U.S. patent number 5,898,613 [Application Number 08/882,717] was granted by the patent office on 1999-04-27 for pmos analog eeprom cell.
This patent grant is currently assigned to California Institute of Technology. Invention is credited to Christopher J. Diorio, Carver A. Mead.
United States Patent |
5,898,613 |
Diorio , et al. |
April 27, 1999 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
pMOS analog EEPROM cell
Abstract
A pMOS EEPROM cell includes a source, drain, channel, control
gate and well contact. The device is a fully functional single
element p-type floating gate MOSFET. A floating gate overlaps the
well contact and completely surrounds the drain and source
implants. The pMOS cell is written to by means of hot-electron
injection, using an intrinsic feedback mechanism to write analog
values. Hot electrons are generated in the channel by means of hole
impact ionization at the transistor's drain. The pMOS cell is
erased by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling. The tunneling voltage is
applied only to the well to tunnel electrons from the floating
gate. The well-source and well-drain junctions are protected from
breakdown by means of guard rings.
Inventors: |
Diorio; Christopher J.
(Torrance, CA), Mead; Carver A. (Pasadena, CA) |
Assignee: |
California Institute of
Technology (Pasadena, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
27487101 |
Appl.
No.: |
08/882,717 |
Filed: |
June 25, 1997 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
690198 |
Jul 26, 1996 |
5825063 |
|
|
|
721261 |
Sep 26, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
845018 |
Apr 22, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
365/185.03;
257/315; 365/185.18; 365/185.28; 257/E27.103; 257/E29.306 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H03F
1/301 (20130101); H01L 29/7885 (20130101); H03F
3/082 (20130101); G11C 27/005 (20130101); H01L
27/115 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H03F
3/04 (20060101); H03F 1/30 (20060101); H03F
3/08 (20060101); H01L 29/66 (20060101); G11C
27/00 (20060101); H01L 27/115 (20060101); H01L
29/788 (20060101); G11C 016/04 () |
Field of
Search: |
;365/185.03,185.18,185.28 ;257/315 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Diorio, et al., "A High-Resolution Non-Volatile Analog Memory
Cell," 1995, IEEE Intl. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, vol. 3, pp.
2233-2236. .
Gray, et al., "Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits",
1984, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 67-71. .
Hasler, et al., "An Autozeroing Amplifier Using PFET Hot-Electron
Injection", May 12-15 1996, IEEE International Symposium on
Circuits and Systems, vol. 3. .
Hasler, et al., "An Autozeroing Floating-Gate Amplifier", IEEE
Journal of Solid State Circuits, pp. 1-15. .
Hasler, et al., "Single Transistor Learning Synapse", 1995,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, MIT Press, pp.
817-824. .
Hasler, et al., "Single Transistor Learning Synapse with Long Term
Storage,"1995, IEEE Intl. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, vol. 3,
pp. 1660-1663. .
Hochet, et al., "Implementation of a Learning Kohonen Neuron Based
on a New Multilevel Storage Technique", Mar. 1991, IEEE J.
Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 262-267. .
Hollis, et al., "A Neural Network Learning Algorithm Tailored for
VLSI Implementation", Sep. 1994, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks,
vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 784-791. .
Hu, et al., "Hot-Electron-Induced MOFET Degradation--Model,
Monitor, and Improvement", Feb. 1985, IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, vol. ED-32, No. 2, pp. 375-385. .
Ismail, "Neural Information Processing II," 1994, Analog VLSI
Signal and Information Process, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp.
358-413. .
Johnson, "Neural Team Bares Silicon Brain", Jul. 3, 1995,
Electronic Engineering Times, p. 1 and 31. .
Johnson, "Mead Envisions New Design Era", Jul. 17, 1995, Electronic
Engineering Times, pp. 1, 37, 38. .
Lazzaro, et al., "Winner-Take-All Networks of O(N)
Complexity,"1989, in D.S. Touretzky, ed., Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems 1, San Mateo, CA; Morgan Kaufmann,
pp. 703-711. .
Lazzaro, et al., "Systems Technologies for Silicon Auditory Models,
" Jun. 1994, IEEE Micro, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 7-15, T. .
Leblebici, et al., "Hot-Carrier Reliability of MOS VLSI Circuits",
1993, Kluwer Academic, 46-49. .
Masuoka, et al., "Reviews and Prospects of Non-Volatile
Semiconductor Memories,"Apr. 1991, IEICE Trans., vol. E 74, No. 4,
pp. 868-874. .
Mead, et al., Introduction to VLSI Systems, Addison-Wesley Pub.
Co., 1980, pp. 1-5. .
Mead, "Analog VLSI and Neural Systems", Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.,
pp. 163-173. .
Minch, "A vMOS Soft-Maximum Current Mirror,"1995 IEEE, vol. 3, pp.
2249-2252. .
Minch, et al., "Translinear Circuits Using Subthreshold
Floating-Gate MOS Transistors,"1996, Analog Integrated Circuits and
Signal Processing, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 167-179. .
Sanchez, et al., "Review of carrier Injection in the
Silicon/Silicon-Dioxide System", Jun. 1991, IEEE Proceedings-G,
vol. 138, No. 3, pp. 377-389. .
Sarpeshkar, et al., "White Noise in MOS Transistors and
Resistors,"Nov. 1993, IEEE Circuits and Devices, pp. 23-29. .
Sarpeshkar, et al., "A Low-Power Wide-Linear-Range Transconductance
Amplifier", Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, in
Press, pp. 1-28. .
Tsividis, et al., "Continuous-Time MOSFET-C Filters in VLSI", Feb.
1986, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 33, No. 2,
pp. 125-140. .
Vittoz, "Dynamic Analog Techniques", 1985, in Y. Tsividis and P.
Antognetti, Design of MOS VLSI Circuits for Telecommunications ,
Prentice Hall, pp. 145-170..
|
Primary Examiner: Hoang; Huan
Attorney, Agent or Firm: D'Alessandro & Ritchie
Government Interests
STATEMENT AS TO RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS
The present invention was made with support from the United States
Government under Grant number N00014-89-J-1675 awarded by the
Office of Naval Research of the Department of the Navy and under
Grant number N00014-89-J-3083 awarded by the Advanced Research
Projects Agency of the Department of Defense. The United States
Government has certain rights in the invention.
Parent Case Text
REFERENCE TO RELATED PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent
Application Ser. No. 60022,360, filed Jul. 24, 1996, and entitled
"A pMOS ANALOG EEPROM CELL", the entirety of which is hereby
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full
herein.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation-in-part of the following
co-pending United States Patent Applications in the name of the
inventors hereof (and others) and bearing the serial numbers,
filing'dates and titles shown below. Each is hereby incorporated
herein by reference as if set forth in full herein.
