U.S. patent number 7,453,860 [Application Number 10/272,175] was granted by the patent office on 2008-11-18 for scheduling method for supplemental channel resource.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Motorola, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jonathan H. Gross, Shawn W. Hogberg, Daniel R. Tayloe.
United States Patent |
7,453,860 |
Hogberg , et al. |
November 18, 2008 |
Scheduling method for supplemental channel resource
Abstract
A method (30) schedules the utilization of the supplemental
channel of a base station transceiver (20-25). This scheduling
includes time slot assignment as well as data transfer rate per
time slot. One method simply selects the next time slot with a
maximum rate for the primary base station transceiver (130). The
method then selects the same time slot for each of the secondary
links with the secondary base stations (132). The data is then
simply sent to each of the BTSs (20-25) for transmission to the
mobile station (10). In another alternative, a request is made for
a supplemental channel usage for the primary link (144). Then
secondary links are selected for transmission to the mobile station
(10) only if they provide additional diversity gain (148) and
resources are available at the secondary link BTSs.
Inventors: |
Hogberg; Shawn W. (Chandler,
AZ), Gross; Jonathan H. (Gilbert, AZ), Tayloe; Daniel
R. (Phoenix, AZ) |
Assignee: |
Motorola, Inc. (Schaumburg,
IL)
|
Family
ID: |
32069238 |
Appl.
No.: |
10/272,175 |
Filed: |
October 15, 2002 |
Prior Publication Data
|
|
|
|
Document
Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20040071163 A1 |
Apr 15, 2004 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
370/341; 370/261;
370/318; 370/329; 370/331; 370/335; 370/342; 370/441; 455/436;
455/442; 455/450 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04W
72/1257 (20130101); H04W 72/1263 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H04Q
7/28 (20060101) |
Field of
Search: |
;370/341,335,342,318,329,330,331,332,444,441,442,436,437,455,261 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Milord; Marceau
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A communication system for communicating with a mobile station
comprising: a base station coupled to said mobile station and for
maintaining communication with said mobile station; said base
station including: a selection distribution unit (SDU) for
controlling communication of said communication system with said
mobile station; a first base station transceiver (BTS) having a
primary channel; a second BTS having a supplemental channel: a time
slot manager (TSM) for said primary channel and said supplemental
channel; and said SDU including means for scheduling said
supplemental channel to correspond to a time slot and rate of the
primary channel via said TSM for communicating with said mobile
station wherein the SDU grants the scheduled supplemental channel
without a response from the second BTS.
2. A communication system as claimed in claim 1 wherein: said means
for scheduling selects said time slot having maximum data rate for
said first BTS and said second BTS; and said means for scheduling
selects said time slot for others of said plurality of BTSs.
3. A communication system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said first
BTS includes a primary link in soft handoff with said mobile
station.
4. A communication system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said second
BTS includes a secondary link in soft handoff with said mobile
station.
5. A communication system as claimed in claim 1 wherein said means
for scheduling initiates communication with said mobile station via
said time slot of first BTS and said second BTS.
6. A communication system as claimed in claim 1 wherein: said means
for scheduling requests said supplemental channel of said first
BTS; and said TSM of said first BTS assigning a time slot in said
supplemental channel of said first BTS.
7. A communication system as claimed in claim 6 wherein means for
scheduling initiates communication with said mobile station via
said assigned time slot of said first BTS and via a corresponding
time slot of said others of said plurality of BTSs.
8. A communication system as claimed in claim 6 wherein said first
BTS includes a primary link in soft handoff with said mobile
station.
9. A communication system as claimed in claim 6 wherein said second
BTS includes a secondary link in soft handoff with said mobile
station.
10. In a communication system including a base station having a
selection distribution unit (SDU) and a plurality of base station
transceivers (BTSs) coupled to a mobile station, a method for
scheduling a supplemental channel comprising the steps of:
providing a primary link from a first BTS of the plurality of BTSs
to the mobile station; providing at least one secondary link from
at least one other BTS of the plurality of BTSs to the mobile
station; allocating by the first BTS a time slot within the first
BTS having a maximum transmission rate for communication with the
mobile station; and selecting by the at least one other BTS of the
plurality of BTSs a same time slot as the time slot in the first
BTS within the at least one other BTS for communication with the
mobile station without a response from the at least one other BTS
of the plurality of BTSs.
