibody being developed by Genmab and Amgen, HuMax-Inflam, being
developed by Genmab and Medarex, HuMax-Cancer, an anti-Heparanase I
antibody being developed by Genmab and Medarex and Oxford
GcoSciences, HuMax-Lymphoma, being developed by Genmab and Amgen,
HuMax-TAC, being developed by Genmab, IDEC-131, and anti-CD40L
antibody being developed by IDEC Pharmaceuticals, IDEC-151
(Clenoliximab), an anti-CD4 antibody being developed by IDEC
Pharmaceuticals, IDEC-114, an anti-CD80 antibody being developed by
IDEC Pharmaceuticals, IDEC-152, an anti-CD23 being developed by
IDEC Pharmaceuticals, anti-macrophage migration factor (MIF)
antibodies being developed by IDEC Pharmaceuticals, BEC2, an
anti-idiotypic antibody being developed by Imclone, IMC-1C11, an
anti-KDR antibody being developed by Imclone, DC101, an anti-flk-1
antibody being developed by Imclone, anti-VE cadherin antibodies
being developed by Imclone, CEA-Cide.TM. (labetuzumab), an
anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody being developed by
Immunomedics, LymphoCide.TM. (Epratuzumab), an anti-CD22 antibody
being developed by Immunomedics, AFP-Cide, being developed by
Immunomedics, MyelomaCide, being developed by Immunomedics,
LkoCide, being developed by Immunomedics, ProstaCide, being
developed by Immunomedics, MDX-010, an anti-CTLA4 antibody being
developed by Medarex, MDX-060, an anti-CD30 antibody being
developed by Medarex, MDX-070 being developed by Medarex, MDX-018
being developed by Medarex, Osidem.TM. (IDM-1), and anti-Her2
antibody being developed by Medarex and Immuno-Designed Molecules,
HuMax.TM.-CD4, an anti-CD4 antibody being developed by Medarex and
Genmab, HuMax-IL15, an anti-IL15 antibody being developed by
Medarex and Genmab, CNTO 148, an anti-TNF.alpha. antibody being
developed by Medarex and Centocor/J&J, CNTO 1275, an
anti-cytokine antibody being developed by Centocor/J&J, MOR101
and MOR102, anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (CD54)
antibodies being developed by MorphoSys, MOR201, an anti-fibroblast
growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR-3) antibody being developed by
MorphoSys, Nuvion.RTM. (visilizumab), an anti-CD3 antibody being
developed by Protein Design Labs, HuZAF.TM., an anti-gamma
interferon antibody being developed by Protein Design Labs,
Anti-.quadrature.5.quadrature.1Integrin, being developed by Protein
Design Labs, anti-IL-12, being developed by Protein Design Labs,
ING-1, an anti-Ep-CAM antibody being developed by Xoma, and MLN01,
an anti-Beta2 integrin antibody being developed by Xoma.
Application of the Fc variants to the aforementioned antibody and
Fc fusion clinical products and candidates is not meant to be
constrained to their precise composition. The Fc variants of the
present invention may be incorporated into the aforementioned
clinical candidates and products, or into antibodies and Fc fusions
that are substantially similar to them. The Fc variants of the
present invention may be incorporated into versions of the
aforementioned clinical candidates and products that are humanized,
affinity matured, engineered, or modified in some other way.
Furthermore, the entire polypeptide of the aforementioned clinical
products and candidates need not be used to construct a new
antibody or Fc fusion that incorporates the Fc variants of the
present invention; for example only the variable region of a
clinical product or candidate antibody, a substantially similar
variable region, or a humanized, affinity matured, engineered, or
modified version of the variable region may be used. In another
embodiment, the Fc variants of the present invention may find use
in an antibody or Fc fusion that binds to the same epitope,
antigen, ligand, or receptor as one of the aforementioned clinical
products and candidates.
The Fc variants of the present invention may find use in a wide
range of antibody and Fc fusion products. In one embodiment the
antibody or Fc fusion of the present invention is a therapeutic, a
diagnostic, or a research reagent, preferably a therapeutic.
Alternatively, the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present
invention may be used for agricultural or industrial uses. In an
alternate embodiment, the Fc variants of the present invention
compose a library that may be screened experimentally. This library
may be a list of nucleic acid or amino acid sequences, or may be a
physical composition of nucleic acids or polypeptides that encode
the library sequences. The Fc variant may find use in an antibody
composition that is monoclonal or polyclonal. In a preferred
embodiment, the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present invention
are used to kill target cells that bear the target antigen, for
example cancer cells. In an alternate embodiment, the antibodies
and Fc fusions of the present invention are used to block,
antagonize, or agonize the target antigen, for example for
antagonizing a cytokine or cytokine receptor. In an alternately
preferred embodiment, the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present
invention are used to block, antagonize, or agonize the target
antigen and kill the target cells that bear the target antigen.
The Fc variants of the present invention may be used for various
therapeutic purposes. In a preferred embodiment, the Fc variant
proteins are administered to a patient to treat an antibody-related
disorder. A "patient" for the purposes of the present invention
includes both humans and other animals, preferably mammals and most
preferably humans. Thus the antibodies and Fc fusions of the
present invention have both human therapy and veterinary
applications. In the preferred embodiment the patient is a mammal,
and in the most preferred embodiment the patient is human. The term
"treatment" in the present invention is meant to include
therapeutic treatment, as well as prophylactic, or suppressive
measures for a disease or disorder. Thus, for example, successful
administration of an antibody or Fc fusion prior to onset of the
disease results in treatment of the disease. As another example,
successful administration of an optimized antibody or Fc fusion
after clinical manifestation of the disease to combat the symptoms
of the disease comprises treatment of the disease. "Treatment" also
encompasses administration of an optimized antibody or Fc fusion
protein after the appearance of the disease in order to eradicate
the disease. Successful administration of an agent after onset and
after clinical symptoms have developed, with possible abatement of
clinical symptoms and perhaps amelioration of the disease,
comprises treatment of the disease. Those "in need of treatment"
include mammals already having the disease or disorder, as well as
those prone to having the disease or disorder, including those in
which the disease or disorder is to be prevented. By "antibody
related disorder" or "antibody responsive disorder" or "condition"
or "disease" herein are meant a disorder that may be ameliorated by
the administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising an
antibody or Fc fusion of the present invention. Antibody related
disorders include but are not limited to autoimmune diseases,
immunological diseases, infectious diseases, inflammatory diseases,
neurological diseases, and oncological and neoplastic diseases
including cancer. By "cancer" and "cancerous" herein refer to or
describe the physiological condition in mammals that is typically
characterized by unregulated cell growth. Examples of cancer
include but are not limited to carcinoma, lymphoma, blastoma,
sarcoma (including liposarcoma), neuroendocrine tumors,
mesothelioma, schwanoma, meningioma, adenocarcinoma, melanoma, and
leukemia or lymphoid malignancies. More particular examples of such
cancers include squamous cell cancer (e.g. epithelial squamous cell
cancer), lung cancer including small-cell lung cancer, non-small
cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the lung and squamous carcinoma
of the lung, cancer of the peritoneum, hepatocellular cancer,
gastric or stomach cancer including gastrointestinal cancer,
pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer,
liver cancer, bladder cancer, hepatoma, breast cancer, colon
cancer, rectal cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial or uterine
carcinoma, salivary gland carcinoma, kidney or renal cancer,
prostate cancer, vulval cancer, thyroid cancer, hepatic carcinoma,
anal carcinoma, penile carcinoma, testicular cancer, esophagael
cancer, tumors of the biliary tract, as well as head and neck
cancer. Furthermore, the Fc variants of the present invention may
be used to treat conditions including but not limited to congestive
heart failure (CHF), vasculitis, rosecea, acne, eczema, myocarditis
and other conditions of the myocardium, systemic lupus
erythematosus, diabetes, spondylopathies, synovial fibroblasts, and
bone marrow stroma; bone loss; Paget's disease, osteoclastoma;
multiple myeloma; breast cancer; disuse osteopenia; malnutrition,
periodontal disease, Gaucher's disease, Langerhans' cell
histiocytosis, spinal cord injury, acute septic arthritis,
osteomalacia, Cushing's syndrome, monoostotic fibrous dysplasia,
polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, periodontal reconstruction, and bone
fractures; sarcoidosis; multiple myeloma; osteolytic bone cancers,
breast cancer, lung cancer, kidney cancer and rectal cancer; bone
metastasis, bone pain management, and humoral malignant
hypercalcemia, ankylosing spondylitisa and other
spondyloarthropathies; transplantation rejection, viral infections,
hematologic neoplasisas and neoplastic-like conditions for example,
Hodgkin's lymphoma; non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (Burkitt's lymphoma,
small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mycosis
fungoides, mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, diffuse large
B-cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia and
lymphoplasmacytic leukemia), tumors of lymphocyte precursor cells,
including B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, and T-cell
acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, thymoma, tumors of the
mature T and NK cells, including peripheral T-cell leukemias, adult
T-cell leukemia/T-cell lymphomas and large granular lymphocytic
leukemia, Langerhans cell histocytosis, myeloid neoplasias such as
acute myelogenous leukemias, including AML with maturation, AML
without differentiation, acute promyelocytic leukemia, acute
myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute monocytic leukemias,
myelodysplastic syndromes, and chronic myeloproliferative
disorders, including chronic myelogenous leukemia, tumors of the
central nervous system, e.g., brain tumors (glioma, neuroblastoma,
astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and retinoblastoma),
solid tumors (nasopharyngeal cancer, basal cell carcinoma,
pancreatic cancer, cancer of the bile duct, Kaposi's sarcoma,
testicular cancer, uterine, vaginal or cervical cancers, ovarian
cancer, primary liver cancer or endometrial cancer, and tumors of
the vascular system (angiosarcoma and hemagiopericytoma),
osteoporosis, hepatitis, HIV, AIDS, spondyloarthritis, rheumatoid
arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), sepsis and septic
shock, Crohn's Disease, psoriasis, schleraderma, graft versus host
disease (GVHD), allogenic islet graft rejection, hematologic
malignancies, such as multiple myeloma (MM), myelodysplastic
syndrome (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), inflammation
associated with tumors, peripheral nerve injury or demyelinating
diseases.
In one embodiment, an antibody or Fc fusion of the present
invention is administered to a patient having a disease involving
inappropriate expression of a protein. Within the scope of the
present invention this is meant to include diseases and disorders
characterized by aberrant proteins, due for example to alterations
in the amount of a protein present, the presence of a mutant
protein, or both. An overabundance may be due to any cause,
including but not limited to overexpression at the molecular level,
prolonged or accumulated appearance at the site of action, or
increased activity of a protein relative to normal. Included within
this definition are diseases and disorders characterized by a
reduction of a protein. This reduction may be due to any cause,
including but not limited to reduced expression at the molecular
level, shortened or reduced appearance at the site of action,
mutant forms of a protein, or decreased activity of a protein
relative to normal. Such an overabundance or reduction of a protein
can be measured relative to normal expression, appearance, or
activity of a protein, and said measurement may play an important
role in the development and/or clinical testing of the antibodies
and Fc fusions of the present invention.
In one embodiment, an antibody or Fc fusion of the present
invention is the only therapeutically active agent administered to
a patient. Alternatively, the antibody or Fc fusion of the present
invention is administered in combination with one or more other
therapeutic agents, including but not limited to cytotoxic agents,
chemotherapeutic agents, cytokines, growth inhibitory agents,
anti-hormonal agents, kinase inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents,
cardioprotectants, or other therapeutic agents. Such molecules are
suitably present in combination in amounts that are effective for
the purpose intended. The skilled medical practitioner can
determine empirically the appropriate dose or doses of other
therapeutic agents useful herein. The antibodies and Fc fusions of
the present invention may be administered concomitantly with one or
more other therapeutic regimens. For example, an antibody or Fc
fusion of the present invention may be administered to the patient
along with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both chemotherapy
and radiation therapy. In one embodiment, the antibody or Fc fusion
of the present invention may be administered in conjunction with
one or more antibodies or Fc fusions, which may or may not comprise
an Fc variant of the present invention.
In one embodiment, the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present
invention are administered with a chemotherapeutic agent. By
"chemotherapeutic agent" as used herein is meant a chemical
compound useful in the treatment of cancer. Examples of
chemotherapeutic agents include but are not limited to alkylating
agents such as thiotepa and cyclosphosphamide (CYTOXAN.TM.); alkyl
sulfonates such as busulfan, improsulfan and piposulfan; aziridines
such as benzodopa, carboquone, meturedopa, and uredopa;
ethylenimines and methylamelamines including altretamine,
tnethylenemelamine, trietylenephosphoramide,
triethylenethiophosphaoramide and trimethylolomelamine; nitrogen
mustards such as chlorambucil, chlornaphazine, cholophosphamide,
estramustine, ifosfamide, mechlorethamine, mechlorethamine oxide
hydrochloride, melphalan, novembichin, phenesterine, prednimustine,
trofosfamide, uracil mustard; nitrosureas such as carmustine,
chlorozotocin, fotemustine, lomustine, nimustine, ranimustine;
antibiotics such as aclacinomysins, actinomycin, authramycin,
azaserine, bleomycins, cactinomycin, calicheamicin, carabicin,
caminomycin, carzinophilin, chromomycins, dactinomycin,
daunorubicin, detorubicin, 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine, doxorubicin,
epirubicin, esorubicin, idarubicin, marcellomycin, mitomycins,
mycophenolic acid, nogalamycin, olivomycins, peplomycin,
potfiromycin, puromycin, quelamycin, rodorubicin, streptonigrin,
streptozocin, tubercidin, ubenimex, zinostatin, zorubicin;
anti-metabolites such as methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU);
folic acid analogues such as denopterin, methotrexate, pteropterin,
trimetrexate; purine analogs such as fludarabine, 6-mercaptopurine,
thiamiprine, thioguanine; pyrimidine analogs such as ancitabine,
azacitidine, 6-azauridine, carmofur, cytarabine, dideoxyuridine,
doxifluridine, enocitabine, floxuridine, 5-FU; androgens such as
calusterone, dromostanolone propionate, epitiostanol, mepitiostane,
testolactone; anti-adrenals such as aminoglutethimide, mitotane,
trilostane; folic acid replenisher such as frolinic acid;
aceglatone; aldophosphamide glycoside; aminolevulinic acid;
amsacrine; bestrabucil; bisantrene; edatraxate; defofamine;
demecolcine; diaziquone; elformithine; elliptinium acetate;
etoglucid; gallium nitrate; hydroxyurea; lentinan; lonidamine;
mitoguazone; mitoxantrone; mopidamol; nitracrine; pentostatin;
phenamet; pirarubicin; podophyllinic acid; 2-ethylhydrazide;
procarbazine; PSK.RTM.; razoxane; sizofuran; spirogermanium;
tenuazonic acid; triaziquone; 2,2',2''-trichlorotriethylamine;
urethan; vindesine; dacarbazine; mannomustine; mitobronitol;
mitolactol; pipobroman; gacytosine; arabinoside ("Ara-C");
cyclophosphamide; thiotepa; taxanes, e.g. paclitaxel (TAXOL.RTM.,
Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, N.J.) and docetaxel
(TAXOTERE.RTM., Rhne-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France); chlorambucil;
gemcitabine; 6-thioguanine; mercaptopurine; methotrexate; platinum
analogs such as cisplatin and carboplatin; vinblastine; platinum;
etoposide (VP-16); ifosfamide; mitomycin C; mitoxantrone;
vincristine; vinorelbine; navelbine; novantrone; teniposide;
daunomycin; aminopterin; xeloda; ibandronate; CPT-11; topoisomerase
inhibitor RFS 2000; difluoromethylornithine (DMFO); retinoic acid;
esperamicins; capecitabine; thymidylate synthase inhibitor (such as
Tomudex); cox-2 inhibitors, such as celicoxib (CELEBREX.RTM.) or
MK-0966 (VIOXX.RTM.); and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, acids
or derivatives of any of the above. Also included in this
definition are anti-hormonal agents that act to regulate or inhibit
hormone action on tumors such as anti estrogens including for
example tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibiting
4(5)-imidazoles, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, trioxifene, keoxifene, LY
117018, onapristone, and toremifene (Fareston); and anti-androgens
such as flutamide, nilutamide, bicalutamide, leuprolide, and
goserelin; and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, acids or
derivatives of any of the above.
A chemotherapeutic or other cytotoxic agent may be administered as
a prodrug. By "prodrug" as used herein is meant a precursor or
derivative form of a pharmaceutically active substance that is less
cytotoxic to tumor cells compared to the parent drug and is capable
of being enzymatically activated or converted into the more active
parent form. See, for example Wilman, 1986, Biochemical Society
Transactions, 615th Meeting Belfast, 14:375-382; and Stella et al.,
"Prodrugs: A Chemical Approach to Targeted Drug Delivery," Directed
Drug Delivery, Borchardt et al., (ed.): 247-267, Humana Press,
1985, The prodrugs that may find use with the present invention
include but are not limited to phosphate-containing prodrugs,
thiophosphate-containing prodrugs, sulfate-containing prodrugs,
peptide-containing prodrugs, D-amino acid-modified prodrugs,
glycosylated prodrugs, beta-lactam-containing prodrugs, optionally
substituted phenoxyacetamide-containing prodrugs or optionally
substituted phenylacetamide-containing prodrugs, 5-fluorocytosine
and other 5-fluorouridine prodrugs which can be converted into the
more active cytotoxic free drug. Examples of cytotoxic drugs that
can be derivatized into a prodrug form for use with the antibodies
and Fc fusions of the present invention include but are not limited
to any of the aforementioned chemotherapeutic agents.
The antibodies and Fc fusions of the present invention may be
combined with other therapeutic regimens. For example, in one
embodiment, the patient to be treated with the antibody or Fc
fusion may also receive radiation therapy. Radiation therapy can be
administered according to protocols commonly employed in the art
and known to the skilled artisan. Such therapy includes but is not
limited to cesium, iridium, iodine, or cobalt radiation. The
radiation therapy may be whole body irradiation, or may be directed
locally to a specific site or tissue in or on the body, such as the
lung, bladder, or prostate. Typically, radiation therapy is
administered in pulses over a period of time from about 1 to 2
weeks. The radiation therapy may, however, be administered over
longer periods of time. For instance, radiation therapy may be
administered to patients having head and neck cancer for about 6 to
about 7 weeks. Optionally, the radiation therapy may be
administered as a single dose or as multiple, sequential doses. The
skilled medical practitioner can determine empirically the
appropriate dose or doses of radiation therapy useful herein. In
accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the antibody
or Fc fusion of the present invention and one or more other
anti-cancer therapies are employed to treat cancer cells ex vivo.
It is contemplated that such ex vivo treatment may be useful in
bone marrow transplantation and particularly, autologous bone
marrow transplantation. For instance, treatment of cells or
tissue(s) containing cancer cells with antibody or Fc fusion and
one or more other anti-cancer therapies, such as described above,
can be employed to deplete or substantially deplete the cancer
cells prior to transplantation in a recipient patient. It is of
course contemplated that the antibodies and Fc fusions of the
invention can be employed in combination with still other
therapeutic techniques such as surgery.
In an alternate embodiment, the antibodies and Fc fusions of the
present invention are administered with a cytokine. By "cytokine"
as used herein is meant a generic term for proteins released by one
cell population that act on another cell as intercellular
mediators. Examples of such cytokines are lymphokines, monokines,
and traditional polypeptide hormones. Included among the cytokines
are growth hormone such as human growth hormone, N-methionyl human
growth hormone, and bovine growth hormone; parathyroid hormone;
thyroxine; insulin; proinsulin; relaxin; prorelaxin; glycoprotein
hormones such as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid
stimulating hormone (TSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH); hepatic
growth factor; fibroblast growth factor; prolactin; placental
lactogen; tumor necrosis factor-alpha and -beta;
mullerian-inhibiting substance; mouse gonadotropin-associated
peptide; inhibin; activin; vascular endothelial growth factor;
integrin; thrombopoietin (TPO); nerve growth factors such as
NGF-beta; platelet-growth factor; transforming growth factors
(TGFs) such as TGF-alpha and TGF-beta; insulin-like growth factor-I
and -II; erythropoietin (EPO); osteoinductive factors; interferons
such as interferon-alpha, beta, and -gamma; colony stimulating
factors (CSFs) such as macrophage-CSF (M-CSF);
granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF); and granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF);
interleukins (ILs) such as IL-1, IL-1alpha, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5,
IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12; IL-15, a tumor
necrosis factor such as TNF-alpha or TNF-beta; and other
polypeptide factors including LIF and kit ligand (KL). As used
herein, the term cytokine includes proteins from natural sources or
from recombinant cell culture, and biologically active equivalents
of the native sequence cytokines.
A variety of other therapeutic agents may find use for
administration with the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present
invention. In one embodiment, the antibody or Fc fusion is
administered with an anti-angiogenic agent. By "anti-angiogenic
agent" as used herein is meant a compound that blocks, or
interferes to some degree, the development of blood vessels. The
anti-angiogenic factor may, for instance, be a small molecule or a
protein, for example an antibody, Fc fusion, or cytokine, that
binds to a growth factor or growth factor receptor involved in
promoting angiogenesis. The preferred anti-angiogenic factor herein
is an antibody that binds to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
(VEGF). In an alternate embodiment, the antibody or Fc fusion is
administered with a therapeutic agent that induces or enhances
adaptive immune response, for example an antibody that targets
CTLA-4. In an alternate embodiment, the antibody or Fc fusion is
administered with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. By "tyrosine kinase
inhibitor" as used herein is meant a molecule that inhibits to some
extent tyrosine kinase activity of a tyrosine kinase. Examples of
such inhibitors include but are not limited to quinazolines, such
as PD 153035, 4-(3-chloroanilino) quinazoline; pyridopyrimidines;
pyrimidopyrimidines; pyrrolopyrimidines, such as CGP 59326, CGP
60261 and CGP 62706; pyrazolopyrimidines,
4-(phenylamino)-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines; curcumin (diferuloyl
methane, 4,5-bis(4-fluoroanilino)phthalimide); tyrphostines
containing nitrothiophene moieties; PD-0183805 (Warner-Lambert);
antisense molecules (e.g. those that bind to ErbB-encoding nucleic
acid); quinoxalines (U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,396); tryphostins (U.S.
Pat. No. 5,804,396); ZD6474 (Astra Zeneca); PTK-787
(Novartis/Schering AG); pan-ErbB inhibitors such as C1-1033
(Pfizer); Affinitac (ISIS 3521; Isis/Lilly); Imatinib mesylate
(STI571, Gleevec.RTM.; Novartis); PKI 166 (Novartis); GW2016 (Glaxo
SmithKline); C1-1033 (Pfizer); EKB-569 (Wyeth); Semaxinib (Sugen);
ZD6474 (AstraZeneca); PTK-787 (Novartis/Schering AG); INC-1C11
(Imclone); or as described in any of the following patent
publications: U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,396; PCT WO 99/09016 (American
Cyanimid); PCT WO 98/43960 (American Cyanamid); PCT WO 97/38983
(Warner-Lambert); PCT WO 99/06378 (Warner-Lambert); PCT WO 99/06396
(Warner-Lambert); PCT WO 96/30347 (Pfizer, Inc); PCT WO 96/33978
(AstraZeneca); PCT WO96/3397 (AstraZeneca); PCT WO 96/33980
(AstraZeneca), gefitinib (IRESSA.TM., ZD1839, AstraZeneca), and
OSI-774 (Tarceva.TM., OSI Pharmaceuticals/Genentech).
In an alternate embodiment, the antibody or Fc fusion of the
present invention is conjugated or operably linked to another
therapeutic compound. The therapeutic compound may be a cytotoxic
agent, a chemotherapeutic agent, a toxin, a radioisotope, a
cytokine, or other therapeutically active agent. Conjugates of the
antibody or Fc fusion and cytotoxic agent may be made using a
variety of bifunctional protein coupling agents such as
N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithiol) propionate (SPDP),
succinimidyl-4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate,
iminothiolane (IT), bifunctional derivatives of imidoesters (such
as dimethyl adipimidate HCL), active esters (such as disuccinimidyl
suberate), aldehydes (such as glulareldehyde), bis-azido compounds
(such as bis (p-azidobenzoyl) hexanediamine), bis-diazonium
derivatives (such as bis-(p-diazoniumbenzoyl)-ethylenediamine),
diisocyanates (such as tolyene 2,6-diisocyanate), and bis-active
fluorine compounds (such as 1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene). For
example, a ricin immunotoxin can be prepared as described in
Vitetta et al., 1971, Science 238:1098. Carbon-14-labeled
1-isothiocyanatobenzyl-3-methyldiethylene triaminepentaacetc acid
(MX-DTPA) is an exemplary chelating agent for conjugation of
radionucleotide to the antibody. See PCT WO 94/11026. The linker
may be a cleavable linker facilitating release of the cytotoxic
drug in the cell. For example, an acid-labile linker,
peptidase-sensitive linker, dimethyl linker or disulfidecontaining
linker (Chari et al., 1992, Cancer Research 52: 127-131) may be
used. Alternatively, the antibody or Fc fusion is operably linked
to the therapeutic agent, e.g. by recombinant techniques or peptide
synthesis.
Chemotherapeutic agents that may be useful for conjugation to the
antibodies and Fc fusions of the present invention have been
described above. In an alternate embodiment, the antibody or Fc
fusion is conjugated or operably linked to a toxin, including but
not limited to small molecule toxins and enzymatically active
toxins of bacterial, fungal, plant or animal origin, including
fragments and/or variants thereof. Small molecule toxins include
but are not limited to calicheamicin, maytansine (U.S. Pat. No.
5,208,020), trichothene, and CC1065. In one embodiment of the
invention, the antibody or Fc fusion is conjugated to one or more
maytansine molecules (e.g. about 1 to about 10 maytansine molecules
per antibody molecule). Maytansine may, for example, be converted
to May-SS-Me which may be reduced to May-SH3 and reacted with
modified antibody or Fc fusion (Chari et al., 1992, Cancer Research
52: 127-131) to generate a maytansinoid-antibody or maytansinoid-Fc
fusion conjugate. Another conjugate of interest comprises an
antibody or Fc fusion conjugated to one or more calicheamicin
molecules. The calicheamicin family of antibiotics are capable of
producing double-stranded DNA breaks at sub-picomolar
concentrations. Structural analogues of calicheamicin that may be
used include but are not limited to .gamma..sub.1.sup.1,
.alpha..sub.2.sup.1, .alpha..sub.3, N-acetyl-.gamma..sub.1.sup.1,
PSAG, and .THETA..sup.1.sub.1, (Hinman et al, 1993, Cancer Research
53:3336-3342; Lode et al., 1998, Cancer Research 58:2925-2928)
(U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,714,586; 5,712,374; 5,264,586; 5,773,001).
Dolastatin 10 analogs such as auristatin E (AE) and
monomethylauristatin E (MMAE) may find use as conjugates for the Fc
variants of the present invention (Doronina et al., 2003, Nat
Biotechnol 21 (7):778-84; Francisco et al., 2003 Blood
102(4):1456-65). Useful enyzmatically active toxins include but are
not limited to diphtheria A chain, nonbinding active fragments of
diphtheria toxin, exotoxin A chain (from Pseudomonas aeruginosa),
ricin A chain, abrin A chain, modeccin A chain, alpha-sarcin,
Aleurites fordii proteins, dianthin proteins, Phytolaca americana
proteins (PAPI, PAPII, and PAP-S), momordica charantia inhibitor,
curcin, crotin, sapaonaria officinalis inhibitor, gelonin,
mitogellin, restrictocin, phenomycin, enomycin and the
tricothecenes. See, for example, PCT WO 93/21232. The present
invention further contemplates a conjugate or fusion formed between
an antibody or Fc fusion of the present invention and a compound
with nucleolytic activity, for example a ribonuclease or DNA
endonuclease such as a deoxyribonuclease (DNase).
In an alternate embodiment, an antibody or Fc fusion of the present
invention may be conjugated or operably linked to a radioisotope to
form a radioconjugate. A variety of radioactive isotopes are
available for the production of radioconjugate antibodies and Fc
fusions. Examples include, but are not limited to, At.sup.211,
I.sup.131, I.sup.125, Y.sup.90, Re.sup.186, Re.sup.188, Sm.sup.153,
Bi.sup.212, P.sup.32, and radioactive isotopes of Lu.
In yet another embodiment, an antibody or Fc fusion of the present
invention may be conjugated to a "receptor" (such streptavidin) for
utilization in tumor pretargeting wherein the antibody-receptor or
Fc fusion-receptor conjugate is administered to the patient,
followed by removal of unbound conjugate from the circulation using
a clearing agent and then administration of a "ligand" (e.g.
avidin) which is conjugated to a cytotoxic agent (e.g. a
radionucleotide). In an alternate embodiment, the antibody or Fc
fusion is conjugated or operably linked to an enzyme in order to
employ Antibody Dependent Enzyme Mediated Prodrug Therapy (ADEPT).
ADEPT may be used by conjugating or operably linking the antibody
or Fc fusion to a prodrug-activating enzyme that converts a prodrug
(e.g. a peptidyl chemotherapeutic agent, see PCT WO 81/01145) to an
active anti-cancer drug. See, for example, PCT WO 88/07378 and U.S.
Pat. No. 4,975,278. The enzyme component of the immunoconjugate
useful for ADEPT includes any enzyme capable of acting on a prodrug
in such a way so as to covert it into its more active, cytotoxic
form. Enzymes that are useful in the method of this invention
include but are not limited to alkaline phosphatase useful for
converting phosphate-containing prodrugs into free drugs;
arylsulfatase useful for converting sulfate-containing prodrugs
into free drugs; cytosine deaminase useful for converting non-toxic
5-fluorocytosine into the anti-cancer drug, 5-fluorouracil;
proteases, such as serrata protease, thermolysin, subtilisin,
carboxypeptidases and cathepsins (such as cathepsins B and L), that
are useful for converting peptide-containing prodrugs into free
drugs; D-alanylcarboxypeptidases, useful for converting prodrugs
that contain D-amino acid substituents; carbohydrate-cleaving
enzymes such as .beta.-galactosidase and neuramimidase useful for
converting glycosylated prodrugs into free drugs; beta-lactamase
useful for converting drugs derivatized with .alpha.-lactams into
free drugs; and penicillin amidases, such as penicillin V amidase
or penicillin G amidase, useful for converting drugs derivatized at
their amine nitrogens with phenoxyacetyl or phenylacetyl groups,
respectively, into free drugs. Alternatively, antibodies with
enzymatic activity, also known in the art as "abzymes", can be used
to convert the prodrugs of the invention into free active drugs
(see, for example, Massey, 1987, Nature 328: 457-458).
Antibody-abzyme and Fc fusion-abzyme conjugates can be prepared for
delivery of the abzyme to a tumor cell population. Other
modifications of the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present
invention are contemplated herein. For example, the antibody or Fc
fusion may be linked to one of a variety of nonproteinaceous
polymers, e.g., polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol,
polyoxyalkylenes, or copolymers of polyethylene glycol and
polypropylene glycol.
Pharmaceutical compositions are contemplated wherein an antibody or
Fc fusion of the present invention and one or more therapeutically
active agents are formulated. Formulations of the antibodies and Fc
fusions of the present invention are prepared for storage by mixing
said antibody or Fc fusion having the desired degree of purity with
optional pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients or
stabilizers (Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition,
Osol, A. Ed., 1980), in the form of lyophilized formulations or
aqueous solutions. Acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers
are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations
employed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate, acetate,
and other organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid and
methionine; preservatives (such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium
chloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride,
benzethonium chloride; phenol, butyl orbenzyl alcohol; alkyl
parabens such as methyl or propyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol;
cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; and m-cresol); low molecular weight (less
than about 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such as serum
albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as
polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids such as glycine, glutamine,
asparagine, histidine, arginine, or lysine; monosaccharides,
disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including glucose, mannose,
or dextrins: chelating agents such as EDTA; sugars such as sucrose,
mannitol, trehalose or sorbitol; sweeteners and other flavoring
agents; fillers such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, corn
and other starches; binding agents; additives; coloring agents;
salt-forming counter-ions such as sodium; metal complexes (e.g.
Zn-protein complexes); and/or non-ionic surfactants such as
TWEEN.TM., PLURONICS.TM. or polyethylene glycol (PEG). In a
preferred embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition that comprises
the antibody or Fc fusion of the present invention is in a
water-soluble form, such as being present as pharmaceutically
acceptable salts, which is meant to include both acid and base
addition salts. "Pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salt"
refers to those salts that retain the biological effectiveness of
the free bases and that are not biologically or otherwise
undesirable, formed with inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid,
hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid and
the like, and organic acids such as acetic acid, propionic acid,
glycolic acid, pyruvic acid, oxalic acid, maleic acid, malonic
acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, citric acid,
benzoic acid, cinnamic acid, mandelic acid, methanesulfonic acid,
ethanesulfonic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, salicylic acid and the
like. "Pharmaceutically acceptable base addition salts" include
those derived from inorganic bases such as sodium, potassium,
lithium, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, copper,
manganese, aluminum salts and the like. Particularly preferred are
the ammonium, potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium salts.
Salts derived from pharmaceutically acceptable organic non-toxic
bases include salts of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines,
substituted amines including naturally occurring substituted
amines, cyclic amines and basic ion exchange resins, such as
isopropylamine, trimethylamine, diethylamine, triethylamine,
tripropylamine, and ethanolamine. The formulations to be used for
in vivo administration are preferrably sterile. This is readily
accomplished by filtration through sterile filtration membranes or
other methods.
The antibodies and Fc fusions disclosed herein may also be
formulated as immunoliposomes. A liposome is a small vesicle
comprising various types of lipids, phospholipids and/or surfactant
that is useful for delivery of a therapeutic agent to a mammal.
Liposomes containing the antibody or Fc fusion are prepared by
methods known in the art, such as described in Epstein et al.,
1985, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 82:3688; Hwang et al., 1980, Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA, 77:4030; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,485,045; 4,544,545;
and PCT WO 97/38731. Liposomes with enhanced circulation time are
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,556. The components of the
liposome are commonly arranged in a bilayer formation, similar to
the lipid arrangement of biological membranes. Particularly useful
liposomes can be generated by the reverse phase evaporation method
with a lipid composition comprising phosphatidylcholine,
cholesterol and PEG-derivatized phosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-PE).
Liposomes are extruded through filters of defined pore size to
yield liposomes with the desired diameter. A chemotherapeutic agent
or other therapeutically active agent is optionally contained
within the liposome (Gabizon et al., 1989, J National Cancer Inst
81:1484).
The antibodies, Fc fusions, and other therapeutically active agents
may also be entrapped in microcapsules prepared by methods
including but not limited to coacervation techniques, interfacial
polymerization (for example using hydroxymethylcellulose or
gelatin-microcapsules, or poly-(methylmethacylate) microcapsules),
colloidal drug delivery systems (for example, liposomes, albumin
microspheres, microemulsions, nano-particles and nanocapsules), and
macroemulsions. Such techniques are disclosed in Remington's
Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition, Osol, A. Ed., 1980.