Additionally incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein
is U.S. Pat. No. 5,627,392, dated May 6, 1997 (U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 08399,966 filed Mar. 7,1995) and entitled "A
Semiconductor Structure for Long Term Learning."
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An EEPROM cell comprising:
a p- type substrate;
a n- type well disposed within said substrate;
a p+ type source region;
a p+ type drain region;
an n+ region disposed within said n- type well;
a channel region disposed between said source region and said drain
region;
a drain-channel depletion region disposed in said channel region
about said drain region;
a floating gate disposed over said channel region and insulated
therefrom;
a control gate capacitively coupled to and insulated from said
floating gate;
means for applying a first potential to said source;
means for applying a second potential to said drain;
means for applying a third potential to said control gate, said
second potential being not greater than said first potential and in
a range so that the phenomenon of hole impact ionization occurs
substantially in said drain-channel depletion region, said range
selected so that a current of electrons injected onto said floating
gate is linear in magnitude with changes in channel current between
source and drain, and exponential in drain voltage.
2. An EEPROM cell according to claim 1 further comprising tunneling
means for removing electrons from said floating gate.
3. An EEPROM cell comprising:
a p- type substrate:
a n- type well disposed within said substrate:
a p+ type source region:
a p+ type drain region:
a channel region disposed between said source region and said drain
region:
a drain-channel depletion region disposed in said channel region
about said drain region:
a floating gate disposed over said channel region and insulated
therefrom:
a control gate capacitively coupled to and insulated from said
floating gate:
means for applying a first potential to said source;
means for applying a second potential to said drain:
means for applying a third potential to said control gate, said
second potential being not greater than said first potential and in
a range so that the phenomenon of hole impact ionization occurs
substantially in said drain-channel depletion region, said range
selected so that a current of electrons injected onto said floating
gate is linear in magnitude with changes in channel current between
source and drain, and exponential in drain voltage;
tunneling means for removing electrons from said floating gate,
wherein said tunneling means includes an n+ type region disposed
within said n- type well, said n+ type region disposed adjacent to
at least a portion of said floating gate.
4. An EEPROM cell according to claim 3 wherein at least a portion
of said floating gate is disposed over at least a portion of said
n+ type region.
5. An EEPROM cell according to claim 3 wherein said tunneling means
includes means for applying a fourth potential to said n+ region in
order to induce Fowler-Nordheim tunneling of electrons from said
floating gate.
6. An EEPROM cell according to claim 5 wherein said fourth
potential is in the range of about -0.5V to about +50V volts
relative to said p+ type source region.
7. An EEPROM cell comprising:
a p- type region disposed within a semiconductor substrate;
a first n- type region disposed in said p- type region;
a first p+ type region disposed within said first n- type
region;
a second p+ type region disposed within said first n- type
region;
a n+ type region disposed within said first n- type region;
a channel disposed between said first p+ type region and said
second p+ type region;
a drain-channel depletion region disposed within said channel about
said second p+ type region;
a floating gate separated from said channel by an insulator;
an insulating layer disposed over said floating gate;
a control gate conductive region capacitively coupled to said
floating gate and separated therefrom by an insulating layer;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said control gate conductive region, said first potential
referenced to said first p+ type region;
means for applying a second potential to said second p+ type
region, said second potential referenced to said first p+ type
region, said second potential being in a range of from about 0
volts to about -15 volts relative to said n.sup.- type region;
means for applying a third potential to said n+ type region, said
third potential referenced to said first p+ type region, said third
potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about +50
volts.
8. A transistor according to claim 7 wherein hole impact ionization
occurs in said drain-channel depletion region when said second
potential is negative and wherein a current of electrons injected
from said drain-channel depletion region changes substantially
exponentially with changes in said second potential.
9. A transistor according to claim 8 wherein a portion of said
floating gate is also disposed over at least a portion of said n+
type region.
10. A transistor according to claim 9 wherein a portion of said
floating gate is also disposed over at least a portion of said n+
type region.
11. A semiconductor structure for long-term learning
comprising:
a p- type region in a semiconductor substrate;
an n- type region disposed in said p- type region;
a first p+ type region disposed within said n- type region;
a second p+ type region disposed within said n- type region;
a n+ type region disposed within said p- type region;
a channel disposed between said first p+ type region and said
second p+ type region;
a floating gate disposed over at least a portion of said channel
and separated from said channel by an insulator, at least a portion
of said floating gate also disposed adjacent to at least a portion
of said n+ type region;
an insulating layer disposed over at least a portion of said
floating gate;
a gate conductive region disposed over at least a portion of said
insulating layer and capacitively coupled to said floating
gate;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said gate conductive region, said first potential
referenced to said first p+ type region;
means for applying a second potential to said second p+ type
region, said second potential referenced to said n- type region,
said second potential being in a range of from about 0 volts to
about -15 volts;
means for applying a third potential to said n- type region, said
third potential referenced to said first p+ type region, said third
potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about +50
volts; and
means for selectively applying a fourth potential to said n+ type
region, said fourth potential referenced to said first p+ type
region, said fourth potential being in a range of from about -0.5
volts to about +50 volts.
12. A semiconductor structure for charge storage according to claim
11 wherein at least a portion of said floating gate is disposed
over at least a portion of said n+ type region.
13. A semiconductor structure for long-term learning
comprising:
a p- type region in a semiconductor substrate;
an n- type region disposed in said p- type region;
a first p+ type region disposed within said n- type region;
a second p+ type region disposed within said n- type region;
an n+ type region disposed within said p- type region;
a channel disposed between said first p+ type region and said
second p+ type region;
a floating gate disposed both above said channel and above at least
a portion of said n+ type region and separated from said channel
and said portion of said n+ type region by an insulator;
an insulating layer disposed over said floating gate;
a gate conductive region disposed over said insulating layer and
capacitively coupled to said floating gate;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said gate conductive region, said first potential
referenced to said first p+ type region, said first potential being
in a range of from about 0 volts to about -5 volts;
means for applying a second potential to said second p+ type
region, said second potential referenced to said n- type region,
said second potential being in a range of from about 0 volts to
about -15 volts;
means for applying a third potential to said n- type region, said
third potential referenced to said first p+ type region, said third
potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about +50
volts; and
means for selectively applying a fourth potential to said n+ type
region, said fourth potential referenced to said first p+ type
region, said fourth potential being in a range of from about -0.5
volts to about +50 volts.