11. In a communication system the method for scheduling the
supplemental channel as claimed in claim 10 wherein there is
further included a step of sending information to the first BTS and
the at least one other BTS for the mobile station.
12. In a communication system the method for scheduling the
supplemental channel as claimed in claim 10 wherein there is
further included a step of selecting all other BTSs of the
plurality of BTSs having the secondary link with the mobile
station.
13. In a communication system the method for scheduling the
supplemental channel as claimed in claim 12, wherein there is
further included a step of sending information to the first BTS and
to all the other BTSs having the secondary link with the mobile
station.
14. In a communication system the method for scheduling the
supplemental channel as claimed in claim 13 wherein there is
further included a step of transmitting the information, by the
first BTS and all the other BTSs having the secondary link, to the
mobile station.
15. In a communication system the method for scheduling the
supplemental channel as claimed in claim 14 wherein the step of
transmitting includes a step of transmitting the information at the
maximum transmission rate to the first BTS and to all other BTSs.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains to cellular communication systems
and more particularly to efficiently using an allocated shared
channel resource in the cellular communication system.
Modern cellular telecommunication systems include mobile users,
base stations, mobile switching centers (MSC), and message
distribution centers (MDC). A base station includes a base station
transceiver and a base station unit. In CDMA (Code Division
Multiple Access) systems, multiple base station transceivers may be
in communication with each particular mobile unit. Therefore, each
mobile unit may have several links from the telecommunication
equipment to it in the communication mode at a single time. One of
these links will be designated primary. As can be seen, there is
much equipment associated with a modern cellular communication link
or channel. Since data as well as voice type communications are
desirable by mobile telecommunication users, high data rate
resources are installed within the telecommunication system.
These high data rate resources are supplemental forward and reverse
channels with a capability to transmit far in excess of current
voice channel limitations. Such high data rate equipment, and the
radio spectrum and/or power consumed, is by nature expensive.
Therefore, this equipment and system resources must be shared in
order to provide economical services to many mobile units.
Each channel has a number of time slices which make up the channel
and may operate at various transmission rates. Typically mobile
units request when connecting to the system the highest rate
possible that they can handle. To fulfill this request the base
station presently considers the user's subscribed rate, previously
allocated channels and the current message flow backlog.
This base station scheme does not work well for transmission
control protocol (TCP) flows and yields a significantly lower
throughput. The present scheme yields varying requested rates which
cause TCP to react to the varying bandwidths by substantially
reducing throughput.
Further, the base station transceiver typically searches for the
highest channel rate available up to the requested rate by the
mobile unit. If for any reason the base station transceiver (BTS)
cannot provide this highest channel rate, the BTS will then search
for the next lower rate beginning with the earliest available time
slot (time slice). This process continues until a success is found
or the searching is exhausted and therefore the request is
denied.
Further complicating matters, since CDMA systems typically have
several links to the mobile unit, this process must be repeated and
negotiated to find a common rate and time slice among the several
base station transceivers involved with the mobile unit. Therefore,
again subscriber throughput may be severely impacted due to
limitations with the weakest or most congested base station.
Accordingly it is highly desirable to have methodology for
efficient selection of rates and time slot assignments within the
base station to substantially increase system throughput.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a cellular communication system in
accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a time slot (or time slice) diagram of a base station and
two base station transceivers.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a base station scheduling method in
accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a base station supplemental channel
scheduling method in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a supplemental channel fairness method in
accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a power fairness method in accordance
with the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a data diagram depicting through-put rate versus time
without the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a diagram of data rate versus time with the present
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a cellular communication system
embodying the principles of operation of the present invention. The
present invention will be explained in the context of CDMA 2000
type network, although other networks such as UMTS may be utilized.
The shared channel resources to be explained apply to the
supplemental channels in both the forward and reverse links.
However, the forward link will be used as the primary means of
explanation. Resources which are manageable by this methodology
include channels, power of the channels and Walsh codes, for
example.