Sustained-release preparations may be prepared. Suitable examples
of sustained-release preparations include semipermeable matrices of
solid hydrophobic polymer, which matrices are in the form of shaped
articles, e.g. films, or microcapsules. Examples of
sustained-release matrices include polyesters, hydrogels (for
example poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate), or poly(vinylalcohol)),
polylactides (U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919), copolymers of L-glutamic
acid and gamma ethyl-L-glutamate, non-degradable ethylene-vinyl
acetate, degradable lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers such as
the LUPRON DEPOT.TM. (which are injectable microspheres composed of
lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer and leuprolide acetate),
poly-D-(-)-3-hydroxybutyric acid, and ProLease.RTM. (commercially
available from Alkermes), which is a microsphere-based delivery
system composed of the desired bioactive molecule incorporated into
a matrix of poly-DL-lactide-co-glycolide (PLG).
The concentration of the therapeutically active antibody or Fc
fusion of the present invention in the formulation may vary from
about 0.1 to 100 weight %. In a preferred embodiment, the
concentration of the antibody or Fc fusion is in the range of 0.003
to 1.0 molar. In order to treat a patient, a therapeutically
effective dose of the antibody or Fc fusion of the present
invention may be administered. By "therapeutically effective dose"
herein is meant a dose that produces the effects for which it is
administered. The exact dose will depend on the purpose of the
treatment, and will be ascertainable by one skilled in the art
using known techniques. Dosages may range from 0.01 to 100 mg/kg of
body weight or greater, for example 0.1, 1, 10, or 50 mg/kg of body
weight, with 1 to 10 mg/kg being preferred. As is known in the art,
adjustments for antibody or Fc fusion degradation, systemic versus
localized delivery, and rate of new protease synthesis, as well as
the age, body weight, general health, sex, diet, time of
administration, drug interaction and the severity of the condition
may be necessary, and will be ascertainable with routine
experimentation by those skilled in the art.
Administration of the pharmaceutical composition comprising an
antibody or Fc fusion of the present invention, preferably in the
form of a sterile aqueous solution, may be done in a variety of
ways, including, but not limited to, orally, subcutaneously,
intravenously, intranasally, intraotically, transdermally,
topically (e.g., gels, salves, lotions, creams, etc.),
intraperitoneally, intramuscularly, intrapulmonary (e.g., AERx.RTM.
inhalable technology commercially available from Aradigm, or
Inhance.TM. pulmonary delivery system commercially available from
Inhale Therapeutics), vaginally, parenterally, rectally, or
intraocularly. In some instances, for example for the treatment of
wounds, Inflammation, etc., the antibody or Fc fusion may be
directly applied as a solution or spray. As is known in the art,
the pharmaceutical composition may be formulated accordingly
depending upon the manner of introduction.
Engineering Methods
The present invention provides engineering methods that may be used
to generate Fc variants. A principal obstacle that has hindered
previous attempts at Fc engineering is that only random attempts at
modification have been possible, due in part to the inefficiency of
engineering strategies and methods, and to the low-throughput
nature of antibody production and screening. The present invention
describes engineering methods that overcome these shortcomings. A
variety of design strategies, computational screening methods,
library generation methods, and experimental production and
screening methods are contemplated. These strategies, approaches,
techniques, and methods may be applied individually or in various
combinations to engineer optimized Fc variants.
Design Strategies
The most efficient approach to generating Fc variants that are
optimized for a desired property is to direct the engineering
efforts toward that goal. Accordingly, the present invention
teaches design strategies that may be used to engineer optimized Fc
variants. The use of a design strategy is meant to guide Fc
engineering, but is not meant to constrain an Fc variant to a
particular optimized property based on the design strategy that was
used to engineer it. At first thought this may seem
counterintuitive; however its validity is derived from the enormous
complexity of subtle interactions that determine the structure,
stability, solubility, and function of proteins and protein-protein
complexes. Although efforts can be made to predict which protein
positions, residues, interactions, etc. are important for a design
goal, often times critical ones are not predictable. Effects on
protein structure, stability, solubility, and function, whether
favorable or unfavorable, are often unforeseen. Yet there are
innumerable amino acid modifications that are detrimental or
deleterious to proteins. Thus often times the best approach to
engineering comes from generation of protein variants that are
focused generally towards a design goal but do not cause
detrimental effects. In this way, a principal objective of a design
strategy may be the generation of quality diversity. At a
simplistic level this can be thought of as stacking the odds in
one's favor. As an example, perturbation of the Fc carbohydrate or
a particular domain-domain angle, as described below, are valid
design strategies for generating optimized Fc variants, despite the
fact that how carbohydrate and domain-domain angles determine the
properties of Fc is not well understood. By reducing the number of
detrimental amino acid modifications that are screened, i.e. by
screening quality diversity, these design strategies become
practical. Thus the true value of the design strategies taught in
the present invention is their ability to direct engineering
efforts towards the generation of valuable Fc variants. The
specific value of any one resulting variant is determined after
experimentation.
One design strategy for engineering Fc variants is provided in
which interaction of Fc with some Fc ligand is altered by
engineering amino acid modifications at the interface between Fc
and said Fc ligand. Fc ligands herein may include but are not
limited to Fc.gamma.Rs, C1q, FcRn, protein A or G, and the like. By
exploring energetically favorable substitutions at Fc positions
that impact the binding interface, variants can be engineered that
sample new interface conformations, some of which may improve
binding to the Fc ligand, some of which may reduce Fc ligand
binding, and some of which may have other favorable properties.
Such new interface conformations could be the result of, for
example, direct interaction with Fc ligand residues that form the
interface, or indirect effects caused by the amino acid
modifications such as perturbation of side chain or backbone
conformations. Variable positions may be chosen as any positions
that are believed to play an important role in determining the
conformation of the interface. For example, variable positions may
be chosen as the set of residues that are within a certain
distance, for example 5 Angstroms (.ANG.), preferrably between 1
and 10 .ANG., of any residue that makes direct contact with the Fc
ligand.
An additional design strategy for generating Fc variants is
provided in which the conformation of the Fc carbohydrate at N297
is optimized. Optimization as used in this context is meant to
includes conformational and compositional changes in the N297
carbohydrate that result in a desired property, for example
increased or reduced affinity for an Fc.gamma.R. Such a strategy is
supported by the observation that the carbohydrate structure and
conformation dramatically affect Fc/Fc.gamma.R and Fc/C1q binding
(Umana et al., 1999, Nat Biotechnol 17:176-180; Davies et al.,
2001, Biotechnol Bioeng 74:288-294; Mimura et al., 2001, J Biol
Chem 276:45539-45547; Radaev et al., 2001, J Biol Chem
276:16478-16483; Shields et al., 2002, J Biol Chem 277:26733-26740;
Shinkawa et al., 2003, J Biol Chem 278:3466-3473). However the
carbohydrate makes no specific contacts with Fc.gamma.Rs. By
exploring energetically favorable substitutions at positions that
interact with carbohydrate, a quality diversity of variants can be
engineered that sample new carbohydrate conformations, some of
which may improve and some of which may reduce binding to one or
more Fc ligands. While the majority of mutations near the
Fc/carbohydrate interface appear to alter carbohydrate
conformation, some mutations have been shown to alter the
glycosylation composition (Lund et al., 1996, J Immunol
157:4963-4969; Jefferis et al., 2002, Immunol Lett 82:57-65).
Another design strategy for generating Fc variants is provided in
which the angle between the C.gamma.2 and C.gamma.3 domains is
optimized Optimization as used in this context is meant to describe
conformational changes in the C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3 domain angle that
result in a desired property, for example increased or reduced
affinity for an Fc.gamma.R. This angle is an important determinant
of Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity (Radaev et al., 2001, J Biol Chem
276:16478-16483), and a number of mutations distal to the
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface affect binding potentially by modulating it
(Shields et al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:6591-6604). By exploring
energetically favorable substitutions positions that appear to play
a key role in determining the C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3 angle and the
flexibility of the domains relative to one another, a quality
diversity of variants can be designed that sample new angles and
levels of flexibility, some of which may be optimized for a desired
Fc property.
Another design strategy for generating Fc variants is provided in
which Fc is reengineered to eliminate the structural and functional
dependence on glycosylation. This design strategy involves the
optimization of Fc structure, stability, solubility, and/or Fc
function (for example affinity of Fc for one or more Fc ligands) in
the absence of the N297 carbohydrate. In one approach, positions
that are exposed to solvent in the absence of glycosylation are
engineered such that they are stable, structurally consistent with
Fc structure, and have no tendency to aggregate. The C.gamma.2 is
the only unpaired Ig domain in the antibody (see FIG. 1). Thus the
N297 carbohydrate covers up the exposed hydrophobic patch that
would normally be the interface for a protein-protein interaction
with another Ig domain, maintaining the stability and structural
integrity of Fc and keeping the C.gamma.2 domains from aggregating
across the central axis. Approaches for optimizing aglycosylated Fc
may involve but are not limited to designing amino acid
modifications that enhance aglycoslated Fc stability and/or
solubility by incorporating polar and/or charged residues that face
inward towards the C.gamma.2-C.gamma.2 dimer axis, and by designing
amino acid modifications that directly enhance the aglycosylated
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface or the interface of aglycosylated Fc with
some other Fc ligand.
An additional design strategy for engineering Fc variants is
provided in which the conformation of the C.gamma.2 domain is
optimized Optimization as used in this context is meant to describe
conformational changes in the C.gamma.2 domain angle that result in
a desired property, for example increased or reduced affinity for
an Fc.gamma.R. By exploring energetically favorable substitutions
at C.gamma.2 positions that impact the C.gamma.2 conformation, a
quality diversity of variants can be engineered that sample new
C.gamma.2 conformations, some of which may achieve the design goal.
Such new C.gamma.2 conformations could be the result of, for
example, alternate backbone conformations that are sampled by the
variant. Variable positions may be chosen as any positions that are
believed to play an important role in determining C.gamma.2
structure, stability, solubility, flexibility, function, and the
like. For example, C.gamma.2 hydrophobic core residues, that is
C.gamma.2 residues that are partially or fully sequestered from
solvent, may be reengineered. Alternatively, noncore residues may
be considered, or residues that are deemed important for
determining backbone structure, stability, or flexibility.
An additional design strategy for Fc optimization is provided in
which binding to an Fc.gamma.R, complement, or some other Fc ligand
is altered by modifications that modulate the electrostatic
interaction between Fc and said Fc ligand. Such modifications may
be thought of as optimization of the global electrostatic character
of Fc, and include replacement of neutral amino acids with a
charged amino acid, replacement of a charged amino acid with a
neutral amino acid, or replacement of a charged amino acid with an
amino acid of opposite charge (i.e. charge reversal). Such
modifications may be used to effect changes in binding affinity
between an Fc and one or more Fc ligands, for example Fc.gamma.Rs.
In a preferred embodiment, positions at which electrostatic
substitutions might affect binding are selected using one of a
variety of well known methods for calculation of electrostatic
potentials. In the simplest embodiment, Coulomb's law is used to
generate electrostatic potentials as a function of the position in
the protein. Additional embodiments include the use of Debye-Huckel
scaling to account for ionic strength effects, and more
sophisticated embodiments such as Poisson-Boltzmann calculations.
Such electrostatic calculations may highlight positions and suggest
specific amino acid modifications to achieve the design goal. In
some cases, these substitutions may be anticipated to variably
affect binding to different Fc ligands, for example to enhance
binding to activating Fc.gamma.Rs while decreasing binding affinity
to inhibitory Fc.gamma.Rs.
Computational Screening
A principal obstacle to obtaining valuable Fc variants is the
difficulty in predicting what amino acid modifications, out of the
enormous number of possibilities, will achieve the desired goals.
Indeed one of the principle reasons that previous attempts at Fc
engineering have failed to produce Fc variants of significant
clinical value is that approaches to Fc engineering have thus far
involved hit-or-miss approaches. The present invention provides
computational screening methods that enable quantitative and
systematic engineering of Fc variants. These methods typically use
atomic level scoring functions, side chain rotamer sampling, and
advanced optimization methods to accurately capture the
relationships between protein sequence, structure, and function.
Computational screening enables exploration of the entire sequence
space of possibilities at target positions by filtering the
enormous diversity which results. Variant libraries that are
screened computationally are effectively enriched for stable,
properly folded, and functional sequences, allowing active
optimization of Fc for a desired goal. Because of the overlapping
sequence constraints on protein structure, stability, solubility,
and function, a large number of the candidates in a library occupy
"wasted" sequence space. For example, a large fraction of sequence
space encodes unfolded, misfolded, incompletely folded, partially
folded, or aggregated proteins. This is particularly relevant for
Fc engineering because Ig domains are small beta sheet structures,
the engineering of which has proven extremely demanding (Quinn et
al., 1994, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8747-8751; Richardson et al.,
2002, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2754-2759). Even seemingly harmless
substitutions on the surface of a beta sheet can cause severe
packing conflicts, dramatically disrupting folding equilibrium
(Smith et al., 1995, Science 270:980-982); incidentally, alanine is
one of the worst beta sheet formers (Minor et al., 1994, Nature
371:264-267). The determinants of beta sheet stability and
specificity are a delicate balance between an extremely large
number of subtle interactions. Computational screening enables the
generation of libraries that are composed primarily of productive
sequence space, and as a result increases the chances of
identifying proteins that are optimized for the design goal. In
effect, computational screening yields an increased hit-rate,
thereby decreasing the number of variants that must be screened
experimentally. An additional obstacle to Fc engineering is the
need for active design of correlated or coupled mutations. For
example, the greatest Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity enhancement observed
thus far is S298A/E333A/K334A, obtained by combining three better
binders obtained separately in an alanine scan (Shields et al.,
2001, J Biol Chem 276:6591-6604). Computational screening is
capable of generating such a three-fold variant in one experiment
instead of three separate ones, and furthermore is able to test the
functionality of all 20 amino acids at those positions instead of
just alanine. Computational screening deals with such complexity by
reducing the combinatorial problem to an experimentally tractable
size.
Computational screening, viewed broadly, has four steps: 1)
selection and preparation of the protein template structure or
structures, 2) selection of variable positions, amino acids to be
considered at those positions, and/or selection of rotamers to
model considered amino acids, 3) energy calculation, and 4)
combinatorial optimization. In more detail, the process of
computational screening can be described as follows. A
three-dimensional structure of a protein is used as the starting
point. The positions to be optimized are identified, which may be
the entire protein sequence or subset(s) thereof. Amino acids that
will be considered at each position are selected. In a preferred
embodiment, each considered amino acid may be represented by a
discrete set of allowed conformations, called rotamers. Interaction
energies are calculated between each considered amino acid and each
other considered amino acid, and the rest of the protein, including
the protein backbone and invariable residues. In a preferred
embodiment, interaction energies are calculated between each
considered amino acid side chain rotamer and each other considered
amino acid side chain rotamer and the rest of the protein,
including the protein backbone and invariable residues. One or more
combinatorial search algorithms are then used to identify the
lowest energy sequence and/or low energy sequences.
In a preferred embodiment, the computational screening method used
is substantially similar to Protein Design Automation.RTM.
(PDA.RTM.) technology, as is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,188,965;
6,269,312; 6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/782,004; 09/927,790;
10/218,102; PCT WO 98/07254; PCT WO 01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588.
In another preferred embodiment, a computational screening method
substantially similar to Sequence Prediction Algorithm.TM.
(SPA.TM.) technology is used, as is described in (Raha et al.,
2000, Protein Sci 9:1106-1119), U.S. Ser. Nos. 091877,695, and
10/071,859. In another preferred embodiment, the computational
screening methods described in U.S. Ser. No. 10/339,788, filed on
Mar. 3, 2003, entitled "ANTIBODY OPTIMIZATION", are used. In some
embodiments, combinations of different computational screening
methods are used, including combinations of PDA.RTM. technology and
SPA.TM. technology, as well as combinations of these computational
methods in combination with other design tools. Similarly, these
computational methods can be used simultaneously or sequentially,
in any order.
A template structure is used as input into the computational
screening calculations. By "template structure" herein is meant the
structural coordinates of part or all of a protein to be optimized.
The template structure may be any protein for which a three
dimensional structure (that is, three dimensional coordinates for a
set of the protein's atoms) is known or may be calculated,
estimated, modeled, generated, or determined. The three dimensional
structures of proteins may be determined using methods including
but not limited to X-ray crystallographic techniques, nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques, de novo modeling, and homology
modeling. If optimization is desired for a protein for which the
structure has not been solved experimentally, a suitable structural
model may be generated that may serve as the template for
computational screening calculations. Methods for generating
homology models of proteins are known in the art, and these methods
find use in the present invention. See for example, Luo, et al.
2002, Protein Sci1: 1218-1226, Lehmann & Wyss, 2001, Curr Opin
Biotechnol 12(4):371-5.; Lehmann et al., 2000, Biochim Biophys Acta
1543(2):408-415; Rath & Davidson, 2000, Protein Sci,
9(12):2457-69; Lehmann et al., 2000, Protein Eng 13(1):49-57;
Desjarlais & Berg, 1993, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(6):2256-60;
Desjarlais & Berg, 1992, Proteins 12(2):101-4; Henikoff &
Henikoff, 2000, Adv Protein Chem 54:73-97; Henikoff & Henikoff,
1994, J Mol Biol 243(4):574-8; Morea et al., 2000, Methods
20:267-269. Protein/protein complexes may also be obtained using
docking methods. Suitable protein structures that may serve as
template structures include, but are not limited to, all of those
found in the Protein Data Base compiled and serviced by the
Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB,
formerly the Brookhaven National Lab).
The template structure may be of a protein that occurs naturally or
is engineered. The template structure may be of a protein that is
substantially encoded by a protein from any organism, with human,
mouse, rat, rabbit, and monkey preferred. The template structure
may comprise any of a number of protein structural forms. In a
preferred embodiment the template structure comprises an Fc region
or a domain or fragment of Fc. In an alternately preferred
embodiment the template structure comprises Fc or a domain or
fragment of Fc bound to one or more Fc ligands, with an
Fc/Fc.gamma.R complex being preferred. The Fc in the template
structure may be glycosylated or unglycosylated. The template
structure may comprise more than one protein chain. The template
structure may additionally contain nonprotein components, including
but not limited to small molecules, substrates, cofactors, metals,
water molecules, prosthetic groups, polymers and carbohydrates. In
a preferred embodiment, the template structure is a plurality or
set of template proteins, for example an ensemble of structures
such as those obtained from NMR. Alternatively, the set of template
structures is generated from a set of related proteins or
structures, or artificially created ensembles. The composition and
source of the template structure depends on the engineering goal.
For example, for enhancement of human Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity, a
human Fc/Fc.gamma.R complex structure or derivative thereof may be
used as the template structure. Alternatively, the uncomplexed Fc
structure may be used as the template structure. If the goal is to
enhance affinity of a human Fc for a mouse Fc.gamma.R, the template
structure may be a structure or model of a human Fc bound to a
mouse Fc.gamma.R.
The template structure may be modified or altered prior to design
calculations. A variety of methods for template structure
preparation are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,188,965; 6,269,312;
6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/782,004; 09/927,790; 09/877,695;
10/071,859, 10/218,102; PCT WO 98/07254; PCT WO 01/40091; and PCT
WO 02/25588. For example, in a preferred embodiment, explicit
hydrogens may be added if not included within the structure. In an
alternate embodiment, energy minimization of the structure is run
to relax strain, including strain due to van der Waals clashes,
unfavorable bond angles, and unfavorable bond lengths.
Alternatively, the template structure is altered using other
methods, such as manually, including directed or random
perturbations. It is also possible to modify the template structure
during later steps of computational screening, including during the
energy calculation and combinatorial optimization steps. In an
alternate embodiment, the template structure is not modified before
or during computational screening calculations.
Once a template structure has been obtained, variable positions are
chosen. By "variable position" herein is meant a position at which
the amino acid identity is allowed to be altered in a computational
screening calculation. As is known in the art, allowing amino acid
modifications to be considered only at certain variable positions
reduces the complexity of a calculation and enables computational
screening to be more directly tailored for the design goal. One or
more residues may be variable positions in computational screening
calculations. Positions that are chosen as variable positions may
be those that contribute to or are hypothesized to contribute to
the protein property to be optimized, for example Fc affinity for
an Fc.gamma.R, Fc stability, Fc solubility, and so forth. Residues
at variable positions may contribute favorably or unfavorably to a
specific protein property. For example, a residue at an
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface may be involved in mediating binding, and
thus this position may be varied in design calculations aimed at
improving Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity. As another example, a residue
that has an exposed hydrophobic side chain may be responsible for
causing unfavorable aggregation, and thus this position may be
varied in design calculations aimed at improving solubility.
Variable positions may be those positions that are directly
involved in interactions that are determinants of a particular
protein property. For example, the Fc.gamma.R binding site of Fc
may be defined to include all residues that contact that particular
F.gamma.cR. By "contact" herein is meant some chemical interaction
between at least one atom of an Fc residue with at least one atom
of the bound Fc.gamma.R, with chemical interaction including, but
not limited to van der Waals interactions, hydrogen bond
interactions, electrostatic interactions, and hydrophobic
interactions. In an alternative embodiment, variable positions may
include those positions that are indirectly involved in a protein
property, i.e. such positions may be proximal to residues that are
known to or hypothesized to contribute to an Fc property. For
example, the Fc.gamma.R binding site of an Fc may be defined to
include all Fc residues within a certain distance, for example 4-10
.ANG., of any Fc residue that is in van der Waals contact with the
Fc.gamma.R. Thus variable positions in this case may be chosen not
only as residues that directly contact the Fc.gamma.R, but also
those that contact residues that contact the Fc.gamma.R and thus
influence binding indirectly. The specific positions chosen are
dependent on the design strategy being employed.
One or more positions in the template structure that are not
variable may be floated. By "floated position" herein is meant a
position at which the amino acid conformation but not the amino
acid identity is allowed to vary in a computational screening
calculation. In one embodiment, the floated position may have the
parent amino acid identity. For example, floated positions may be
positions that are within a small distance, for example 5 .ANG., of
a variable position residue. In an alternate embodiment, a floated
position may have a non-parent amino acid identity. Such an
embodiment may find use in the present invention, for example, when
the goal is to evaluate the energetic or structural outcome of a
specific mutation.
Positions that are not variable or floated are fixed. By "fixed
position" herein is meant a position at which the amino acid
identity and the conformation are held constant in a computational
screening calculation. Positions that may be fixed include residues
that are not known to be or hypothesized to be involved in the
property to be optimized. In this case the assumption is that there
is little or nothing to be gained by varying these positions.
Positions that are fixed may also include positions whose residues
are known or hypothesized to be important for maintaining proper
folding, structure, stability, solubility, and/or biological
function. For example, positions may be fixed for residues that
interact with a particular Fc ligand or residues that encode a
glycosylation site in order to ensure that binding to the Fc ligand
and proper glycosylation respectively are not perturbed. Likewise,
if stability is being optimized, it may be beneficial to fix
positions that directly or indirectly interact with an Fc ligand,
for example an Fc.gamma.R, so that binding is not perturbed. Fixed
positions may also include structurally important residues such as
cysteines participating in disulfide bridges, residues critical for
determining backbone conformation such as proline or glycine,
critical hydrogen bonding residues, and residues that form
favorable packing interactions.
The next step in computational screening is to select a set of
possible amino acid identities that will be considered at each
particular variable position. This set of possible amino acids is
herein referred to as "considered amino acids" at a variable
position. "Amino acids" as used herein refers to the set of natural
20 amino acids and any nonnatural or synthetic analogues. In one
embodiment, all 20 natural amino acids are considered.
Alternatively, a subset of amino acids, or even only one amino acid
is considered at a given variable position. As will be appreciated
by those skilled in the art, there is a computational benefit to
considering only certain amino acid identities at variable
positions, as it decreases the combinatorial complexity of the
search. Furthermore, considering only certain amino acids at
variable positions may be used to tailor calculations toward
specific design strategies. For example, for solubility
optimization of aglycosylated Fc, it may be beneficial to allow
only polar amino acids to be considered at nonpolar Fc residues
that are exposed to solvent in the absence of carbohydrate.
Nonnatural amino acids, including synthetic amino acids and
analogues of natural amino acids, may also be considered amino
acids. For example see Chin et al., 2003, Science, 301(5635):964-7;
and Chin et al., 2003, Chem Biol. 10(6):511-9.
A wide variety of methods may be used, alone or in combination, to
select which amino acids will be considered at each position. For
example, the set of considered amino acids at a given variable
position may be chosen based on the degree of exposure to solvent.
Hydrophobic or nonpolar amino acids typically reside in the
interior or core of a protein, which are inaccessible or nearly
inaccessible to solvent. Thus at variable core positions it may be
beneficial to consider only or mostly nonpolar amino acids such as
alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine,
tryptophan, and methionine. Hydrophilic or polar amino acids
typically reside on the exterior or surface of proteins, which have
a significant degree of solvent accessibility. Thus at variable
surface positions it may be beneficial to consider only or mostly
polar amino acids such as alanine, serine, threonine, aspartic
acid, asparagine, glutamine, glutamic acid, arginine, lysine and
histidine. Some positions are partly exposed and partly buried, and
are not clearly protein core or surface positions, in a sense
serving as boundary residues between core and surface residues.
Thus at such variable boundary positions it may be beneficial to
consider both nonpolar and polar amino acids such as alanine,
serine, threonine, aspartic acid, asparagine, glutamine, glutamic
acid, arginine, lysine histidine, valine, isoleucine, leucine,
phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and methionine. Determination
of the degree of solvent exposure at variable positions may be by
subjective evaluation or visual inspection of the template
structure by one skilled in the art of protein structural biology,
or by using a variety of algorithms that are known in the art.
Selection of amino acid types to be considered at variable
positions may be aided or determined wholly by computational
methods, such as calculation of solvent accessible surface area, or
using algorithms that assess the orientation of the
C.alpha.-C.alpha. vectors relative to a solvent accessible surface,
as outlined in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,188,965; 6,269,312; 6,403,312; U.S.
Ser. Nos. 09/782,004; 09/927,790; 10/218,102; PCT WO 98/07254; PCT
WO 01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588. In one embodiment, each variable
position may be classified explicitly as a core, surface, or
boundary position or a classification substantially similar to
core, surface, or boundary.
In an alternate embodiment, selection of the set of amino acids
allowed at variable positions may be hypothesis-driven. Hypotheses
for which amino acid types should be considered at variable
positions may be derived by a subjective evaluation or visual
inspection of the template structure by one skilled in the art of
protein structural biology. For example, if it is suspected that a
hydrogen bonding interaction may be favorable at a variable
position, polar residues that have the capacity to form hydrogen
bonds may be considered, even if the position is in the core.
Likewise, if it is suspected that a hydrophobic packing interaction
may be favorable at a variable position, nonpolar residues that
have the capacity to form favorable packing interactions may be
considered, even if the position is on the surface. Other examples
of hypothesis-driven approaches may involve issues of backbone
flexibility or protein fold. As is known in the art, certain
residues, for example proline, glycine, and cysteine, play
important roles in protein structure and stability. Glycine enables
greater backbone flexibility than all other amino acids, proline
constrains the backbone more than all other amino acids, and
cysteines may form disulfide bonds. It may therefore be beneficial
to include one or more of these amino acid types to achieve a
desired design goal. Alternatively, it may be beneficial to exclude
one or more of these amino acid types from the list of considered
amino acids.
In an alternate embodiment, subsets of amino acids may be chosen to
maximize coverage. In this case, additional amino acids with
properties similar to that in the template structure may be
considered at variable positions. For example, if the residue at a
variable position in the template structure is a large hydrophobic
residue, additional large hydrophobic amino acids may be considered
at that position. Alternatively, subsets of amino acids may be
chosen to maximize diversity. In this case, amino acids with
properties dissimilar to those in the template structure may be
considered at variable positions. For example, if the residue at a
variable position in the template is a large hydrophobic residue,
amino acids that are small, polar, etc. may be considered.
As is known in the art, some computational screening methods
require only the identity of considered amino acids to be
determined during design calculations. That is, no information is
required concerning the conformations or possible conformations of
the amino acid side chains. Other preferred methods utilize a set
of discrete side chain conformations, called rotamers, which are
considered for each amino acid. Thus, a set of rotamers may be
considered at each variable and floated position. Rotamers may be
obtained from published rotamer libraries (see for example, Lovel
et al., 2000, Proteins: Structure Function and Genetics 40:389-408;
Dunbrack & Cohen, 1997, Protein Science 6:1661-1681; DeMaeyer
ot al., 1997, Folding and Design 2:53-66; Tuffery et al., 1991, J
Biomol Struct Dyn 8:1267-1289, Ponder & Richards, 1987, J Mol
Blot 193:775-791). As is known in the art, rotamer libraries may be
backbone-independent or backbone-dependent. Rotamers may also be
obtained from molecular mechanics or ab initio calculations, and
using other methods. In a preferred embodiment, a flexible rotamer
model is used (see Mendes et al., 1999, Proteins: Structure,
Function, and Genetics 37:530-543). Similarly, artificially
generated rotamers may be used, or augment the set chosen for each
amino acid and/or variable position. In one embodiment, at least
one conformation that is not low in energy is included in the list
of rotamers. In an alternate embodiment, the rotamer of the
variable position residue in the template structure is included in
the list of rotamers allowed for that variable position. In an
alternate embodiment, only the identity of each amino acid
considered at variable positions is provided, and no specific
conformational states of each amino acid are used during design
calculations. That is, use of rotamers is not essential for
computational screening.
Experimental information may be used to guide the choice of
variable positions and/or the choice of considered amino acids at
variable positions. As is known in the art, mutagenesis experiments
are often carried out to determine the role of certain residues in
protein structure and function, for example, which protein residues
play a role in determining stability, or which residues make up the
interface of a protein-protein interaction. Data obtained from such
experiments are useful in the present invention. For example,
variable positions for Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity enhancement could
involve varying all positions at which mutation has been shown to
affect binding. Similarly, the results from such an experiment may
be used to guide the choice of allowed amino acid types at variable
positions. For example, if certain types of amino acid
substitutions are found to be favorable, similar types of those
amino acids may be considered. In one embodiment, additional amino
acids with properties similar to those that were found to be
favorable experimentally may be considered at variable positions.
For example, if experimental mutation of a variable position at an
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface to a large hydrophobic residue was found to
be favorable, the user may choose to include additional large
hydrophobic amino acids at that position in the computational
screen. As is known in the art, display and other selection
technologies may be coupled with random mutagenesis to generate a
list or lists of amino acid substitutions that are favorable for
the selected property. Such a list or lists obtained from such
experimental work find use in the present invention. For example,
positions that are found to be invariable in such an experiment may
be excluded as variable positions in computational screening
calculations, whereas positions that are found to be more
acceptable to mutation or respond favorably to mutation may be
chosen as variable positions. Similarly, the results from such
experiments may be used to guide the choice of allowed amino acid
types at variable positions. For example, if certain types of amino
acids arise more frequently in an experimental selection, similar
types of those amino acids may be considered. In one embodiment,
additional amino acids with properties similar to those that were
found to be favorable experimentally may be considered at variable
positions. For example, if selected mutations at a variable
position that resides at an Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface are found to be
uncharged polar amino acids, the user may choose to include
additional uncharged polar amino acids, or perhaps charged polar
amino acids, at that position.
Sequence information may also be used to guide choice of variable
positions and/or the choice of amino acids considered at variable
positions. As is known in the art, some proteins share a common
structural scaffold and are homologous in sequence. This
information may be used to gain insight into particular positions
in the protein family. As is known in the art, sequence alignments
are often carried out to determine which protein residues are
conserved and which are not conserved. That is to say, by comparing
and contrasting alignments of protein sequences, the degree of
variability at a position may be observed, and the types of amino
acids that occur naturally at positions may be observed. Data
obtained from such analyses are useful in the present invention.
The benefit of using sequence information to choose variable
positions and considered amino acids at variable positions are
several fold. For choice of variable positions, the primary
advantage of using sequence information is that insight may be
gained into which positions are more tolerant and which are less
tolerant to mutation. Thus sequence information may aid in ensuring
that quality diversity, i.e. mutations that are not deleterious to
protein structure, stability, etc., is sampled computationally. The
same advantage applies to use of sequence information to select
amino acid types considered at variable positions. That is, the set
of amino acids that occur in a protein sequence alignment may be
thought of as being pre-screened by evolution to have a higher
chance than random for being compatible with a protein's structure,
stability, solubility, function, etc. Thus higher quality diversity
is sampled computationally. A second benefit of using sequence
information to select amino acid types considered at variable
positions is that certain alignments may represent sequences that
may be less immunogenic than random sequences. For example, if the
amino acids considered at a given variable position are the set of
amino acids which occur at that position in an alignment of human
protein sequences, those amino acids may be thought of as being
pre-screened by nature for generating no or low immune response if
the optimized protein is used as a human therapeutic.
The source of the sequences may vary widely, and include one or
more of the known databases, including but not limited to the Kabat
database (Johnson & Wu, 2001, Nucleic Acids Res 29:205-206;
Johnson & Wu, 2000, Nucleic Acids Res 28:214-218), the IMGT
database (IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics information
System.RTM.; Lefranc et al., 1999, Nucleic Acids Res 27:209-212;
Ruiz et al., 2000 Nucleic Acids Re. 28:219-221; Lefranc et al.,
2001, Nucleic Acids Res29:207-209; Lefranc et al., 2003, Nucleic
Acids Res 31:307-310), and VBASE, SwissProt, GenBank and Entrez,
and EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. Protein sequence information
can be obtained, compiled, and/or generated from sequence
alignments of naturally occurring proteins from any organism,
including but not limited to mammals. Protein sequence information
can be obtained from a database that is compiled privately. There
are numerous sequence-based alignment programs and methods known in
the art, and all of these find use in the present invention for
generation of sequence alignments of proteins that comprise Fc and
Fc ligands.
Once alignments are made, sequence information can be used to guide
choice of variable positions. Such sequence information can relate
the variability, natural or otherwise, of a given position.
Variability herein should be distinguished from variable position.
Variability refers to the degree to which a given position in a
sequence alignment shows variation in the types of amino acids that
occur there. Variable position, to reiterate, is a position chosen
by the user to vary in amino acid identity during a computational
screening calculation. Variability may be determined qualitatively
by one skilled in the art of bioinformatics. There are also methods
known in the art to quantitatively determine variability that may
find use in the present invention. The most preferred embodiment
measures Information Entropy or Shannon Entropy. Variable positions
can be chosen based on sequence information obtained from closely
related protein sequences, or sequences that are less closely
related.
The use of sequence information to choose variable positions finds
broad use in the present invention. For example, if an
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface position in the template structure is
tryptophan, and tryptophan is observed at that position in greater
than 90% of the sequences in an alignment, it may be beneficial to
leave that position fixed. In contrast, if another interface
position is found to have a greater level of variability, for
example if five different amino acids are observed at that position
with frequencies of approximately 20% each, that position may be
chosen as a variable position. In another embodiment, visual
inspection of aligned protein sequences may substitute for or aid
visual inspection of a protein structure. Sequence information can
also be used to guide the choice of amino acids considered at
variable positions. Such sequence information can relate to how
frequently an amino acid, amino acids, or amino acid types (for
example polar or nonpolar, charged or uncharged) occur, naturally
or otherwise, at a given position. In one embodiment, the set of
amino acids considered at a variable position may comprise the set
of amino acids that is observed at that position in the alignment.
