Compressed digital overlay controller and method for MPEG type video signal

Hoarty January 14, 1

Patent Grant 5594507

U.S. patent number 5,594,507 [Application Number 08/250,723] was granted by the patent office on 1997-01-14 for compressed digital overlay controller and method for mpeg type video signal. This patent grant is currently assigned to ICTV, Inc.. Invention is credited to W. Leo Hoarty.


United States Patent 5,594,507
Hoarty January 14, 1997

Compressed digital overlay controller and method for MPEG type video signal

Abstract

A controller, in accordance with a preferred embodiment provides, in a specified region of first television picture generated by a first digitally compressed video signal, an overlay of a second picture embodied in a second video signal. The controller includes an I-frame buffer for storing updated macroblock pixel data in I-frame format derived from the second signal. The controller also has a matte mask storage register for storing data that identifies the specified region by means of macroblocks. A matte substitution processor is in communication with the matte mask storage register and has as an input the first signal and provides an overlayed output; the controller inhibits transmission to the output of any macroblock, of the first signal's data stream, lying in the specified region. It also functions to substitute for such macroblock a corresponding macroblock from the I-frame buffer. Further embodiments permit overlay of a graphic display for interactive television on a picture derived from a digitally compressed video signal.


Inventors: Hoarty; W. Leo (Morgan Hill, CA)
Assignee: ICTV, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)
Family ID: 22948896
Appl. No.: 08/250,723
Filed: May 27, 1994

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
56958 May 3, 1993
877325 May 1, 1992 5412325
754932 Sep 10, 1991 5220420
589205 Sep 27, 1990 5093718

Current U.S. Class: 348/584; 348/E7.094; 348/E7.073; 348/E7.069; 348/E7.071; 348/E7.074; 348/E7.049; 348/E5.108; 348/E5.056; 348/E5.112; 348/E5.105; 375/E7.268; 375/E7.211; 375/E7.206; 348/598
Current CPC Class: H04N 7/52 (20130101); H04N 21/44016 (20130101); H04N 7/173 (20130101); H04N 5/265 (20130101); H04N 7/17318 (20130101); H04N 21/4312 (20130101); H04N 5/4401 (20130101); H04N 7/22 (20130101); H04N 19/507 (20141101); H04N 19/48 (20141101); G06F 3/04815 (20130101); H04N 7/17336 (20130101); H04N 19/61 (20141101); H04N 7/17345 (20130101); H04N 19/90 (20141101); H04N 21/426 (20130101); H04N 5/262 (20130101); H04N 7/10 (20130101); G06F 2203/04802 (20130101); H04N 19/30 (20141101); H04N 2007/1739 (20130101); H04N 2007/17372 (20130101); H04N 5/45 (20130101); H04N 21/4316 (20130101)
Current International Class: H04N 7/22 (20060101); H04N 5/265 (20060101); H04N 5/44 (20060101); H04N 7/10 (20060101); H04N 7/173 (20060101); H04N 7/52 (20060101); H04N 7/58 (20060101); G06F 3/033 (20060101); H04N 7/50 (20060101); H04N 7/26 (20060101); G06T 9/00 (20060101); H04N 5/445 (20060101); H04N 5/45 (20060101); H04N 7/16 (20060101); H04N 005/272 ()
Field of Search: ;348/584,585,586,588,589,598,599,600