The elements involved in the explanation of the present invention
are mainly mobile unit or mobile station 10, 1.times.BTS (base
station transceiver) base stations 20-25, each including a time
slice (or slot) manager 26 and Selector Distribution Unit 30
including selection distribution function 32, packet control
function (PCF) 34, and Forward Supplemental Channel Method 36. In
CDMA 2000, mobile station 10 has links to 1.times.BTS 20 and
1.times.BTS 25. 1.times.BTS is a base station with many
transceivers. In the soft handoff condition, mobile station is
linked to several base stations and primarily operates with the
base stations having the best signal link quality. However, when
handoff occurs one or more of the existing base stations may drop
their links with the mobile station 10 and one or more base
stations may add new links to the mobile station 10. Each base
station includes a time slice manager (TSM) 26 that assigns mobile
stations to particular time slots and channels in the CDMA data
frame. The SDU 30 provides the transmission of signaling and bearer
messages to and from packet data support node 40 and the many base
stations 20-25 for subsequent routing to mobile stations. Server 50
is coupled to PDSN 40 and represents a typical end point for such
actions as internet access, data transmission or voice information.
SDU 30 further includes packet control function 34 that is coupled
to selection distribution function 32. The SDU 30 also includes the
forward supplemental channel (SCH) method 36. The reverse
supplemental channel method is the same as the forward and is not
shown for the sake of simplicity.
Scheduling Method
Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3 taken together, the shared channel
scheduling method 36 will be explained. SDU 30 and 1.times.BTS 20
through 25 comprise one or more base stations. FIG. 2 depicts a
time slot (time slice) arrangement on the horizontal axis and the
various control functions on the horizontal axis. The current time
slot is TS0. The time slots then increase by one for each time slot
giving time slots TS1 through TS6 shown for the sake of
explanation. The supplemental channel method 36 is shown on the
center timeline. Located above is the primary base station
transceiver (BTS) 20 and located below method 36 is a secondary BTS
25.
The method to be explained in FIG. 3 for sharing the supplemental
channel is termed "fire and forget" method. The primary leg BTS
will allocate a time slice and rate and send a response to the SDU,
block 130. At this point, the SDU forwards a request to each
secondary leg BTS to select the same time slice and rate per the
response from the primary leg BTS, block 132. The SDU does not wait
for a response from the secondary leg BTS(s). The SDU assumes that
there is a reasonable probability that at least one additional
links or ("leg") will grant the supplemental channel request at the
given rate for the given time slice that matches the primary BTS
response. The links or legs are those supported by each of the base
stations 20-25 with the mobile station 10 as shown in FIG. 1.
For example, if the shared channel method 36 were to require an
8.times. channel, block 130 would select the next time slot with
the maximum rate required for the primary leg base station BTS 20.
This would result in the selection of time slot (slice) 117 which
is time slot (slice) TS4 for the primary leg BTS. Next block 132
requests the same time slice and rate for the secondary link(s) or
leg(s) for the other secondary leg BTS(s) 25. This results in the
allocation of time slot 118 in time slot 4 at the 8.times. channel
rate. Since, the data transmission rate which the shared channel
method was requesting was a rate of 8.times. and both channels 117
and 118 are available, these channels will be utilized to
communicate from BTS 20 and 25 respectively to mobile unit 10. Both
these channels will be available and send data at the allocated
time and data rate to mobile station 10. In the instant example,
only two BTS links were employed. If more links are utilized,
method 36 will determine whether all the coupled base station via
other secondary links have been selected, block 134. If less than
all of the links have been selected, block 134 will transfer
control to block 132 to select the same time slot for that
secondary link until all the secondary links have been handled.
When all the links which are coupled from BTSs to the mobile
station have been selected, block 134 transfers control to block
136 which sends the data from the SDU 30 to the mobile station via
the allocated links from all the BTSs 20-25.
The process is then ended. This fire and forget methodology
recognizes that the request is granted from the primary leg BTS.
The shared channel method 36 does not wait for response from each
secondary leg BTS. Subsequent time slots for the mobile station are
selected in a similar fashion.
One advantage of the fire and forget method is that it eliminates
inefficiency associated with reserving the shared channel resource
at each base station transceiver during a negotiation process which
has multiple links or legs due to soft handoff conditions. Further,
because the SDU 30 does not wait for the secondary leg BTS response
message, the time slice duration may be reduced thereby improving
overall efficiency.