Thus, the position-specific alignment information is used directly
to generate the list of considered amino acids at a variable
position in a computational screening calculation. Such a strategy
is well known in the art; see for example Lehmann & Wyss, 2001,
Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(4):371-5; Lehmann et al., 2000, Biochim
Biophys Acta 1543(2):408-415; Rath & Davidson, 2000, Protein
Sci, 9(12):2457-69; Lehmann et al., 2000, Protein Eng 13(1):49-57;
Desjarlais & Berg, 1993, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(6):2256-60;
Desjarlais & Berg, 1992, Proteins 12(2):101-4; Henikoff &
Henikoff, 2000, Adv Protein Chem 54:73-97; Henikoff & Henikoff,
1994, J Mol Biol 243(4):574-8. In an alternate embodiment, the set
of amino acids considered at a variable position or positions may
comprise a set of amino acids that is observed most frequently in
the alignment. Thus, a certain criteria is applied to determine
whether the frequency of an amino acid or amino acid type warrants
its inclusion in the set of amino acids that are considered at a
variable position. As is known in the art, sequence alignments may
be analyzed using statistical methods to calculate the sequence
diversity at any position in the alignment and the occurrence
frequency or probability of each amino acid at a position. Such
data may then be used to determine which amino acids types to
consider. In the simplest embodiment, these occurrence frequencies
are calculated by counting the number of times an amino acid is
observed at an alignment position, then dividing by the total
number of sequences in the alignment. In other embodiments, the
contribution of each sequence, position or amino acid to the
counting procedure is weighted by a variety of possible mechanisms.
In a preferred embodiment, the contribution of each aligned
sequence to the frequency statistics is weighted according to its
diversity weighting relative to other sequences in the alignment. A
common strategy for accomplishing this is the sequence weighting
system recommended by Henikoff and Henikoff (Henikoff &
Henikoff, 2000, Adv Protein Chem 54:73-97; Henikoff & Henikoff,
1994, J Mol Biol 243:574-8. In a preferred embodiment, the
contribution of each sequence to the statistics is dependent on its
extent of similarity to the target sequence, i.e. the template
structure used, such that sequences with higher similarity to the
target sequence are weighted more highly. Examples of similarity
measures include, but are not limited to, sequence identity, BLOSUM
similarity score, PAM matrix similarity score, and BLAST score. In
an alternate embodiment, the contribution of each sequence to the
statistics is dependent on its known physical or functional
properties. These properties include, but are not limited to,
thermal and chemical stability, contribution to activity, and
solubility. For example, when optimizing aglycosylated Fc for
solubility, those sequences in an alignment that are known to be
most soluble (for example see Ewert et al., 2003, J Mol
Bio/325:531-553), will contribute more heavily to the calculated
frequencies.
Regardless of what criteria are applied for choosing the set of
amino adds in a sequence alignment to be considered at variable
positions, use of sequence information to choose considered amino
acids finds broad use in the present invention. For example, to
optimize Fc solubility by replacing exposed nonpolar surface
residues, considered amino acids may be chosen as the set of amino
acids, or a subset of those amino acids which meet some criteria,
that are observed at that position in an alignment of protein
sequences. As another example, one or more amino acids may be added
or subtracted subjectively from a list of amino acids derived from
a sequence alignment in order to maximize coverage. For example,
additional amino acids with properties similar to those that are
found in a sequence alignment may be considered at variable
positions. For example, if an Fc position that is known to or
hypothesized to bind an Fc.gamma.R is observed to have uncharged
polar amino adds in a sequence alignment, the user may choose to
include additional uncharged polar amino acids in a computational
screening calculation, or perhaps charged polar amino acids, at
that position.
In one embodiment, sequence alignment information is combined with
energy calculation, as discussed below. For example, pseudo
energies can be derived from sequence information to generate a
scoring function. The use of a sequence-based scoring function may
assist in significantly reducing the complexity of a calculation.
However, as is appreciated by those skilled in the art, the use of
a sequence-based scoring function alone may be inadequate because
sequence information can often indicate misleading correlations
between mutations that may in reality be structurally conflicting.
Thus, in a preferred embodiment, a structure-based method of energy
calculation is used, either alone or in combination with a
sequence-based scoring function. That is, preferred embodiments do
not rely on sequence alignment information alone as the analysis
step.
Energy calculation refers to the process by which amino acid
modifications are scored. The energies of interaction are measured
by one or more scoring functions. A variety of scoring functions
find use in the present invention for calculating energies. Scoring
functions may include any number of potentials, herein referred to
as the energy terms of a scoring function, including but not
limited to a van der Waals potential, a hydrogen bond potential, an
atomic salvation potential or other solvation models, a secondary
structure propensity potential, an electrostatic potential, a
torsional potential, and an entropy potential. At least one energy
term is used to score each variable or floated position, although
the energy terms may differ depending on the position, considered
amino acids, and other considerations. In one embodiment, a scoring
function using one energy term is used. In the most preferred
embodiment, energies are calculated using a scoring function that
contains more than one energy term, for example describing van der
Waals, solvation, electrostatic, and hydrogen bond interactions,
and combinations thereof. In additional embodiments, additional
energy terms include but are not limited to entropic terms,
torsional energies, and knowledge-based energies.
A variety of scoring functions are described in U.S. Pat. Nos.
6,188,965; 6,269,312; 6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/782,004;
09/927,790, 09/877,695; 10/071,859, 10/218,102; PCT WO 98/07254;
PCT WO 01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588. As will be appreciated by
those skilled in the art, scoring functions need not be limited to
physico-chemical energy terms. For example, knowledge-based
potentials may find use in the computational screening methodology
of the present invention. Such knowledge-based potentials may be
derived from protein sequence and/or structure statistics including
but not limited to threading potentials, reference energies, pseudo
energies, homology-based energies, and sequence biases derived from
sequence alignments. In a preferred embodiment, a scoring function
is modified to include models for immunogenicity, such as functions
derived from data on binding of peptides to MHC (Major
Htocompatability Complex), that may be used to identify potentially
immunogenic sequences (see for example U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/903,378;
10/039,170; 60/222,697; 10/339,788; PCT WO 01/21823; and PCT WO
02/00165). In one embodiment, sequence alignment information can be
used to score amino acid substitutions. For example, comparison of
protein sequences, regardless of whether the source of said
proteins is human, monkey, mouse, or otherwise, may be used to
suggest or score amino acid mutations in the computational
screening methodology of the present invention. In one embodiment,
as is known in the art, one or more scoring functions may be
optimized or "trained" during the computational analysis, and then
the analysis re-run using the optimized system. Such altered
scoring functions may be obtained for example, by training a
scoring function using experimental data. As will be appreciated by
those skilled in the art, a number of force fields, which are
comprised of one or more energy terms, may serve as scoring
functions. Force fields include but are not limited to ab initio or
quantum mechanical force fields, semi-empirical force fields, and
molecular mechanics force fields. Scoring functions that are
knowledge-based or that use statistical methods may find use in the
present invention. These methods may be used to assess the match
between a sequence and a three-dimensional protein structure, and
hence may be used to score amino acid substitutions for fidelity to
the protein structure. In one embodiment, molecular dynamics
calculations may be used to computationally screen sequences by
individually calculating mutant sequence scores.
There are a variety of ways to represent amino acids in order to
enable efficient energy calculation. In a preferred embodiment,
considered amino acids are represented as rotamers, as described
previously, and the energy (or score) of interaction of each
possible rotamer at each variable and floated position with the
other variable and floated rotamers, with fixed position residues,
and with the backbone structure and any non-protein atoms, is
calculated. In a preferred embodiment, two sets of interaction
energies are calculated for each side chain rotamer at every
variable and floated position: the interaction energy between the
rotamer and the fixed atoms (the "singles" energy), and the
interaction energy between the variable and floated positions
rotamer and all other possible rotamers at every other variable and
floated position (the "doubles" energy). In an alternate
embodiment, singles and doubles energies are calculated for fixed
positions as well as for variable and floated positions. In an
alternate embodiment, considered amino acids are not represented as
rotamers.
An important component of computational screening is the
identification of one or more sequences that have a favorable
score, i.e. are low in energy. Determining a set of low energy
sequences from an extremely large number of possibilities is
nontrivial, and to solve this problem a combinatorial optimization
algorithm is employed. The need for a combinatorial optimization
algorithm is illustrated by examining the number of possibilities
that are considered in a typical computational screening
calculation. The discrete nature of rotamer sets allows a simple
calculation of the number of possible rotameric sequences for a
given design problem. A backbone of length n with m possible
rotamers per position will have m.sup.n possible rotamer sequences,
a number that grows exponentially with sequence length. For very
simple calculations, it is possible to examine each possible
sequence in order to identify the optimal sequence and/or one or
more favorable sequences. However, for a typical design problem,
the number of possible sequences (up to 10.sup.80 or more) is
sufficiently large that examination of each possible sequence is
intractable. A variety of combinatorial optimization algorithms may
then be used to identify the optimum sequence and/or one or more
favorable sequences. Combinatorial optimization algorithms may be
divided into two classes: (1) those that are guaranteed to return
the global minimum energy configuration if they converge, and (2)
those that are not guaranteed to return the global minimum energy
configuration, but which will always return a solution. Examples of
the first class of algorithms include but are not limited to
Dead-End Elimination (DEE) and Branch & Bound (B&B)
(including Branch and Terminate) (Gordon & Mayo, 1999,
Structure Fold Des 7:1089-98). Examples of the second class of
algorithms include, but are not limited to, Monte Carlo (MC),
self-consistent mean field (SCMF), Boltzmann sampling (Metropolis
et al., 1953, J Chem Phys 21:1087), simulated annealing
(Kirkpatrick et al., 1983, Science, 220:671-680), genetic algorithm
(GA), and Fast and Accurate Side-Chain Topology and Energy
Refinement (FASTER) (Desmet, et al., 2002, Proteins, 48:31-43). A
combinatorial optimization algorithm may be used alone or in
conjunction with another combinatorial optimization algorithm.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the strategy for
applying a combinatorial optimization algorithm is to find the
global minimum energy configuration. In an alternate embodiment,
the strategy is to find one or more low energy or favorable
sequences. In an alternate embodiment, the strategy is to find the
global minimum energy configuration and then find one or more low
energy or favorable sequences. For example, as outlined in U.S.
Pat. No. 6,269,312, preferred embodiments utilize a Dead End
Elimination (DEE) step and a Monte Carlo step. In other
embodiments, tabu search algorithms are used or combined with DEE
and/or Monte Carlo, among other search methods (see Modern
Heuristic Search Methods, edited by V. J. Rayward-Smith et al.,
1996, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; U.S. Ser. No. 10/218,102; and PCT
WO 02/25588). In another preferred embodiment, a genetic algorithm
may be used; see for example U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/877,695 and
10/071,859. As another example, as is more fully described in U.S.
Pat. Nos. 6,188,965; 6,269,312; 6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos.
09/782,004; 09/927,790; 10/218,102; PCT WO 98/07254; PCT WO
01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588, the global optimum may be reached,
and then further computational processing may occur, which
generates additional optimized sequences. In the simplest
embodiment, design calculations are not combinatorial. That is,
energy calculations are used to evaluate amino acid substitutions
individually at single variable positions. For other calculations
it is preferred to evaluate amino acid substitutions at more than
one variable position. In a preferred embodiment, all possible
interaction energies are calculated prior to combinatorial
optimization. In an alternatively preferred embodiment, energies
may be calculated as needed during combinatorial optimization.
Library Generation
The present invention provides methods for generating libraries
that may subsequently be screened experimentally to single out
optimized Fc variants. By "library" as used herein is meant a set
of one or more Fc variants. Library may refer to the set of
variants in any form. In one embodiment, the library is a list of
nucleic acid or amino acid sequences, or a list of nucleic acid or
amino acid substitutions at variable positions. For example, the
examples used to illustrate the present invention below provide
libraries as amino acid substitutions at variable positions. In one
embodiment, a library is a list of at least one sequence that are
Fc variants optimized for a desired property. For example see,
Filikov et al., 2002, Protein Sci 11:1452-1461 and Luo et al.,
2002, Protein Sci 11:1218-1226. In an alternate embodiment, a
library may be defined as a combinatorial list, meaning that a list
of amino acid substitutions is generated for each variable
position, with the implication that each substitution is to be
combined with all other designed substitutions at all other
variable positions. In this case, expansion of the combination of
all possibilities at all variable positions results in a large
explicitly defined library. A library may refer to a physical
composition of polypeptides that comprise the Fc region or some
domain or fragment of the Fc region. Thus a library may refer to a
physical composition of antibodies or Fc fusions; either in
purified or unpurified form. A library may refer to a physical
composition of nucleic acids that encode the library sequences.
Said nucleic acids may be the genes encoding the library members,
the genes encoding the library members with any operably linked
nucleic acids, or expression vectors encoding the library members
together with any other operably linked regulatory sequences,
selectable markers, fusion constructs, and/or other elements. For
example, the library may be a set of mammalian expression vectors
that encode Fc library members, the protein products of which may
be subsequently expressed, purified, and screened experimentally.
As another example, the library may be a display library. Such a
library could, for example, comprise a set of expression vectors
that encode library members operably linked to some fusion partner
that enables phage display, ribosome display, yeast display,
bacterial surface display, and the like.
The library may be generated using the output sequence or sequences
from computational screening. As discussed above, computationally
generated libraries are significantly enriched in stable, properly
folded, and functional sequences relative to randomly generated
libraries. As a result, computational screening increases the
chances of identifying proteins that are optimized for the design
goal. The set of sequences in a library is generally, but not
always, significantly different from the parent sequence, although
in some cases the library preferably contains the parent sequence.
As is known in the art, there are a variety of ways that a library
may be derived from the output of computational screening
calculations. For example, methods of library generation described
in U.S. Pat. No. 6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/782,004; 09/927,790;
10/218,102; PCT WO 01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588 find use in the
present invention. In one embodiment, sequences scoring within a
certain range of the global optimum sequence may be included in the
library. For example, all sequences within 10 kcal/mol of the
lowest energy sequence could be used as the library. In an
alternate embodiment, sequences scoring within a certain range of
one or more local minima sequences may be used. In a preferred
embodiment, the library sequences are obtained from a filtered set.
Such a list or set may be generated by a variety of methods, as is
known in the art, for example using an algorithm such as Monte
Carlo, B&B, or SCMF. For example, the top 10.sup.3 or the top
10.sup.5 sequences in the filtered set may comprise the library.
Alternatively, the total number of sequences defined by the
combination of all mutations may be used as a cutoff criterion for
the library. Preferred values for the total number of recombined
sequences range from 10 to 10.sup.20, particularly preferred values
range from 100 to 10.sup.9. Alternatively, a cutoff may be enforced
when a predetermined number of mutations per position is reached.
In some embodiments, sequences that do not make the cutoff are
included in the library. This may be desirable in some situations,
for instance to evaluate the approach to library generation, to
provide controls or comparisons, or to sample additional sequence
space. For example, the parent sequence may be included in the
library, even if it does not make the cutoff.
Clustering algorithms may be useful for classifying sequences
derived by computational screening methods into representative
groups. For example, the methods of clustering and their
application described in U.S. Ser. No. 10/218,102 and PCT WO
02/25588, find use in the present invention. Representative groups
may be defined, for example, by similarity. Measures of similarity
include, but are not limited to sequence similarity and energetic
similarity. Thus the output sequences from computational screening
may be clustered around local minima, referred to herein as
clustered sets of sequences. For example, sets of sequences that
are close in sequence space may be distinguished from other sets.
In one embodiment, coverage within one or a subset of clustered
sets may be maximized by including in the library some, most, or
all of the sequences that make up one or more clustered sets of
sequences. For example, it may be advantageous to maximize coverage
within the one, two, or three lowest energy clustered sets by
including the majority of sequences within these sets in the
library. In an alternate embodiment, diversity across clustered
sets of sequences may be sampled by including within a library only
a subset of sequences within each clustered set. For example, all
or most of the clustered sets could be broadly sampled by including
the lowest energy sequence from each clustered set in the
library.
Sequence information may be used to guide or filter computationally
screening results for generation of a library. As discussed, by
comparing and contrasting alignments of protein sequences, the
degree of variability at a position and the types of amino acids
which occur naturally at that position may be observed. Data
obtained from such analyses are useful in the present invention.
The benefits of using sequence information have been discussed, and
those benefits apply equally to use of sequence information to
guide library generation. The set of amino acids that occur in a
sequence alignment may be thought of as being pre-screened by
evolution to have a higher chance than random at being compatible
with a protein's structure, stability, solubility, function, and
immunogenicity. The variety of sequence sources, as well as the
methods for generating sequence alignments that have been
discussed, find use in the application of sequence information to
guiding library generation. Likewise, as discussed above, various
criteria may be applied to determine the importance or weight of
certain residues in an alignment. These methods also find use in
the application of sequence information to guide library
generation. Using sequence information to guide library generation
from the results of computational screening finds broad use in the
present invention. In one embodiment, sequence information is used
to filter sequences from computational screening output. That is to
say, some substitutions are subtracted from the computational
output to generate the library. For example the resulting output of
a computational screening calculation or calculations may be
filtered so that the library includes only those amino acids, or a
subset of those amino acids that meet some criteria, for example
that are observed at that position in an alignment of sequences. In
an alternate embodiment, sequence information is used to add
sequences to the computational screening output. That is to say,
sequence information is used to guide the choice of additional
amino acids that are added to the computational output to generate
the library. For example, the output set of amino acids for a given
position from a computational screening calculation may be
augmented to include one or more amino acids that are observed at
that position in an alignment of protein sequences. In an alternate
embodiment, based on sequence alignment information, one or more
amino acids may be added to or subtracted from the computational
screening sequence output in order to maximize coverage or
diversity. For example, additional amino acids with properties
similar to those that are found in a sequence alignment may be
added to the library. For example, if a position is observed to
have uncharged polar amino acids in a sequence alignment,
additional uncharged polar amino acids may be included in the
library at that position.
Libraries may be processed further to generate subsequent
libraries. In this way, the output from a computational screening
calculation or calculations may be thought of as a primary library.
This primary library may be combined with other primary libraries
from other calculations or other libraries, processed using
subsequent calculations, sequence information, or other analyses,
or processed experimentally to generate a subsequent library,
herein referred to as a secondary library. As will be appreciated
from this description, the use of sequence information to guide or
filter libraries, discussed above, is itself one method of
generating secondary libraries from primary libraries. Generation
of secondary libraries gives the user greater control of the
parameters within a library. This enables more efficient
experimental screening, and may allow feedback from experimental
results to be interpreted more easily, providing a more efficient
design/experimentation cycle.
There are a wide variety of methods to generate secondary libraries
from primary libraries. For example, U.S. Ser. No. 10/218,102 and
PCT WO 02/25588, describes methods for secondary library generation
that find use in the present invention. Typically some selection
step occurs in which a primary library is processed in some way.
For example, in one embodiment a selection step occurs wherein some
set of primary sequences are chosen to form the secondary library.
In an alternate embodiment, a selection step is a computational
step, again generally including a selection step, wherein some
subset of the primary library is chosen and then subjected to
further computational analysis, including both further
computational screening as well as techniques such as "in silico"
shuffling or recombination (see, for example U.S. Pat. Nos.
5,830,721; 5,811,238; 5,605,793; and 5,837,458, error-prone PCR,
for example using modified nucleotides; known mutagenesis
techniques including the use of multi-cassettes; and DNA shuffling
(Crameri et al., 1998, Nature 391:288-291; Coco et al., 2001, Nat
Biotechnol 19:354-9; Coco et al., 2002, Nat Biotechnol,
20:1246-50), heterogeneous DNA samples (U.S. Pat. No. 5,939,250);
ITCHY (Ostermeier et al., 1999, Nat Biotechnol 17:1205-1209); StEP
(Zhao et al., 1998, Nat Biotechnol 16:258-261), GSSM (U.S. Pat.
Nos. 6,171,820 and 5,965,408); in vivo homologous recombination,
ligase assisted gene assembly, end-complementary PCR, profusion
(Roberts & Szostak, 1997, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:12297-12302); yeast/bacteria surface display (Lu et al., 1995,
Biotechnology 13:366-372); Seed & Aruffo, 1987, Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 84(10):3365-3369; Boder & Wittrup, 1997, Nat Biotechnol
15:553-557). In an alternate embodiment, a selection step occurs
that is an experimental step, for example any of the library
screening steps below, wherein some subset of the primary library
is chosen and then recombined experimentally, for example using one
of the directed evolution methods discussed below, to form a
secondary library. In a preferred embodiment, the primary library
is generated and processed as outlined in U.S. Pat. No.
6,403,312.
Generation of secondary and subsequent libraries finds broad use in
the present invention. In one embodiment, different primary
libraries may be combined to generate a secondary or subsequent
library. In another embodiment, secondary libraries may be
generated by sampling sequence diversity at highly mutatable or
highly conserved positions. The primary library may be analyzed to
determine which amino acid positions in the template protein have
high mutational frequency, and which positions have low mutational
frequency. For example, positions in a protein that show a great
deal of mutational diversity in computational screening may be
fixed in a subsequent round of design calculations. A filtered set
of the same size as the first would now show diversity at positions
that were largely conserved in the first library. Alternatively,
the secondary library may be generated by varying the amino acids
at the positions that have high numbers of mutations, while keeping
constant the positions that do not have mutations above a certain
frequency.
This discussion is not meant to constrain generation of libraries
subsequent to primary libraries to secondary libraries. As will be
appreciated, primary and secondary libraries may be processed
further to generate tertiary libraries, quaternary libraries, and
so on. In this way, library generation is an iterative process. For
example, tertiary libraries may be constructed using a variety of
additional steps applied to one or more secondary libraries; for
example, further computational processing may occur, secondary
libraries may be recombined, or subsets of different secondary
libraries may be combined. In a preferred embodiment, a tertiary
library may be generated by combining secondary libraries. For
example, primary and/or secondary libraries that analyzed different
parts of a protein may be combined to generate a tertiary library
that treats the combined parts of the protein. In an alternate
embodiment, the variants from a primary library may be combined
with the variants from another primary library to provide a
combined tertiary library at lower computational cost than creating
a very long filtered set. These combinations may be used, for
example, to analyze large proteins, especially large multi-domain
proteins, of which Fc is an example. Thus the above description of
secondary library generation applies to generating any library
subsequent to a primary library, the end result being a final
library that may screened experimentally to obtain protein variants
optimized for a design goal. These examples are not meant to
constrain generation of secondary libraries to any particular
application or theory of operation for the present invention.
Rather, these examples are meant to illustrate that generation of
secondary libraries, and subsequent libraries such as tertiary
libraries and so on, is broadly useful in computational screening
methodology for library generation.
Experimental Production and Screening
The present invention provides methods for producing and screening
libraries of Fc variants. The described methods are not meant to
constrain the present invention to any particular application or
theory of operation. Rather, the provided methods are meant to
illustrate generally that one or more Fc variants or one or more
libraries of Fc variants may be produced and screened
experimentally to obtain optimized Fc variants. Fc variants may be
produced and screened in any context, whether as an Fc region as
precisely defined herein, a domain or fragment thereof, or a larger
polypeptide that comprises Fc such as an antibody or Fc fusion.
General methods for antibody molecular biology, expression,
purification, and screening are described in Antibody Engineering,
edited by Duebel & Kontermann, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg,
2001; and Hayhurst & Georgiou, 2001, Curr Opin Chem Biol
5:683-689; Maynard & Georgiou, 2000, Annu Rev Biomed Eng
2:339-76.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the library sequences
are used to create nucleic acids that encode the member sequences,
and that may then be cloned into host cells, expressed and assayed,
if desired. Thus, nucleic acids, and particularly DNA, may be made
that encode each member protein sequence. These practices are
carried out using well-known procedures. For example, a variety of
methods that may find use in the present invention are described in
Molecular Cloning--A Laboratory Manual, 3.sup.rd Ed. (Maniatis,
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 2001), and Current
Protocols in Molecular Biology (John Wiley & Sons). As will be
appreciated by those skilled in the art, the generation of exact
sequences for a library comprising a large number of sequences is
potentially expensive and time consuming. Accordingly, there are a
variety of techniques that may be used to efficiently generate
libraries of the present invention. Such methods that may find use
in the present invention are described or referenced in U.S. Pat.
No. 6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/782,004; 09/927,790; 10/218,102;
PCT WO 01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588. Such methods include but are
not limited to gene assembly methods, PCR-based method and methods
which use variations of PCR, ligase chain reaction-based methods,
pooled oligo methods such as those used in synthetic shuffling,
error-prone amplification methods and methods which use oligos with
random mutations, classical site-directed mutagenesis methods,
cassette mutagenesis, and other amplification and gene synthesis
methods. As is known in the art, there are a variety of
commercially available kits and methods for gene assembly,
mutagenesis, vector subcloning, and the like, and such commercial
products find use in the present invention for generating nucleic
acids that encode Fc variant members of a library.
The Fc variants of the present invention may be produced by
culturing a host cell transformed with nucleic acid, preferably an
expression vector, containing nucleic acid encoding the Fc
variants, under the appropriate conditions to induce or cause
expression of the protein. The conditions appropriate for
expression will vary with the choice of the expression vector and
the host cell, and will be easily ascertained by one skilled in the
art through routine experimentation. A wide variety of appropriate
host cells may be used, including but not limited to mammalian
cells, bacteria, insect cells, and yeast. For example, a variety of
cell lines that may find use in the present invention are described
in the ATCC.RTM. cell line catalog, available from the American
Type Culture Collection.
In a preferred embodiment, the Fc variants are expressed in
mammalian expression systems, including systems in which the
expression constructs are introduced into the mammalian cells using
virus such as retrovirus or adenovirus. Any mammalian cells may be
used, with human, mouse, rat, hamster, and primate cells being
particularly preferred. Suitable cells also include known research
cells, including but not limited to Jurkat T cells, NIH3T3, CHO,
COS, and 293 cells. In an alternately preferred embodiment, library
proteins are expressed in bacterial cells. Bacterial expression
systems are well known in the art, and include Escherichia coli (E.
coli), Bacillus subtills, Streptococcus cremoris, and Streptococcus
lividans. In alternate embodiments, Fc variants are produced in
insect cells or yeast cells. In an alternate embodiment, Fc
variants are expressed in vitro using cell free translation
systems. In vitro translation systems derived from both prokaryotic
(e.g. E. coli) and eukaryotic (e.g. wheat germ, rabbit
reticulocytes) cells are available and may be chosen based on the
expression levels and functional properties of the protein of
interest. For example, as appreciated by those skilled in the art,
in vitro translation is required for some display technologies, for
example ribosome display. In addition, the Fc variants may be
produced by chemical synthesis methods.
The nucleic acids that encode the Fc variants of the present
invention may be incorporated into an expression vector in order to
express the protein. A variety of expression vectors may be
utilized for protein expression. Expression vectors may comprise
self-replicating extra-chromosomal vectors or vectors which
integrate into a host genome. Expression vectors are constructed to
be compatible with the host cell type. Thus expression vectors
which find use in the present invention include but are not limited
to those which enable protein expression in mammalian cells,
bacteria, insect cells, yeast, and in in vitro systems. As is known
in the art, a variety of expression vectors are available,
commercially or otherwise, that may find use in the present
invention for expressing Fc variant proteins.
Expression vectors typically comprise a protein operably linked
with control or regulatory sequences, selectable markers, any
fusion partners, and/or additional elements. By "operably linked"
herein is meant that the nucleic acid is placed into a functional
relationship with another nucleic acid sequence. Generally, these
expression vectors include transcriptional and translational
regulatory nucleic acid operably linked to the nucleic acid
encoding the Fc variant, and are typically appropriate to the host
cell used to express the protein. In general, the transcriptional
and translational regulatory sequences may include promoter
sequences, ribosomal binding sites, transcriptional start and stop
sequences, translational start and stop sequences, and enhancer or
activator sequences. As is also known in the art, expression
vectors typically contain a selection gene or marker to allow the
selection of transformed host cells containing the expression
vector. Selection genes are well known in the art and will vary
with the host cell used.
Fc variants may be operably linked to a fusion partner to enable
targeting of the expressed protein, purification, screening,
display, and the like. Fusion partners may be linked to the Fc
variant sequence via a linker sequences. The linker sequence will
generally comprise a small number of amino acids, typically less
than ten, although longer linkers may also be used. Typically,
linker sequences are selected to be flexible and resistant to
degradation. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art,
any of a wide variety of sequences may be used as linkers. For
example, a common linker sequence comprises the amino acid sequence
GGGGS (SEQ ID NO: 6). A fusion partner may be a targeting or signal
sequence that directs Fc variant protein and any associated fusion
partners to a desired cellular location or to the extracellular
media. As is known in the art, certain signaling sequences may
target a protein to be either secreted into the growth media, or
into the periplasmic space, located between the inner and outer
membrane of the cell. A fusion partner may also be a sequence that
encodes a peptide or protein that enables purification and/or
screening. Such fusion partners include but are not limited to
polyhistidine tags (His-tags) (for example H.sub.6 and H.sub.10 or
other tags for use with Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography
(IMAC) systems (e.g. Ni.sup.+2 affinity columns)), GST fusions, MBP
fusions, Strep-tag, the BSP biotinylation target sequence of the
bacterial enzyme BirA, and epitope tags which are targeted by
antibodies (for example c-myc tags, flag-tags, and the like). As
will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, such tags may be
useful for purification, for screening, or both. For example, an Fc
variant may be purified using a His-tag by immobilizing it to a
Ni.sup.+2 affinity column, and then after purification the same
His-tag may be used to immobilize the antibody to a Ni.sup.+2
coated plate to perform an ELISA or other binding assay (as
described below). A fusion partner may enable the use of a
selection method to screen Fc variants (see below). Fusion partners
that enable a variety of selection methods are well-known in the
art, and all of these find use in the present invention. For
example, by fusing the members of an Fc variant library to the gene
III protein, phage display can be employed (Kay et al., Phage
display of peptides and proteins: a laboratory manual, Academic
Press, San Diego, Calif., 1996; Lowman et al., 1991, Biochemistry
30:10832-10838; Smith, 1985, Science 228:1315-1317). Fusion
partners may enable Fc variants to be labeled. Alternatively, a
fusion partner may bind to a specific sequence on the expression
vector, enabling the fusion partner and associated Fc variant to be
linked covalently or noncovalently with the nucleic acid that
encodes them. For example, U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/642,574; 10/080,376;
09/792,630; 10/023,208; 09/792,626; 10/082,671; 09/953,351;
10/097,100; USSN 60/366,658; PCT WO 00/22906; PCT WO 01/49058; PCT
WO 02/04852; PCT WO 02/04853; PCT WO 02/08023; PCT WO 01/28702; and
PCT WO 02/07466 describe such a fusion partner and technique that
may find use in the present invention.
The methods of introducing exogenous nucleic acid into host cells
are well known in the art, and will vary with the host cell used.
Techniques include but are not limited to dextran-mediated
transfection, calcium phosphate precipitation, calcium chloride
treatment, polybrene mediated transfection, protoplast fusion,
electroporation, viral or phage infection, encapsulation of the
polynucleotide(s) in liposomes, and direct microinjection of the
DNA into nuclei. In the case of mammalian cells, transfection may
be either transient or stable.
In a preferred embodiment, Fc variant proteins are purified or
isolated after expression. Proteins may be isolated or purified in
a variety of ways known to those skilled in the art. Standard
purification methods include chromatographic techniques, including
ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction, affinity, sizing or gel
filtration, and reversed-phase, carried out at atmospheric pressure
or at high pressure using systems such as FPLC and HPLC.
Purification methods also include electrophoretic, immunological,
precipitation, dialysis, and chromatofocusing techniques.
Ultrafiltration and diafiltration techniques, in conjunction with
protein concentration, are also useful. As is well known in the
art, a variety of natural proteins bind Fc and antibodies, and
these proteins can find use in the present invention for
purification of Fc variants. For example, the bacterial proteins A
and G bind to the Fc region. Likewise, the bacterial protein L
binds to the Fab region of some antibodies, as of course does the
antibody's target antigen. Purification can often be enabled by a
particular fusion partner. For example, Fc variant proteins may be
purified using glutathione resin if a GST fusion is employed,
Ni.sup.+2 affinity chromatography if a His-tag is employed, or
immobilized anti-flag antibody if a flag-tag is used. For general
guidance in suitable purification techniques, see Protein
Purification: Principles and Practice, 3.sup.rd Ed., Scopes,
Springer-Verlag, NY, 1994. The degree of purification necessary
will vary depending on the screen or use of the Fc variants. In
some instances no purification is necessary. For example in one
embodiment, if the Fc variants are secreted, screening may take
place directly from the media. As is well known in the art, some
methods of selection do not involve purification of proteins. Thus,
for example, if a library of Fc variants is made into a phage
display library, protein purification may not be performed.
Fc variants may be screened using a variety of methods, including
but not limited to those that use in vitro assays, in vivo and
cell-based assays, and selection technologies. Automation and
high-throughput screening technologies may be utilized in the
screening procedures. Screening may employ the use of a fusion
partner or label. The use of fusion partners has been discussed
above. By "labeled" herein is meant that the Fc variants of the
invention have one or more elements, isotopes, or chemical
compounds attached to enable the detection in a screen. In general,
labels fall into three classes: a) immune labels, which may be an
epitope incorporated as a fusion partner that is recognized by an
antibody, b) isotopic labels, which may be radioactive or heavy
isotopes, and c) small molecule labels, which may include
fluorescent and colorimetric dyes, or molecules such as biotin that
enable other labeling methods. Labels may be incorporated into the
compound at any position and may be incorporated in vitro or in
vivo during protein expression.
In a preferred embodiment, the functional and/or biophysical
properties of Fc variants are screened in an in vitro assay. In
vitro assays may allow a broad dynamic range for screening
properties of interest. Properties of Fc variants that may be
screened include but are not limited to stability, solubility, and
affinity for Fc ligands, for example Fc.gamma.Rs. Multiple
properties may be screened simultaneously or individually. Proteins
may be purified or unpurified, depending on the requirements of the
assay. In one embodiment, the screen is a qualitative or
quantitative binding assay for binding of Fc variants to a protein
or nonprotein molecule that is known or thought to bind the Fc
variant. In a preferred embodiment, the screen is a binding assay
for measuring binding to the antibody's or Fc fusions' target
antigen. In an alternately preferred embodiment, the screen is an
assay for binding of Fc variants to an Fc ligand, including but are
not limited to the family of Fc.gamma.Rs, the neonatal receptor
FcRn, the complement protein C1q, and the bacterial proteins A and
G. Said Fc ligands may be from any organism, with humans, mice,
rats, rabbits, and monkeys preferred. Binding assays can be carried
out using a variety of methods known in the art, including but not
limited to FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) and BRET
(Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer)-based assays,
AlphaScreen.TM. (Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous
Assay), Scintillation Proximity Assay, ELISA (Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assay), SPR (Surface Plasmon Resonance, also known as
BIACORE.RTM.), isothermal titration calorimetry, differential
scanning calorimetry, gel electrophoresis, and chromatography
including gel filtration. These and other methods may take
advantage of some fusion partner or label of the Fc variant. Assays
may employ a variety of detection methods including but not limited
to chromogenic, fluorescent, luminescent, or isotopic labels.