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
4032972 June 1977 Saylor
4077006 February 1978 Nicholson
4081831 March 1978 Tang et al.
4245245 January 1981 Matsumoto et al.
4247106 January 1981 Jeffers et al.
4253114 February 1981 Tang et al.
4264924 April 1981 Freeman
4290142 September 1981 Schnee et al.
4367557 January 1983 Stern et al.
4450477 May 1984 Lovett
4454538 June 1984 Toriumi
4466017 August 1984 Banker
4471380 September 1984 Mobley
4491983 January 1985 Pinnow et al.
4506387 March 1985 Walter
4507680 March 1985 Freeman
4509073 April 1985 Baran et al.
4523228 June 1985 Banker
4533948 August 1985 McNamara et al.
4536791 August 1985 Campbell et al.
4538174 August 1985 Gargini et al.
4567517 January 1986 Mobley
4573072 February 1986 Freeman
4591906 May 1986 Morales-Garza et al.
4602279 July 1986 Freeman
4616263 October 1986 Eichelberger
4627105 December 1986 Ohashi et al.
4633462 December 1986 Stifle et al.
4695880 September 1987 Johnson et al.
4706121 November 1987 Young
4709418 November 1987 Fox et al.
4710971 December 1987 Nozaki et al.
4748689 May 1988 Mohr
4760442 July 1988 O'Connell et al.
4769833 September 1988 Farleigh et al.
4769838 September 1988 Hasegawa
4801190 January 1989 Imoto
4821102 April 1989 Ichikawa et al.
4823386 April 1989 Dumbauld et al.
4827253 May 1989 Maltz
4829372 May 1989 McCalley et al.
4847700 July 1989 Freeman
4860379 August 1989 Schoeneberger et al.
4891694 January 1990 Way
4901367 February 1990 Nicholson
4903126 February 1990 Kassatly
4912760 March 1990 West, Jr. et al.
4918516 April 1990 Freeman
4922532 May 1990 Farmer et al.
4941040 July 1990 Pocock
4947244 August 1990 Fenwick et al.
4963995 October 1990 Lang
4975771 December 1990 Kassatly
4994909 February 1991 Graves et al.
4995078 February 1991 Monslow et al.
5008934 April 1991 Endoh
5014125 May 1991 Pocock et al.
5027400 June 1991 Baji et al.
5057917 October 1991 Shalkauser et al.
5060262 October 1991 Bevins, Jr. et al.
5093718 March 1992 Hoarty et al.
5109414 August 1992 Harvey et al.
5119188 June 1992 McCalley et al.
5130792 July 1992 Tindell et al.
5132992 July 1992 Yurt et al.
5133079 July 1992 Ballantyne et al.
5172413 December 1992 Bradley et al.
5191410 March 1993 McCalley et al.
5231494 July 1993 Wachob
5253341 October 1993 Rozmanith et al.
5422674 June 1995 Hooper et al.

Other References

Dukes, Stephen D., "Photonics for cable television system design", Communications Engineering and Design, 1992. .
Langenberg, Earl, "Integrating Entertainment and Voice on the Cable Network", pp. 187-194. .
Large, David,"Tapped Fiber vs Fiber-Reinforced Coaxial CATV Systems; A Comparison of Evolutionary Paths", pp. 1-21 1989. .
InSight -brochure. .
European Patent Application 0 477 786 A2. .
European Patent Application 0 449 633 A1. .
World Patent Application WO 90/13972. .
UK Patent Application GB 2 248 955 A. .
Le Gall, Didier, "MPEG: A Video Compression Standard for Multimedia Applications", Communication of the ACM, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr., 1991, New York, NY. .
Tamitani et al., "An Encoder/Decoder Chip Set for the MPEG Video Standard", 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, vol. 5, Mar., 1992, San Francisco, CA. .
Van der Star, Jack A. M., "Video on Demand Without Compression: A Review of the Business Model, Regulation and Future Implication"..

Primary Examiner: Kostak; Victor R.
Assistant Examiner: Flynn; Nathan J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bromberg & Sunstein

Parent Case Text



This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08,056,958, filed May 3, 1993, which in turn is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/877,325, filed May 1, 1992 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,325, which in turn is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/754,932, filed Sep. 10, 1991 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,220,420, which is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/589,205, filed Sep. 27, 1990, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,718. These related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Claims



What is claimed is:

1. A controller, for providing, in a specified region of a television picture generated by a first digitally compressed video signal, an overlay of a second picture embodied in a second video signal, comprising:

an I-frame buffer for storing updated macroblock pixel data in I-frame format derived from the second signal;

matte mask storage register for storing data that identifies the specified region by means of macroblocks;

matte substitution processor, in communication with the matte mask storage register and having as an input the first signal and providing an overlayed output, for inhibiting transmission to the output of any macroblock, of the first signal's data stream, lying in the specified region and for substituting for such macroblock a corresponding macroblock from the I-frame buffer.