14. A semiconductor structure for long-term learning
comprising:
a p- type region in a semiconductor substrate;
an n- type well region disposed within said p- type region;
a p+ type source region disposed within said n- type well
region;
a p+ type drain region disposed within said n- type well
region;
an n+ type tunneling junction region disposed within said n- type
well region;
a channel disposed between said source region and said drain
region;
a floating gate disposed over said channel and over said n+ type
tunneling junction region, said floating gate disposed adjacent to
at least one edge of each of said drain region, said source region
and said n+ type tunneling junction region, and separated from said
semiconductor substrate by a gate oxide under a portion of said
floating gate including at least where it is adjacent to an edge of
each of said drain region, said source region and said n+ type
tunneling junction region;
an insulating layer disposed over said floating gate;
a gate conductive region disposed over said insulating layer and
capacitively coupled to said floating gate;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said gate conductive region, said first potential
referenced to said p+ type source region;
means for applying a second potential to said p+ type draw region,
said second potential referenced to said n- type well region, said
second potential being in a range of from about 0 volts to about
-15 volts;
means for applying a third potential to said n- type well region,
said third potential referenced to said p+ type source region, said
third potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about
+50 volts; and
means for selectively applying a fourth potential to said n+ type
tunneling junction region, said fourth potential referenced to said
p+ type source region, said fourth potential being in a range of
from about -0.5 volts to about +50 volts.
15. A semiconductor structure for long-term learning
comprising:
a p- type region in a semiconductor substrate;
an n- type well region disposed within said p- type region;
a p+ type source region disposed in said n- type well region;
a p+ type drain region disposed in said n- type well region;
a channel disposed between said p+ type source region and said p+
type drain region;
a floating gate disposed over said channel and separated from said
channel by an insulator;
an insulating layer disposed over said floating gate;
a first conductive region disposed over said insulating layer and
capacitively coupled to said floating gate;
a tunneling junction disposed between said floating gate and an n+
type region disposed within said n- type well region;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said first conductive region, said first potential
referenced to said p+ type source region;
means for applying a second potential to said p+ type drain region,
said second potential referenced to said n- type well region, said
second potential being in a range of from about 0 volts to about
-15 volts;
means for applying a third potential to said n- type well region,
said third potential referenced to said p+ type source region, said
third potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about
+50 volts; and
means for selectively applying a fourth potential to said second
conductive region, said fourth potential referenced to said p+ type
source region, said fourth potential being in a range of from about
-0.5 volts to about +50 volts.
16. A semiconductor structure for long-term learning
comprising:
a semiconductor substrate including a p- type region;
an n- type well region disposed within said p- type region;
a first p+ type region disposed in said n- type well region;
a second p+ type region disposed in said n- type well region;
a channel disposed between said first p+ type region and said
second p+ type region;
a floating gate disposed above said channel and extending over a
portion of said first and second p+ type regions and separated from
said channel and said p+ type regions by a layer of gate oxide;
an insulating layer disposed over said floating gate;
a first conductive region disposed over said insulating layer and
capacitively coupled to said floating gate;
a tunneling junction disposed between said floating gate and an n+
type region disposed within said n- type well region, a layer of
gate oxide separating said floating gate and said n+ type
region;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said first conductive region said first potential
referenced to said p+ type region;
means for applying a second potential to said second p+ type
region, said second potential referenced to said n- type well
region, said second potential being in a range of from about 0
volts to about -15 volts;
means for applying a third potential to said n- type well region,
said third potential referenced to said first p+ type region, said
third potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about
+50 volts; and
means for selectively applying a fourth potential to said n+ type
region, said fourth potential referenced to said first p+ type
region, said fourth potential being in a range of from about -0.5
volts to about +50 volts.
17. A semiconductor substrate comprising:
a p- type region;
an n- type well region disposed in said p- type region;
a first p+ type region disposed within said n- type well
region;
a second p+ type region disposed in said n- type well region;
a channel disposed between said first p+ type region and said
second p+ type region;
a floating gate disposed above said channel and separated from said
channel by a first insulating layer;
a second insulating layer disposed over said floating gate;
a first conductive region disposed over said second insulating
layer and capacitively coupled to sad floating gate;
means for capacitively coupling a first potential to said floating
gate via said first conductive region, said first potential
referenced to said first p+ type region;
means for applying a second potential to said second p+ type
region, said second potential referenced to said n- type well
region, said second potential being in a range of from about 0
volts to about -15 volts,
means for applying a third potential to said n- type well region,
said third potential referenced to said first p+ type region, said
(third potential being in a range of from about -0.5 volts to about
+50 volts;
means for selectively applying a fourth potential to a second
conductive region, said fourth potential referenced to said first
p+ type region, said fourth potential being in a range of from
about -0.5 volts to about +50 volts; and
a tunneling junction for causing electrons to tunnel from said
floating gate to said second conductive region in response to
selective application of said fourth potential to said second
conductive region, said tunneling junction including n+ region in
contact with said n- well region.
18. A semiconductor structure for long-term learning
comprising:
a p- type region disposed within a semiconductor substrate;
a n- type well region disposed within said p- type region;
a first p+ type region disposed within said n- type well
region;
a second p+ type region disposed within said n- type well
region;
a floating gate disposed over a channel region and separated from
said channel region by a first insulating layer, said channel
region disposed in said n- type well region between said first p+
type region and said second p+ type region;
means for capacitively coupling a negative potential to said
floating gate, said negative potential referenced to said fist p+
type region, said negative potential having a value in a range of
about 0 volts to about -5.0 volts;
a tunneling junction region disposed adjacent to a portion of said
floating gate, said tunneling junction including an n+ region in
contact with said n- type well region;
a second insulating layer disposed over said floating gate; and
a conductive region disposed over said second insulating layer and
capacitively coupled to said floating gate.
19. In a semiconductor device having a lattice, a source, a control
gate terminal, a drain and a tunneling junction terminal, said
source and drain disposed in p+ type regions of an n- type well
region in a p- type region of a semiconductor substrate and said
control gate terminal capacitively coupled to a floating gate
disposed over and insulated from a channel region existing between
said source and said drain and said tunneling junction disposed in
an n+ region of said n- type well region, a method of injecting
electrons onto said floating gate and removing electrons from said
floating gate comprising the steps of:
applying a first potential to the drain said first potential
referenced to the n- type well region, said first potential being
in a range of about 0 to about -15 volts;
applying a second potential to the control gate terminal, thereby
causing hole charge carriers to accelerate from the drain toward
the source in the channel region, collide with the semiconductor
lattice, and thereby cause hole impact ionization, liberating
electrons in the channel region for injection onto the floating
gate;
applying a third potential to the n+ type region, said third
potential referenced to the source, said third potential being in a
range of from about -0.5 volts to about +50 volts.