The biophysical properties of Fc variant proteins, for example
stability and solubility, may be screened using a variety of
methods known in the art. Protein stability may be determined by
measuring the thermodynamic equilibrium between folded and unfolded
states. For example, Fc variant proteins of the present invention
may be unfolded using chemical denaturant, heat, or pH, and this
transition may be monitored using methods including but not limited
to circular dichroism spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy,
absorbance spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy, calorimetry, and
proteolysis. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art,
the kinetic parameters of the folding and unfolding transitions may
also be monitored using these and other techniques. The solubility
and overall structural integrity of an Fc variant protein may be
quantitatively or qualitatively determined using a wide range of
methods that are known in the art. Methods which may find use in
the present invention for characterizing the biophysical properties
of Fc variant proteins include gel electrophoresis, chromatography
such as size exclusion chromatography and reversed-phase high
performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, ultraviolet
absorbance spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, circular
dichroism spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry,
differential scanning calorimetry, analytical ultra-centrifugation,
dynamic light scattering, proteolysis, and cross-linking, turbidity
measurement, filter retardation assays, immunological assays,
fluorescent dye binding assays, protein-staining assays,
microscopy, and detection of aggregates via ELISA or other binding
assay. Structural analysis employing X-ray crystallographic
techniques and NMR spectroscopy may also find use. In one
embodiment, stability and/or solubility may be measured by
determining the amount of protein solution after some defined
period of time. In this assay, the protein may or may not be
exposed to some extreme condition, for example elevated
temperature, low pH, or the presence of denaturant. Because
function typically requires a stable, soluble, and/or
well-folded/structured protein, the aforementioned functional and
binding assays also provide ways to perform such a measurement. For
example, a solution comprising an Fc variant could be assayed for
its ability to bind target antigen, then exposed to elevated
temperature for one or more defined periods of time, then assayed
for antigen binding again. Because unfolded and aggregated protein
is not expected to be capable of binding antigen, the amount of
activity remaining provides a measure of the Fc variant's stability
and solubility.
In a preferred embodiment, the library is screened using one or
more cell-based or in vivo assays. For such assays, Fc variant
proteins, purified or unpurified, are typically added exogenously
such that cells are exposed to individual variants or pools of
variants belonging to a library. These assays are typically, but
not always, based on the function of an antibody or Fc fusion that
comprises the Fc variant; that is, the ability of the antibody or
Fc fusion to bind a target antigen and mediate some biochemical
event, for example effector function, ligand/receptor binding
inhibition, apoptosis, and the like. Such assays often involve
monitoring the response of cells to antibody or Fc fusion, for
example cell survival, cell death, change in cellular morphology,
or transcriptional activation such as cellular expression of a
natural gene or reporter gene. For example, such assays may measure
the ability of Fc variants to elicit ADCC, ADCP, or CDC. For some
assays additional cells or components, that is in addition to the
target cells, may need to be added, for example serum complement,
or effector cells such as peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs), NK
cells, macrophages, and the like. Such additional cells may be from
any organism, preferably humans, mice, rat, rabbit, and monkey.
Antibodies and Fc fusions may cause apoptosis of certain cell lines
expressing the antibody's target antigen, or they may mediate
attack on target cells by immune cells which have been added to the
assay. Methods for monitoring cell death or viability are known in
the art, and include the use of dyes, immunochemical, cytochemical,
and radioactive reagents. For example, caspase staining assays may
enable apoptosis to be measured, and uptake or release of
radioactive substrates or fluorescent dyes such as alamar blue may
enable cell growth or activation to be monitored. In a preferred
embodiment, the DELFIA.RTM. EuTDA-based cytotoxicity assay (Perkin
Elmer, Mass.) is used. Alternatively, dead or damaged target cells
may be monitored by measuring the release of one or more natural
intracellular proteins, for example lactate dehydrogenase.
Transcriptional activation may also serve as a method for assaying
function in cell-based assays. In this case, response may be
monitored by assaying for natural genes or proteins which may be
upregulated, for example the release of certain interleukins may be
measured, or alternatively readout may be via a reporter construct.
Cell-based assays may also involve the measure of morphological
changes of cells as a response to the presence of an Fc variant.
Cell types for such assays may be prokaryotic or eukaryotic, and a
variety of cell lines that are known in the art may be
employed.
Alternatively, cell-based screens are performed using cells that
have been transformed or transfected with nucleic acids encoding
the Fc variants. That is, Fc variant proteins are not added
exogenously to the cells. For example, in one embodiment, the
cell-based screen utilizes cell surface display. A fusion partner
can be employed that enables display of Fc variants on the surface
of cells (Witrrup, 2001, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 12:395-399). Cell
surface display methods that may find use in the present invention
include but are not limited to display on bacteria (Georgiou et
al., 1997, Nat Biotechnol 15:29-34; Georgiou et al., 1993, Trends
Biotechnol 11:6-10; Lee et al., 2000, Nat Biotechnol 18:645-648;
Jun et al., 1998, Nat Biotechnol 16:576-80), yeast (Boder &
Wittrup, 2000, Methods Enzymol 328:430-44; Boder & Wittrup,
1997, Nat Biotechnol 15:553-557), and mammalian cells (Whitehorn et
al., 1995, Biotechnology 13:1215-1219). In an alternate embodiment,
Fc variant proteins are not displayed on the surface of cells, but
rather are screened intracellularly or in some other cellular
compartment. For example, periplasmic expression and cytometric
screening (Chen et al., 2001, Nat Biotechnol 19: 537-542), the
protein fragment complementation assay (Johnson & Varshavsky,
1994, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10340-10344.; Pelletier et al.,
1998, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12141-12146), and the yeast two
hybrid screen (Fields & Song, 1989, Nature 340:245-246) may
find use in the present invention. Alternatively, if a polypeptide
that comprises the Fc variants, for example an antibody or Fc
fusion, imparts some selectable growth advantage to a cell, this
property may be used to screen or select for Fc variants.
As is known in the art, a subset of screening methods are those
that select for favorable members of a library. Said methods are
herein referred to as "selection methods", and these methods find
use in the present invention for screening Fc variant libraries.
When libraries are screened using a selection method, only those
members of a library that are favorable, that is which meet some
selection criteria, are propagated, isolated, and/or observed. As
will be appreciated, because only the most fit variants are
observed, such methods enable the screening of libraries that are
larger than those screenable by methods that assay the fitness of
library members individually. Selection is enabled by any method,
technique, or fusion partner that links, covalently or
noncovalently, the phenotype of an Fc variant with its genotype,
that is the function of an Fc variant with the nucleic acid that
encodes it. For example the use of phage display as a selection
method is enabled by the fusion of library members to the gene III
protein. In this way, selection or isolation of variant proteins
that meet some criteria, for example binding affinity for an
Fc.gamma.R, also selects for or isolates the nucleic acid that
encodes it. Once isolated, the gene or genes encoding Fc variants
may then be amplified. This process of isolation and amplification,
referred to as panning, may be repeated, allowing favorable Fc
variants in the library to be enriched. Nucleic acid sequencing of
the attached nucleic acid ultimately allows for gene
identification.
A variety of selection methods are known in the art that may find
use in the present invention for screening Fc variant libraries.
These include but are not limited to phage display (Phage display
of peptides and proteins: a laboratory manual, Kay et al., 1996,
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1996; Lowman et al., 1991,
Biochemistry 30:10832-10838; Smith, 1985, Science 228:1315-1317)
and its derivatives such as selective phage infection (Malmborg et
al., 1997, J Mol Biol 273:544-551), selectively infective phage
(Krebber et al., 1997, J Mol Biol 268:619-630), and delayed
infectivity panning (Benhar et al, 2000, J Mol Biol 301:893-904),
cell surface display (Witrrup, 2001, Curr Opin Biotechnol,
12:395-399) such as display on bacteria (Georgiou et al., 1997, Nat
Biotechnol 15:29-34; Georgiou et al., 1993, Trends Biotechnol
11:6-10; Lee et al., 2000, Nat Biotechnol 18:645-648; Jun et al.,
1998, Nat Biotechnol 16:576-80), yeast (Boder & Wittrup, 2000,
Methods Enzymol 328:430-44; Boder & Wittrup, 1997, Nat
Biotechnol 15:553-557), and mammalian cells (Whitehorn et al.,
1995, Bio/technology 13:1215-1219), as well as in vitro display
technologies (Amstutz et al., 2001, Curr Opin Biotechnol
12:400-405) such as polysome display (Mattheakis et al, 1994, Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 91:9022-9026), ribosome display (Hanes et al.,
1997, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:4937-4942), mRNA display (Roberts
& Szostak, 1997, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12297-12302; Nemoto
et al., 1997, FEBS Lett 414:405-408), and ribosome-inactivation
display system (Zhou et al., 2002, J Am Chem Soc 124, 538-543)
Other selection methods that may find use in the present invention
include methods that do not rely on display, such as in Vivo
methods including but not limited to periplasmic expression and
cytometric screening (Chen et al., 2001, Nat Biotechnol
19:537-542), the protein fragment complementation assay (Johnsson
& Varshavsky, 1994, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10340-10344;
Pelletier et al., 1998, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12141-12146), and
the yeast two hybrid screen (Fields & Song, 1989, Nature
340:245-246) used in selection mode (Visintin et al., 1999, Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11723-11728). In an alternate embodiment,
selection is enabled by a fusion partner that binds to a specific
sequence on the expression vector, thus linking covalently or
noncovalently the fusion partner and associated Fc variant library
member with the nucleic acid that encodes them. For example, U.S.
Ser. Nos. 09/642,574; 10/080,376; 09/792,630; 10/023,208;
09/792,626; 10/082,671; 09/953,351; 10/097,100; USSN 60/366,658;
PCT WO 00/22906; PCT WO 01/49058; PCT WO 02/04852; PCT WO 02/04853;
PCT WO 02/08023; PCT WO 01/28702; and PCT WO 02/07466 describe such
a fusion partner and technique that may find use in the present
invention. In an alternative embodiment, in vivo selection can
occur if expression of a polypeptide that comprises the Fc variant,
such as an antibody or Fc fusion, imparts some growth,
reproduction, or survival advantage to the cell.
A subset of selection methods referred to as "directed evolution"
methods are those that include the mating or breading of favorable
sequences during selection, sometimes with the incorporation of new
mutations. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art,
directed evolution methods can facilitate identification of the
most favorable sequences in a library, and can increase the
diversity of sequences that are screened. A variety of directed
evolution methods are known in the art that may find use in the
present invention for screening Fc variant libraries, including but
not limited to DNA shuffling (PCT WO 00/42561 A3; PCT WO 01/70947
A3), exon shuffling (U.S. Pat. No. 6,365,377; Kolkman &
Stemmer, 2001, Nat Biotechnol 19:423-428), family shuffling
(Crameri et al., 1998, Nature 391:288-291; U.S. Pat. No.
6,376,246), RACHITT.TM. (Coco et al., 2001, Nat Biotechnol
19:354-359; PCT WO 02/06469), STEP and random priming of in vitro
recombination (Zhao et al., 1998, Nat Biotechnol 16:258-261; Shao
et al., 1998, Nucleic Acids Res 26:681-683), exonuclease mediated
gene assembly (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,352,842; 6,361,974), Gene Site
Saturation Mutagenesis.TM. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,358,709), Gene
Reassembly.TM. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,358,709), SCRATCHY (Lutz et al.,
2001, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11248-11253), DNA fragmentation
methods (Kikuchi et al., Gene 236:159-167), single-stranded DNA
shuffling (Kikuchi et al., 2000, Gene 243:133-137), and
AMEsystem.TM. directed evolution protein engineering technology
(Applied Molecular Evolution) (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,824,514; 5,817,483;
5,814,476; 5,763,192; 5,723,323).
The biological properties of the antibodies and Fc fusions that
comprise the Fc variants of the present invention may be
characterized in cell, tissue, and whole organism experiments. As
is know in the art, drugs are often tested in animals, including
but not limited to mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, cats, pigs, and
monkeys, in order to measure a drug's efficacy for treatment
against a disease or disease model, or to measure a drug's
pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and other properties. Said animals may
be referred to as disease models. Therapeutics are often tested in
mice, including but not limited to nude mice, SCID mice, xenograft
mice, and transgenic mice (including knockins and knockouts). For
example, an antibody or Fc fusion of the present invention that is
intended as an anti-cancer therapeutic may be tested in a mouse
cancer model, for example a xenograft mouse. In this method, a
tumor or tumor cell line is grafted onto or injected into a mouse,
and subsequently the mouse is treated with the therapeutic to
determine the ability of the antibody or Fc fusion to reduce or
inhibit cancer growth. Such experimentation may provide meaningful
data for determination of the potential of said antibody or Fc
fusion to be used as a therapeutic. Any organism, preferably
mammals, may be used for testing. For example because of their
genetic similarity to humans, monkeys can be suitable therapeutic
models, and thus may be used to test the efficacy, toxicity,
pharmacokinetics, or other property of the antibodies and Fc
fusions of the present invention. Tests of the antibodies and Fc
fusions of the present invention in humans are ultimately required
for approval as drugs, and thus of course these experiments are
contemplated. Thus the antibodies and Fc fusions of the present
invention may be tested in humans to determine their therapeutic
efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and/or other clinical
properties.
EXAMPLES
Examples are provided below to illustrate the present invention.
These examples are not meant to constrain the present invention to
any particular application or theory of operation.
For all positions discussed in the present invention, numbering is
according to the EU index as in Kabat (Kabat et al., 1991,
Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed., United
States Public Health Svice, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda). Those skilled in the art of antibodies will appreciate
that this convention consists of nonsequential numbering in
specific regions of an immunoglobulin sequence, enabling a
normalized reference to conserved positions in immunoglobulin
families. Accordingly, the positions of any given immunoglobulin as
defined by the EU index will not necessarily correspond to its
sequential sequence. FIG. 3 (SEQ ID NO: 1) shows the sequential and
EU index numbering schemes for the antibody alemtuzumab in order to
illustrate this principal more clearly. It should also be noted
that polymorphisms have been observed at a number of Fc positions,
including but not limited to Kabat 270, 272, 312, 315, 356, and
358, and thus slight differences between the presented sequence and
sequences in the scientific literature may exist.
Example 1
Computational Screening and Design of Fc Libraries
Computational screening calculations were carried out to design
optimized Fc variants. Fc variants were computationally screened,
constructed, and experimentally investigated over several
computation/experimentation cycles. For each successive cycle,
experimental data provided feedback into the next set of
computational screening calculations and library design. All
computational screening calculations and library design are
presented in Example 1. For each set of calculations, a table is
provided that presents the results and provides relevant
information and parameters.
Several different structures of Fc bound to the extracellular
domain of Fc.gamma.Rs served as template structures for the
computational screening calculations. Publicly available
Fc/Fc.gamma.R complex structures included pdb accession code 1 E4K
(Sondermann et al., 2000, Nature 406:267-273.), and pdb accession
codes 1IIS and IIX (Radaev et al., 2001, J Biol Chom
276:16469-16477). The extracellular regions of Fc.gamma.RIIIb and
Fc.gamma.RIIIa are 96% identical, and therefore the use of the
Fc/Fc.gamma.RIIIb structure is essentially equivalent to use of
Fc.gamma.RIIIa. Nonetheless, for some calculations, a more precise
Fc/Fc.gamma.RIIIa template structure was constructed by modeling a
D129G mutation in the 1IIS and 1E4K structures (referred to as
D129G 1IIS and D129G 1E4K template structures). In addition, the
structures for human Fc bound to the extracellular domains of human
Fc.gamma.RIIb, human F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa, and mouse Fc.gamma.RIII
were modeled using standard methods, the available Fc.gamma.R
sequence information, the aforementioned Fc/Fc.gamma.R structures,
as well as structural information for unbound complexes (pdb
accession code 1H9V)(Sondermann et al., 2001, J Mol Biol
309:737-749) (pdb accession code 1 FCG)(Maxwell et al., 1999, Nat
Struct Biol 6:437-442), Fc.gamma.RIIb (pdb accession code
2FCB)(Sondermann et al, 1999, Embo J 18:1095-1103), and
Fc.gamma.RIIIb (pdb accession code 1E4J)(Sondermann et al., 2000,
Nature 406:267-273.).
Variable positions and amino adds to be considered at those
positions were chosen by visual inspection of the aforementioned
Fc/Fc.gamma.R and Fc.gamma.R structures, and using solvent
accessibility information and sequence information. Sequence
information of Fcs and Fc.gamma.Rs was particularly useful for
determining variable positions at which substitutions may provide
distinguishing affinities between activating and inhibitory
receptors. Virtually all C.gamma.2 positions were screened
computationally. The Fc structure is a homodimer of two heavy
chains (labeled chains A and B in the 1IIS, 1IIX, and 1E4K
structures) that each include the hinge and C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3
domains (shown in FIG. 2). Because the Fc.gamma.R (labeled chain C
in the 1IIS, 1IIX, and 1E4K structures) binds asymmetrically to the
Fc homodimer, each chain was often considered separately in design
calculations. For some calculations, Fc and/or
Fc.quadrature..gamma.R residues proximal to variable position
residues were floated, that is the amino acid conformation but not
the amino acid identity was allowed to vary in a protein design
calculation to allow for conformational adjustments. These are
indicated below the table for each set of calculations when
relevant. Considered amino acids typically belonged to either the
Core, Core XM, Surface, Boundary, Boundary XM, or All 20
classifications, unless noted otherwise. These classifications are
defined as follows: Core=alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine,
phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and methionine; Core
XM=alanine, valine, isoleucine, leudne, phenylalanine, tyrosine,
and tryptophan; Surface=alanine, serine, threonine, aspartic acid,
asparagine, glutamine, glutamic acid, arginine, lysine and
histidine; Boundary=alanine, serine, threonine, aspartic acid,
asparagine, glutamine, glutamic acid, arginine, lysine, histidine,
valine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan,
and methionine; Boundary XM=Boundary=alanine, serine, threonine,
aspartic acid, asparagine, glutamine, glutamic acid, arginine,
lysine, histidine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine,
tyrosine, and tryptophan; All 20=all 20 naturally occurring amino
acids.
The majority of calculations followed one of two general types of
computational screening methods. In one method, the conformations
of amino acids at variable positions were represented as a set of
backbone-independent side chain rotamers derived from the rotamer
library of Dunbrack & Cohen (Dunbrack of al., 1997, Protein Sci
6:1661-1681). The energies of all possible combinations of the
considered amino acids at the chosen variable positions were
calculated using a force field containing terms describing van der
Waals, solvation, electrostatic, and hydrogen bond interactions,
and the optimal (ground state) sequence was determined using a Dead
End Elimination (DEE) algorithm. As will be appreciated by those in
the art, the predicted lowest energy sequence is not necessarily
the true lowest energy sequence because of errors primarily in the
scoring function, coupled with the fact that subtle conformational
differences in proteins can result in dramatic differences in
stability. However, the predicted ground state sequence is likely
to be close to the true ground state, and thus additional favorable
diversity can be explored by evaluating the energy of sequences
that are close in sequence space and energy around the predicted
ground state. To accomplish this, as well as to generate a
diversity of sequences for a library, a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm
was used to evaluate the energies of 1000 similar sequences around
the predicted ground state. The number of sequences out of the 1000
sequence set that contain that amino acid at that variable position
is referred to as the occupancy for that substitution, and this
value may reflect how favorable that substitution is. This
computational screening method is substantially similar to Protein
Design Automation.RTM. (PDA.RTM.) technology, as described in U.S.
Pat. Nos. 6,188,965; 6,269,312; 6,403,312; U.S. Ser. Nos.
09/782,004; 09/927,790; 10/218,102; PCT WO 98/07254; PCT WO
01/40091; and PCT WO 02/25588, and for ease of description, is
referred to as PDA.RTM. technology throughout the examples. Tables
that present the results of these calculations provide for each
variable position on the designated chain (column 1) the amino
acids considered at each variable position (column 2), the WT Fc
amino acid identity at each variable position (column 3), the amino
acid identity at each variable position in the DEE ground state
sequence (column 4), and the set of amino acids and corresponding
occupancy that are observed in the Monte Carlo output (column
5).
Other calculations utilized a genetic algorithm (GA) to screen for
low energy sequences, with energies being calculated during each
round of "evolution" for those sequences being sampled. The
conformations of amino acids at variable and floated positions were
represented as a set of side chain rotamers derived from a
backbone-independent rotamer library using a flexible rotamer model
(Mendes et al., 1999, Proteins 37:530-543). Energies were
calculated using a force field containing terms describing van der
Waals, salvation, electrostatic, and hydrogen bond interactions.
This calculation generated a list of 300 sequences which are
predicted to be low in energy. To facilitate analysis of the
results and library generation, the 300 output sequences were
clustered computationally into 10 groups of similar sequences using
a nearest neighbor single linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm
to assign sequences to related groups based on similarity scores
(Diamond, 1995, Acta Cryst D51:127-135). That is, all sequences
within a group are most similar to all other sequences within the
same group and less similar to sequences in other groups. The
lowest energy sequence from each of these ten clusters are used as
a representative of each group, and are presented as results. This
computational screening method is substantially similar to Sequence
Prediction Algorithm.TM. (SPA.TM.) technology, as described in
(Raha et al., 2000, Protein Sci 9:1106-1119); U.S. Ser. Nos.
09/877,695; and 10/071,859, and for ease of description, is
referred to as SPA.TM. technology throughout the examples.
Computational screening was applied to design energetically
favorable interactions at the Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface at groups of
variable positions that mediate or potentially mediate binding with
Fc.gamma.R. Because the binding interface involves a large number
of Fc residues on the two different chains, and because Fc.gamma.Rs
bind asymmetrically to Fc, residues were grouped in different sets
of interacting variable positions, and designed in separate sets of
calculations. In many cases these sets were chosen as groups of
residues that were deemed to be coupled, that is the energy of one
or more residues is dependent on the identity of one or more other
residues. Various template structures were used, and in many cases
calculations explored substitutions on both chains. For many of the
variable position sets, calculations were carried out using both
the PDA.RTM. and SPA.TM. technology computational screening methods
described. The results of these calculations and relevant
parameters and information are presented in Tables 1-30 below.
Tables that present the results of these calculations provide for
each variable position on the designated chain (column 1) the amino
acids considered at each variable position (column 2), the WT Fc
amino acid identity at each variable position (column 3), and the
amino acid identity at the variable positions for the lowest energy
sequence from each cluster group (columns 4-13). Tables 1-59 are
broken down into two sets, as labeled below, PDA.RTM. and SPA.TM.
technology. Column 4 of the PDA.RTM. tables show the frequency of
each residue that occurs in the top 1000 sequences during that
PDA.RTM. run. Thus, in the first row of Table 1, at position 328,
when run using boundary amino acids as the set of variable residues
for that position, L occurred 330 times in the top 1000 sequence, M
occurred 302 times, etc.
In addition, included within the compositions of the invention are
antibodies that have any of the listed amino acid residues in the
listed positions, either alone or in any combination (note
preferred combinations are listed in the claims, the summary and
the figures). One preferred combination is the listed amino acids
residues in the listed positions in a ground state (sometimes
referred to herein as the "global solution", as distinguished from
the wild-type). Similarly, residue positions and particular amino
acids at those residue positions may be combined between
tables.
For SPA.TM. technology tables, such as Table 4, column 4 is a
SPA.TM. run that results in a protein with the six listed amino
acids at the six listed positions (e.g. column 4 is a single
protein with a wild-type sequence except for 239E, 265G, 267S,
269Y, 270T and 299S. Thus, each of these individual proteins are
included within the invention. In addition, combinations between
SPA.TM. proteins, both within tables and between tables, are also
included.
In addition, each table shows the presence or absence of
carbohydrate, but specifically included are the reverse sequences;
e.g. Table 1 is listed for an aglycosylated variant, but these same
amino acid changes can be done on a glycosylated variant.
Furthermore, each table lists the template structure used, as well
as "floated" residues; for example, Table 2 used a PDA.RTM. run
that floated C120, C132 and C134.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 328 A Boundary L L L: 330 M: 302
E: 111 K: 62 A: 45 Q: 39 D: 36 S: 30 T: 28 N: 10 R: 7 332 A Surface
I R R: 247 K: 209 Q: 130 H: 95 E: 92 T: 59 D: 51 N: 51 S: 42 A: 24
328 B Boundary L L L: 321 M: 237 T: 166 K: 73 R: 72 S: 55 Q: 20 D:
17 E: 13 A: 12 V: 10 N: 4 332 B Surface I E E: 269 Q: 180 R: 145 K:
111 D: 97 T: 78 N: 65 S: 28 A: 14 H: 13 PDA .RTM. technology, 1IIS
template structure; -carbohydrate
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Surface S K E: 349 D: 203
K: 196 A: 95 Q: 83 S: 63 N: 10 R: 1 265 A Boundary XM D D D: 616 N:
113 L: 110 E: 104 S: 25 A: 23 Q: 9 299 A Boundary XM T I I: 669 H:
196 V: 135 327 A Boundary XM A S A: 518 S: 389 N: 67 D: 26 265 B
Boundary XM D Q Q: 314 R: 247 N: 118 I: 115 A: 63 E: 55 D: 34 S: 22
K: 21 V: 11 PDA .RTM. technology; 1IIS template structure;
+carbohydrate; floated 120 C, 132 C, 134 C
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Surface S E E: 872 Q: 69 D:
39 K: 16 A: 4 265 A Boundary XM D Y Y: 693 H: 111 E: 69 D: 62 F: 29
K: 19 R: 14 W: 2 Q: 1 267 A Boundary XM S S S: 991 A: 9 269 A Core
XM E F F: 938 E: 59 Y: 3 270 A Surface D E E: 267 T: 218 K: 186 D:
89 Q: 88 R: 46 S: 34 N: 29 H: 23 A: 20 299 A Boundary XM T H H: 486
T: 245 K: 130 E: 40 S: 39 D: 27 Q: 27 A: 4 N: 2 PDA .RTM.
technology; 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 120 C,
122 C, 132 C, 133 C, 134 C
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A Surface S E Q Q Q E E E Q E E 265 A All 20 D G G
G G G G G G G G 267 A All 20 S S S S S S S S S S S 269 A Core E Y Y
A A V Y A A A A 270 A Surface D T S A S T T T A A A 299 A All 20 T
S S S S S S S S S S SPA .TM. technology; 1IIS template structure;
+carbohydrate; floated 120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 133 C, 134 C
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 235 A Boundary XM L T T: 195 V:
131 L: 112 W: 107 K: 85 F: 66 Y: 56 E: 52 Q: 38 S: 37 I: 34 R: 29
H: 26 N: 23 D: 9 296 A Surface Y N N: 322 D: 181 R: 172 K: 76 Y: 70
Q: 59 E: 48 S: 40 H: 20 T: 11 A: 1 298 A Surface S T T: 370 R: 343
K: 193 A: 55 S: 39 235 B Boundary XM L L L: 922 I: 78 PDA .RTM.
technology; 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 119 C,
128 C, 157 C
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 235 A All 20 L S S P S S S S S S S 296 A Surface Y Q Q
Q E E Q E Q Q N 298 A Surface S S K K K K S S S K S 235 B All 20 L
K K K L L L L L L K SPA .TM. technology; 1IIS template structure;
+carbohydrate; floated 119 C, 128 C, 157 C
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Surface S E K: 402 E: 282
H: 116 T: 67 R: 47 Q: 39 D: 26 A: 11 S: 7 N: 3 265 B Boundary XM D
W Y: 341 W: 283 I: 236 V: 77 F: 36 H: 9 T: 7 E: 4 K: 4 A: 2 D: 1
327 B Boundary XM A R R: 838 K: 86 H: 35 E: 12 T: 10 Q: 7 A: 6 D: 3
N: 3 328 B Core XM L L L: 1000 329 B Core XM P P P: 801 A: 199 330
B Core XM A Y Y: 918 F: 42 L: 22 A: 18 332 B Surface I I I: 792 E:
202 Q: 5 K: 1 PDA .RTM. technology; 1IIS template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 88 C, 90 C, 113 C, 114 C, 116 C, 160 C, 161
C
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B Surface S D T E E E E E E E E 265 B All 20 D G G
K G K G G K K G 327 B All 20 A K M L L N L K L L L 328 B Core L M M
M L A M L M L L 329 B Core P P P P P P P P P P P 330 B Core A L A A
A A A A A A A 332 B Surface I I Q I I Q Q E D I I SPA .TM.
technology; 1IIS template structure; + carbohydrate; floated 88 C,
90 C, 113 C, 114 C, 116 C, 160 C, 161 C
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A Surface S Q Q Q E Q E Q E Q Q 265 A All 20 D G G
G G G G G G G G 299 A All 20 T S S A S S S S S S S 327 A All 20 A A
S S S S S S S A S 265 B All 20 D N G G G G G G G G G SPA .TM.
technology; 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 120 C,
132 C, 134 C
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 234 A Boundary XM L K Y: 401 L:
260 F: 151 I: 82 K: 63 H: 17 Q: 11 W: 7 R: 3 T: 2 E: 2 V: 1 235 A
Boundary XM L L W: 777 L: 200 K: 12 Y: 5 I: 3 F: 2 V: 1 234 B
Boundary XM L W W: 427 Y: 203 L: 143 F: 74 I: 59 E: 32 K: 23 V: 14
D: 10 T: 7 H: 4 R: 4 235 B Boundary XM L W W: 380 Y: 380 F: 135 K:
38 L: 26 E: 15 Q: 12 H: 8 R: 4 T: 2 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G
1E4K template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 113 C, 116 C, 132
C, 155 C, 157 C
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 234 A All 20 L G G G G G G G G G G 235 A All 20 L T
L L L L L L L T L 234 B All 20 L G G G G G G G G G G 235 B All 20 L
S A S A A S S S A A SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; +carbohydrate; floated 113 C, 116 C, 132 C, 155 C, 157
C
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Boundary XM S E E: 235 S:
122 D: 94 Q: 93 A: 74 K: 70 L: 67 T: 63 N: 57 R: 51 I: 29 V: 18 W:
15 H: 12 328 A Boundary XM L L L: 688 E: 121 K: 43 Q: 41 A: 33 D:
26 S: 14 T: 14 N: 12 R: 8 332 A Boundary XM I W I: 155 W: 95 L: 82
K: 79 E: 74 Q: 69 H: 67 V: 63 R: 57 T: 57 D: 45 S: 43 N: 42 A: 35
F: 19 Y: 18 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1IIS template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 120 C
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A All 20 S L E E Q E E K K K K 328 A All 20 L L
Q L Q K L L Q K L 332 A All 20 I K K L Q A K L Q A Q SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; +carbohydrate; floated
120 C
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Boundary XM S I R: 195 I:
169 L: 126 V: 91 K: 89 E: 61 H: 52 T: 50 Q: 42 N: 35 S: 34 D: 30 A:
26 328 B Boundary XM L L L: 671 T: 165 K: 40 S: 38 E: 28 R: 17 Q:
17 V: 11 A: 8 D: 5 332 B Boundary XM I I I: 387 E: 157 L: 151 V: 78
Q: 63 K: 50 R: 33 T: 29 D: 25 A: 12 N: 8 S: 6 W: 1 PDA .RTM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated
90 C, 160 C, 161 C
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B All 20 S T L L L L L L L L L 328 B All 20 L M
R M D T M L Q D L 332 B All 20 I I D Q Q Q L L T Q L SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; +carbohydrate; floated
90 C, 160 C, 161 C
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Boundary XM S T T: 164 S:
159 L: 156 E: 86 W: 76 K: 71 D: 65 A: 52 R: 43 H: 38 Q: 38 N: 31 I:
14 V: 7 328 B Boundary XM L L L: 556 E: 114 T: 84 K: 80 S: 69 Q: 36
A: 31 D: 15 R: 11 N: 4 332 B Boundary XM I W I: 188 W: 177 E: 97 L:
94 T: 59 Q: 57 V: 54 K: 52 F: 51 D: 34 H: 33 S: 27 R: 26 N: 18 A:
17 Y: 16 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1E4K template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 117 C
TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B All 20 S P S P E L L L L L L 328 B All 20 L K
K K K K L K K K L 332 B All 20 I S S E L L L E L L L SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; +carbohydrate; floated
117 C
TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Boundary XM S L K: 196 L:
171 I: 146 E: 88 V: 76 R: 75 T: 50 H: 45 D: 43 Q: 39 S: 30 N: 22 A:
19 328 A Boundary XM L W L: 517 F: 230 W: 164 H: 40 K: 29 E: 11 R:
5 T: 4 332 A Boundary XM I E I: 283 L: 217 E: 178 Q: 81 V: 64 D: 47
T: 35 K: 27 W: 18 R: 12 A: 10 Y: 7 N: 7 F: 6 S: 5 H: 3 PDA .RTM.
technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; -carbohydrate; floated
87 C, 157 C, 158 C
TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A All 20 S F Q E T P P T P P P 328 A All 20 L K
R R K K M R K M R 332 A All 20 I L L I I E I E E I I SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; + carbohydrate atoms;
floated 87 C, 157 C, 158 C
TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 240 A Core + Thr V V V: 698 M:
162 T: 140 263 A Core + Thr V V V: 966 T: 34 266 A Core + Thr V V
V: 983 T: 17 325 A Boundary N N N: 943 T: 40 A: 17 328 A Boundary L
L L: 610 M: 363 K: 27 332 A Glu I E E: 1000 PDA .RTM. technology;
D129G 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 273 A, 275 A,
302 A, 323 A, 134 C
TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 21 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 240 A All 20 V V A V V V V V V V V 263 A All 20 V V
V V V V V V V V V 266 A All 20 V I V I I T V V V V I 325 A All 20 N
A N N N Q T T Q N T 328 A All 20 L K K L K L K L L L L 332 A Glu I
D D D D D D D D D D SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1IIS template
structure; + carbohydrate; floated 273 A, 275 A, 302 A, 323 A, 134
C
TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 22 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 240 B Core + Thr V V V: 713 T:
287 263 B Core + Thr V V V: 992 T: 8 266 B Core + Thr V V V: 976 T:
24 325 B Boundary N N N: 453 T: 296 A: 116 D: 96 S: 30 V: 9 328 B
Boundary L L L: 623 M: 194 T: 100 R: 72 K: 11 332 B Glu I E E: 1000
PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate;
floated 273 B, 275 B, 302 B, 323 B, 161 C
TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 23 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 240 B All 20 V A T A T T A A T T T 263 B All 20 V V
A A T T V V T A T 266 B All 20 V V V V V V V V V I V 325 B All 20 N
N K K N K K N N N N 328 B All 20 L R L L L L L L L L L 332 A Glu I
D D D D D D D D D D SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1IIS template
structure; + carbohydrate; floated 273 B, 275 B, 302 B, 323 B, 161
C
TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 24 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 240 B Core + Thr V M V: 715 M:
271 T: 12 I: 2 263 B Core + Thr V V V: 992 T: 8 266 B Core + Thr V
V V: 996 T: 4 325 B Boundary N N N: 651 T: 232 D: 64 A: 53 328 B
Boundary L M M: 556 L: 407 K: 37 332 B Glu I E E: 1000 PDA .RTM.
technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; -carbohydrate; floated
273 B, 275 B, 302 B, 323 B, 131 C
TABLE-US-00025 TABLE 25 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 240 B All 20 V T A T A A A A T A A 263 B All 20 V T
W T T A T T T L L 266 B All 20 V L A T T V L T T L V 325 B All 20 N
A N A A N A A A A A 328 B All 20 L L K L L L L L L L L 332 A Glu I
D D D D D D D D D D SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; + carbohydrate; floated 273 B, 275 B, 302 B, 323 B, 131
C
TABLE-US-00026 TABLE 26 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 240 A Core + Thr V V V: 876 T:
109 M: 15 263 A Core + Thr V V V: 913 T: 87 266 A Core + Thr V V V:
969 T: 31 325 A Boundary N V V: 491 N: 236 T: 187 A: 35 D: 32 S: 19
328 A Boundary L L L: 321 W: 290 M: 271 F: 49 K: 46 R: 23 332 A Glu
I E E: 1000 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1E4K template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 273 A, 275 A, 302 A, 323 A, 158 C
TABLE-US-00027 TABLE 27 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 240 A All 20 V A T A A T T A A A T 263 A All 20 V T
T V V T V L L V T 266 A All 20 V V V V V V V V V V V 325 A All 20 N
Q N Q Q Q Q Q Q N N 328 A All 20 L K M K K K K K K K K 332 A Glu I
D D D D D D D D D D SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; + carbohydrate; floated 273 A, 275 A, 302 A, 323 A, 158
C
Computational screening calculations were aimed at designing Fc
variants to optimize the conformation of the N297 carbohydrate and
the C.gamma.2 domain. By exploring energetically favorable
substitutions at positions that interact with carbohydrate,
variants can be engineered that sample new, potentially favorable
carbohydrate conformations. Fc residues F241, F243, V262, and V264
mediate the Fc/carbohydrate interaction and thus are target
positions. The results of these design calculations are presented
in Table 28.