The data transmission rates referred to in this application
translate to particular kilo-bits per second rates as shown in
Table 1 below.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Kilo-bits Per Rate Second 1.times. 9.6
2.times. 19.2 4.times. 38.4 8.times. 76.8 16.times. 153.6
FIG. 4 is a flow chart of another embodiment of a supplemental
channel scheduling method termed a request/response type method.
FIGS. 4 and 2 will be used to explain this method.
In this methodology as opposed to that as shown in FIG. 3, the SDU
30 does not immediately begin sending data to the BTS 20. Instead
in this method SDU 30 makes a resource request to the BTS with the
highest priority (primary) link. That is, the highest priority
(primary) link is the best link between a BTS and the mobile
station 10. First the SDU determines which is the highest priority
(primary) link with the mobile station 10, block 140. Next, SDU 30
requests the supplemental channel with the maximum rate, for
example, 16.times., from the BTS associated with the highest
priority link, block 142. The time slot (slice) manager 26 of the
associated BTS 20, for examples then assigns the particular time
slot(slice) and responds to SDU 30 with the time slot(slice)
number, block 144 and channel rate.
Next, the supplemental channel scheduling method 36 requests all
secondary links for specific resources with rate and time slot
number corresponding to the one assigned from the primary link,
block 146. The time slot manager 26 of each BTS 20-25 assigns the
specific resources requested only if there are sufficient resources
(power, channel elements, etc.) in order to provide the link with
additional diversity gain, block 148, that meets a given diversity
gain threshold.
Lastly, the data is sent from the SDU to the mobile on all the
assigned time slots for each BTS at the rate assigned by the
primary BTS, block 150. That is, secondary leg BTSs that did not
allocate resources will not receive data. Therefore, during any
given time slots, the mobile station 10 may not have the benefit of
all diversity gain possible. Time slots in which one or more
secondary links from secondary leg BTSs are used such as time slots
118 and 120, the mobile station will have diversity gain and
therefore more reliable data. The additional diversity gain from
secondary links is therefore provided when and only when the system
has sufficient resources available to do so and the use of those
resources provide sufficient diversity gain. This mechanism
provides the means to tradeoff system resources to provide higher
quality links or to provide higher system capacity.
As an example, refer again to FIG. 2. Again, the current time slot
is time slot 0 and the primary link is handled by BTS 20. At time
slot 0 the supplemental channel scheduling method 36 of SDU 30
sends a request to the primary BTS 20 for three time slots at the
maximum rate of 16.times.. In this example depicted in FIG. 2, the
time slot manager 26 of BTS 20 was unable to assign all three time
slots with a 16.times. rate. Time slot manager 26 assigned time
slot 115 and time slot 119 with a maximum rate of 16.times. and
time slot 117 with a rate of 8.times. or half the maximum rate.
Once SDU 30 receives this information from BTS 20, SDU 30 then
sends a resource request message to the secondary link BTS 25
requesting the maximum 16.times. rate for time slots 2 and 6 and
the 8.times. rate for time slot 4. BTS 25, the secondary link
manager, has its time slot manager 26 respond with a denial for
time slot 2 and a granting of 16.times. for time slot 6 (120) and a
granting of 8.times. for time slot 4 (118), based on the
availability of resources and the determination that these
allocations provided sufficient additional diversity gain to meet
the required threshold. The SDU then transmits data at 8.times.
during time slot 4 and 16.times. during time slot 6 to both base
station transceivers 20 and 25. SDU 30 transmits data at the
16.times. rate in time slot 2 (115) only to BTS 20 which is the
primary link BTS. As a result, mobile subscriber 10 will have
diversity gain for two of the three time slots allocated by the
primary link BTS 20. That is, diversity gain will exist during time
slots 4 and 6. There is no availability of time slot 2, since the
time slot manager 26 of BTS 25 denied the request for time slot 2
availability.
It should be pointed out that response messages from the BTSs
associated with each of the secondary links are delayed to the
greatest extent possible, and delivered to the SDU 30 on a
just-in-time basis, by the associated time slot manager (TSM) 26 so
that each BTS can reserve resources for higher priority subscribers
such as those subscribers in which it is the primary link. The
above-mentioned process is continually repeated until the mobile
station 10's service is completed.