20. A method according to claim 19 further comprising the step
of:
applying a fourth potential to the n- type well region, said fourth
potential referenced to the source, said fourth potential being in
a range of about -0.5 volts to about +5.0 volts.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to an analog memory cell. More
particularly, the present invention is directed to an analog EEPROM
(electrically erasable programmable read only memory) device for
use in storage and retrieval of analog signals on a floating gate.
Still more particularly the present invention is directed to a pMOS
analog EEPROM cell using Impact Ionization to generate hot
electrons for injection from the drain-channel depletion region to
the floating gate and Fowler-Nordheim tunneling to remove electrons
from the floating gate.
2. The Background Art
A primary goal of the research leading to the present invention is
the development of silicon learning systems and analog
memory-storage systems. One impediment to achieving these goals has
been the lack of a simple circuit element combining nonvolatile
analog memory storage with locally computed memory updates. Prior
efforts typically used capacitive storage with clocked refresh as
described in B. Hochet, et al., "Implementation of a Learning
Kohonen Neuron Based on a New Multilevel Storage Technique," IEEE
J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 262-267, 1991, or
storage of a multi-bit digital equivalent word as described in P.
Hollis and J. Paulos, "A Neural Network Learning Algorithm Tailored
for VLSI Implementation," IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 5, no.
5, pp. 784-791, 1994. Such approaches result in large and complex
devices which are usually power hungry. Nonvolatile floating-gate
devices, such as EEPROM transistors, typically are optimized for
binary-valued data storage rather than analog use (see, e.g., F.
Masuoka, R. Shirota, and K. Saku, "Reviews and prospects of
non-volatile semiconductor memories," IEICE Trans., vol. E 74, no.
4, pp. 868-874, 1991), and do not compute their own memory
updates.
Unlike conventional EEPROM transistors, the guarded-pFET synapse
described herein allow simultaneous memory reading and writing.
Consequently, it is possible to apply continuous negative feedback
during the write process to store an analog memory value in a
single-step write. This process is called self-convergent writing:
an intrinsic, self-limiting feedback path within the transistor
itself ensures that the analog memory value is stored
accurately.
To achieve a substantial improvement over current technology
silicon learning systems, a single transistor learning device with
the following attributes would be very valuable:
1. Non-volatile analog storage;
2. Bi-directional memory writing;
3. Support for simultaneous memory reading and writing;
4. On-chip read/write driver circuitry operating off of a single
polarity voltage supply;
5. Self-convergent memory writing;
6. Low power consumption;
7. Compact size; and
8. Compatibility with standard silicon MOS processing.
Prior art floating gate transistors, which use electrical charge
stored on a floating polysilicon gate embedded in an insulator such
as silicon dioxide, provide suitable non-volatile analog storage.
The charge on such a floating gate is known to remain fixed for
periods of many years. Although the advantages of using floating
gate transistors as memory elements are well known, J. Lazzaro, et
al., "Systems Technologies for Silicon Auditory Models," IEEE
Micro, Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 7-15, 1994, T. Allen, et al., "Writable
Analog Reference Voltage Storage Device," U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,562,
1991, their application to silicon learning networks and analog
memory cells has been limited. The principal reason has been the
lack of suitable bi-directional and self-convergent mechanisms for
writing the analog memory. Since the gate of a floating gate
transistor is completely embedded within an insulator, writing the
memory involves moving charge carriers through this insulator. Many
mechanisms are known which will move electrons through an
insulator. Two of the most common and most easily controlled
methods are tunneling and hot-electron injection. The inherent
difficulty in performing these operations has been the primary
impediment to implementation of floating gate transistors in
silicon learning and analog memory systems.
The difficulty in transporting electrons across the barrier
presented by the silicon/oxide interface is depicted in FIG. 1.
Surmounting the barrier 10 requires that an electron possess more
than about 3.2 eV of energy. At room temperature the probability
that semiconductor electrons will possess this energy is
exceedingly small. Alternatively, an electron could tunnel through
this barrier; however, at the voltages and oxide thicknesses used
in conventional silicon MOS processing, the tunneling probability
is also exceedingly small.
Fowler-Nordheim (FN) tunneling involves applying a voltage across
the oxide 12, as shown in FIG. 2 which enhances the probability of
an electron tunneling through it. Tunneling current versus oxide
voltage for a 400 .ANG. SiO.sub.2 gate oxide typical of a 2 .mu.m
MOS process is shown in FIG. 3. Bi-directional currents through the
oxide are required to achieve the learning and unlearning functions
necessary in a silicon learning cell, and the writing and erasing
necessary in an analog memory cell. Although the tunneling process
has no preferred direction, bi-directional tunneling requires
either dual polarity high voltages, or a single polarity high
voltage and a means for pulling the floating gate to this voltage
when adding electrons, and pulling it near ground when removing
them. Both approaches are unattractive. The dual polarity solution
requires a negative voltage much lower than the substrate
potential; the single polarity solution does not support
simultaneous memory reading and writing or self-convergent memory
writes.
Single polarity bi-directional tunneling is often used in writing
digital EEPROMs. Since writing the memory involves pulling the
floating gate either to the supply voltage or to ground, the EEPROM
cell cannot be read during the write process. Excess charge is
typically added to the floating gate to compensate for this lack of
memory state feedback. Although excess charge is acceptable when
writing a binary valued "digital" memory, where the exact quantity
of charge is irrelevant once it exceeds the amount necessary to
completely switch the device to one of its two binary states,
uncertainty in the amount of charge applied to an analog memory
cell results in significant memory error. Because the memory-write
process is not self-convergent, analog EEPROMS use inerative
writes. This need has not been satisfied adequately by commercial
nFET EEPROMs, primarily because conventional EEPROM transistors do
not permit simultaneous memory reading and writing. Most analog
EEPROM implementations require iterative writes: the memory first
is written, then is read; the written and read values then are
compared, and the error is used to write a correction. This cycle
is repeated until the error is within prescribed bounds.
Hot-electron injection is a process whereby electrons near the
surface of a semiconductor acquire more than about 3.2 eV of
energy, typically by acceleration in an electric field, and then
surmount the silicon/oxide barrier. Once in the silicon dioxide
conduction band, an electric field applied across the oxide carries
these electrons to the floating gate. There are a number of ways of
accomplishing hot-electron injection.
One source for a high electric field is the collector-to-base
depletion region of either a vertical or lateral bipolar junction
transistor (BJT). An example of a lateral BJT used in a similar
application is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,953,928 to Anderson, et al.