TABLE-US-00028 TABLE 28 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 241 A Core F Y Y: 172 M: 162 L:
144 F: 140 W: 110 I: 97 A: 91 V: 84 243 A Core F Y Y: 211 L: 204 W:
199 F: 160 M: 141 A: 85 262 A Core V M M: 302 I: 253 V: 243 A: 202
264 A Core V F I: 159 M: 152 V: 142 L: 140 W: 136 F: 120 Y: 104 A:
47 PDA .RTM. technology, 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate
Computational screening calculations were aimed a1 designing Fc
variants to optimize the angle between the C.gamma.3 and C.gamma.2
domains. Residues P244, P245, P247, and W313, which reside at the
C.gamma.2/C.gamma.3 interface, appear to play a key role in
determining the C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3 angle and the flexibility of
the domains relative to one another. By exploring energetically
favorable substitutions at these positions, variants can be
designed that sample new, potentially favorable angles and levels
of flexibility. The results of these design calculations are
presented in Table 29.
TABLE-US-00029 TABLE 29 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 244 A Boundary P H K: 164 H: 152
R: 110 M: 100 S: 92 N: 57 A: 54 D: 50 Q: 49 T: 46 E: 37 V: 30 L: 27
W: 23 F: 9 245 A Boundary P A A: 491 S: 378 N: 131 247 A Boundary P
V V: 156 T: 125 K: 101 E: 87 Q: 79 R: 78 S: 76 A: 72 D: 72 H: 60 M:
47 N: 47 313 A Boundary W W W: 359 F: 255 Y: 128 M: 114 H: 48 K: 29
T: 24 A: 11 E: 10 V: 10 S: 9 Q: 3 PDA .RTM. technology; 1IIS
template structure; -carbohydrate
In addition to the above calculations using PDA.RTM. and SPA.TM.
computational screening methods, additional calculations using
solely an electrostatic potential were used to computationally
screen Fc variants. Calculations with Coulomb's law and
Debye-Huckel scaling highlighted a number of positions in the Fc
for which amino acid substitutions would favorably affect binding
to one or more Fc.gamma.Rs, including positions for which
replacement of a neutral amino acid with a negatively charged amino
acid may enhance binding to Fc.gamma.RIIIa, and for which
replacement of a positively charged amino acid with a neutral or
negatively charged amino acid may enhance binding to
Fc.gamma.RIIIa. These results are presented in Table 30.
TABLE-US-00030 TABLE 30 Replacement Replacement of of a + residue a
neutral residue with a - residue with a - residue H268 S239 K326
Y296 K334 A327 I332 Coulomb's law and Debye-Huckel scaling; 1IIS
template structure; +carbohydrate
Computational screening calculations were carried out to optimize
aglycosylated Fc, that is to optimize Fc structure, stability,
solubility, and Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity in the absence of the N297
carbohydrate. Design calculations were aimed at designing favorable
substitutions in the context of the aglycosylated Fc template
structure at residue 297, residues proximal to it, residues at the
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interface, and residues at the Fc/carbohydrate
interface. Variable positions were grouped in different sets of
interacting variable positions and designed in separate sets of
calculations, and various template structures were used. For many
of the variable position sets, calculations were carried out using
both the PDA.RTM. and SPA.TM. computational screening methods. The
results of these calculations and relevant information are
presented in Tables 31-53 below.
TABLE-US-00031 TABLE 31 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 265 A Boundary XM D Y Y: 531 F:
226 W: 105 H: 92 K: 21 D: 16 E: 6 T: 3 297 A Boundary XM N D A: 235
S: 229 D: 166 E: 114 N: 92 Y: 57 F: 55 Q: 25 H: 10 T: 7 K: 6 L: 3
R: 1 299 A Boundary XM T L L: 482 Y: 186 F: 131 T: 55 S: 51 K: 31
H: 22 A: 18 E: 14 Q: 10 297 B Boundary XM N I I: 299 K: 147 V: 85
R: 82 W: 71 N: 65 D: 35 E: 35 Q: 34 S: 32 L: 31 H: 30 T: 28 A: 26
PDA .RTM. technology; 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate;
floated 122 C, 129 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00032 TABLE 32 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 265 A All 20 D G G G G G G G G G G 297 A All 20 N A
T A E K K A A N N 299 A All 20 T S K S K F F F F F S 297 B All 20 N
K K K K K K K K K K SPA .TM. technology; 1IIS template structure; -
carbohydrate; floated 122 C, 129 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00033 TABLE 33 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Surface S E E: 928 Q: 65 D:
7 265 A Boundary XM D W W: 709 Y: 248 F: 43 296 A Surface Y H H:
449 Y: 146 E: 137 D: 89 K: 64 N: 32 T: 30 R: 25 Q: 23 S: 5 297 A
Surface N E E: 471 H: 189 D: 102 T: 97 K: 96 R: 22 Q: 15 S: 8 298 A
Boundary XM S R R: 353 T: 275 K: 269 A: 56 S: 38 E: 5 Q: 2 H: 2 299
A Boundary XM T F Y: 398 F: 366 L: 217 H: 15 K: 4 PDA .RTM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated
120 C, 122 C, 128 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00034 TABLE 34 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A All 20 S E Q Q E Q Q Q Q Q Q 265 A All 20 D G
G G G G G G G G G 296 A All 20 Y D Q N N Q N N N Q N 297 A All 20 N
A A N A D D E N N E 298 A All 20 S K K K S K K K K S K 299 A All 20
T S Y F S Y F K F S K SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1IIS template
structure; - carbohydrate; floated 120 C, 122 C, 128 C, 132 C, 155
C
TABLE-US-00035 TABLE 35 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Surface S E E: 417 T: 122
D: 117 Q: 94 R: 84 S: 63 K: 47 H: 29 N: 19 A: 8 265 B Boundary XM D
W W: 865 Y: 79 F: 55 K: 1 296 B Surface Y Y Y: 549 H: 97 D: 80 S:
75 N: 48 E: 45 K: 32 R: 30 Q: 28 A: 16 297 B Surface N R R: 265 H:
224 E: 157 K: 154 Q: 75 D: 47 T: 34 N: 24 S: 13 A: 7 298 B Boundary
XM S V V: 966 D: 10 T: 8 A: 8 N: 4 S: 4 299 B Boundary XM T Y Y:
667 F: 330 H: 3 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; -carbohydrate; floated 117 C, 119 C, 125 C, 129 C, 152
C
TABLE-US-00036 TABLE 36 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B All 20 S S R E K S S E E E K 265 B All 20 D A
D K Y A A F F K Y 296 B All 20 Y A A A A A A A A A A 297 B All 20 N
T S T T E E E S E E 298 B All 20 S G G G G G G G G G G 299 B All 20
T L F E E Y F Y F Y Y SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; - carbohydrate; floated 117 C, 119 C, 125 C, 129 C, 152
C
TABLE-US-00037 TABLE 37 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Surface S E E: 868 Q: 92 D:
38 K: 1 N: 1 265 A Boundary XM D W W: 575 Y: 343 F: 66 H: 15 K: 1
296 A Surface Y H H: 489 Y: 103 R: 98 K: 97 Q: 64 D: 63 T: 41 N: 38
E: 7 297 A Asp N D D: 1000 298 A Boundary XM S R R: 340 K: 262 T:
255 A: 59 S: 57 E: 11 Q: 10 H: 6 299 A Boundary XM T F Y: 375 F:
323 L: 260 H: 24 K: 18 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1IIS template
structure; -carbohydrate; floated 120 C, 122 C, 128 C, 132 C, 155
C
TABLE-US-00038 TABLE 38 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A All 20 S E Q E E E E E E Q E 265 A All 20 D G
G G G G G G G G G 296 A All 20 Y E N Q E N Q Q Q Q N 297 A Asp N D
D D D D D D D D D 298 A All 20 S K S K S K K K S K K 299 A All 20 T
S K Y S F F F F F K SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1IIS template
structure; - carbohydrate; floated 120 C, 122 C, 128 C, 132 C, 155
C
TABLE-US-00039 TABLE 39 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Surface S E E: 318 Q: 123
T: 109 D: 108 R: 93 S: 89 K: 69 N: 40 H: 38 A: 13 265 B Boundary XM
D W W: 745 Y: 158 F: 85 K: 9 E: 1 R: 1 H: 1 296 B Surface Y Y Y:
390 H: 127 S: 83 R: 81 K: 78 N: 65 D: 55 E: 49 Q: 44 A: 26 T: 2 297
B Asp N D D: 1000 298 B Boundary XM S V V: 890 T: 35 A: 29 D: 19 S:
16 N: 10 E: 1 299 B Boundary XM T Y Y: 627 F: 363 H: 10 PDA .RTM.
technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; -carbohydrate; floated
117 C, 119 C, 125 C, 129 C, 152 C
TABLE-US-00040 TABLE 40 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B All 20 S K E E Q E K Q E K Q 265 B All 20 D F
K K A K Y W K L F 296 B All 20 Y A A A A A A A A A A 297 B Asp N D
D D D D D D D D D 298 B All 20 S G G G G G G G G G G 299 B All 20 T
Y Y Y Y Y Y F F Y Y SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; - carbohydrate; floated 117 C, 119 C, 125 C, 129 C, 152
C
TABLE-US-00041 TABLE 41 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Boundary XM S E E: 312 L:
148 D: 102 Q: 98 K: 64 I: 61 S: 57 A: 44 T: 39 N: 29 R: 23 V: 18 W:
5 265 A Boundary XM D W W: 363 Y: 352 F: 139 H: 77 K: 39 R: 14 D:
11 E: 4 Q: 1 297 A Asp N D D: 1000 299 A Boundary XM T Y Y: 309 F:
224 L: 212 H: 96 K: 92 E: 28 Q: 20 R: 16 T: 2 S: 1 PDA .RTM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated
120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00042 TABLE 42 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A All 20 S E L L L E E E Q L E 265 A All 20 D G
G G G G G G G G G 297 B Asp N D D D D D D D D D D 299 A All 20 T S
K K F F F K F K F SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1IIS template
structure; - carbohydrate; floated 120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00043 TABLE 43 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Boundary XM S L L: 194 T:
122 S: 120 E: 111 D: 79 K: 71 A: 62 Q: 57 R: 43 H: 43 N: 37 I: 24
W: 24 V: 13 265 B Boundary XM D W Y: 248 W: 233 F: 198 K: 84 D: 57
E: 55 H: 42 R: 28 Q: 20 A: 10 T: 10 N: 8 S: 7 297 B Asp N D D: 1000
299 B Boundary XM T Y Y: 493 F: 380 H: 76 T: 31 E: 10 D: 4 A: 3 S:
3 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1E4K template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 117 C, 119 C, 129 C, 152 C
TABLE-US-00044 TABLE 44 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B All 20 S R E P L L F P P L L 265 B All 20 D D
K S F S Y A M A D 297 B Asp N D D D D D D D D D D 299 B All 20 T Y
Y Y Y E Y Y Y Y Y SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template
structure; - carbohydrate; floated 117 C, 119 C, 129 C, 152 C
TABLE-US-00045 TABLE 45 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 A Boundary XM S E E: 251 L:
125 D: 120 Q: 112 S: 73 K: 65 I: 61 A: 58 T: 45 N: 35 R: 28 V: 23
W: 4 265 A Boundary XM D Y Y: 216 H: 153 K: 135 D: 109 W: 104 F: 86
R: 54 T: 38 E: 29 Q: 22 A: 21 N: 17 S: 13 L: 3 297 A Asp N D D:
1000 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1IIS template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 299 A, 120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00046 TABLE 46 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 A All 20 S S L E L Q Q E Q Q E 265 A All 20 D G
G G G G G G G G G 297 A Asp N D D D D D D D D D D SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; - carbohydrate; floated
299 A, 120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00047 TABLE 47 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 239 B Boundary XM S L L: 158 S:
137 T: 125 E: 115 D: 86 K: 75 A: 62 Q: 56 H: 43 R: 39 N: 35 W: 30
I: 24 V: 15 265 B Boundary XM D Y Y: 188 W: 159 F: 156 D: 122 K: 77
E: 71 H: 61 Q: 44 R: 39 A: 24 S: 22 N: 19 T: 18 297 B Asp N D D:
1000 PDA .RTM. technology; D129G 1E4K template structure;
-carbohydrate; floated 299 B, 117 C, 119 C, 129 C, 152 C
TABLE-US-00048 TABLE 48 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 239 B All 20 S S E P P E S P L F L 265 B All 20 D A
K A M K F Y D F F 297 B Asp N D D D D D D D D D D SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; - carbohydrate; floated
299 B, 117 C, 119 C, 129 C, 152 C
TABLE-US-00049 TABLE 49 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 297 A Asp N D D: 1000 299 A
Boundary XM T Y T: 123 Y: 64 H: 64 K: 64 Q: 64 F: 64 R: 63 D: 63 E:
63 S: 63 L: 63 N: 62 I: 57 A: 54 V: 52 W: 17 PDA .RTM. technology;
D129G 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 239 A, 265 A,
120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00050 TABLE 50 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 297 A Asp N D D D D D D D D D D 299 A All 20 T K K K
K F F K K K K SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; -
carbohydrate; floated 239 A, 265 A, 120 C, 122 C, 132 C, 155 C
TABLE-US-00051 TABLE 51 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 297 B Asp N D D: 1000 299 B
Boundary XM T Y T: 123 F: 64 Y: 64 H: 64 S: 63 N: 61 Q: 61 D: 61 E:
60 K: 58 V: 57 A: 57 R: 54 I: 52 L: 51 W: 50 PDA .RTM. technology;
D129G 1E4K template structure; -carbohydrate; floated 239 B, 265 B,
117 C, 119 C, 129 C, 152 C
TABLE-US-00052 TABLE 52 Con- sidered Amino Position Acids WT 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 297 B Asp N D D D D D D D D D D 299 B All 20 T Y Y Y
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y SPA .TM. technology; D129G 1E4K template structure; -
carbohydrate; floated 239 B, 265 B, 117 C, 119 C, 129 C, 152 C
Computational screening calculations were carried out to optimize
aglycosylated Fc by designing favorable substitutions at residues
that are exposed to solvent in the absence of glycosylation such
that they are stable, maintain Fc structure, and have no tendency
to aggregate. The N297 carbohydrate covers up the exposed
hydrophobic patch that would normally be the interface for a
protein-protein interaction with another Ig domain, maintaining the
stability and structural integrity of Fc and keeping the C.gamma.2
domains from aggregating across the central axis. Key residues for
design are F241, F243, V262, and V264, which reside behind the
carbohydrate on C.gamma.2, in addition to residues such as L328,
I332, and I336, which are exposed nonpolar residues facing inward
towards the opposed C.gamma.2 domain, that were considered in
previously presented calculations. The importance of these
C.gamma.2 residues is supported by noting that the corresponding
residues in the C.gamma.3 domain by sequence alignment either
mediate the nonpolar interaction between the two C.gamma.3 domains
or are buried in the C.gamma.3 core. The results of these design
calculations are presented in Table 53.
TABLE-US-00053 TABLE 53 Considered Ground Sequences Around Position
Amino Acids WT State Ground State 241 A Surface F E E: 190 R: 172
K: 138 H: 117 T: 93 Q: 91 D: 85 S: 49 N: 49 A: 16 243 A Surface F R
R: 190 H: 164 Q: 152 E: 149 K: 92 T: 71 D: 64 N: 58 S: 42 A: 18 262
A Surface V D D: 416 E: 164 N: 138 Q: 87 T: 83 R: 44 S: 32 K: 24 A:
11 H: 1 264 A Surface V H R: 368 H: 196 K: 147 E: 108 Q: 68 T: 34
N: 33 D: 25 S: 15 A: 6 PDA .RTM. technology; 1IIS template
structure; -carbohydrate
In a final set of calculations, a SPA.TM. computational screening
method was applied to evaluate the replacement of all chosen
variable positions with all 20 amino acids. The lowest energy
rotamer conformation for all 20 amino acids was determined, and
this energy was defined as the energy of substitution for that
amino acid at that variable position. These calculations thus
provided an energy of substitution for each of the 20 amino acids
at each variable position. These data were useful for a variety of
design goals aimed at both glycosylated and aglycosylated Fc,
including optimization of Fc/Fc.gamma.R affinity, Fc stability, Fc
solubility, carbohydrate conformation, and hinge conformation.
Furthermore, because these calculations provide energies for both
favorable and unfavorable substitutions, they guide substitutions
that may enable differential binding to activating versus
inhibitory Fc.gamma.Rs. Various template structures were used, and
calculations explored substitutions on both chains. The results of
these calculations and relevant parameters and information are
presented in Tables 54-59 below. Column 1 lists the variable
positions on chain A and B of the 1IIS template structure. Column 2
lists the wild-type amino acid identity at each variable position.
The remaining 20 columns provide the energy for each of the natural
20 amino acids (shown in the top row). All substitutions were
normalized with respect to the lowest energy substitution, which
was set to 0 energy. For example in Table 54, for L235 on chain A,
serine is the lowest energy substitution, and L235A is 0.9 kcal/mol
less stable than L235S. Extremely high energies were set to 20
kcal/mol for energies between 20-50 kcal/mol, and 50 kcal/mold for
energies greater than 50 kcal/mol. Favorable substitutions may be
considered to be the lowest energy substitution for each position,
and substitutions that have small energy differences from the
lowest energy substitution, for example substitutions within 1-2,
1-3, 1-5, or 1-10 kcal/mol.
TABLE-US-00054 TABLE 54 Pos WT A C D E F G H I K L 235 A L 0.9 2.8
2.8 1.5 3.2 3.2 3.4 4.9 1.6 2.1 236 A G 0.0 1.9 5.1 6.7 10.0 2.3
4.3 17.2 5.7 20.0 237 A G 20.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0
20.0 50.0 239 A S 0.2 4.3 2.6 0.0 12.8 4.5 6.9 11.3 1.7 0.1 265 A D
9.0 8.1 6.3 7.8 5.1 0.0 7.3 50.0 8.2 9.9 267 A S 2.1 3.3 7.3 1.4
50.0 7.3 20.0 20.0 0.9 2.2 269 A E 0.5 2.1 1.3 0.6 1.6 3.9 2.0 1.2
1.1 1.3 270 A D 0.3 2.8 2.3 2.0 4.0 4.0 3.4 2.4 1.2 0.0 296 A Y 2.7
2.0 1.4 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 4.6 2.1 2.4 298 A S 0.7 2.4 6.7 3.4 20.0
3.9 20.0 6.7 0.0 4.1 299 A T 0.6 2.8 11.5 10.1 20.0 6.1 20.0 10.7
7.1 20.0 234 B L 2.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 1.6 5.3 0.1 0.7 0.6 1.0 235 B L
0.6 2.3 2.5 0.7 5.4 4.8 1.4 3.6 0.1 0.0 236 B G 3.1 1.3 4.4 8.2 5.2
0.0 1.9 20.0 3.1 20.0 237 B G 20.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 239 B S 0.9 2.4 3.4 1.8 5.4 5.6 2.7 3.0 0.9 0.0 265
B D 4.5 5.1 4.6 4.6 4.9 0.0 3.8 9.0 2.0 2.5 327 B A 1.8 3.4 4.7 3.9
20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 0.8 0.0 328 B L 3.7 3.6 4.0 3.7 50.0 8.4 6.8
50.0 3.8 0.0 329 B P 3.4 8.6 20.0 20.0 50.0 8.0 16.8 50.0 20.0 20.0
330 B A 0.5 2.0 2.6 0.5 2.4 3.8 1.4 4.2 0.0 2.0 332 B I 1.5 2.7 1.2
1.6 11.9 6.8 12.9 1.2 2.9 0.0 Pos M N P Q R S T V W Y 235 A 3.2 0.9
0.3 1.3 0.7 0.0 1.7 4.3 6.5 3.2 236 A 4.6 3.2 12.6 5.6 6.1 0.6 6.2
12.0 6.7 20.0 237 A 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 239 A 2.1 1.7 7.9 1.2 2.6 0.3 5.7 11.0 20.0 20.0 265 A 7.7 6.0
50.0 9.0 8.5 7.8 20.0 50.0 20.0 5.8 267 A 5.0 4.8 0.0 2.2 3.1 2.9
20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 269 A 2.7 0.0 50.0 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.8 1.0 5.6 1.2
270 A 2.3 2.1 20.0 2.0 2.3 1.4 1.8 4.2 5.4 6.0 296 A 3.3 1.2 50.0
0.2 1.5 1.3 4.6 4.4 16.3 18.2 298 A 1.4 4.1 50.0 1.8 1.1 0.2 2.2
6.3 17.8 20.0 299 A 4.3 6.8 50.0 6.3 12.0 0.0 3.0 7.1 14.8 20.0 234
B 2.0 1.7 50.0 2.8 0.3 2.3 1.7 2.6 13.0 0.0 235 B 2.0 1.7 16.6 0.5
1.2 0.7 0.7 5.3 6.8 5.5 236 B 4.1 2.7 50.0 3.7 16.0 1.2 20.0 20.0
20.0 11.3 237 B 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
239 B 2.0 1.6 50.0 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.4 5.1 20.0 5.3 265 B 4.1 2.1 50.0
4.5 5.1 4.4 5.9 9.2 11.4 5.8 327 B 1.9 1.5 20.0 3.0 2.6 3.2 20.0
20.0 20.0 20.0 328 B 2.1 4.1 50.0 3.6 8.1 4.9 3.0 12.5 50.0 50.0
329 B 16.9 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 1.3 17.1 16.5 50.0 50.0 330 B 2.2 0.8
20.0 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.3 5.1 8.0 2.7 332 B 1.4 1.7 50.0 1.3 4.9 1.8 1.7
3.0 20.0 20.0 SPA .TM. technology; 1IIS template structure;
+carbohydrate atoms, no floated positions
TABLE-US-00055 TABLE 55 Pos WT A C D E F G H I K L 235 A L 0.9 2.8
2.6 1.7 3.3 3.3 3.4 5.0 1.6 2.1 236 A G 0.0 1.7 5.2 6.0 11.3 2.3
4.4 17.2 5.8 19.0 237 A G 20.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0
20.0 50.0 238 A P 8.6 8.0 10.5 13.4 6.4 0.0 5.0 50.0 12.4 11.3 239
A S 0.1 4.2 2.5 0.0 20.0 4.5 9.0 10.8 1.8 0.2 240 A V 1.3 2.4 2.3
6.3 20.0 7.2 20.0 5.1 10.8 6.2 241 A F 0.1 1.6 1.2 0.3 0.2 4.1 1.2
10.0 1.3 0.1 242 A L 3.0 3.4 5.5 8.3 14.4 8.5 11.1 3.3 13.9 2.2 243
A F 1.6 2.2 2.7 0.2 1.4 5.6 2.5 0.0 2.2 2.0 244 A P 1.2 1.8 3.8 0.8
10.2 3.8 4.6 20.0 0.2 2.9 245 A P 3.9 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 9.1 20.0
20.0 20.0 20.0 246 A K 1.3 2.7 2.0 2.0 2.9 5.7 2.9 1.4 1.4 1.5 247
A P 1.2 2.1 0.3 0.7 4.0 3.9 3.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 248 A K 0.9 2.7 1.5 0.8
3.1 4.7 3.4 3.3 2.0 1.9 249 A D 1.2 3.7 1.6 0.0 20.0 7.3 19.7 50.0
1.7 20.0 250 A T 0.0 1.8 3.8 5.8 50.0 6.0 20.0 4.5 6.3 6.3 251 A L
1.1 1.9 1.2 0.5 5.8 5.1 1.9 5.6 0.9 0.7 252 A M 0.3 1.2 0.6 0.0 3.0
3.8 3.4 3.9 1.0 0.3 253 A I 0.7 1.7 1.1 0.2 1.8 3.5 2.2 2.0 0.3 1.2
254 A S 0.7 1.7 0.4 0.7 2.2 3.6 2.0 0.3 1.2 1.9 255 A R 1.4 2.8 2.4
2.5 0.2 5.4 1.1 17.0 1.0 2.2 256 A T 0.6 1.8 1.2 1.1 2.7 3.4 2.1
1.4 0.7 1.5 257 A P 0.0 7.8 20.0 12.9 50.0 6.2 50.0 20.0 12.3 12.8
258 A E 0.0 1.6 4.8 2.6 1.0 4.3 2.2 14.8 4.4 6.2 259 A V 3.9 4.3
5.1 8.7 20.0 10.3 6.8 2.3 9.6 2.8 260 A T 1.7 2.3 3.3 1.1 20.0 6.6
8.6 0.0 0.2 1.8 261 A C 0.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 3.9 20.0 20.0 20.0
20.0 262 A V 1.9 3.2 0.0 3.3 20.0 7.2 20.0 8.3 2.9 2.9 263 A V 2.2
2.7 6.0 17.4 20.0 8.8 20.0 10.0 7.1 7.6 264 A V 1.9 3.3 2.8 2.2 0.0
6.4 2.1 0.7 2.6 0.9 265 A D 9.0 8.1 5.9 8.6 5.3 0.0 7.3 50.0 7.9
9.7 266 A V 4.9 5.3 7.1 12.1 20.0 11.2 20.0 0.4 12.2 20.0 267 A S
2.3 3.5 7.2 1.3 50.0 7.4 20.0 20.0 0.7 1.4 268 A H 1.2 1.9 2.2 1.5
3.7 5.0 4.9 0.4 0.5 3.7 269 A E 0.3 1.9 1.3 0.5 1.3 3.7 1.9 1.1 0.8
1.2 270 A D 0.2 2.6 2.1 1.9 5.2 3.9 3.1 2.1 1.2 0.0 271 A P 0.0 5.3
8.1 9.3 20.0 3.1 9.1 20.0 6.0 9.5 272 A Q 0.8 1.9 0.9 1.2 3.0 3.2
3.7 3.7 1.6 1.8 273 A V 1.2 2.9 1.8 20.0 20.0 7.1 20.0 6.8 20.0
20.0 274 A K 0.4 1.8 1.4 0.8 1.9 3.9 2.4 1.4 0.7 1.1 275 A F 8.0
9.5 10.3 9.5 0.0 13.5 5.1 10.1 6.2 6.3 276 A N 1.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 0.8
5.1 0.8 1.2 0.6 2.3 277 A W 5.5 7.4 8.4 6.4 15.4 11.2 3.2 8.2 1.9
3.9 278 A Y 1.6 2.7 3.9 1.6 1.0 7.3 3.4 17.7 1.4 7.5 279 A V 3.1
4.1 4.0 2.2 20.0 8.1 9.7 8.5 0.0 1.4 280 A D 1.8 2.6 2.7 0.2 11.5
2.9 8.8 20.0 3.4 3.2 281 A G 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 282 A V 0.9 2.1 1.6 1.1 2.9 4.2 3.5 1.4 1.5 1.8 283 A E
0.7 1.6 0.7 0.5 1.0 4.4 1.4 0.4 1.2 1.8 284 A V 0.0 2.2 3.1 1.2
20.0 5.0 20.0 4.0 0.7 2.6 285 A H 0.2 1.4 3.1 1.3 3.0 2.0 2.4 3.6
1.1 2.6 286 A N 0.8 2.5 1.2 1.1 2.4 4.7 2.7 2.1 0.0 0.7 287 A A 0.6
2.6 5.8 3.3 10.4 5.4 9.1 11.3 0.0 4.4 288 A K 0.8 2.6 2.0 1.3 3.0
3.4 3.8 2.3 1.4 1.7 289 A T 0.3 1.9 4.7 1.1 3.1 3.6 2.9 10.5 0.4
2.7 290 A K 1.7 2.2 0.5 0.6 3.0 1.3 3.0 3.7 1.7 2.1 291 A P 1.6 3.1
1.8 0.5 1.9 5.5 1.8 0.1 0.5 1.5 292 A R 1.1 2.2 3.1 0.8 5.9 4.4 8.0
5.0 0.0 1.6 293 A E 2.2 6.5 9.0 17.9 16.3 0.0 13.2 50.0 12.8 10.3
294 A E 1.5 2.1 2.1 0.7 8.1 2.8 3.3 2.0 2.6 1.8 295 A Q 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 296 A Y 2.8 2.3 1.1 0.4 50.0
0.0 50.0 4.6 2.2 2.3 297 A N 0.0 6.5 8.4 5.3 20.0 3.4 20.0 13.8 2.7
20.0 298 A S 0.8 2.4 5.7 2.2 20.0 3.7 20.0 6.2 0.9 9.2 299 A T 1.9
3.4 6.0 3.1 1.0 7.1 2.9 3.1 0.0 2.7 300 A Y 2.8 2.9 2.7 4.5 20.0
4.0 7.5 13.1 1.2 0.0 301 A R 3.0 3.5 3.8 2.8 0.8 3.4 1.8 0.0 1.3
0.7 302 A V 2.7 4.6 6.7 3.9 2.8 8.9 1.2 6.9 2.7 2.0 303 A V 0.0 2.2
3.3 1.0 6.7 4.5 5.3 1.4 2.5 3.1 304 A S 0.0 12.1 10.8 20.0 20.0 6.2
20.0 20.0 17.2 20.0 305 A V 1.1 2.3 3.3 1.2 0.3 5.4 1.2 0.0 0.9 1.1
306 A L 4.3 6.2 7.1 5.9 2.8 10.4 3.4 13.7 3.0 0.0 307 A T 1.4 3.2
3.8 2.2 6.5 5.5 4.2 0.5 0.3 4.2 308 A V 1.8 5.5 6.5 8.0 50.0 7.9
20.0 4.5 20.0 5.5 309 A L 1.1 2.7 0.7 0.7 1.3 4.6 2.7 0.7 1.7 1.0
310 A H 2.0 2.6 0.9 4.1 50.0 5.6 0.2 6.8 4.0 7.1 311 A Q 0.6 2.5
1.6 1.6 2.5 4.3 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.9 312 A N 5.4 5.1 5.9 1.3 20.0 0.0
20.0 10.0 3.4 4.8 313 A W 4.6 6.4 5.5 5.6 1.1 10.8 5.0 11.0 5.8 5.2
314 A L 2.1 2.9 4.3 2.2 5.7 6.1 7.9 5.4 0.7 0.0 315 A D 0.3 1.4 1.5
0.1 3.3 4.2 1.9 1.8 0.8 0.5 316 A G 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 317 A K 0.0 14.0 18.4 17.9 50.0 5.0 50.0 20.0
8.5 12.5 318 A E 2.0 3.0 2.7 1.7 2.7 6.7 2.6 0.0 1.1 1.6 319 A Y
2.9 4.4 3.9 3.4 0.0 8.8 1.8 20.0 0.5 5.2 320 A K 2.3 3.1 3.0 2.7
20.0 7.8 20.0 9.4 0.0 0.6 321 A C 0.0 3.2 20.0 18.8 20.0 6.9 20.0