The SDU request/BTS response methodology described above provides
for giving preference to the best link between the BTS and the
mobile station. The best link is selected based on a number of
criteria such as received signal strength. As a result of using and
giving preference to the best link, the overall system saves on
power in this example. That is, weak links require more power to
affect communications with the BTS. The primary benefit of this
approach is that during period of time where there is significant
contention for resources, the system will tend to allocate fewer
secondary legs per mobile station, thus maximizing overall system
capacity. Conversely, when resources are not in contention, this
system will provide highest number of secondary legs providing the
highest quality of service.
The diversity gain criteria used for secondary leg allocation may
itself be adaptively based on system load, mobile speed, and other
factors.
Further, the above methodology eliminates the need to reserve
resources at any of the BTSs while awaiting the negotiations among
each of the primary and secondary BTSs to reach common allocation.
Further, in the case of secondary links, the processing of data
requests through secondary links is much simpler, saving the system
processing resources.
Further, it may be possible to make secondary link decisions on a
frame-by-frame basis based upon BTS power constraints. The result
would be that only frames with available power are used for
transmission within an allocated time slot.
Fairness Method
In order to prevent certain mobile stations from monopolizing the
high data rate supplemental channel and such mobile stations from
consuming great amounts of system power, fairness methodology is
employed in the time slot manager 26 of each 1.times.BTS 20-25.
Referring to FIG. 5, the fairness method for channel resources is
shown in the form of a flow chart. Time slot manager 26 receives a
resource request from the selector or SDU selection distribution
unit 30 or mobile station 10, block 160. SDU 30 initiates this
request for the forward supplemental channel and the mobile station
10 initiates this request for the reverse supplemental channel.
This method applies to both the forward and reverse supplemental
channels.
Next, block 162 determines whether enough time slot resources are
available for a full allocation for time slots selected. Referring
again to FIG. 2, for example, the selector 30 may for the primary
link, BTS 20, select time slots 2, 4 and 6 with the maximum rate of
16.times., for example. If the TSM 26 is able to grant the request,
block 162 transfers control to block 164 via the yes path and the
request is fully granted. Then block 186 sends the resource request
response message to the selector 30.
If the resources were not sufficient to grant the full request,
block 162 transfers control to block 166 via the no path. For
example, referring to FIG. 2, in time slot 4 for the primary BTS 20
the time slot 117 was only able to provide an 8.times. rate. Block
166 modifies the original request to select one half of the
originally selected rate and one half the original requested
resources. Again, referring to FIG. 2 in the example of BTS 20,
only time slot 117 needs to be modified by half the previous rate
to fit the original request of three time slots.
Next, block 168 determines whether enough resources for the
modified request are available having consecutive time slots
starting with the next time slot. If enough resources are available
to fill the request as modified, block 168 transfers control to
block 170 which grants the modified request. Then the time slot
manager 26 sends a resource request response message to selector or
SDU 30, block 186.
Referring again to the example for BTS 20 in FIG. 2, since time
slot 117 was an 8.times. rate and the original request was
16.times., the resources did not meet the requirements so block 168
transfers control to block 172 via the no path. Block 172
determines whether the rate is greater than 1.times.. If the rate
is greater than 1.times., block 172 transfers control to block 166
via the yes path. In our example of FIG. 2, the rate has been cut
in half from 16.times. to 8.times. in time slot 117. Since an
8.times. time slot was selected to replace a 16.times. time slot
previously, another time slot of 8.times. and rate will be required
to complete the request. This time slot will exist in a time slot
greater than TS 6, that is TS 7 or farther. If a suitable such time
slot is found, block 166 transfers control of block 168 which in
turn transfers control to block 170 and grants the request and
causes block 186 to send the resource request response message back
to the SDU 30. If the request for another 8.times. time slot cannot
be found, block 166 cuts the rate in half and the process of block
168 and 172 is iterated.
After successive iterations, if the rate has been halved to a point
where the rate is no longer greater than 1.times., block 172
transfers control to block 174 via the no path. Block 174 modifies
the original request to one-half the total originally requested
time slots at one-half the original rate. Block 176 then searches
to find the first available time slot with these modified
requirements. The search begins with the time slots beyond the next
time slot up to M time slots away. M is a predetermined selected
number which will keep the request in the present frame of time
slots.