Although this device is suitable for analog learning applications,
each learning cell requires both an injection BJT and a MOSFET, the
former to effect hot-electron injection and the latter to read the
stored charge. A reduction in the number of transistors per cell
would be highly desirable.
Another source for a high electric field is in the channel region
of a split-gate n-type MOSFET. Split-gate injectors, as shown and
described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,622,656 to Kamiya, et al., contain two
partially overlapping gate regions at very different voltages. The
resulting surface potential drops abruptly at the interface between
the two gates, creating a high electric field localized in this
small region of the transistor channel. Unfortunately, since the
control gate modulates the injection rate but does not receive the
injected charge, the memory cannot be both written and read
simultaneously. Such a device is acceptable for digital EEPROMs but
is unsuitable for analog learning cell or analog memory
applications.
A third source for high electric field is the drain to source
voltage dropped across the channel region of an above-threshold
sub-micron n-type MOSFET. The disadvantage of this device is that
in order to achieve injection, both the drain and gate voltages
must exceed approximately 2.5 volts which results in high channel
current and consequent high power consumption.
A fourth source for high electric field is the drain to channel
depletion region formed in an n-type MOSFET. In a conventional
MOSFET, as depicted in FIGS. 4-5, this field only exists when the
drain-to-source voltage exceeds 2.5 volts and the transistor is
operated at or near its subthreshold regime. Since subthreshold
MOSFET gate voltages are typically less than one volt, electrons
injected into the gate oxide encounter a large electric field
directed towards the transistor drain, opposing their transport to
the floating gate. The resulting charge transfer to the floating
gate is negligibly small as can be seen in the FIG. 5 energy band
diagram of the transistor of FIG. 4.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved silicon analog memory
cell which can be written and erased, which can be written and read
simultaneously, and which can be realized in a single device.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A pMOS EEPROM cell includes a source, drain, channel, control gate
and well contact. The device is a fully functional single element
p-type floating gate MOSFET. A floating gate overlaps the well
contact and completely surrounds the drain and source implants. The
pMOS cell is written to by means of hot-electron injection, using
an intrinsic self-convergent feedback mechanism to write analog
values. Hot electrons are generated in the channel by means of hole
impact ionization at the transistor's drain. The pMOS cell is
erased by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling. The tunneling voltage is
applied only to the well to tunnel electrons from the floating
gate. The well-source and well-drain junctions are protected from
breakdown by means of floating-gate guard rings.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object and advantage of the present invention
to provide an improved analog memory device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a novel silicon synaptic device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a pFET analog memory device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a pFET analog memory device with self-convergent memory
writes.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a four terminal single transistor pFET analog memory
device.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor four terminal analog memory cell.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a memory cell capable of use in an extremely high density
memory system.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor analog memory cell that supports
simultaneous memory reading and writing.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor analog memory cell with a time-varying
transfer function that is a component in the circuit used to write
its own memory where the time-varying transfer function implements
a learning function.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor analog memory cell with a time-varying
transfer function that is a component in the circuit used to write
its own memory where the time-varying transfer function implements
a learning function and the learning function defines a learning
rule which can be used in the development of learning systems.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor analog memory cell which can support a
feedback loop-type writing mechanism.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor four-terminal device for storing analog
values.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to
provide a single transistor four-terminal device for manipulating
stored values.
Yet a further object and advantage of the present invention is to
provide an extremely low power, compact, analog memory device which
can be incorporated into existing silicon integrated circuits and
process.
These and many other objects and advantages of the present
invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the
art from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description of
the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is an energy band diagram showing the potential barrier
faced by a conduction electron at a silicon/oxide interface.
FIG. 2 is an energy band diagram showing the potential faced by an
electron in silicon attempting to pass through a silicon dioxide
barrier in the presence of a Fowler-Nordheim tunneling
potential.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a semi-log plot of tunneling current
versus oxide voltage for a gate oxide tunneling junction.
FIG. 4 is a diagram of an n-type MOSFET showing the inability to
inject electrons from the channel to the gate.
FIG. 5 is an energy band diagram of the conventional n-type MOSFET
described in FIG. 4.
FIG. 6A is a top view of a pMOS analog EEPROM cell in accordance
with a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6B is a cross sectional view taken along line 6B--6B of FIG.
6A of a pMOS analog EEPROM cell in accordance with a presently
preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6C is an electron band diagram of a pMOS analog EEPROM cell in
accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
FIG. 6D is a schematic diagram of a floating gate EEPROM transistor
implementing a self-convergent write process.
FIG. 7 is a plot of pFET impact ionization versus drain-to-channel
potential V.sub.dc for a fixed subthreshold source current I.sub.s
=10 nA.
FIG. 8 is a plot of pFET gate current versus drain-to-channel
potential V.sub.dc, for a fixed, subthreshold source current
I.sub.s =10 nA.
FIG. 9 is a plot of pFET gate current versus source current, for a
fixed drain-to-source voltage V.sub.ds =12V.
FIG. 10 is a plot of junction-diode breakdown voltage versus
guard-ring voltage for a heavily-doped n.sup.+ implant (in
substrate) surrounded by a polysilicon-gate guard ring.
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a 2.times.2 array of pMOS memory
cells in accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the
present invention.
FIG. 12 is a plot of pMOS memory-cell input-output transfer
function and output write error for a 1 sec write-pulse width.
FIG. 13 is a plot of pMOS memory-cell write errors versus
write-pulse width.
FIG. 14A is a top view of a guarded -pFET synapse incorporating a
bowl-shaped tunneling junction.
FIG. 14B is a cross-sectional view of the device of FIG. 14A taken
along line 14B--14B of FIG. 14A.
FIG. 15 is a plot of the bowl-shaped tunneling junction turn-on
delay.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following
description of the present invention is illustrative only and is
not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the
invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons
from an examination of the within disclosure.
There is a need for an analog EEPROM cell in analog-type storage
applications such as speech recorders, H. V. Tran, T. Blyth et al.,
"A 2.5V 256-level non-volatile analog storage device using EEPROM
technology, " IEEE Intl. Solid-State Circuits Conf, Dig. Tech.