20.0 20.0 20.0 322 A K 2.0 2.5 3.5 2.8 2.7 6.4 2.1 0.2 0.1 1.2 323
A V 1.5 2.8 7.3 11.9 20.0 8.1 20.0 6.0 9.6 20.0 324 A S 2.0 2.1 0.6
0.0 1.9 4.9 3.9 1.5 2.8 0.7 325 A N 2.8 3.9 8.4 3.0 20.0 8.3 20.0
0.0 7.7 20.0 326 A K 1.0 2.7 3.0 1.6 3.7 4.1 3.1 3.2 1.7 2.4 327 A
A 0.9 2.8 5.8 3.1 20.0 6.3 16.7 14.7 2.8 20.0 328 A L 6.0 6.3 7.0
4.1 50.0 8.6 20.0 50.0 5.7 0.0 329 A P 1.0 2.5 0.9 0.6 4.0 3.4 3.3
1.7 1.9 2.5 330 A A 0.9 2.0 1.3 0.7 3.4 3.8 3.0 2.0 1.4 2.0 331 A P
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 332 A I 1.9 3.7
4.6 1.7 5.0 7.0 1.9 3.8 1.8 0.0 333 A E 0.0 3.1 3.2 0.8 4.1 4.4 4.2
16.9 3.6 2.8 334 A K 1.7 2.9 2.5 0.0 1.0 6.1 3.3 1.0 1.5 0.5 335 A
T 0.5 3.2 4.5 2.7 4.2 4.9 4.1 20.0 2.1 3.1 336 A I 1.2 1.6 5.0 1.5
20.0 6.1 16.8 0.7 3.4 7.8 337 A S 4.8 4.8 7.5 11.5 10.1 0.0 5.5
50.0 9.9 7.0 338 A K 1.0 2.7 2.3 2.2 4.6 5.9 2.4 50.0 0.0 2.1 339 A
A 1.0 2.5 0.8 1.1 4.4 3.7 3.7 2.1 1.8 2.6 340 A K 1.3 2.4 2.3 2.0
1.7 4.1 2.3 1.9 0.0 2.3 232 B P 1.3 3.2 2.2 2.2 4.1 2.9 3.6 1.8 2.1
2.8 233 B E 0.5 2.2 1.7 0.5 2.6 3.7 2.9 4.4 1.4 1.1 234 B L 2.9 4.0
4.8 4.9 2.0 6.1 0.8 1.5 0.0 1.9 235 B L 0.6 2.3 2.4 0.9 5.7 4.9 1.4
3.7 0.0 0.0 236 B G 3.6 2.5 5.1 11.8 6.8 0.0 2.8 20.0 5.0 20.0 237
B G 20.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 238 B P 3.5
4.7 8.5 4.2 20.0 9.8 20.0 0.0 5.6 9.6 239 B S 1.0 2.5 3.4 2.0 7.2
5.7 3.1 3.1 0.6 0.0 240 B V 0.1 2.3 7.0 11.9 20.0 6.5 20.0 8.1 12.7
20.0 241 B F 0.0 2.0 1.4 0.8 1.0 4.0 2.0 6.5 1.1 0.6 242 B L 2.2
3.3 6.5 6.6 6.9 7.9 4.3 0.0 8.7 3.9 243 B F 0.8 2.6 1.9 1.7 0.8 4.9
2.0 3.6 1.2 0.8 244 B P 1.1 2.1 4.0 1.1 11.9 3.5 5.4 20.0 1.4 3.2
245 B P 3.2 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 246 B K 0.5
2.6 1.4 1.2 2.1 4.4 1.6 0.6 0.9 1.4 247 B P 0.8 2.5 0.7 1.0 3.6 3.9
2.6 6.2 1.8 2.1 248 B K 0.2 2.2 0.2 0.6 2.2 4.1 2.5 2.4 1.7 1.0 249
B D 2.8 3.3 0.0 4.6 10.1 8.2 6.5 50.0 4.6 6.2 250 B T 0.0 2.2 4.9
2.8 20.0 6.3 20.0 2.2 4.3 3.2 251 B L 0.0 2.4 1.6 1.2 5.6 3.6 2.2
7.4 1.2 0.6 252 B M 1.3 2.4 0.8 0.0 1.8 5.7 2.3 0.6 1.6 0.6 253 B I
1.6 3.0 2.0 1.2 3.7 4.5 3.5 2.9 0.8 2.4 254 B S 1.0 1.5 0.8 0.6 3.8
3.8 3.2 0.5 1.9 2.5 255 B R 0.9 2.0 2.0 1.7 0.0 5.4 1.4 20.0 1.0
1.6 256 B T 0.6 2.0 1.8 1.1 2.5 3.7 1.9 1.6 1.0 1.4 257 B P 2.5
20.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 9.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 258 B E 1.5 2.4 2.7 1.4
2.7 6.4 4.2 0.0 0.2 5.4 259 B V 2.9 4.2 6.3 5.2 20.0 9.3 20.0 0.0
8.1 8.9 260 B T 0.0 1.6 5.3 1.9 20.0 4.9 20.0 0.6 1.1 2.8 261 B C
0.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 262 B V 2.1 2.4 2.7
2.4 8.1 7.2 3.8 1.8 3.5 8.6 263 B V 2.2 3.7 4.7 11.2 20.0 9.1 20.0
15.0 13.7 2.8 264 B V 2.1 3.0 4.6 2.7 8.6 6.8 6.6 0.0 1.8 1.8 265 B
D 4.5 5.2 4.8 4.7 5.0 0.0 3.8 8.5 1.8 2.6 266 B V 5.3 5.5 7.2 12.7
20.0 12.0 20.0 2.1 20.0 20.0 267 B S 2.8 4.3 6.2 3.8 0.0 7.4 1.0
50.0 1.0 0.3 268 B H 2.6 3.7 5.1 4.1 4.9 6.0 1.8 2.6 0.0 2.5 269 B
E 0.4 2.4 1.7 0.8 2.8 3.7 2.6 1.0 1.0 1.6 270 B D 0.0 1.6 1.1 7.3
4.8 4.3 2.6 20.0 3.8 14.5 271 B P 1.1 3.3 5.6 3.4 4.1 5.5 4.2 20.0
1.9 3.6 272 B Q 0.9 1.9 1.0 0.6 3.0 3.9 2.9 1.5 1.7 2.2 273 B V 3.5
4.8 6.2 8.3 20.0 9.2 20.0 4.6 8.4 3.1 274 B K 0.1 1.6 0.4 0.9 1.7
3.8 1.8 1.9 0.4 0.5 275 B F 5.7 7.0 8.4 9.2 0.0 11.2 3.5 9.2 7.9
5.7 276 B N 0.0 6.2 6.9 6.4 20.0 4.7 12.1 20.0 9.3 10.0 277 B W 8.3
10.0 10.6 9.2 2.6 14.2 7.4 12.7 6.7 7.4 278 B Y 0.0 2.3 17.4 4.0
50.0 5.1 50.0 20.0 2.8 20.0 279 B V 3.1 3.5 4.2 2.9 20.0 8.5 13.9
0.4 0.0 2.9 280 B D 0.5 3.0 2.1 1.5 6.7 3.1 4.7 12.6 2.9 1.6 281 B
G 5.6 5.8 5.5 4.8 7.9 0.0 7.2 6.5 5.3 5.7 282 B V 0.4 1.9 1.1 0.6
2.9 4.1 2.1 1.3 1.0 1.4 283 B E 0.6 1.9 4.3 1.7 6.7 4.2 5.2 2.9 0.5
4.4 284 B V 0.4 2.4 2.5 1.1 20.0 5.9 20.0 1.1 1.2 6.2 285 B H 1.3
2.4 2.1 1.7 2.4 3.4 1.2 1.8 0.7 2.3 286 B N 1.2 2.7 1.0 1.1 3.0 3.1
2.6 0.8 2.0 1.9 287 B A 2.5 4.4 6.1 7.5 0.0 8.2 3.0 10.2 5.1 16.5
288 B K 0.4 1.9 1.9 0.0 2.9 3.5 2.9 2.5 1.8 2.1 289 B T 0.1 1.5 3.7
1.4 2.7 3.9 2.6 1.8 0.0 2.2 290 B K 0.9 1.8 0.8 0.5 2.4 0.8 2.7 3.0
1.3 1.3 291 B P 1.2 2.1 2.5 0.5 3.9 4.6 3.4 0.7 0.0 3.4 292 B R 0.8
2.6 3.3 1.2 4.9 3.6 6.8 3.1 2.0 2.4 293 B E 0.0 3.0 4.1 2.8 7.3 3.6
5.8 5.8 2.6 4.5 294 B E 2.5 3.3 3.9 2.3 8.3 6.8 4.4 5.6 3.6 2.3 295
B Q 1.1 2.2 1.9 0.6 3.8 2.8 3.1 8.0 1.4 2.2 296 B Y 1.5 2.7 1.2 1.2
4.1 4.1 3.5 1.1 1.8 2.7 297 B N 3.9 4.5 10.1 6.0 15.5 7.3 16.7 6.6
0.0 5.1 298 B S 1.7 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.7 2.4 3.0 0.0 1.8 299 B T 0.0
2.7 7.2 11.1 20.0 4.8 20.0 7.5 6.9 20.0 300 B Y 3.8 5.2 8.0 4.3
20.0 8.6 20.0 12.2 0.0 4.3 301 B R 1.2 1.8 2.3 1.1 20.0 5.8 11.3
5.2 0.3 5.0 302 B V 3.5 4.8 5.5 3.7 0.2 9.6 1.1 0.5 2.6 3.5 303 B V
0.2 0.0 0.1 1.0 20.0 5.0 13.3 5.1 1.7 10.4 304 B S 1.5 2.3 8.2 20.0
20.0 7.6 20.0 7.6 20.0 20.0 304 B S 1.5 2.3 8.2 20.0 20.0 7.6 20.0
7.6 20.0 20.0 305 B V 0.1 1.2 3.3 1.1 20.0 4.6 20.0 3.2 1.1 11.0
306 B L 4.7 6.8 6.3 4.3 10.4 11.1 7.8 4.2 3.0 0.0 307 B T 1.5 3.0
2.7 1.7 4.1 5.2 3.0 1.6 1.9 3.1 308 B V 0.0 0.6 7.6 20.0 20.0 6.6
20.0 20.0 16.1 15.1 309 B L 1.4 3.0 2.2 1.1 3.0 6.0 3.5 20.0 2.4
1.7 310 B H 2.4 2.9 2.7 4.9 20.0 6.8 4.4 4.8 3.1 15.0 311 B Q 0.0
2.2 1.3 0.7 2.1 3.3 2.4 12.6 0.6 0.9 312 B N 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.3 6.0
5.4 2.3 12.0 2.1 2.9 313 B W 5.3 6.6 7.3 5.4 0.0 11.4 6.2 20.0 4.0
5.2 314 B L 1.7 2.2 3.1 0.0 6.4 5.6 1.5 2.1 0.6 0.2 315 B D 1.4 2.3
2.4 0.7 6.0 5.5 2.3 4.8 2.2 1.0 316 B G 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 317 B K 0.9 2.3 4.3 2.8 1.2 4.0 0.6 13.9
0.0 4.8 318 B E 0.7 1.2 3.1 1.0 7.0 5.1 8.2 0.4 1.0 5.7 319 B Y 6.5
7.1 8.5 8.8 0.0 12.5 3.9 3.1 5.2 5.4 320 B K 3.1 4.3 7.3 4.3 20.0
8.6 15.0 1.4 0.0 11.6 321 B C 0.0 6.5 20.0 20.0 20.0 6.6 20.0 20.0
20.0 20.0 322 B K 2.3 3.2 3.5 1.8 20.0 7.9 20.0 1.1 0.6 4.9 323 B V
4.0 4.6 6.9 8.1 20.0 10.6 20.0 9.0 17.1 7.9 324 B S 1.3 3.0 1.4 0.0
2.1 6.0 4.4 1.3 2.4 0.6 325 B N 3.4 5.1 9.0 4.7 20.0 8.2 20.0 16.6
16.6 20.0 326 B K 0.3 2.1 2.0 0.9 1.0 3.5 2.0 2.9 0.9 2.9 327 B A
1.9 3.3 4.7 3.5 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 0.3 0.0 328 B L 3.7 3.6 3.8 4.4
50.0 8.4 7.0 50.0 3.8 0.0 329 B P 3.3 8.5 20.0 20.0 50.0 8.0 16.5
50.0 18.5 20.0 330 B A 0.5 2.0 2.8 0.5 2.4 3.9 1.2 4.0 0.0 2.0 331
B P 1.7 3.8 6.4 10.1 20.0 4.7 11.0 10.1 7.5 20.0 332 B I 1.7 2.9
1.3 1.7 14.8 7.0 13.9 1.7 3.1 0.0 333 B E 1.9 2.5 1.9 0.0 8.9 5.9
8.2 1.2 3.0 6.4 334 B K 2.9 3.9 3.7 2.6 20.0 8.3 12.1 1.5 2.6 5.3
335 B T 0.0 2.1 7.2 7.0 4.2 0.4 3.3 17.3 6.5 7.7 336 B I 0.5 1.6
2.1 0.7 20.0 5.0 6.1 0.0 1.3 5.3 337 B S 1.1 2.1 4.0 2.0 3.1 3.2
2.0 50.0 0.0 1.6 338 B K 0.6 2.3 3.0 3.0 9.4 5.3 10.6 2.2 1.1 0.0
339 B A 1.1 2.4 1.2 0.8 4.3 3.6 3.7 2.6 1.8 2.6 340 B K 0.9 2.0 1.4
0.8 3.0 3.4 2.9 2.1 0.8 2.5 Pos M N P Q R S T V W Y 235 A 3.3 1.0
0.3 1.4 1.8 0.0 1.9 3.6 6.6 3.3 236 A 4.9 3.3 8.2 5.6 6.0 0.8 5.6
11.8 6.6 20.0 237 A 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 238 A 9.7 9.3 3.2 12.4 20.0 8.6 50.0 50.0 20.0 8.4 239 A 2.1
1.8 9.1 1.3 2.5 0.3 5.7 10.7 20.0 19.7 240 A 5.7 2.0 1.1 9.5 13.1
2.5 0.5 0.0 20.0 20.0 241 A 2.1 0.4 14.7 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.0 8.3 3.6
0.4 242 A 2.7 5.5 0.9 7.9 17.1 3.8 2.3 0.0 20.0 17.5 243 A 3.0 2.3
10.2 0.5 1.6 1.3 0.9 1.2 5.3 1.6 244 A 2.0 2.8 2.0 0.9 1.7 0.0 19.3
20.0 7.6 12.2 245 A 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 20.0
246 A 3.1 0.2 0.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.2 5.4 3.0 247 A 3.3 0.0 0.5 0.9
1.5 0.7 1.1 1.3 6.9 3.7 248 A 2.6 1.2 3.6 1.5 2.3 0.7 0.0 2.5 5.6
2.7 249 A 2.2 1.4 20.0 1.5 3.4 2.5 18.3 50.0 20.0 20.0 250 A 0.3
3.2 50.0 8.7 9.3 1.8 1.3 1.9 20.0 50.0 251 A 2.4 1.4 50.0 0.0 1.4
0.5 0.8 6.9 8.9 5.8 252 A 2.2 0.3 17.4 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.2 4.6 4.2 3.3
253 A 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.5 2.8 2.4 1.9 254 A 2.4 0.0 20.0
0.3 1.2 0.3 0.8 0.7 3.8 1.9 255 A 1.5 1.7 50.0 2.1 0.0 2.3 50.0
17.2 4.0 0.5 256 A 2.4 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.2 5.6 2.7 257 A
14.4 20.0 0.1 13.1 20.0 2.9 16.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 258 A 3.2 2.9 10.4
7.4 6.0 1.0 6.2 17.6 20.0 1.0 259 A 6.2 4.1 50.0 9.2 20.0 5.2 2.1
0.0 20.0 20.0 260 A 2.8 1.8 1.1 0.8 0.9 1.7 0.4 1.9 7.1 20.0 261 A
20.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 3.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
262 A 2.2 0.6 50.0 3.8 5.2 3.4 3.0 1.7 20.0 20.0 263 A 16.9 5.2
50.0 19.8 17.7 2.8 1.4 0.0 20.0 20.0 264 A 2.7 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.2
1.1 0.6 3.9 0.1 265 A 7.5 5.5 50.0 10.2 8.6 7.9 20.0 50.0 20.0 5.7
266 A 8.8 7.1 50.0 12.2 20.0 6.1 3.8 0.0 20.0 20.0 267 A 3.9 4.7
0.0 2.3 3.1 3.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 268 A 2.7 1.7 0.0 1.4 1.7 1.1
0.2 0.9 6.1 3.7 269 A 2.5 0.0 50.0 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.6 0.7 4.0 1.0 270
A 2.2 1.9 20.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 1.7 4.1 5.1 7.0 271 A 5.3 7.3 5.9 5.9
5.9 1.6 4.1 15.2 20.0 20.0 272 A 3.2 0.3 50.0 1.1 1.6 0.0 1.0 3.5
4.0 3.4 273 A 20.0 0.0 2.8 20.0 20.0 2.1 1.4 1.7 20.0 20.0 274 A
2.9 0.9 20.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.7 3.3 2.3 275 A 6.0 9.1 6.1 9.1 15.1
9.6 7.2 6.1 13.5 4.3 276 A 2.5 1.8 50.0 1.6 2.5 1.2 0.0 0.3 4.2 3.6
277 A 3.6 6.6 3.5 5.5 15.4 6.9 6.1 14.1 0.0 20.0 278 A 2.1 0.0 50.0
1.9 2.2 2.6 9.9 20.0 15.8 1.4 279 A 3.1 3.3 20.0 1.9 4.6 4.3 3.4
4.2 20.0 20.0 280 A 2.8 3.8 50.0 0.0 3.7 0.6 6.8 12.7 11.9 11.4 281
A 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 282 A 3.6 0.4
18.9 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 4.7 3.1 283 A 1.9 0.0 0.4 0.6 1.5 0.4 0.3
1.2 4.1 0.9 284 A 0.8 2.6 50.0 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.1 1.5 20.0 20.0 285 A
3.0 0.7 2.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 1.1 4.7 4.9 4.0 286 A 1.8 0.6 20.0 1.2 0.7
0.9 1.7 2.1 5.2 2.7 287 A 1.3 3.6 50.0 2.6 2.3 1.0 1.9 12.5 9.1
10.4 288 A 2.5 0.3 50.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.4 2.0 4.5 3.6 289 A 1.6 2.1
8.2 1.2 2.0 0.0 0.4 12.0 3.9 3.2 290 A 3.2 0.0 50.0 0.7 2.0 0.3 1.3
3.3 5.6 3.3 291 A 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.0 2.9 2.2 0.9 1.3 2.6 0.9 292 A 2.1
1.1 8.4 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.3 4.7 8.3 5.7 293 A 10.3 7.2 5.5 15.1 14.5
3.5 20.0 50.0 14.5 17.1 294 A 2.8 1.0 50.0 1.3 1.3 0.5 0.0 3.4 11.2
10.2 295 A 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 296 A
3.1 0.9 50.0 0.2 1.8 1.3 4.7 4.8 18.2 20.0 297 A 4.8 9.3 50.0 4.4
4.4 1.5 1.6 15.5 20.0 20.0 298 A 1.8 3.3 50.0 1.7 2.1 0.0 2.2 7.3
15.6 20.0 299 A 2.6 3.6 50.0 2.2 2.5 1.1 2.2 5.4 3.6 1.4 300 A 2.2
2.3 50.0 3.3 4.0 2.6 1.1 1.1 11.0 2.4 301 A 2.6 2.5 50.0 2.6 2.3
2.9 1.8 0.9 9.8 1.8 302 A 2.2 4.8 50.0 4.7 3.2 4.3 7.7 3.8 0.0 8.4
303 A 2.0 3.1 1.0 2.1 2.9 0.4 0.4 2.9 10.9 6.2 304 A 11.9 16.6 50.0
20.0 16.6 2.2 14.2 17.9 20.0 20.0 305 A 2.8 1.1 3.9 1.1 1.4 1.2 0.9
0.0 0.8 0.8 306 A 3.5 6.0 50.0 5.9 9.9 6.2 5.3 11.4 9.6 10.3 307 A
3.0 2.2 0.0 1.9 1.3 1.4 0.9 1.2 6.2 6.5 308 A 19.4 7.6 50.0 7.7
15.5 0.0 0.7 5.9 50.0 50.0 309 A 2.8 0.0 1.6 0.7 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.5
5.0 2.1 310 A 4.0 0.0 0.2 4.9 10.0 2.0 2.5 6.4 50.0 50.0 311 A 2.9
0.9 1.7 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.3 2.2 4.6 2.0 312 A 3.3 7.1 50.0 2.7 3.9 4.1
3.2 11.9 20.0 20.0 313 A 7.6 5.4 50.0 4.8 12.9 6.0 3.8 6.6 0.0 2.6
314 A 1.7 2.3 50.0 1.6 1.6 3.0 4.7 6.3 8.0 6.0 315 A 1.8 0.6 50.0
0.0 0.7 0.0 0.9 2.4 6.2 3.7 316 A 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 317 A 12.7 20.0 15.9 17.2 13.5 2.8 9.2 20.0
50.0 50.0 318 A 1.3 1.7 20.0 1.4 2.6 2.2 1.3 0.0 6.1 9.5 319 A 0.7
3.2 50.0 3.1 5.6 3.4 3.6 20.0 20.0 0.2 320 A 2.7 1.3 50.0 2.4 1.9
3.3 3.3 7.2 20.0 20.0 321 A 10.4 20.0 50.0 19.6 20.0 1.5 8.7 18.3
20.0 20.0 322 A 2.7 2.7 50.0 2.1 0.0 2.3 1.6 0.9 14.5 2.8 323 A 4.9
8.5 50.0 13.6 20.0 2.8 1.6 0.0 20.0 20.0 324 A 1.9 0.9 50.0 0.8 2.9
2.7 1.9 2.1 3.8 2.5 325 A 6.2 1.6 13.4 0.5 20.0 3.1 0.1 1.3 20.0
20.0 326 A 3.7 1.2 0.0 0.6 1.4 1.0 1.9 2.6 5.6 3.6 327 A 2.5 5.3
20.0 1.3 4.1 0.0 5.2 13.7 20.0 20.0 328 A 7.1 6.0 50.0 3.7 8.2 6.6
50.0 50.0 20.0 50.0 329 A 3.6 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.5 0.1 1.1 1.1 6.2 3.6
330 A 3.4 0.0 20.0 0.6 1.2 0.2 0.6 1.9 7.0 3.4 331 A 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 332 A 2.5 3.9 20.0 0.8 2.4 2.3
2.6 4.4 20.0 5.9 333 A 2.8 2.5 1.6 1.3 3.2 1.3 1.4 7.7 4.0 4.8 334
A 3.5 1.5 4.4 0.1 2.7 2.2 0.9 1.3 4.9 1.8 335 A 3.0 1.2 0.0 2.3 2.8
1.4 1.4 7.3 5.1 4.5 336 A 2.5 3.2 20.0 2.8 1.4 0.7 0.6 0.0 20.0
20.0 337 A 7.9 5.0 50.0 11.4 12.7 4.5 2.3 50.0 19.3 10.6 338 A 1.9
1.0 50.0 1.5 0.9 0.7 10.3 50.0 5.4 4.9 339 A 3.6 0.0 0.8 0.6 1.6
0.6 0.9 2.4 6.8 3.8 340 A 1.8 1.0 1.9 0.9 1.3 0.5 0.8 1.7 4.9 2.4
232 B 3.9 1.1 0.0 1.1 1.6 0.7 1.4 3.0 6.2 4.1 233 B 3.2 0.6 2.7 0.4
1.6 0.0 1.2 6.9 5.5 2.6 234 B 2.7 2.6 20.0 3.6 1.2 3.1 2.5 3.4 13.4
0.5 235 B 1.9 1.9 17.3 0.6 1.4 0.8 0.7 5.2 7.8 5.3 236 B 4.5 3.5
50.0 5.5 19.9 2.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 14.1 237 B 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 238 B 4.6 8.1 1.3 5.8 20.0 4.9 4.4
1.3 20.0 20.0 239 B 2.0 1.9 50.0 1.7 1.1 1.5 1.5 5.2 20.0 5.2 240 B
12.0 7.6 0.0 11.6 20.0 1.2 1.9 0.8 20.0 20.0 241 B 2.3 0.2 50.0 0.3
1.5 0.1 0.9 5.7 4.1 1.1 242 B 4.8 5.3 0.0 9.1 6.8 2.9 1.1 0.5 20.0
8.7 243 B 2.5 0.0 50.0 1.6 2.7 0.1 1.8 3.9 4.3 1.0 244 B 3.0 2.0
1.8 1.2 1.3 0.0 19.6 20.0 9.1 11.0 245 B 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0
6.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 246 B 2.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 2.0 4.9
2.4 247 B 2.9 0.3 0.0 0.8 1.5 0.3 0.7 9.5 6.6 3.4 248 B 2.2 0.0 1.3
0.8 1.7 0.5 0.7 2.8 4.7 2.3 249 B 4.4 0.5 50.0 4.7 6.3 3.5 6.1 50.0
20.0 7.2 250 B 3.0 9.2 50.0 3.4 4.9 1.3 2.3 3.1 20.0 20.0 251 B 2.3
0.5 50.0 0.6 1.8 0.4 2.5 8.7 8.2 5.9 252 B 2.5 1.0 50.0 1.0 1.6 1.5
1.3 0.8 5.1 1.6 253 B 2.4 1.1 1.0 0.0 1.5 1.2 1.4 3.4 4.4 3.6 254 B
3.1 0.3 6.2 0.5 1.7 0.0 0.1 1.1 5.5 3.7 255 B 1.3 0.8 50.0 1.4 1.1
1.5 20.0 20.0 3.7 0.8 256 B 2.2 0.0 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.8 1.2 1.2 5.5 2.4
257 B 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 4.8 20.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 258 B 2.4 1.1
50.0 1.3 2.5 2.2 1.1 1.0 19.1 3.0 259 B 5.5 5.6 50.0 6.2 20.0 4.5
2.5 0.0 20.0 20.0 260 B 1.4 3.9 0.2 2.3 2.6 0.4 0.1 2.7 20.0 20.0
261 B 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.0 16.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 262 B 3.4
2.7 50.0 3.2 4.8 2.9 1.9 0.0 14.7 9.1 263 B 20.0 5.4 50.0 13.0 20.0
3.6 2.1 0.0 20.0 20.0 264 B 3.7 3.6 10.1 3.0 2.2 2.6 2.2 1.0 12.7
20.0 265 B 4.1 1.8 50.0 4.5 5.3 4.5 6.0 9.2 12.2 5.6 266 B 20.0 5.7
50.0 18.3 20.0 5.9 4.7 0.0 50.0 50.0 267 B 3.2 3.2 0.5 1.5 0.8 3.3
11.6 50.0 6.3 50.0 268 B 3.8 2.6 3.4 2.1 1.8 2.5 3.8 2.7 7.8 5.5
269 B 3.0 0.0 12.8 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.6 5.1 2.7 270 B 3.8 1.2 5.9
6.3 2.1 0.3 1.9 5.4 16.3 5.6 271 B 3.9 3.3 7.4 2.7 0.0 1.5 2.2 5.2
4.8 4.4 272 B 3.5 0.6 4.9 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.6 1.4 3.9 3.2 273 B 3.5 7.4
50.0 10.6 20.0 2.0 0.0 4.8 20.0 20.0 274 B 2.4 0.3 15.6 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.2 1.6 2.2 1.9 275 B 5.1 7.0 4.1 9.7 12.3 6.9 4.5 3.3 10.3 5.0 276
B 7.4 3.8 50.0 6.4 9.2 2.8 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 277 B 6.4 10.8 6.8
9.3 11.9 9.7 8.0 14.4 0.0 15.9 278 B 2.1 12.6 11.0 4.4 2.0 0.8 2.5
19.8 20.0 4.2 279 B 2.0 3.4 20.0 1.4 4.0 4.2 2.4 1.2 20.0 20.0 280
B 2.9 1.6 20.0 1.4 3.1 0.0 2.7 5.5 8.1 7.3 281 B 7.1 3.4 50.0 4.0
5.3 3.6 3.2 6.4 10.3 7.6 282 B 2.9 0.2 50.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.7 6.1
2.8 283 B 0.3 2.5 0.0 1.5 1.6 1.0 1.5 3.9 7.9 6.7 284 B 0.8 2.4
50.0 1.5 3.3 0.0 1.5 1.8 20.0 20.0 285 B 2.7 0.0 1.6 0.9 0.8 0.5
0.4 2.0 5.8 2.4 286 B 2.9 0.0 50.0 0.4 1.6 1.1 0.5 2.9 4.9 3.0 287
B 4.5 0.3 12.3 8.1 9.1 4.1 3.3 7.1 3.4 0.8 288 B 2.5 0.9 15.4 0.6
1.1 0.2 0.9 3.8 5.9 2.7 289 B 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.1 1.7 0.0 0.4 2.3 3.4
2.5 290 B 2.6 0.2 50.0 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.6 2.9 5.0 2.7 291 B 1.5 1.1
0.6 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.5 3.2 2.6 292 B 2.2 2.2 16.6 1.5 1.8 0.1 0.0
3.2 7.6 5.2 293 B 3.2 2.2 1.3 2.2 2.5 0.0 1.2 7.8 7.0 6.9 294 B 3.7
4.1 0.0 3.3 5.0 2.1 2.9 5.0 6.7 11.9 295 B 3.4 1.0 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.0
3.9 6.6 6.1 3.5 296 B 3.5 0.0 20.0 0.6 1.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 6.4 4.0 297
B 4.6 7.3 20.0 4.4 4.2 3.6 4.1 7.9 18.0 15.0 298 B 2.3 0.4 50.0 1.2
1.0 0.9 2.2 3.3 5.5 2.0 299 B 7.1 4.8 50.0 9.8 17.9 0.3 1.3 5.8
20.0 20.0 300 B 3.2 6.5 50.0 4.0 3.8 4.3 3.6 9.1 20.0 6.4 301 B 2.0
1.6 14.1 0.6 0.4 1.8 1.1 0.0 17.9 20.0 302 B 2.5 4.7 9.6 4.1 0.6
4.3 2.0 0.0 20.0 0.2 303 B 1.9 2.0 8.6 2.0 4.7 0.6 0.5 1.3 20.0
20.0 304 B 20.0 6.3 50.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 2.7 3.8 20.0 20.0 304 B 20.0
6.3 50.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 2.7 3.8 20.0 20.0 305 B 1.5 1.8 50.0 0.6 2.0
0.6 0.0 0.7 20.0 20.0 306 B 3.8 5.7 13.4 4.4 14.1 5.5 4.3 6.0 20.0
12.1 307 B 3.4 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.9 1.5 1.4 2.0 4.4 4.3 308 B 20.0 12.4
50.0 20.0 20.0 1.2 3.6 4.3 20.0 20.0 309 B 3.6 0.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 1.8
14.3 20.0 5.1 3.3 310 B 3.4 0.0 2.3 4.6 7.0 1.8 1.6 3.8 20.0 20.0
311 B 2.3 0.6 3.2 0.4 0.8 0.2 1.6 18.8 4.6 2.0 312 B 1.6 0.9 50.0
1.3 5.7 0.1 5.6 3.8 8.0 7.8 313 B 4.3 8.0 50.0 6.5 8.9 6.6 17.2
20.0 2.1 0.9 314 B 1.1 1.9 50.0 0.8 1.0 1.7 0.9 3.1 3.7 11.3 315 B
2.9 1.8 50.0 1.0 2.2 0.2 0.0 4.5 8.5 6.8 316 B 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 317 B 1.6 1.3 50.0 4.2 0.9 0.4 13.8
10.1 20.0 1.7 318 B 1.7 2.3 3.8 1.0 1.6 0.4 0.0 1.0 3.8 7.7 319 B
8.4 7.2 50.0 9.0 13.7 7.2 5.8 3.9 20.0 1.7 320 B 3.6 6.6 50.0 2.9
2.4 4.0 3.3 2.0 20.0 20.0 321 B 20.0 20.0 19.7 20.0 20.0 3.1 11.2
20.0 20.0 20.0 322 B 3.7 2.2 50.0 0.9 0.3 3.3 1.6 0.0 20.0 20.0 323
B 8.1 10.5 50.0 8.7 20.0 5.6 4.6 0.0 20.0 20.0 324 B 2.7 2.2 50.0
1.3 3.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 3.6 2.4 325 B 20.0 0.0 50.0 6.3 20.0 4.6 8.8
17.8 20.0 20.0 326 B 2.8 0.1 4.4 0.0 1.1 0.1 3.2 2.1 5.2 0.7 327 B
1.9 1.9 20.0 3.0 2.3 3.3 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 328 B 2.6 4.0 50.0 4.2
8.7 4.8 2.9 12.3 50.0 50.0 329 B 14.7 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 1.4 17.1
16.4 50.0 50.0 330 B 2.1 0.8 20.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.2 4.6 8.2 2.6 331 B
5.5 5.0 0.0 7.6 7.4 2.6 20.0 10.1 17.6 20.0 332 B 1.7 1.7 50.0 1.8
5.3 2.0 1.9 3.4 20.0 20.0 333 B 3.4 2.0 3.1 1.1 2.3 1.8 1.6 1.6 8.9
9.3 334 B 3.7 4.3 50.0 1.9 0.0 3.4 1.8 1.4 9.9 20.0 335 B 5.2 5.5
3.5 7.0 5.7 0.2 5.5 11.5 5.2 3.1 336 B 2.1 1.8 20.0 0.6 3.1 1.1 0.8
0.7 19.4 20.0 337 B 0.9 1.9 15.8 1.1 2.2 1.4 50.0 50.0 5.5 3.9 338
B 3.2 1.5 16.2 2.7 2.7 1.1 2.8 3.5 8.1 11.0 339 B 3.5 0.0 2.3 0.5
1.3 0.2 0.8 2.0 6.7 3.8 340 B 2.3 0.2 1.0 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.5 2.0 5.5
3.2 SPA .TM. technology; 1IIS template structure; -carbohydrate, no
floated positions
TABLE-US-00056 TABLE 56 Pos WT A C D E F G H I K L M N P Q R S T V
W Y 239 A S 0.2 4.6 2.7 0.0 20.0 4.6 14.5 11.0 1.9 0.3 2.0 1.9 8.1
1.4 2.6 0.4- 5.7 11.6 20.0 20.0 240 A V 1.5 2.4 2.4 6.9 20.0 7.4
20.0 5.1 9.9 5.9 5.5 2.4 1.1 12.3 13.1 2.- 6 0.5 0.0 20.0 20.0 263
A V 2.3 2.8 6.3 16.5 20.0 8.8 20.0 9.6 7.3 7.3 15.3 4.8 50.0 16.4
17.4- 2.8 1.4 0.0 20.0 20.0 264 A V 1.8 3.1 2.6 1.8 0.0 6.3 1.9 0.6
2.4 0.8 2.7 2.1 1.6 2.3 2.7 2.3 1.- 1 0.5 3.5 0.0 266 A V 4.9 5.2
6.9 12.3 20.0 11.1 20.0 0.8 11.9 20.0 8.5 6.6 50.0 12.5 20- .0 6.1
3.7 0.0 20.0 20.0 296 A Y 3.4 2.7 1.1 0.0 50.0 0.7 50.0 5.0 3.6 3.5
4.2 0.9 50.0 0.9 2.9 2.2- 5.3 5.5 16.1 18.4 299 A T 0.7 3.2 9.9
10.4 20.0 6.2 20.0 10.7 6.7 20.0 4.1 12.9 50.0 5.9 11.- 8 0.0 2.5
8.2 13.3 20.0 325 A N 2.5 3.5 7.7 2.5 20.0 8.0 20.0 0.0 6.1 20.0
7.8 1.2 12.8 0.8 20.0 2- .7 0.0 1.0 20.0 20.0 328 A L 6.1 6.3 7.1
4.2 50.0 8.8 20.0 50.0 4.6 0.0 7.2 6.1 50.0 4.0 8.3 6.- 7 50.0 50.0
20.0 50.0 330 A A 0.9 1.8 1.2 0.0 2.5 4.0 2.9 1.7 1.2 1.6 2.8 0.0
20.0 0.4 1.0 0.2 0- .5 1.7 6.2 2.9 332 A I 1.9 3.8 4.6 1.3 5.1 7.1
1.8 3.4 0.2 0.0 2.6 3.8 20.0 0.6 2.4 2.3 2- .5 4.2 20.0 5.6 239 B S
1.0 2.4 3.5 2.0 6.7 5.6 2.9 3.1 0.3 0.0 1.9 2.1 50.0 1.5 1.8 1.4 1-
.4 5.2 20.0 4.2 240 B V 0.3 2.4 6.9 11.7 20.0 6.6 20.0 8.3 12.3
20.0 14.2 7.4 0.0 13.4 20.- 0 1.3 1.9 0.9 20.0 20.0 263 B V 2.4 3.9
4.5 12.5 20.0 9.3 20.0 15.8 17.1 2.1 20.0 5.3 50.0 13.8 20- .0 3.9
2.2 0.0 20.0 20.0 264 B V 2.2 3.2 4.8 2.7 7.4 6.9 6.0 0.0 1.9 1.9
3.8 3.7 9.9 3.1 2.2 2.7 2.- 4 0.9 14.7 18.2 266 B V 5.4 5.5 7.5
13.2 20.0 12.1 20.0 2.6 20.0 20.0 20.0 5.4 50.0 16.1 2- 0.0 6.0 4.7
0.0 50.0 50.0 296 B Y 1.5 2.7 1.3 1.2 4.0 4.1 3.6 1.1 1.9 2.6 3.5
0.0 20.0 0.7 1.8 1.1 1- .4 1.3 6.5 4.2 299 B T 0.0 2.2 7.5 10.2
20.0 4.8 20.0 7.7 5.8 20.0 10.3 5.1 50.0 10.2 18.- 4 0.3 1.1 5.4
20.0 20.0 325 B N 3.4 5.1 8.6 5.0 20.0 8.2 20.0 16.7 20.0 20.0 20.0
0.0 19.7 6.3 20.- 0 4.6 8.6 18.2 20.0 20.0 328 B L 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.9
50.0 8.3 7.0 50.0 2.9 0.0 1.9 3.8 50.0 3.4 8.4 4.7- 2.9 12.5 50.0
50.0 330 B A 0.7 2.1 2.9 0.7 2.7 4.0 1.4 4.8 0.0 2.2 2.3 0.8 20.0
0.2 0.8 1.1 0- .2 4.7 7.8 3.2 332 B I 1.8 2.9 1.2 1.8 13.5 7.0 9.9
1.7 3.2 0.0 1.7 1.9 50.0 1.2 5.4 2.0 - 2.0 3.3 20.0 20.0 SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1IIS template structure; +carbohydrate
TABLE-US-00057 TABLE 57 Pos WT A C D E F G H I K L M N P Q R S T V
W Y 239 A S 1.2 3.5 1.7 0.0 20.0 5.8 11.0 6.6 2.9 3.9 3.9 2.7 8.5
1.3 2.7 0.6 - 3.5 5.4 20.0 20.0 240 A V 1.2 2.4 6.0 14.0 20.0 7.1
20.0 6.7 9.4 10.1 7.5 4.4 1.8 14.8 20.0 - 2.0 0.4 0.0 20.0 20.0 263
A V 0.0 0.4 1.0 8.7 20.0 6.9 4.4 11.7 4.9 16.0 19.2 0.8 50.0 11.7
20.0- 1.4 0.1 1.0 20.0 20.0 264 A V 2.9 3.7 6.3 2.8 11.6 7.6 13.2
0.0 3.2 3.4 4.1 4.2 7.1 2.9 3.4 3.1 - 1.9 0.8 12.8 16.3 266 A V 4.8
5.9 6.8 9.5 50.0 10.3 20.0 3.5 12.7 12.2 12.7 4.1 50.0 11.9 11- .9
5.2 2.9 0.0 50.0 50.0 296 A Y 0.8 2.0 1.5 0.1 0.2 3.4 1.5 6.6 1.7
0.6 1.8 1.2 2.6 0.0 1.6 0.2 2.- 5 5.6 3.8 0.0 299 A T 1.9 3.7 7.5
0.0 20.0 7.9 14.2 2.9 0.8 3.4 4.4 2.3 50.0 1.9 3.0 3.5- 4.1 3.3
20.0 20.0 325 A N 1.0 1.4 3.1 2.8 20.0 7.4 20.0 8.5 7.7 10.4 6.1
2.8 15.4 5.4 20.0 0- .0 0.1 3.8 20.0 20.0 328 A L 2.5 5.3 4.0 1.9
50.0 7.5 20.0 20.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 2.9 50.0 0.4 4.8 3.- 2 2.9 7.0 50.0
50.0 330 A A 0.9 2.1 1.8 1.2 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.1 1.4 2.1 3.5 0.5 20.0
0.8 1.0 0.0 0- .5 2.9 5.2 2.9 332 A I 2.9 3.7 3.9 0.9 6.1 7.8 2.5
0.0 2.7 0.8 2.8 3.5 50.0 0.7 3.7 2.9 2- .5 1.0 8.1 6.9 239 B S 1.9
3.1 3.0 1.9 1.5 6.2 2.3 14.1 1.8 1.4 2.9 1.8 0.0 1.9 3.2 1.9 2- .3
7.7 6.6 15.8 240 B V 0.5 1.7 5.0 13.3 20.0 6.6 20.0 1.2 12.4 12.1
8.8 4.6 6.3 20.0 20.0- 1.0 0.2 0.0 20.0 20.0 263 B V 2.9 3.2 6.4
18.2 10.1 9.2 6.9 12.8 6.0 20.0 10.3 5.7 50.0 17.5 20.- 0 3.2 2.2
0.0 20.0 20.0 264 B V 2.9 3.6 4.4 3.0 8.8 7.1 6.2 0.0 2.3 1.9 4.5
3.4 1.7 3.2 3.5 3.5 2.- 0 0.9 12.0 16.4 266 B V 4.4 4.6 2.6 6.6
20.0 10.7 20.0 0.0 4.9 1.7 8.5 5.6 50.0 6.0 12.4 5- .3 4.6 1.5 20.0
50.0 296 B Y 0.0 7.1 6.7 7.2 20.0 0.1 18.6 50.0 7.0 2.7 6.6 6.8
50.0 7.2 9.3 2.- 3 50.0 50.0 20.0 14.1 299 B T 0.0 3.2 10.4 6.0
20.0 5.5 20.0 15.9 3.2 5.9 4.4 6.4 50.0 5.7 9.4 1- .2 1.4 13.7 20.0
20.0 325 B N 1.4 2.5 5.0 0.0 20.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 1.0 2.2 1.0 0.3 1.9
1.1 20.0 2.- 6 5.1 20.0 20.0 20.0 328 B L 0.4 1.3 5.6 0.0 50.0 4.5
50.0 50.0 1.9 2.4 2.4 8.3 50.0 0.8 16.4 1- .0 1.2 50.0 50.0 50.0
330 B A 0.6 1.4 2.5 0.9 3.1 2.5 1.2 20.0 0.0 2.4 2.1 0.3 20.0 0.4
0.6 0.0 - 4.0 20.0 13.5 3.4 332 B I 4.3 5.3 5.7 0.0 11.4 9.3 4.3
2.5 5.8 2.0 4.0 6.5 17.9 3.7 5.9 4.6 - 4.2 3.7 20.0 11.6 SPA .TM.