Next, block 178 determines whether the time slot found by block 176
is less than M time slots in the future. If the time slot found is
not less than M time slots in the future, that is if it is greater
than or equal to M time slots, block 178 transfers control to block
182 via the no path. Block 182 denies the request and sends the
denied request message back to the selector 30 via block 186. If
the time slot found by block 176 is less than M time slots in the
future, block 178 transfers control to block 180 via the yes path.
Block 180 grants the modified request and transfers control to
block 186 to send the resource request grant response message back
to SDU or selector 30.
It should be noted that this channel fairness algorithm is one of
many that could be employed to yield the intended result that is to
allocate a fair amount of channel resources to multiple subscribers
contending for a limited amount of resources.
In this fairness method a particular mobile station will not
capture all the high data rate (16.times.) channel resources
continually to the exclusion of the other mobile stations.
Referring to FIG. 6, a power-based fairness method is shown in the
flow chart. The power required for each time slot depends on the
link conditions, including distance and propagation paths, between
the BTS and the mobile station. CDMA system capacity and
performance are highly dependent on the link conditions, and RF
power requirements, to each mobile subscriber being served.
The time slot manager 26 of a BTS receives a resource availability
request from the selector or SDU 30, block 200. Next, block 202
determines whether there is a multiple mobile station call
supplemental channel activity present. If there is no multiple call
activity present on the supplemental channel, block 202 transfers
control to block 204 via the no path. Block 204 evaluates the
requested resources from an RF load management standpoint. Next,
block 206 returns the message to SDU 30 indicting a supportable
transmission rate with the requisite power.
If multiple call supplemental channel activity is present, block
202 transfers control to block 208 via the yes path. Block 208
calculates the RF conditions for each simultaneous supplemental
channel call. That is it looks into the load management and the
forward channel transmission power. Next, block 210 calculates the
penalty function for the rates requested based on RF conditions.
This allows the requested rate for each mobile to be adjusted based
on that mobile's RF conditions when necessary in a multiple-mobile
scenario. For example, the rate could be reduced (or penalized) for
mobiles that are in poor RF conditions in order to prevent them
from consuming too much system capacity and power, thus granting
more users in better RF conditions higher data rates. Finally,
block 212 evaluates direct costs via the RF load management and
returns a supportable transmission rate and requisite power to SDU
30, block 206.
FIG. 7 is a diagram of a plot of rate over time for a simulation
test of five callers. FIG. 7 shows that each of the callers is
assigned radically different transmission rates over time. Such
constant changing of transmission rates substantially affects the
throughput of the base station, and the behavior of higher-layer
protocols such as TCP (Transmit Control Protocol), in a negative
manner.
FIG. 8 is a similar plot of transmission rate versus time for five
callers. The results depicted are simulation results. FIG. 8 shows
that there is some substantial rate changing for a short while;
however, after a brief period the rates converge and settle out to
a high throughput of about 40 kilo-bits per second. The results of
FIG. 8 include both the supplemental channel scheduling method and
the fairness methods mentioned above. Contrast FIG. 8 with FIG. 7
that shows a result throughput just slightly above the zero mark in
kilo-bits per second transmission rate.
The present inventions as described provide a simple, low
complexity means and method to manage a set of shared supplemental
channel calls and providing substantial diversity gains for the
soft handoff function. Further, the number of subscribers or
callers that can effectively use the supplemental channel and its
high-speed access is maximized. The methods described herein do not
overburden the processing power of the base station.
The time slot manager bases its decisions on power fairness, that
is links between the base station and the mobile station which are
more remote may be expendable if they are secondary links.
The present invention provides enhanced call processing by handling
the primary link first and then the secondary link; simplified,
aggressive supplemental channel scheduling methodology with a slow
start transmission; and resource management by fairness based
methodology for power and supplemental channel resources.
Although the preferred embodiment of the invention has been
illustrated, and that form described in detail, it will be readily
apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may
be made therein without departing from the spirit of the present
invention or from the scope of the appended claims.
* * * * *