Papers, pp. 270-271, 1996, and in systems such as silicon neural
networks. Conventional EEPROMs typically employ n-type MOSFETs, and
use Fowler-Nordheim tunneling to write the memory. Because
simultaneously tunneling and reading an n-type floating-gate MOSFET
is difficult, writing an analog memory usually is an iterative
process. In accordance with the present invention an alternative
pMOS EEPROM cell permits simultaneous memory writing and reading,
thereby allowing accurate, single-step analog writes. In addition,
the cell preferably operates from a single-polarity supply, and is
preferably fabricated in a standard n-well, double-poly CMOS
process. As shown in FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D, this new memory cell
14 has three notable features: (1) it employs a fully functional
p-type floating-gate MOSFET in a single n.sup.- well, (2) its
polysilicon floating gate 16 abuts n+ well contact 18, and (3) its
floating gate 16 surrounds completely the drain 18 and source 20
implants.
The Memory Cell
Turning now in more detail to the figures, FIGS. 6A, 6B and 6C
depict the EEPROM transistor 14 according to the present invention,
showing the tunneling and injection locations. FIG. 6D is a
schematic diagram of the EEPROM transistor implementing a
self-convergent write process. FIGS. 6A and 6C are drawn to scale;
the vertical dimension in FIG. 6B has been exaggerated. All
voltages are referenced to the source potential, and subthreshold
source currents (I.sub.s <100 nA) are assumed. In FIG. 6C, the
gate oxide actually projects into the plane of the page; however,
for clarity, it is rotated 90.degree. and drawn in the channel
direction. The memory is written by hot-electron injection, and
erased by tunneling. Because the channel current comprises holes,
hot electrons are generated by means of impact ionization at the
drain 18. Channel holes, accelerated rapidly in the transistor's
drain-to-channel E-field, collide with the semiconductor lattice to
produce additional electron-hole pairs. The liberated electrons are
promoted to their conduction band by the collision, and are
expelled rapidly from the drain region by this same
drain-to-channel E-field. Electrons that acquire more than 3.2 eV
of kinetic energy can scatter upward into the gate oxide and inject
onto the floating gate 16. The transistor 14 is large, and the
tunneling voltages are high, because a 2 .mu.m process with 400
.ANG. gate oxides was used. As pointed out above, the transistor's
size and tunneling voltages can be trivially reduced by using a
more modern process with finer line widths and thinner gate
oxides.
Writing the Cell
The pMOS memory cell 14 is written to by hot-electron injection,
using an intrinsic feedback mechanism to write analog values. As
shown in FIGS. 6A, 6B 6C and 7, hot electrons are generated by
means of hole impact ionization at the transistor's drain 18 in the
channel 22 formed between the drain 18 and the source 20. The
hot-electron gate current increases with drain-to-channel voltage
as depicted in FIG. 8, and with drain current as depicted in FIG.
9. Drain current is selected as the memory-cell output, and the
transistor 14 is operated in its saturated regime. To write the
memory, a programming current is sinked from the drain 18, using a
current source 24. As long as this programming current exceeds the
drain current, the drain voltage is low, and electrons inject onto
the floating gate 16. Electron injection decreases the
floating-gate voltage, increasing the drain current. As soon as the
drain current is equal to the programming current, the drain
voltage rises, turning off the injection process. Hot-electron
injection closes a negative feedback loop around the inverting
amplifier that is formed by the pFET and the programming current
source as a depicted in, for example, P. Hasler, B. A. Minch, C.
Diorio, and C. Mead, "An autozeroing amplifier using pFET
hot-electron injection, " Proc. IEEE Intl. Symp. On Circuits and
Systems, vol. 3, pp. 325-328, 1996. The memory-write process adapts
the floating-gate charge, using this intrinsic feedback mechanism,
to equalize the programming and pFET-drain currents.
Erasing the Cell
The memory cell is erased by Fowler-Nordheim tunneling. Whereas
typical nFET memory cells use high source voltages to cause oxide
tunneling, erasing a pMOS memory cell in this fashion would require
that the tunneling voltage be applied not only to the source, but
also to the well and drain. Because it is desirable to avoid
applying high voltages to all three device terminals, instead the
tunneling voltage is applied to only the well, and causes electrons
to tunnel from the floating gate, through gate oxide formed where
the floating gate abuts (and preferably overlies) the n.sup.+ well
contact (FIG. 6B), to the well contact. Unfortunately, the well
voltage required for tunneling exceeds the reverse-biased breakdown
voltage of the well-to-drain and well-to-source junctions. To solve
this problem, the drain and source implants are guarded, A. S.
Grove, Physics and Technology of Semiconductor Devices, New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1967, by surrounding them with the
polysilicon floating gate.
Assume, for the moment, that to make the four-terminal pFET synapse
smaller, one can simply merge the wells containing the tunneling
implant and the floating-gate pFET. The tunneling implant comprises
n.sup.+ doped silicon, and an n-well comprises n.sup.- doped
silicon; consequently, a tunneling implant is a well contact. To
induce electron tunneling, one must apply about 30V across the gate
oxide separating the floating gate and the well contact. One can do
this by lowering the floating gate by 30V; unfortunately, if the
well potential is +12V, lowering V.sub.fg by 30V requires using a
large negative supply voltage on chip, and precludes reading the
source current during tunneling. Alternately, one can raise the
well potential by 30V, but doing this will cause pn breakdown at
the reverse-biased drain-to-well and source-to-well pn junctions.
To prevent this pn breakdown, one can raise the drain, source, and
well potentials by 30V during tunneling, but then one cannot read
the synapse's source current during tunneling. Therefore, a
technique called junction guarding has been employed to solve this
problem.
In a planar IC-fabrication technology, the implant-impurity
concentrations usually are much higher near the semiconductor
surface than they are in the bulk. Consequently, the electric field
across a pn junction is highest at the surface, and reverse-bias
junction breakdown usually occurs near the surface. Junction
guarding is a well-known technique for reducing the surface
electric field. By surrounding an implant with a MOS guard ring,
and applying the high voltage to both the implant and the ring, the
depletion region at the semiconductor surface is widened, thereby
decreasing the peak electric field and increasing the junction's
breakdown voltage. In FIG. 10, a plot of pn-breakdown voltage
versus guard-ring voltage is shown for a heavily-doped n.sup.+
implant (in substrate) surrounded by a polysilicon-gate guard ring.
For junction voltages in the 30V range, the pn-breakdown voltage
increases nearly one-to-one with the guard-ring voltage.
High positive voltages are applied to the n.sup.- well 26,
electrons tunneled from the floating gate 16 to the n.sup.+ well
contact 18, and the floating gate 16 are used to guard the drain 18
and source 20 implants against pn breakdown. From the well's (26)
perspective, the drain 18 and source 20 implants are at large
negative voltages (although the voltages still are positive with
respect to the substrate 28); consequently, for guarding, the
floating gate 16 must also be at a large negative voltage. In a
subthreshold pFET, the floating-gate voltage will always be near
the source voltage; consequently, the floating gate is naturally at
the proper potential for guarding. Simply by surrounding the drain
18 and source 20 implants with the floating gate 16, these
junctions are guarded against pn breakdown during tunneling.