technology; D129G 1IIX template structure; +carbohydrate
TABLE-US-00058 TABLE 58 Pos WT A C D E F G H I K L 239 A S 1.2 2.3
2.2 1.8 7.9 5.5 7.6 0.5 0.2 1.8 240 A V 0.7 2.9 6.8 4.3 20.0 6.5
20.0 0.0 10.7 20.0 263 A V 1.7 2.9 4.6 18.8 20.0 8.4 5.8 15.1 2.3
14.5 264 A V 2.7 3.3 3.6 1.5 13.9 6.7 5.9 0.0 2.3 4.9 266 A V 3.5
3.5 5.7 12.4 20.0 10.0 20.0 5.7 6.3 7.8 296 A Y 2.6 50.0 50.0 50.0
50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 18.5 18.0 299 A T 0.2 0.7 6.6 1.2 20.0 5.6 9.6
1.6 0.8 1.5 325 A N 3.1 3.6 7.3 2.4 20.0 7.7 20.0 20.0 20.0 10.0
328 A L 0.6 0.0 1.5 5.4 50.0 1.6 50.0 50.0 3.1 4.2 330 A A 1.9 2.5
4.1 2.8 4.5 4.1 3.0 3.2 1.0 2.7 332 A I 2.3 3.5 2.2 0.8 20.0 6.8
9.6 0.0 3.4 0.2 239 B S 1.4 3.6 2.5 1.4 16.8 5.8 6.2 5.0 2.5 1.4
240 B V 0.0 2.6 12.8 18.6 20.0 5.7 20.0 12.7 10.4 20.0 263 B V 1.1
2.4 3.6 20.0 20.0 7.8 17.7 11.8 4.5 20.0 264 B V 3.3 4.0 5.0 2.9
14.2 7.5 4.8 0.0 2.6 3.6 266 B V 2.9 3.3 4.9 11.3 50.0 9.5 20.0
20.0 20.0 7.9 296 B Y 2.8 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 17.7
18.7 299 B T 0.0 3.8 12.6 9.2 20.0 5.9 20.0 7.3 4.8 3.2 325 B N 0.3
2.0 5.5 2.2 50.0 6.1 20.0 0.0 10.5 15.5 328 B L 5.4 5.7 7.3 4.4
50.0 9.8 20.0 50.0 2.5 0.0 330 B A 0.6 1.4 3.2 1.3 3.9 3.2 2.7 4.0
1.3 3.7 332 B I 1.9 3.1 2.7 1.7 5.2 6.9 3.1 0.4 1.3 0.0 Pos M N P Q
R S T V W Y 239 A 2.6 1.4 0.9 1.3 1.9 1.5 0.8 0.0 8.6 9.6 240 A 3.1
9.1 2.1 7.7 20.0 1.4 1.1 2.4 20.0 20.0 263 A 2.1 3.2 50.0 20.0 15.0
3.6 1.2 0.0 20.0 20.0 264 A 3.7 3.2 1.9 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 0.7 19.9
19.0 266 A 7.4 5.2 50.0 16.6 20.0 4.2 1.7 0.0 20.0 50.0 296 A 50.0
50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 13.6 299 A 1.8 4.8 50.0 1.0
9.2 0.0 0.0 1.6 20.0 20.0 325 A 13.1 3.6 50.0 0.0 20.0 4.0 9.7 20.0
20.0 20.0 328 A 9.6 1.4 50.0 6.9 9.6 0.6 0.1 50.0 50.0 50.0 330 A
3.5 2.1 20.0 2.4 2.6 1.3 0.0 3.9 7.6 5.3 332 A 2.6 2.8 14.5 3.3 4.6
2.6 1.3 0.9 10.5 20.0 239 B 2.0 3.8 0.3 0.5 2.4 0.0 1.6 5.3 20.0
19.5 240 B 8.5 15.1 3.1 20.0 20.0 1.0 0.2 2.4 20.0 20.0 263 B 6.3
3.3 50.0 20.0 20.0 3.2 1.2 0.0 20.0 20.0 264 B 4.6 3.5 1.7 3.1 4.1
3.9 2.9 1.3 6.9 20.0 266 B 15.0 4.5 50.0 4.9 20.0 1.9 0.0 3.6 50.0
50.0 296 B 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 11.3 299 B
4.3 8.0 50.0 12.3 8.8 0.2 2.1 4.4 20.0 20.0 325 B 14.6 1.3 10.0 2.4
20.0 2.3 2.0 1.0 20.0 50.0 328 B 5.1 5.9 50.0 2.8 7.4 6.1 6.4 50.0
50.0 50.0 330 B 3.1 0.7 20.0 0.6 1.3 0.0 0.4 4.2 8.2 3.6 332 B 1.9
2.6 7.7 1.3 2.2 2.3 1.6 2.0 10.4 5.6 SPA .TM. technology; D129G
1E4K template structure; +carbohydrate
TABLE-US-00059 TABLE 59 Pos WT A C D E F G H I K L 239 A S 1.4 2.6
3.1 1.0 20.0 5.7 4.8 3.4 2.0 1.2 240 A V 2.9 3.5 3.7 4.6 20.0 8.2
10.8 0.0 9.1 3.2 263 A V 3.6 4.9 6.2 8.7 20.0 9.9 20.0 3.7 4.2 0.5
264 A V 1.8 2.8 3.3 2.0 2.9 6.2 3.1 0.0 2.4 0.8 266 A V 4.4 5.2 4.9
7.1 20.0 10.6 20.0 1.0 12.1 4.8 296 A Y 1.2 2.9 0.7 1.4 3.1 3.9 2.7
2.4 2.3 1.9 299 A T 0.0 2.6 6.0 11.5 20.0 5.3 20.0 20.0 6.0 20.0
325 A N 5.2 7.0 6.6 6.9 50.0 11.3 20.0 1.3 14.3 13.5 328 A L 4.8
5.5 7.0 3.2 20.0 10.5 20.0 50.0 5.1 0.0 330 A A 0.9 1.8 1.1 0.9 3.5
4.0 3.0 2.3 1.2 1.6 332 A I 5.3 6.4 6.7 4.8 8.2 9.9 5.2 3.1 0.0 3.6
239 B S 0.7 2.3 2.6 2.0 5.3 5.1 3.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 240 B V 2.3 3.0 4.1
7.3 20.0 8.1 20.0 5.1 20.0 11.8 263 B V 3.2 4.3 7.3 8.3 20.0 9.6
20.0 13.3 8.5 0.6 264 B V 2.1 3.2 3.7 2.7 17.8 6.6 11.5 0.0 2.0 0.8
266 B V 5.0 5.0 5.2 16.3 20.0 11.2 20.0 2.3 20.0 14.3 296 B Y 0.9
2.3 1.0 0.5 2.7 3.7 2.5 1.2 1.3 2.1 299 B T 1.1 2.2 7.6 5.4 20.0
6.4 12.8 1.8 3.9 17.5 325 B N 10.1 11.5 13.1 11.2 20.0 15.7 20.0
8.6 14.3 17.1 328 B L 2.9 4.1 4.8 3.5 50.0 8.5 1.7 9.6 1.5 0.0 330
B A 0.1 2.0 1.4 1.8 1.6 4.0 3.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 332 B I 3.4 4.4 3.5 3.1
6.1 8.2 4.1 0.0 3.3 1.3 Pos M N P Q R S T V W Y 239 A 2.6 1.6 4.8
0.0 2.1 1.3 2.1 3.3 13.8 19.6 240 A 5.4 3.1 4.8 5.5 17.5 4.0 1.8
1.2 20.0 20.0 263 A 6.7 6.1 50.0 9.5 20.0 5.1 3.6 0.0 20.0 20.0 264
A 3.0 2.4 6.1 1.4 2.8 2.4 1.9 0.8 10.2 2.2 266 A 9.1 4.6 50.0 7.9
12.6 5.8 3.5 0.0 20.0 20.0 296 A 2.2 0.0 1.6 1.4 3.0 0.9 1.0 3.5
6.0 2.6 299 A 4.4 3.0 50.0 14.1 13.2 0.9 3.8 15.1 15.0 20.0 325 A
13.9 0.0 5.0 6.0 20.0 6.0 4.6 3.2 20.0 50.0 328 A 8.5 5.5 50.0 3.5
8.2 5.5 13.4 50.0 20.0 50.0 330 A 2.8 0.0 14.5 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.4 2.0
6.4 3.2 332 A 5.2 6.8 20.0 3.5 4.6 5.5 4.8 4.0 11.2 7.1 239 B 2.0
0.8 15.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 3.3 8.2 6.0 240 B 10.9 3.8 2.0 17.0 20.0
3.6 1.3 0.0 20.0 20.0 263 B 20.0 6.0 50.0 8.5 20.0 4.6 4.0 0.0 20.0
20.0 264 B 3.5 3.0 7.8 2.0 1.5 2.5 1.3 1.0 13.9 20.0 266 B 17.3 2.5
50.0 11.6 20.0 5.4 3.9 0.0 20.0 20.0 296 B 3.0 0.0 7.0 0.4 1.1 0.3
0.8 1.8 6.0 2.4 299 B 6.9 3.9 20.0 4.6 10.3 0.8 0.0 1.9 20.0 20.0
325 B 20.0 0.0 16.1 10.6 20.0 11.1 10.9 10.5 20.0 20.0 328 B 1.5
3.5 50.0 3.3 2.0 3.3 1.9 5.2 50.0 50.0 330 B 2.6 0.0 20.0 0.7 2.0
0.3 0.6 2.1 4.4 2.4 332 B 3.3 4.0 15.7 0.8 2.1 3.9 2.7 1.1 20.0 6.1
SPA .TM. technology; Fc/Fc.gamma.RIIb model template structure;
-carbohydrate
The results of the design calculations presented above in Tables
1-59 were used to construct a series of Fc variant libraries for
experimental production and screening. Experimental libraries were
designed in successive rounds of computational and experimental
screening. Design of subsequent Fc libraries benefited from
feedback from prior libraries, and thus typically comprised
combinations of Fc variants that showed favorable properties in the
previous screen. The entire set of Fc variants that were
constructed and experimentally tested is shown in Table 60. In this
table, row 1 lists the variable positions, and the rows that follow
indicate the amino acids at those variable positions for WT and the
Fc variants. For example, variant 18 has the following four
mutations: F241E, F243Y, V262T, and V264R. The variable position
residues that compose this set of Fc variants are illustrated
structurally in FIG. 3 (SEQ ID NO:3), and are presented in the
context of the human IgG1 Fc sequence in FIG. 4.
TABLE-US-00060 TABLE 60 Position 234 235 239 240 241 243 244 245
247 262 263 264 265 266 267 WT L L S V F F P P P V V V D V S 1 A 2
L 3 I 4 W 5 L 6 W 7 L 8 L L I I 9 W W 10 W W A A 11 L I 12 L I 13 L
I W 14 Y Y T T 15 E R E R 16 E Q T E 17 R Q T R 18 E Y T R 19 20 21
22 23 24 H 25 A 26 V 27 28 H A V 29 G 30 I 31 E R E R 32 E Q T E 33
R Q T R 34 E Y T R 35 36 37 41 E 42 Q 43 E 44 G 45 N 46 E G 47 E N
48 E Q 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Q 57 L 58 59 60 61 62 62 63 64 65 66
67 68 Y 69 Y 70 F 71 72 73 74 75 T 76 F 77 I 78 I 79 I 80 81 82 83
84 85 86 D 87 N 88 F 89 D 90 D 91 D 92 D 93 E 94 E 95 E 96 N 97 N
98 N 99 N 100 Q 101 Q 102 Q 103 104 105 106 Y Y T T 107 108 I 109
110 I 111 D 112 E 112 N 114 Q 115 T 116 H 117 Y 118 I 119 V 120 F
121 D 122 S 123 N 124 Q 125 T 126 H 127 Y 128 I 129 V 130 F 131 T
132 H 133 Y 134 A 135 T 136 M 137 A 138 T 139 M 140 M 141 Y 142 A
143 T 144 M 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158
159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175
176 177 178 179 E I 180 Q I 181 E I 182 E I 183 D 184 E 185 D V 186
D I 187 D L 188 D F 189 D Y 190 D H 191 D T 192 E 193 194 195 196
197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 D 208 N 209 D 210 N 211
I 212 D 213 N 214 D I 215 D I 216 D I Position 269 296 297 298 299
313 325 326 327 328 329 330 332 333 334 WT E Y N S T W N K A L P A
I E K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 M 20 E 21 F
22 E 23 M E 24 25
26 27 F 28 29 30 E 31 E 32 E 33 E 34 E 35 A 36 A E 37 A A A 41 E 42
E 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 E 50 Q 51 T 52 N 53 I 54 S 55 N 56 S 57 S 58
L 59 F 60 L 61 Y 62 D 62 D 63 S 64 D 65 S E 66 D E 67 E E 68 D E 69
D E 70 E E 71 I E 72 Q E 73 N 74 Q 75 76 77 78 79 80 A 81 S 82 V 83
Q 84 L 85 I 86 87 88 89 D 90 E 91 N 92 Q 93 D 94 N 95 Q 96 D 97 E
98 N 99 Q 100 D 101 N 102 Q 103 E 104 D 105 N 106 D E 107 Y E 108 Y
E 109 L E 110 L E 111 112 112 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139
140 141 142 143 144 145 H 146 Y 147 F 148 R 149 S 150 T 151 L 152 I
153 H 154 H 155 V 156 I 157 F 158 R 159 H 160 D 161 E 162 A 163 T
164 V 165 H 166 D E 167 E E 168 N E 169 Q E 170 V E 171 T E 172 H E
173 I E 174 A 175 T 176 H 177 Y 178 A 179 E 180 E 181 Y E 182 A Y E
183 D E 184 D E 185 D E 186 D E 187 D E 188 D E 189 D E 190 D E 191
D E 192 D E 193 D D E 194 E D E 195 N D E 196 Q D E 197 H D E 198 T
D E 199 D V E 200 D I E 201 D L E 202 D F E 203 D H E 204 D E E 205
D Y E 206 D A Y E 207 Y E 208 Y E 209 L E 210 L E 211 A E 212 A E
213 A E 214 E 215 A E 216 L E
Example 2
Experimental Production and Screening of Fc Libraries
The majority of experimentation on the Fc variants was carried out
in the context of the anti-cancer antibody alemtuzumab
(Campath.RTM., a registered trademark of Hex Pharmaceuticals LP).
Alemtuzumab binds a short linear epitope within its target antigen
CD52 (Hale et al., 1990, Tissue Antigens 35:118-127; Hale, 1995,
Immunotechnology 1:175-187). Alemtuzumab has been chosen as the
primary engineering template because its efficacy is due in part to
its ability to recruit effector cells (Dyer et al., 1989, Blood
73:1431-1439; Friend et al., 1991, Transplant Proc 23:2253-2254;
Hale et al., 1998, Blood 92:4581-4590; Glennie et al., 2000,
Immunol Today 21:403-410), and because production and use of its
antigen in binding assays are relatively straightforward. In order
to evaluate the optimized Fc variants of the present invention in
the context of other antibodies, select Fc variants were evaluated
in the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (Rituxan.RTM., a registered
trademark of IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation), and the anti-Her2
antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin.RTM., a registered trademark of
Genentech). The use of alemtuzumab, rituximab, and trastuzumabfor
screening purposes is not meant to constrain the present invention
to any particular antibody.
The IgG1 full length light (V.sub.L-C.sub.L) and heavy
(V.sub.H-C.gamma.1-C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3) chain antibody genes for
alemtuzumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab were constructed with
convenient end restriction sites to facilitate subcloning. The
genes were ligated into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1Zeo
(Invitrogen). The V.sub.H-C.gamma.1-C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3 clone in
pcDNA3.1zeo was used as a template for mutagenesis of the Fc
region. Mutations were introduced into this clone using PCR-based
mutagenesis techniques. Fc variants were sequenced to confirm the
fidelity of the sequence. Plasmids containing heavy chain gene
(V.sub.H-C.gamma.1-C.gamma.2-C.gamma.3) (wild-type or variants)
were co-transfected with plasmid containing light chain gene
(V.sub.L-C.sub.L) into 293T cells. Media were harvested 5 days
after transfection. Expression of immunoglobulin was monitored by
screening the culture supernatant of transfectomas by western using
peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch,
catalog #109-035-088). FIG. 6 shows expression of wild-type
alemtuzumab and variants 1 through 10 in 293T cells. Antibodies
were purified from the supernatant using protein A affinity
chromatography (Pierce, Catalog #20334. FIG. 7 shows results of the
protein purification for WT alemtuzumab. Antibody Fc variants
showed similar expression and purification results to WT. Some Fc
variants were deglycosylated in order to determine their solution
and functional properties in the absence of carbohydrate. To obtain
deglycosylated antibodies, purified alemtuzumab antibodies were
incubated with peptide-N-glycosidase (PNGase F) at 37.degree. C.
for 24 h. FIG. 8 presents an SDS PAGE gel confirming
deglycosylation for several Fc variants and WT alemtuzumab.
In order to confirm the functional fidelity of alemtuzumab produced
under these conditions, the antigenic CD52 peptide, fused to GST,
was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) under IPTG induction. Both
un-induced and induced samples were run on a SDS PAGE gel, and
transferred to PVDF membrane. For western analysis, either
alemtuzumab from Sotec (final concentration 2.5 ng/ul) or media of
transfected 293T cells (final alemtuzumab concentration about
0.1-0.2 ng/ul) were used as primary antibody, and
peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti human IgG was used as secondary
antibody. FIG. 9 presents these results. The ability to bind target
antigen confirms the structural and functional fidelity of the
expressed alemtuzumab. Fc variants that have the same variable
region as WT alemtuzumab are anticipated to maintain a comparable
binding affinity for antigen.
In order to screen for Fc/Fc.gamma.R binding, the extracellular
regions of human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa, human F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa,
human Fc.gamma.RIIb, human Fc.gamma.RIIa, and mouse Fc.gamma.RIII,
were expressed and purified. FIG. 10 presents an SDS PAGE gel that
shows the results of expression and purification of human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The extracellular region of this receptor was
obtained by PCR from a clone obtained from the Mammalian Gene
Collection (MGC:22630). The receptor was fused with glutathione
S-Transferase (GST) to enable screening. Tagged Fc.gamma.RIIIa was
transfected in 293T cells, and media containing secreted
Fc.gamma.RIIIa were harvested 3 days later and purified. For
western analysis, membrane was probed with anti-GST antibody.
Binding affinity to Fc.gamma.RIIIa and Fc.gamma.RIIb was measured
for all designed Fc variants using an AlphaScreen.TM. assay
(Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous Assay (ALPHA),
PerkinElmer, Wellesley, Mass.), a bead-based non-radioactive
luminescent proximity assay. Laser excitation of a donor bead
excites oxygen, which if sufficiently close to the acceptor bead
generates a cascade of chemiluminescent events, ultimately leading
to fluorescence emission at 520-620 nm. The AlphaScreen.TM. assay
was applied as a competition assay for screening Fc variants. WT
alemtuzumab antibody was biotinylated by standard methods for
attachment to streptavidin donor beads, and GST-tagged Fc.gamma.R
was bound to glutathione chelate acceptor beads. In the absence of
competing Fc variants, WT antibody and Fc.gamma.R interact and
produce a signal at 520-620 nm. Addition of untagged Fc variant
competes with the WT Fc/Fc.gamma.R interaction, reducing
fluorescence quantitatively to enable determination of relative
binding affinities. All Fc variants were screened for V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa binding using the AlphaScreen.TM. assay. Select Fc
variants were subsequently screened for binding to Fc.gamma.RIIb,
as well as other Fc.gamma.Rs and Fc ligands.
FIG. 11 shows AlphaScreen.TM. data for binding to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa by select Fc variants. The binding data were
normalized to the maximum and minimum luminescence signal provided
by the baselines at low and high concentrations of competitor
antibody respectively. The data were fit to a one site competition
model using nonlinear regression, and these fits are represented by
the curves in the figure. These fits provide the inhibitory
concentration 50% (IC50) (i.e. the concentration required for 50%
inhibition) for each antibody, illustrated by the dotted lines in
FIG. 11, thus enabling the relative binding affinities of Fc
variants to be quantitatively determined. Here, WT alemtuzumab has
an IC50 of (4.63.times.10.sup.-9).times.(2)=9.2 nM, whereas S239D
has an IC50 of (3.98.times.10.sup.-10).times.(2)=0.8 nM. Thus S239D
alemtuzumab binds 9.2 nM/0.8 nM=11.64-fold more tightly than WT
alemtuzumab to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. Similar calculations were
performed for the binding of all Fc variants to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa. Select Fc variants were also screened for binding
to human Fc.gamma.RIIb, and examples of these AlphaScreen.TM.
binding data are shown in FIG. 12. Table 61 presents the
fold-enhancement or fold-reduction relative to the parent antibody
for binding of Fc variants to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa (column 3)
and human Fc.gamma.RIIb (column 4), as determined by the
AlphaScreen.TM. assay. For these data, a fold above 1 indicates an
enhancement in binding affinity, and a fold below 1 indicates a
reduction in binding affinity relative to WT Fc. All data were
obtained in the context of alemtuzumab, except for those indicated
with an asterix (*), which were tested in the context of
trastuzumab.
TABLE-US-00061 TABLE 61 Fc.gamma.RIIIa Fc.gamma.RIIb Fc.gamma.IIIa-
Variant Substitution(s) Fold Fold fold:Fc.gamma.IIb-fold 1 V264A
0.53 2 V264L 0.56 3 V264I 1.43 4 F241W 0.29 5 F241L 0.26 6 F243W
0.51 7 F243L 0.51 8 F241L/F243L/V262I/V264I 0.09 9 F241W/F243W 0.07
10 F241W/F243W/V262A/V264A 0.04 11 F241L/V262I 0.06 12 F243L/V264I
1.23 13 F243L/V262I/V264W 0.02 14 F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T 0.05 15
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R 0.05 16 F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E 0.07 17
F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R 0.02 18 F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R 0.05 19
L328M 0.21 20 L328E 0.12 21 L328F 0.24 22 I332E 6.72 3.93 1.71 23
L328M/I332E 2.60 24 P244H 0.83 25 P245A 0.25 26 P247V 0.53 27 W313F
0.88 28 P244H/P245A/P247V 0.93 29 P247G 0.54 30 V264I/I332E 12.49
1.57* 7.96 31 F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R/I332E 0.19 32
F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E/I332E 33 F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R/I332E 34
F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R/I332E 0.10 35 S298A 2.21 36 S298A/I332E
21.73 37 S298A/E333A/K334A 2.56 41 S239E/I332E 5.80 3.49 1.66 42
S239Q/I332E 6.60 4.68 1.41 43 S239E 10.16 44 D265G <0.02 45
D265N <0.02 46 S239E/D265G <0.02 47 S239E/D265N 0.02 48
S239E/D265Q 0.05 49 Y296E 0.73 1.11 0.66 50 Y296Q 0.52 0.43 1.21 51
S298T 0.94 <0.02 52 S298N 0.41 <0.02 53 T299I <0.02 54
A327S 0.23 0.39 0.59 55 A327N 0.19 1.15 0.17 56 S267Q/A327S 0.03 57
S267L/A327S <0.02 58 A327L 0.05 59 P329F <0.02 60 A330L 0.73
0.38 1.92 61 A330Y 1.64 0.75 2.19 62 I332D 17.80 3.34 5.33 63 N297S
<0.02 64 N297D <0.02 65 N297S/I332E <0.02 66 N297D/I332E
0.08 <0.02 67 N297E/I332E <0.02 68 D265Y/N297D/I332E <0.02
69 D265Y/N297D/T299L/I332E <0.02 70 D265F/N297E/I332E <0.02
71 L328I/I332E 7.03 72 L328Q/I332E 1.54 73 I332N 0.39 74 I332Q 0.37
75 V264T 2.73 76 V264F 0.16 77 V240I 3.25 78 V263I 0.10 79 V266I
1.86 80 T299A 0.03 81 T299S 0.15 82 T299V <0.02 83 N325Q
<0.02 84 N325L <0.02 85 N325I <0.02 86 S239D 11.64 4.47*
2.60 87 S239N <0.02 88 S239F 0.22 <0.02 89 S239D/I332D 14.10
90 S239D/I332E 56.10 19.71* 2.85 91 S239D/I332N 7.19 92 S239D/I332Q
9.28 93 S239E/I332D 9.33 94 S239E/I332N 11.93 95 S239E/I332Q 3.80
96 S239N/I332D 3.08 97 S239N/I332E 14.21 98 S239N/I332N 0.43 99
S239N/I332Q 0.56 100 S239Q/I332D 5.05 101 S239Q/I332N 0.39 102
S239Q/I332Q 0.59 103 K326E 3.85 104 Y296D 0.62 105 Y296N 0.29 106
F241Y/F243Y/V262T/V264T/N297D/I332E 0.15 107 A330Y/I332E 12.02 4.40
2.73 108 V264I/A330Y/I332E 12.00 3.54 3.39 109 A330L/I332E 10.34
2.03 5.09 110 V264I/A330L/I332E 11.15 1.79 6.23 111 L234D 0.21 112
L234E 1.34 2.21 0.61 113 L234N 0.56 1.39 0.40 114 L234Q 0.37 115
L234T 0.35 116 L234H 0.33 117 L234Y 1.42 1.08 1.31 118 L234I 1.55
1.14 1.36 119 L234V 0.38 120 L234F 0.30 121 L235D 1.66 3.63 0.46
122 L235S 1.25 123 L235N 0.40 124 L235Q 0.51 125 L235T 0.52 126
L235H 0.41 127 L235Y 1.19 10.15 0.12 128 L235I 1.10 0.94 1.17 129
L235V 0.48 130 L235F 0.73 3.53 0.21 131 S239T 1.34 132 S239H 0.20
133 S239Y 0.21 134 V240A 0.70 0.14 5.00 135 V240T 136 V240M 2.06
1.38 1.49 137 V263A 138 V263T 0.43 139 V263M 0.05 140 V264M 0.26
141 V264Y 1.02 0.27 3.78 142 V266A <0.02 143 V266T 0.45 144
V266M 0.62 145 E269H <0.02 146 E269Y 0.12 147 E269F 0.16 148
E269R 0.05 149 Y296S 0.12 150 Y296T <0.02 151 Y296L 0.22 152
Y296I 0.09 153 A298H 0.27 154 T299H <0.02 155 A330V 0.43 156
A330I 1.71 0.02 85.5 157 A330F 0.60 158 A330R <0.02 159 A330H
0.52 160 N325D 0.41 161 N325E <0.02 162 N325A 0.11 163 N325T
1.10 164 N325V 0.48 165 N325H 0.73 166 L328D/I332E 1.34 167
L328E/I332E 0.20 168 L328N/I332E <0.02 169 L328Q/I332E 0.70 170
L328V/I332E 2.06 171 L328T/I332E 1.10 172 L328H/I332E <0.02 173
L328I/I332E 3.49 174 L328A 0.20 175 I332T 0.72 176 I332H 0.46 177
I332Y 0.76 178 I332A 0.89 179 S239E/V264I/I332E 15.46 180
S239Q/V264I/I332E 2.14 181 S239E/V264I/A330Y/I332E 8.53 182
S239E/V264I/S298A/A330Y/I332E 183 S239D/N297D/I332E 0.28 184
S239E/N297D/I332E 0.06 185 S239D/D265V/N297D/I332E 186
S239D/D265I/N297D/I332E 187 S239D/D265L/N297D/I332E <0.02 188
S239D/D265F/N297D/I332E <0.02 189 S239D/D265Y/N297D/I332E 0.02
190 S239D/D265H/N297D/I332E 0.04 191 S239D/D265T/N297D/I332E
<0.02 192 V264I/N297D/I332E 0.05 193 Y296D/N297D/I332E 194
Y296E/N297D/I332E <0.02 195 Y296N/N297D/I332E 0.04 196
Y296Q/N297D/I332E <0.02 197 Y296H/N297D/I332E <0.02 198
Y296T/N297D/I332E <0.02 199 N297D/T299V/I332E <0.02 200
N297D/T299I/I332E <0.02 201 N297D/T299L/I332E <0.02 202
N297D/T299F/I332E <0.02 203 N297D/T299H/I332E <0.02 204
N297D/T299E/I332E <0.02 205 N297D/A330Y/I332E 0.43 206
N297D/S298A/A330Y/I332E 207* S239D/A330Y/I332E 129.58 208*
S239N/A330Y/I332E 14.22 209* S239D/A330L/I332E 138.63 7.50 18.48
210* S239N/A330L/I332E 12.95 211* V264I/S298A/I332E 16.50 212*
S239D/S298A/I332E 295.16 6.16 47.92 213* S239N/S298A/I332E 32.14
5.15 6.24 214* S239D/V264I/I332E 36.58 14.39 2.54 215*
S239D/V264I/S298A/I332E 216* S239D/V264I/A330L/I332E
Example 3
Selectively Enhanced Binding to Fc.gamma.Rs
A number of promising Fc variants with optimized properties were
obtained from the Fc.gamma.RIIIa and Fc.gamma.RIIb screen. Table 61
provides Fc variants that bind more tightly to Fc.gamma.RIIa, and
thus are candidates for improving the effector function of
antibodies and Fc fusions. These include a number of variants that
comprise substitutions at 239, 264, 330, and 332. FIG. 13 shows
AlphaScreen.TM. binding data for some of these Fc variants. The
majority of these Fc variants provide substantially greater
Fc.gamma.RIIIa binding enhancements over S298A/E333A/K334A.
Although the majority of Fc variants were screened in the context
of the antibody alemtuzumab, select Fc variants were also screened
in the context of rituximab and trastuzumab. AlphaScreen.TM. data
for binding of select Fc variants to human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa In
the context of rituximab and trastuzumab are shown in FIGS. 14 and
15 respectively. The results indicate that the Fc variants display
consistent binding enhancements regardless of the antibody context,
and thus the Fc variants of the present invention are broadly
applicable to antibodies and Fc fusions.