A guarded pFET remains a fully functional p-type MOSFET. The only
differences between a guarded pFET and a conventional pFET are the
larger well-voltage range, and larger drain-to-gate and
source-to-gate overlap capacitances. Consequently, in a
guarded-pFET synapse one can simultaneously (1) raise the well
voltage, causing electron tunneling from the floating gate to the
n.sup.+ well contact, (2) adjust the drain and source voltages to
effect subthreshold source currents, and (3) lower the drain
voltage, causing Impact-Ionized Hot-Electron Injection.
Note that guarding the source junction of a n-type memory cell is
impractical, because it would require the floating-gate voltage to
be near the tunneling voltage, however, guarding the drain and
source junctions of a p-type memory cell is trivial, requiring only
that the floating-gate voltage be near the drain and source
voltages. Thus the guard rings are compatible with standard MOS
processing, and extend the n.sup.- -to-p.sup.+ breakdown voltage
from approximately 17 V to more than 75 V.
Cell Arrays
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a 2.times.2 array of pMOS memory
cells 30, 32, 34, 36. This array was fabricated to investigate
memory resolution and crosstalk. Because a 2.times.2 array uses the
same row-column addressing employed by larger arrays, it allows
investigation of EEPROM performance without the complexity of a
large number of devices. The memory resolution is shown in FIGS. 12
and 13; the write crosstalk to the other transistors--defined as
the percentage change in memory value following a write and read of
transistor (1,1)--is about 0.025%. For applications that require
single-transistor, a high voltage is applied to the selected n-well
row and a low voltage to the selected gate column. For applications
that permit flash erasure of a column of transistors, the entire
array is placed in a single n-well. To erase a column of
transistors, a high voltage is applied to the n-well and a low
voltage to the selected gate column. During cell erasure, if
excessive tunneling occurs, the drain current may become small;
when the cell is later written, the gate current will be small, and
the memory write process will be slow. Therefore, all devices are
preferably initialized after tunneling by (1) 25 applying the
minimum programming current, (2) lowering the gate voltage until
the drain current is equal to this programming current, and (3)
using the write-feedback process to hold this drain-current value
as the gate is ramped back up to its nominal voltage.
Process
The present memory cell was fabricated in a 2 .mu.m process, and
uses an off-chip current source for programming. In addition,
because the actual cell described herein was designed for another
application, an enlarged (1 pF) gate capacitor was used along with
an oversized (8 .mu.m) channel length. Neither feature is needed in
an analog EEPROM. Using a more modern process, the cell can easily
be made substantially smaller.
Data Obtained
FIG. 7 is a plot of pFET impact ionization versus drain-to-channel
potential V.sub.dc, for a fixed, subthreshold source current
I.sub.s =10 nA. Because the probabilities of impact ionization and
hot-electron injection vary with the channel potential, all
terminal voltages are referenced to the channel. The results can be
re-referenced to the source terminal using the relationship between
source and channel potential in an MOS transistor. Because the
drain-to-channel E-field increases with V.sub.dc, the
impact-ionization probability also increases with V.sub.dc. These
data in FIG. 7 are fit using a modified lucky-electron model.
FIG. 8 is a plot of pFET gate current versus drain-to-channel
potential V.sub.dc, for a fixed, subthreshold source current Is=10
nA. The source current is fixed, rather than the drain current,
because the drain current increases with drain-to-channel potential
as in FIG. 7. Because the drain-to-channel E-field increases with
V.sub.dc, the gate current also increases with V.sub.dc. The
empirical fit holds for 0.01 nA<I.sub.s <1 .mu.A.
FIG. 9 is a plot of pFET gate current versus source current, for a
fixed drain-to-source voltage V.sub.ds =12V. For silicon-learning
applications, the preferred source-current range is 1 pA<I.sub.s
<100 nA, as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 08845,018, referred to above. For analog EEPROM applications,
the preferred source-current range is from about 20 nA to about 20
.mu.A. Source currents smaller than 20 nA are to be avoided,
because the hot-electron gate current, and therefore the memory
write rate, are small. Because the pFET transconductance changes
rapidly near threshold, source currents that are smaller than about
200 nA are also avoided, for reasons discussed in conjunction with
FIG. 12. Above 20 .mu.A, the potential at the drain end of the
channel drops rapidly, and so does the gate current. For digital
applications, the write rate may be maximized by using I.sub.s
.about.20 .mu.A. pFETs fabricated in more modern processes will
allow higher maximum source currents and faster memory-write
rates.
FIG. 12 is a plot of pMOS memory-cell input-output transfer
function and output write error, for a 1 sec write-pulse width.
Here 64 logarithmically spaced drain-current values were written to
transistor (1,1); log-scale currents were chosen to illustrate the
memory cell's dynamic range. The drain current was reset to 100 nA
prior to each write. To prevent writing the memory during reads,
the drain voltages used for writing and reading must be different.
Due to the intrinsic floating-gate-to-drain overlap capacitance,
this voltage differential couples to the floating gate, causing an
offset between the write current and the read current. Because the
pFET transconductance is non-linear, this offset is nonconstant,
and appears as both a gain error and a nonlinearity in the measured
read-write transfer function.
FIG. 13 is a plot of pMOS memory-cell write errors versus
write-pulse width. The experiment of FIG. 12 was performed using
write-pulse widths ranging from 68 msec to 10 sec; here, the offset
error (the maximum deviation between the measured current and the
programmed current), the linearity error (the maximum deviation
between the measured current and the best-fit line), the gain error
(the deviation of the best-fit line from unity slope), and the
random error (the RMS error after removal of the nonlinearity) is
plotted versus the write-pulse width. Because an oversized (1 pF)
gate capacitor is employed in this example, and an off-chip current
source is used to write the memory, the settling times are long.
The shorter the programming pulse width, the further the drain
voltage is from its settled value when the programming current is
removed, and the larger the errors.
Applications
The above-described pFET EEPROM can be utilized in a number of
applications. For example, the pFET EEPROM can be used in an analog
sound or speech recorder. Because the pFET EEPROM is inherently an
analog device and permits simultaneous reading and writing, the
analog input can be converted to sampled current values and written
directly to the pFET EEPROM cells. Because writing the cells is a
one-step process, storing analog memories in a pFET EEPROM is far
simpler than in conventional analog sound or speech recorders, some
of which at present utilize nFET EEPROMS and require an iterative
write process (See, e.g., H. V. Tran, et al., supra.) Such nFET
devices are presently manufactured by a company known as ISD.