Fc variants have been obtained that show differentially enhanced
binding to Fc.gamma.RIIIa over Fc.gamma.RIIb. As discussed, optimal
effector function may result from Fc variants wherein affinity for
activating Fc.gamma.Rs is greater than affinity for the inhibitory
Fc.gamma.RIIb. AlphaScreen.TM. data directly comparing binding to
Fc.gamma.RIIIa and Fc.gamma.RIIIb for two Fc variants with this
specificity profile are shown in FIGS. 16a and 16b. This concept
can be defined quantitatively as the fold-enhancement or -reduction
of the activating F.gamma.R (Table 61, column 3) divided by the
fold-enhancement or -reduction of the inhibitory Fc.gamma.R (Table
61, column 4), herein referred to as the
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold ratio. This value provided
in Column 5 in Table 61. Table 61 shows that Fc variants provide
this specificity profile, with a
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold ratio as high as 86:1.
Some of the most promising Fc variants of the present invention for
enhancing effector function have both substantial increases in
affinity for Fc.gamma.RIIIa and favorable
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold ratios. These include, for
example, S239D/I332E (Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold=56,
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold=3), S239D/A330Y/I332E
(Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold=130), S239D/A330L/I332E
(Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold=139,
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold=18), and S239D/S298A/I332E
(Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold=295,
Fc.gamma.RIIIa-fold:Fc.gamma.RIIb-fold=48). FIG. 17 shows
AlphaScreen.TM. binding data for these and other Fc variants to
human V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa.
Because there are a number of Fc.gamma.Rs that contribute to
effector function, it may be worthwhile to additionally screen Fc
variants against other receptors. FIG. 18 shows AlphaScreen.TM.
data for binding of select Fc variants to human R131 Fc.gamma.RIIa.
As can be seen, those aforementioned variants with favorable
binding enhancements and specificity profiles also show enhanced
binding to this activating receptor. The use of Fc.gamma.RIIIa,
Fc.gamma.RIIb, and Fc.gamma.RIIc for screening is not meant to
constrain experimental testing to these particular Fc.gamma.Rs;
other Fc.gamma.Rs are contemplated for screening, including but not
limited to the myriad isoforms and allotypes of Fc.gamma.RI,
Fc.gamma.RII, and Fc.gamma.RIII from humans, mice, rats, monkeys,
and the like, as previously described.
Taken together, the Fc.gamma.R binding data provided in FIGS. 11-18
and Table 61 indicate that a number of substitutions at positions
234, 235, 239, 240, 243, 264, 266, 325, 328, 330, and 332 are
promising candidates for improving the effector function of
antibodies and Fc fusions. Because combinations of some of these
substitutions have typically resulted in additive or synergistic
binding improvements, it is anticipated that as yet unexplored
combinations of the Fc variants provided in Table 61 will also
provide favorable results. Thus all combinations of the Fc variants
in Table 61 are contemplated. Likewise, combinations of any of the
Fc variants in Table 61 with other discovered or undiscovered Fc
variants may also provide favorable properties, and these
combinations are also contemplated. Furthermore, it is anticipated
from these results that other substitutions at positions 234, 235,
239, 240, 243, 264, 266, 325, 328, 330, and 332 may also provide
favorable binding enhancements and specificities, and thus
substitutions at these positions other than those presented in
Table 61 are contemplated.
Example 4
Reduced Binding to Fc.gamma.Rs
As discussed, although there is a need for greater effector
function, for some antibody therapeutics, reduced or eliminated
effector function may be desired. Several Fc variants in Table 61
substantially reduce or ablate Fc.gamma.R binding, and thus may
find use in antibodies and Fc fusions wherein effector function is
undesirable. AlphaScreen.TM. binding data for some examples of such
variants are shown in FIGS. 19a and 19b. These Fc variants, as well
as their use in combination, may find use for eliminating effector
function when desired, for example in antibodies and Fc fusions
whose mechanism of action involves blocking or antagonism but not
killing of the cells bearing target antigen.
Example 5
Aglycosylated Fc Variants
As discussed, one goal of the current experiments was to obtain
optimized aglycosylated Fc variants. Several Fc variants provide
significant progress towards this goal. Because it is the site of
glycosylation, substitution at N297 results in an aglycosylated Fc.
Whereas all other Fc variants that comprise a substitution at N297
completely ablate Fc.gamma.R binding, N297D/I332E has significant
binding affinity for Fc.gamma.RIIIa, shown in Table 61 and
illustrated in FIG. 20. The exact reason for this result is
uncertain in the absence of a high-resolution structure for this
variant, although the computational screening predictions suggest
that it is potentially due to a combination of new favorable
Fc/Fc.gamma.R interactions and favorable electrostatic properties.
Indeed other electrostatic substitutions are envisioned for further
optimization of aglycosylated Fc. Table 61 shows that other
aglycosylated Fc variants such as S239D/N297D/I332E and
N297D/A330Y/I332E provide binding enhancements that bring affinity
for Fc.gamma.RIIIa within 0.28- and 0.43-fold respectively of
glycosylated WT alemtuzumab. Combinations of these variants with
other Fc variants that enhance Fc.gamma.R binding are contemplated,
with the goal of obtaining aglycosylated Fc variants that bind one
or more Fc.gamma.Rs with affinity that is approximately the same as
or even better than glycosylated parent Fc. An additional set of
promising Fc variants provide stability and solubility enhancements
in the absence of carbohydrate. Fc variants that comprise
substitutions at positions 241, 243, 262, and 264, positions that
do not mediate F.gamma.R binding but do determine the interface
between the carbohydrate and Fc, ablate F.gamma.R binding,
presumably because they perturb the conformation of the
carbohydrate. In deglycosylated form, however, Fc variants
F241E/F243R/V262E/V264R, F241E/F243Q/V262T/V264E,
F241R/F243Q/V262T/V264R, and F241E/F243Y/V262T/V264R show stronger
binding to Fc.gamma.RIIIa than in glycosylated form, as shown by
the AlphaScreen.TM. data in FIG. 21. This result indicates that
these are key positions for optimization of the structure,
stability, solubility, and function of aglycosylated Fc. Together
these results suggests that protein engineering can be used to
restore the favorable functional and solution properties of
antibodies and Fc fusions in the absence of carbohydrate, and pave
the way for aglycosylated antibodies and Fc fusions with favorable
solution properties and full functionality that comprise
substitutions at these and other Fc positions.
Example 6
Affinity of Fc Variants for Polymorphic Forms of Fc.gamma.RIIIa
As discussed above, an important parameter of Fc-mediated effector
function is the affinity of Fc for both V158 and F158 polymorphic
forms of Fc.gamma.RIIIa. AlphaScreen.TM. data comparing binding of
select variants to the two receptor allotypes are shown in FIG. 22a
(V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa) and FIG. 22b (F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa). As can be
seen, all variants improve binding to both Fc.gamma.RIIIa
allotypes. These data indicate that those Fc variants of the
present invention with enhanced effector function will be broadly
applicable to the entire patient population, and that enhancement
to clinical efficacy will potentially be greatest for the low
responsive patient population who need it most.
The Fc.gamma.R binding affinities of these Fc variants were further
investigated using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) (Biacore,
Uppsala, Sweden). SPR is a sensitive and extremely quantitative
method that allows for the measurement of binding affinities of
protein-protein interactions, and has been used to effectively
measure Fc/Fc.gamma.R binding (Radaev et al., 2001, J Biol Chem
276:16478-16483). SPR thus provides an excellent complementary
binding assay to the AlphaScreen.TM. assay. His-tagged V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa was immobilized to an SPR chip, and WT and Fc
variant alemtuzumab antibodies were flowed over the chip at a range
of concentrations. Binding constants were obtained from fitting the
data using standard curve-fitting methods. Table 62 presents
dissociation constants (Kd) for binding of select Fc variants to
V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa and F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa obtained using SPR, and
compares these with IC50s obtained from the AlphaScreen.TM. assay.
By dividing the Kd and IC50 for each variant by that of WT
alemtuzumab, the fold-improvements over WT (Fold) are obtained.
TABLE-US-00062 TABLE 62 SPR SPR AlphaScreen .TM. AlphaScreen .TM.
V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa V158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa F158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa Kd (nM) Fold Kd (nM) Fold IC50 (nM) Fold IC50 (nM)
Fold WT 68 730 6.4 17.2 V264I 64 1.1 550 1.3 4.5 1.4 11.5 1.5 I332E
31 2.2 72 10.1 1.0 6.4 2.5 6.9 V264I/I332E 17 4.0 52 14.0 0.5 12.8
1.1 15.6 S298A 52 1.3 285 2.6 2.9 2.2 12.0 1.4 S298A/E333A/ 39 1.7
156 4.7 2.5 2.6 7.5 2.3 K334A
The SPR data corroborate the improvements to Fc.gamma.RIIIa
affinity observed by AlphaScreen.TM. assay. Table 62 further
indicates the superiority of V264I/I332E and I332E over S298A and
S298A/E333A/K334A; whereas S298A/E333A/K334A improves Fc binding to
V158 and F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa by 1.7-fold and 4.7-fold respectively,
I332E shows binding enhancements of 2.2-fold and 10.1-fold
respectively, and V264I/I332E shows binding enhancements of
4.0-fold and 14-fold respectively. Also worth noting is that the
affinity of V264I/I332E for F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa (52 nM) is better
than that of WT for the V158 allotype (68 nM), suggesting that this
Fc variant, as well as those with even greater improvements in
binding, may enable the clinical efficacy of antibodies for the low
responsive patient population to achieve that currently possible
for high responders. The correlation between the SPR and
AlphaScreen.TM. binding measurements are shown in FIGS. 23a-23d.
FIGS. 23a and 23b show the Kd-IC50 correlations for binding to V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa and F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa respectively, and FIGS. 23c
and 23d show the fold-improvement correlations for binding to V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa and F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa respectively. The good fits
of these data to straight lines (r.sup.2=0.9, r.sup.2=0.84,
r.sup.2=0.98, and r.sup.2=0.90) support the accuracy the
AlphaScreen.TM. measurements, and validate its use for determining
the relative Fc.gamma.R binding affinities of Fc variants.
Example 7
ADCC of Fc Variants
In order to determine the effect on effector function, cell-based
ADCC assays were performed on select Fc variants. ADCC was measured
using the DELFIA.RTM. EuTDA-based cytotoxicity assay (Perkin Elmer,
Mass.) with purified human peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) as
effector cells. Target cells were loaded with BATDA at
1.times.10.sup.6 cells/ml, washed 4 times and seeded into 96-well
plate at 10,000 cells/well. The target cells were then opsonized
using Fc variant or WT antibodies at the indicated final
concentration. Human PBMCs were added at the indicated fold-excess
of target cells and the plate was incubated at 37.degree. C. for 4
hrs. The co-cultured cells were centrifuged at 500.times.g,
supernatants were transferred to a separate plate and incubated
with Eu solution, and relative fluorescence units were measured
using a Packard Fusion.TM. reader (Packard Biosciences, Ill.).
Samples were run in triplicate to provide error estimates (n=3,
+/-S.D.). PBMCs were allotyped for the V158 or F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa
allotype using PCR.
ADCC assays were run on Fc variant and WT alemtuzumab using DoHH-2
lymphoma target cells. FIG. 24a is a bar graph showing the ADCC of
these proteins at 10 ng/ml antibody. Results show that alemtuzumab
Fc variants I332E, V264I, and I332E/V264I have substantially
enhanced ADCC compared to WT alemtuzumab, with the relative ADCC
enhancements proportional to their binding improvements to
Fc.gamma.RIIIa as indicated by AlphaScreen.TM. assay and SPR. The
dose dependence of ADCC on antibody concentration is shown in FIG.
24b. These data were normalized to the minimum and maximum
fluorescence signal provided by the baselines at low and high
concentrations of antibody respectively. The data were fit to a
sigmoidal dose-response model using nonlinear regression,
represented by the curve in the figure. The fits enable
determination of the effective concentration 50% (EC50) (i.e. the
concentration required for 50% effectiveness), which provides the
relative enhancements to ADCC for each Fc variant. The EC50s for
these binding data are analogous to the IC50s obtained from the
AlphaScreen.TM. competition data, and derivation of these values is
thus analogous to that described in Example 2 and FIG. 11. In FIG.
24b, the log(EC50)s, obtained from the fits to the data, for WT,
V264I/I332E, and S239D/I332E alemtuzumab are 0.99, 0.60, and 0.49
respectively, and therefore their respective EC50s are 9.9, 4.0,
and 3.0. Thus V264I/I332E and S239E/I332E provide a 2.5-fold and
3.3-fold enhancement respectively in ADCC over WT alemtuzumab using
PBMCs expressing heterozygous V158/F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. These data
are summarized in Table 63 below.
TABLE-US-00063 TABLE 63 log (EC50) EC50 (ng/ml) Fold Improvement
Over WT WT 0.99 9.9 V264I/I332E 0.60 4.0 2.5 S239D/I332E 0.49 3.0
3.3
In order to determine whether these ADCC enhancements are broadly
applicable to antibodies, select Fc variants were evaluated in the
context of rituximab and trastuzumab. ADCC assays were run on
V264I/I332E, WT, and S298A/D333A/K334A rituximab using WIL2-S
lymphoma target cells. FIG. 25a presents a bar graph showing the
ADCC of these proteins at 1 ng/ml antibody. Results indicate that
V264I/I332E rituximab provides substantially enhanced ADCC relative
to WT rituximab, as well as superior ADCC to S29BA/D333A/K334A,
consistent with the Fc.gamma.RIIIa binding improvements observed by
AlphaScreen.TM. assay and SPR. FIG. 25b shows the dose dependence
of ADCC on antibody concentration. The EC50s obtained from the fits
of these data and the relative fold-improvements in ADCC are
provided in Table 64 below. As can be seen V264I/I332E rituximab
provides an 11.3-fold enhancement in EC50 over WT for PBMCs
expressing homozygous F158/F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The greater
improvements observed for rituximab versus alemtuzumab are likely
due to the use of homozygous F158/F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa rather than
heterozygous V158/F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa PBMCs, as well as potentially
the use of different antibodies and target cell lines.
TABLE-US-00064 TABLE 64 log Fold Improvement (EC50) EC50 (ng/ml)
Over WT WT 0.23 1.7 S298A/E333A/K334A -0.44 0.37 4.6 V264I/I332E
-0.83 0.15 11.3
ADCC assays were run on Fc variant and WT trastuzumab using two
breast carcinoma target cell lines BT474 and Sk-Br-3. FIG. 26a
shows a bar graph illustrating ADCC at 1 ng/ml antibody. Results
indicate that V264I and V264I/I332E trastuzumab provide
substantially enhanced ADCC compared to WT trastuzumab, with the
relative ADCC enhancements proportional to their binding
improvements to Fc.gamma.RIIIa as indicated by AlphaScreen.TM.
assay and SPR. FIG. 26b shows the dose dependence of ADCC on
antibody concentration. The EC50s obtained from the fits of these
data and the relative fold-improvements in ADCC are provided in
Table 65 below. Significant ADCC improvements are observed for
I332E trastuzumab when combined with A330L and A330Y.
TABLE-US-00065 TABLE 65 Fold log (EC50) EC50 (ng/ml) Improvement
Over WT WT 1.1 11.5 I332E 0.34 2.2 5.2 A330Y/I332E -0.04 0.9 12.8
A330L/I332E 0.04 1.1 10.5
FIG. 26c shows another set of dose response ADCC data at variable
antibody concentrations for trastuzumab variants. The EC50s
obtained from the fits of these data and the relative
fold-improvements in ADCC are provided in Table 66 below. Results
show that trastuzumab Fc variants S239D/I332E, S239D/S298A/I332E,
S239D/A330Y/I332E, and S239D/A330L/I332E/provide substantial ADCC
enhancements relative to WT trastuzumab and S298A/E333A/K334A,
consistent with the Fc.gamma.R binding data observed by the
AlphaScreen.TM. assay and SPR. S239D/A330L/I332E trastuzumab shows
the largest increase in effector function observed thus far,
providing an approximate 50-fold enhancement in EC50 over WT for
PBMCs expressing homozygous F158/F158 Fc.gamma.RIIIa.
TABLE-US-00066 TABLE 66 log Fold Improvement (EC50) EC50 (ng/ml)
Over WT WT 0.45 2.83 S298A/E333A/K334A -0.17 0.67 4.2 S239D/I332E
-0.18 0.66 4.3 S239D/A330Y/I332E -0.29 0.51 5.5 S239D/S298A/I332E
-0.52 0.30 9.4 S239D/A330L/I332E -1.22 0.06 47.2
Example 8
Complement Binding and Activation by Fc Variants
Complement protein C1q binds to a site on Fc that is proximal to
the Fc.gamma.R binding site, and therefore it was prudent to
determine whether the Fc variants have maintained their capacity to
recruit and activate complement. The AlphaScreen.TM. assay was used
to measure binding of select Fc variants to the complement protein
C1q. The assay was carried out with biotinylated WT alemtuzumab
antibody attached to streptavidin donor beads as described in
Example 2, and using C1q coupled directly to acceptor beads.
Binding data of select Fc variants shown in FIG. 27a indicate that
C1q binding is uncompromised. Cell-based CDC assays were also
performed on select Fc variants to investigate whether Fc variants
maintain the capacity to activate complement. Amar Blue was used to
monitor lysis of Fc variant and WT rituximab-opsonized WIL2-S
lymphoma cells by human serum complement (Quidel, San Diego,
Calif.). The results shown in FIG. 27b for select Fc variants
indicate that CDC is uncompromised.
Example 9
Protein A Binding by Fc Variants
As discussed, bacterial protein A binds to the Fc region between
the C.gamma.2 and C.gamma.3 domains, and is frequently employed for
antibody purification. The AlphaScreen.TM. assay was used to
measure binding of select Fc variants to the protein A using
biotinylated WT alemtuzumab antibody attached to streptavidin donor
beads as described in Example 2, and using protein A coupled
directly to acceptor beads. The binding data shown in FIG. 28 for
select Fc variants indicate that the capacity of the Fc variants to
bind protein A is uncompromised. These results suggest that
affinity of the Fc variants for other Fc ligands that bind the same
site on Fc as protein A, such as the neonatal Fc receptor FcRn and
protein G, are also unaffected.
Example 10
Capacity of Fc Variants to Bind Mouse Fc.gamma.Rs
Optimization of Fc to nonhuman Fc.gamma.Rs may be useful for
experimentally testing Fc variants in animal models. For example,
when tested in mice (for example nude mice, SCID mice, xenograft
mice, and/or transgenic mice), antibodies and Fc fusions that
comprise Fc variants that are optimized for one or more mouse
Fc.gamma.Rs may provide valuable information with regard to
efficacy, mechanism of action, and the like. In order to evaluate
whether the Fc variants of the present invention may be useful in
such experiments, affinity of select Fc variants for mouse
Fc.gamma.RIII was measured using the AlphaScreen.TM. assay. The
AlphaScreen.TM. assay was carried out using biotinylated WT
alemtuzumab attached to streptavidin donor beads as described in
Example 2, and GST-tagged mouse Fc.gamma.RIII bound to glutathione
chelate acceptor beads, expressed and purified as described in
Example 2. These binding data are shown in FIG. 29. Results show
that some Fc variants that enhance binding to human Fc.gamma.RIIa
also enhance binding to mouse Fc.gamma.RIII. This result indicates
that the Fc variants of the present invention, or other Fc variants
that are optimized for nonhuman Fc.gamma.Rs, may find use in
experiments that use animal models.
Example 11
Validation of Fc Variants Expressed in CHO Cells
Whereas the Fc variants of the present invention were expressed in
293T cells for screening purposes, large scale production of
antibodies is typically carried out by expression in Chinese
Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines. In order to evaluate the properties
of CHO-expressed Fc variants, select Fc variants and WT alemtuzumab
were expressed in CHO cells and purified as described in Example 2.
FIG. 30 shows AlphaScreenTs data comparing binding of CHO- and
293T-expressed Fc variant and WT alemtuzumab to human V158
Fc.gamma.RIIIa. The results indicate that the Fc variants of the
present invention show comparable Fc.gamma.R binding enhancements
whether expressed in 293T or CHO.
Example 12
Therapeutic Application of Fc Variants
A number of Fc variants described in the present invention have
significant potential for improving the therapeutic efficacy of
anticancer antibodies. For illustration purposes, a number of Fc
variants of the present invention have been incorporated into the
sequence of the antibody rituximab. The WT rituximab light chain
and heavy chain, described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,137, are provided
in FIGS. 31a (SEQ ID NO. 3) and 32b (SEQ ID NO:4). The improved
anti-CD20 antibody sequences are provided in FIG. 31c. (SEQ ID NO:
5) The improved anti-CD20 antibody sequences comprise at least
non-WT amino acid selected from the group consisting of X.sub.1,
X.sub.2, X.sub.3, X.sub.4, X.sub.5, and X.sub.6. These improved
anti-CD20 antibody sequences may also comprise a substitution
Z.sub.1. The use of rituximab here is solely an example, and is not
meant to constrain application of the Fc variants to this antibody
or any other particular antibody or Fc fusion.
All references are herein expressly incorporated by reference.
Whereas particular embodiments of the invention have been described
above for purposes of illustration, it will be appreciated by those
skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details may be
made without departing from the invention as described in the
appended claims.
SEQUENCE LISTINGS
1
61451PRTHomo sapiens 1Gln Val Gln Leu Gln Glu Ser Gly Pro Gly Leu
Val Arg Pro Ser Gln1 5 10 15Thr Leu Ser Leu Thr Cys Thr Val Ser Gly
Phe Thr Phe Thr Asp Phe 20 25 30Tyr Met Asn Trp Val Arg Gln Pro Pro
Gly Arg Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile 35 40 45Gly Phe Ile Arg Asp Lys Ala Lys
Gly Tyr Thr Thr Glu Tyr Asn Pro 50 55 60Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Val Thr
Met Leu Val Asp Thr Ser Lys Asn Gln65 70 75 80Phe Ser Leu Arg Leu
Ser Ser Val Thr Ala Ala Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr 85 90 95Tyr Cys Ala Arg
Glu Gly His Thr Ala Ala Pro Phe Asp Tyr Trp Gly 100 105 110Gln Gly
Ser Leu Val Thr Val Ser Ser Ala Ser Thr Lys Gly Pro Ser 115 120
125Val Phe Pro Leu Ala Pro Ser Ser Lys Ser Thr Ser Gly Gly Thr Ala
130 135 140Ala Leu Gly Cys Leu Val Lys Asp Tyr Phe Pro Glu Pro Val
Thr Val145 150 155 160Ser Trp Asn Ser Gly Ala Leu Thr Ser Gly Val
His Thr Phe Pro Ala 165 170 175Val Leu Gln Ser Ser Gly Leu Tyr Ser
Leu Ser Ser Val Val Thr Val 180 185 190Pro Ser Ser Ser Leu Gly Thr
Gln Thr Tyr Ile Cys Asn Val Asn His 195 200 205Lys Pro Ser Asn Thr
Lys Val Asp Lys Lys Val Glu Pro Lys Ser Cys 210 215 220Asp Lys Thr
His Thr Cys Pro Pro Cys Pro Ala Pro Glu Leu Leu Gly225 230 235
240Gly Pro Ser Val Phe Leu Phe Pro Pro Lys Pro Lys Asp Thr Leu Met
245 250 255Ile Ser Arg Thr Pro Glu Val Thr Cys Val Val Val Asp Val
Ser His 260 265 270Glu Asp Pro Glu Val Lys Phe Asn Trp Tyr Val Asp
Gly Val Glu Val 275 280 285His Asn Ala Lys Thr Lys Pro Arg Glu Glu
Gln Tyr Asn Ser Thr Tyr 290 295 300Arg Val Val Ser Val Leu Thr Val
Leu His Gln Asp Trp Leu Asn Gly305 310 315 320Lys Glu Tyr Lys Cys
Lys Val Ser Asn Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Pro Ile 325 330 335Glu Lys Thr
Ile Ser Lys Ala Lys Gly Gln Pro Arg Glu Pro Gln Val 340 345 350Tyr
Thr Leu Pro Pro Ser Arg Asp Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Gln Val Ser 355 360
365Leu Thr Cys Leu Val Lys Gly Phe Tyr Pro Ser Asp Ile Ala Val Glu
370 375 380Trp Glu Ser Asn Gly Gln Pro Glu Asn Asn Tyr Lys Thr Thr
Pro Pro385 390 395 400Val Leu Asp Ser Asp Gly Ser Phe Phe Leu Tyr
Ser Lys Leu Thr Val 405 410 415Asp Lys Ser Arg Trp Gln Gln Gly Asn
Val Phe Ser Cys Ser Val Met 420 425 430His Glu Ala Leu His Asn His
Tyr Thr Gln Lys Ser Leu Ser Leu Ser 435 440 445Pro Gly Lys
4502227PRTHomo sapiens 2Asp Lys Thr His Thr Cys Pro Pro Cys Pro Ala
Pro Glu Leu Leu Gly1 5 10 15Gly Pro Ser Val Phe Leu Phe Pro Pro Lys
Pro Lys Asp Thr Leu Met 20 25 30Ile Ser Arg Thr Pro Glu Val Thr Cys
Val Val Val Asp Val Ser His 35 40 45Glu Asp Pro Glu Val Lys Phe Asn
Trp Tyr Val Asp Gly Val Glu Val 50 55 60His Asn Ala Lys Thr Lys Pro
Arg Glu Glu Gln Tyr Asn Ser Thr Tyr65 70 75 80Arg Val Val Ser Val
Leu Thr Val Leu His Gln Asp Trp Leu Asn Gly 85 90 95Lys Glu Tyr Lys
Cys Lys Val Ser Asn Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Pro Ile 100 105 110Glu Lys
Thr Ile Ser Lys Ala Lys Gly Gln Pro Arg Glu Pro Gln Val 115 120
125Tyr Thr Leu Pro Pro Ser Arg Asp Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Gln Val Ser
130 135 140Leu Thr Cys Leu Val Lys Gly Phe Tyr Pro Ser Asp Ile Ala
Val Glu145 150 155 160Trp Glu Ser Asn Gly Gln Pro Glu Asn Asn Tyr
Lys Thr Thr Pro Pro 165 170 175Val Leu Asp Ser Asp Gly Ser Phe Phe
Leu Tyr Ser Lys Leu Thr Val 180 185 190Asp Lys Ser Arg Trp Gln Gln
Gly Asn Val Phe Ser Cys Ser Val Met 195 200 205His Glu Ala Leu His
Asn His Tyr Thr Gln Lys Ser Leu Ser Leu Ser 210 215 220Pro Gly
Lys2253213PRTHomo sapiens 3Gln Ile Val Leu Ser Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile
Leu Ser Ala Ser Pro Gly1 5 10 15Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Arg Ala
Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Tyr Ile 20 25 30His Trp Phe Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly
Ser Ser Pro Lys Pro Trp Ile Tyr 35 40 45Ala Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser
Gly Val Pro Val Arg Phe Ser Gly Ser 50 55 60Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr
Ser Leu Thr Ile Ser Arg Val Glu Ala Glu65 70 75 80Asp Ala Ala Thr
Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Gln Trp Thr Ser Asn Pro Pro Thr 85 90 95Phe Gly Gly
Gly Thr Lys Leu Glu Ile Lys Arg Thr Val Ala Ala Pro 100 105 110Ser
Val Phe Ile Phe Pro Pro Ser Asp Glu Gln Leu Lys Ser Gly Thr 115 120
125Ala Ser Val Val Cys Leu Leu Asn Asn Phe Tyr Pro Arg Glu Ala Lys
130 135 140Val Gln Trp Lys Val Asp Asn Ala Leu Gln Ser Gly Asn Ser
Gln Glu145 150 155 160Ser Val Thr Glu Gln Asp Ser Lys Asp Ser Thr
Tyr Ser Leu Ser Ser 165 170 175Thr Leu Thr Leu Ser Lys Ala Asp Tyr
Glu Lys His Lys Val Tyr Ala 180 185 190Cys Glu Val Thr His Gln Gly
Leu Ser Ser Pro Val Thr Lys Ser Phe 195 200 205Asn Arg Gly Glu Cys
2104451PRTHomo sapiens 4Gln Val Gln Leu Gln Gln Pro Gly Ala Glu Leu
Val Lys Pro Gly Ala1 5 10 15Ser Val Lys Met Ser Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly
Tyr Thr Phe Thr Ser Tyr 20 25 30Asn Met His Trp Val Lys Gln Thr Pro
Gly Arg Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile 35 40 45Gly Ala Ile Tyr Pro Gly Asn Gly
Asp Thr Ser Tyr Asn Gln Lys Phe 50 55 60Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr Leu Thr
Ala Asp Lys Ser Ser Ser Thr Ala Tyr65 70 75 80Met Gln Leu Ser Ser
Leu Thr Ser Glu Asp Ser Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys 85 90 95Ala Arg Ser Thr
Tyr Tyr Gly Gly Asp Trp Tyr Phe Asn Val Trp Gly 100 105 110Ala Gly
Thr Thr Val Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Ser Thr Lys Gly Pro Ser 115 120
125Val Phe Pro Leu Ala Pro Ser Ser Lys Ser Thr Ser Gly Gly Thr Ala
130 135 140Ala Leu Gly Cys Leu Val Lys Asp Tyr Phe Pro Glu Pro Val
Thr Val145 150 155 160Ser Trp Asn Ser Gly Ala Leu Thr Ser Gly Val
His Thr Phe Pro Ala 165 170 175Val Leu Gln Ser Ser Gly Leu Tyr Ser
Leu Ser Ser Val Val Thr Val 180 185 190Pro Ser Ser Ser Leu Gly Thr
Gln Thr Tyr Ile Cys Asn Val Asn His 195 200 205Lys Pro Ser Asn Thr
Lys Val Asp Lys Lys Ala Glu Pro Lys Ser Cys 210 215 220Asp Lys Thr
His Thr Cys Pro Pro Cys Pro Ala Pro Glu Leu Leu Gly225 230 235
240Gly Pro Ser Val Phe Leu Phe Pro Pro Lys Pro Lys Asp Thr Leu Met
245 250 255Ile Ser Arg Thr Pro Glu Val Thr Cys Val Val Val Asp Val
Ser His 260 265 270Glu Asp Pro Glu Val Lys Phe Asn Trp Tyr Val Asp
Gly Val Glu Val 275 280 285His Asn Ala Lys Thr Lys Pro Arg Glu Glu
Gln Tyr Asn Ser Thr Tyr 290 295 300Arg Val Val Ser Val Leu Thr Val
Leu His Gln Asp Trp Leu Asn Gly305 310 315 320Lys Glu Tyr Lys Cys
Lys Val Ser Asn Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Pro Ile 325 330 335Glu Lys Thr
Ile Ser Lys Ala Lys Gly Gln Pro Arg Glu Pro Gln Val 340 345 350Tyr
Thr Leu Pro Pro Ser Arg Asp Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Gln Val Ser 355 360
365Leu Thr Cys Leu Val Lys Gly Phe Tyr Pro Ser Asp Ile Ala Val Glu
370 375 380Trp Glu Ser Asn Gly Gln Pro Glu Asn Asn Tyr Lys Thr Thr
Pro Pro385 390 395 400Val Leu Asp Ser Asp Gly Ser Phe Phe Leu Tyr
Ser Lys Leu Thr Val 405 410 415Asp Lys Ser Arg Trp Gln Gln Gly Asn
Val Phe Ser Cys Ser Val Met 420 425 430His Glu Ala Leu His Asn His
Tyr Thr Gln Lys Ser Leu Ser Leu Ser 435 440 445Pro Gly Lys
4505451PRTArtificialSynthetic 5Gln Val Gln Leu Gln Gln Pro Gly Ala
Glu Leu Val Lys Pro Gly Ala1 5 10 15Ser Val Lys Met Ser Cys Lys Ala
Ser Gly Tyr Thr Phe Thr Ser Tyr 20 25 30Asn Met His Trp Val Lys Gln
Thr Pro Gly Arg Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile 35 40 45Gly Ala Ile Tyr Pro Gly
Asn Gly Asp Thr Ser Tyr Asn Gln Lys Phe 50 55 60Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr
Leu Thr Ala Asp Lys Ser Ser Ser Thr Ala Tyr65 70 75 80Met Gln Leu
Ser Ser Leu Thr Ser Glu Asp Ser Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys 85 90 95Ala Arg
Ser Thr Tyr Tyr Gly Gly Asp Trp Tyr Phe Asn Val Trp Gly 100 105
110Ala Gly Thr Thr Val Thr Val Ser Ala Ala Ser Thr Lys Gly Pro Ser
115 120 125Val Phe Pro Leu Ala Pro Ser Ser Lys Ser Thr Ser Gly Gly
Thr Ala 130 135 140Ala Leu Gly Cys Leu Val Lys Asp Tyr Phe Pro Glu
Pro Val Thr Val145 150 155 160Ser Trp Asn Ser Gly Ala Leu Thr Ser
Gly Val His Thr Phe Pro Ala 165 170 175Val Leu Gln Ser Ser Gly Leu
Tyr Ser Leu Ser Ser Val Val Thr Val 180 185 190Pro Ser Ser Ser Leu
Gly Thr Gln Thr Tyr Ile Cys Asn Val Asn His 195 200 205Lys Pro Ser
Asn Thr Lys Val Asp Lys Lys Ala Glu Pro Lys Ser Cys 210 215 220Asp
Lys Thr His Thr Cys Pro Pro Cys Pro Ala Pro Glu Leu Leu Gly225 230
235 240Gly Pro Xaa Xaa Phe Leu Phe Pro Pro Lys Pro Lys Asp Thr Leu
Met 245 250 255Ile Ser Arg Thr Pro Glu Val Thr Cys Val Val Xaa Asp
Val Ser His 260 265 270Glu Asp Pro Glu Val Lys Phe Asn Trp Tyr Val
Asp Gly Val Glu Val 275 280 285His Asn Ala Lys Thr Lys Pro Arg Glu
Glu Gln Tyr Xaa Xaa Thr Tyr 290 295 300Arg Val Val Ser Val Leu Thr
Val Leu His Gln Asp Trp Leu Asn Gly305 310 315 320Lys Glu Tyr Lys
Cys Lys Val Ser Asn Lys Ala Leu Pro Xaa Pro Xaa 325 330 335Glu Lys
Thr Ile Ser Lys Ala Lys Gly Gln Pro Arg Glu Pro Gln Val 340 345
350Tyr Thr Leu Pro Pro Ser Arg Asp Glu Leu Thr Lys Asn Gln Val Ser
355 360 365Leu Thr Cys Leu Val Lys Gly Phe Tyr Pro Ser Asp Ile Ala
Val Glu 370 375 380Trp Glu Ser Asn Gly Gln Pro Glu Asn Asn Tyr Lys
Thr Thr Pro Pro385 390 395 400Val Leu Asp Ser Asp Gly Ser Phe Phe
Leu Tyr Ser Lys Leu Thr Val 405 410 415Asp Lys Ser Arg Trp Gln Gln
Gly Asn Val Phe Ser Cys Ser Val Met 420 425 430His Glu Ala Leu His
Asn His Tyr Thr Gln Lys Ser Leu Ser Leu Ser 435 440 445Pro Gly Lys
45065PRTArtificialSynthetic 6Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser1 5
* * * * *