In another application, a pFET EEPROM can be used in a multilevel
digital memory. If each memory cell is used, for example, to store
8-bit memory values, then with proper decoding, a 1 kilo cell
memory can store 8 kilobits of digital memory. Although nFET
EEPROMS have been used in multi-level memories (see, e.g., devices
produced by Mitsubishi Electric Company of Japan and Intel
Corporation), the iterative memory-write process required by these
nFET devices forces the write process to be unacceptably slow. To
achieve high accuracy requires many iterative write passes. Such
multi-level memories have therefore seen only limited use in
conventional electronics. Because the new pFET write process is
single-step and accurate it can be fast and can compete with
digital memory systems.
In another application, a pFET EEPROM can be used as a synapse
transistor. In a pFET synapse device, the pFET EEPROM will prove to
be a preferred device over other pFET structures, because the
layout requires substantially less layout area, thereby allowing
more devices to be placed on a silicon chip.
In another application, a pFET EEPROM can be utilized in
autozeroing, adaptive devices. In such devices, the pFET EEPROM
will prove to be a preferred device over other pFET structures.
In another application, a pFET EEPROM can eliminate the BIOS memory
in conventional digital computers. Existing computers typically
store their startup code in a BIOS, which may be a flash EEPROM
usually located on the same printed circuit board as the
microprocessor. The startup code typically is not stored on the
microprocessor IC, because the MOS processing required to build
nFET EEPROM cells requires added processing steps when compared to
the MOS processing required to build the microprocessor. These
added processing steps reduce the chip yield, increasing the
microprocessor cost. Because the pFET EEPROM is fabricated in a
standard process, it allows a BIOS memory to be added to a
microprocessor IC without additional processing steps. This will be
advantageous because locating the Bios memory on board the
microprocessor IC will reduce cost, enhance speed and have no
adverse effect on yield.
A further application for a pFET EEPROM is to add nonvolatile
memory to existing ASIC processes. ASIC processes typically do not
possess any form of non-volatile memory for the reasons set forth
above. Because the pFET EEPROM is compatible with standard MOS
processing, it will allow ASIC vendors to add nonvolatile, mixed
analog--digital memory to their existing processes, with no changes
to the process. This change will add nonvolatile memory devices to
the repertoire of cells available to ASIC designers, with endless
new design possibilities.
Alternative Embodiments
In a specialized process it is possible to eliminate the guard
rings and use graded drain and source junctions. Graded junctions
have lower E-fields, thereby preventing well-to-drain (and source)
pn breakdown during tunneling. Accordingly, memories constructed in
this fashion are included in the present invention.
Another alternative is to form a tunneling junction where electrons
are tunneled through a gate-oxide surface to the n- well rather
than at an edge of an n+ well implant (in the FIG. 6 embodiment,
electrons tunnel from the floating gate 16 to the n+ implant 18 at
the edge thereof).
During tunneling, field-oxide-induced junction breakdown at the
n.sup.+ tunneling-well contact causes a leakage current to flow
from the well contact to the pFET's drain and source. Alternate
tunneling junctions were therefore investigated where the floating
gate does not abut the n.sup.+ tunneling-well contact. A
guarded-pFET synapse without a floating-gate extension to the
n.sup.+ well contact was built in the hopes of inducing FN
tunneling through the gate oxide that subtends the channel.
Unfortunately, the pFET's source potential pins the MOS-channel
potential; consequently, the channel is at or near the source
voltage, rather than near the well-contact voltage, and the
resulting oxide voltage is insufficient for tunneling (note: this
is not necessarily true for gate oxides thinner than about 50
.ANG.). To isolate the tunneling region from the pFET's source, the
guarded-pFET synapse 40 shown in FIGS. 14A and 14B was built. In
this device, electrons tunnel from the floating gate 42 to the
n.sup.- well 44 through a tunneling junction 46 through gate-oxide
surface 47.
In this version a presently preferred embodiment of the pFET's (40)
floating gate 42 is extended over a region of field oxide 48, and
an isolated, 4 .mu.m.times.4 .mu.m square bowl of gate oxide 50 is
placed within this field oxide region. The gate-oxide bowl 46 has
n.sup.- silicon 44 beneath it, the polysilicon floating gate 42
above it, and field oxide 52 on all four sides. A high voltage is
applied to the n.sup.- well 44, causing electrons to tunnel from
the floating gate 42, through the gate-oxide bowl 46, to the
n.sup.- well The floating gate 42 depletes the n.sup.- silicon
immediate potential drop from the bulk n.sup.- to the MOS surface.
Consequently, bowl tunneling requires well voltages roughly 5V
higher than those required to tunnel at an n.sup.+ well contact.
However, because the tunneling is through a gate-oxide surface,
rather than at an edge, oxide trapping is reduced.
Bowl-shaped tunneling junctions do not exhibit the leakage currents
observed at n.sup.+ well-contact tunneling junctions.
Although this type of tunneling junction does eliminate the
pn-breakdown problem, its turn-on delay (the delay between applying
a high well voltage and the onset of electron tunneling) is
generally long. In FIG. 15, the amount of charge tunneled through a
bowl-shaped oxide, versus the amount of time the well voltage was
pulsed high, for three different well-pulse voltage amplitudes is
shown. The turn-on delay can exceed ten seconds--an impracticably
long time for a pulse-based learning system. The cause is the
depletion region that forms at the silicon surface beneath the
bowl. As a result of the voltage differential between the floating
gate and the n.sup.- well, the surface region beneath the gate
oxide is depleted, and the depletion-region depth varies with the
voltage differential between the floating gate and the well. If the
well is pulsed high, holes must be provided to the silicon surface
to widen this depletion region. Unfortunately, the only hole source
is thermal carrier generation. Consequently, the depletion region
takes many seconds to widen. Although such tunneling junctions can
be used in systems for which the well-tunneling voltage is a slowly
varying analog quantity, they cannot be used in systems in which
synapses are pulse-tunneling.
In specialized processes, vendors can increase the bulk n.sup.-
doping beneath the bowl-shaped oxide, i.e., they can convert that
part of the n.sup.- well to n.sup.+ to reduce the turn-on delay.
While the delay will always exist, it can be reduced to the order
of nanoseconds with this technique, and thus made
inconsequential.
Although illustrative presently preferred embodiments and
applications of this invention are shown and described herein, many
variations and modifications are possible which remain within the
concept, scope, and spirit of the invention, and these variations
would become clear to those of skill in the art after perusal of
this application. The invention, therefore, is not to be limited
except in the spirit of the appended claims.
* * * * *