2. A controller according to claim 1, wherein the second video signal is in an analog format, further comprising:

an I-frame encoder for encoding the second signal as a series of I-frames, the I-frame encoder having an output in communication with the I-frame buffer.

3. A controller according to claim 2, further comprising:

a macroblock detector in communication with the first signal and the matte substitution processor, for detecting the presence of a macroblock.

4. A controller according to claim 1, wherein the matte substitution processor includes flow control means for refraining from substituting data from the I-frame buffer, while continuing to inhibit transmission of any macroblock of the first signal's data stream lying in the specified region, to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the overlayed output to a rate within system limits.

5. A controller according to claim 3, wherein the matte substitution processor includes flow control means for refraining from substituting data from the I-frame buffer, while continuing to inhibit transmission of any macroblock of the first signal's data stream lying in the specified region, to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the overlayed output to a rate within system limits.

6. An interactive television system providing, in a specified region of a television picture generated by a first digitally compressed video signal, an overlay of a graphic display permitting user input via a remote control, such graphic display embodied in a second signal in an analog format, the system comprising:

an I-frame encoder for encoding the second signal as a series of I-frames;

an I-frame buffer for storing updated macroblock pixel data in I-frame format from the I-frame encoder;

matte mask storage register for storing data that identifies the specified region by means of macroblocks;

matte substitution processor, in communication with the matte mask storage register and having as an input the first signal and providing an overlayed output, for inhibiting transmission to the output of any macroblock, of the first signal's data stream, lying in the specified region and for substituting for such macroblock a corresponding macroblock from the I-frame buffer.

7. A controller according to claim 6, further comprising:

a macroblock detector in communication with the first signal and the matte substitution processor, for detecting the presence of a macroblock.

8. A controller according to claim 6, wherein the matte substitution processor includes flow control means for refraining from substituting data from the I-frame buffer, while continuing to inhibit transmission of any macroblock of the first signal's data stream lying in the specified region, to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the overlayed output to a rate within system limits.

9. A controller according to claim 7, wherein the matte substitution processor includes flow control means for refraining from substituting data from the I-frame buffer, while continuing to inhibit transmission of any macroblock of the first signal's data stream lying in the specified region, to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the overlayed output to a rate within system limits.

10. A method of overlaying in a specified region of a television picture a first digitally compressed video signal with a second analog video signal, comprising:

encoding the second signal as a series of I-frames;

storing the encoded I-frame macroblock pixel data in an I-frame buffer;

storing data that identifies the specified region by means of macroblocks in a matte mask storage register;

processing the data stream of the first signal and providing an overlayed output, by inhibiting transmission to the output of any macroblock, of the first signal's data stream, lying in the specified region and substituting for such macroblock a corresponding macroblock from the I-frame buffer.

11. A method according to claim 10, further comprising:

refraining from substituting data from the I-frame buffer, while continuing to inhibit transmission of any macroblock of the first signal's data stream lying in the specified region, to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the overlayed output to a rate within system limits.

12. A method of providing an interactive television system having, in a specified region of a television picture generated by a first digitally compressed video signal, an overlay of a graphic display permitting user input via a remote control, such graphic display embodied in a second signal in an analog format, the method comprising:

encoding the second signal as a series of I-frames;

storing the encoded I-frame macroblock pixel data in an I-frame buffer;

storing data that identifies the specified region by means of macroblocks in a matte mask storage register;

processing the data stream of the first signal and providing an overlayed output, by inhibiting transmission to the output of any macroblock, of the first signal's data stream, lying in the specified region and substituting for such macroblock a corresponding macroblock from the I-frame buffer.

13. A method according to claim 12, further comprising:

refraining from substituting data from the I-frame buffer, while continuing to inhibit transmission of any macroblock of the first signal's data stream lying in the specified region, to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the overlayed output to a rate within system limits.
Description



TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to controllers for providing in a first television picture generated by signals in a compressed digital format, such as under the MPEG2 standard, an overlay of a second picture.

BACKGROUND ART

Overlay controllers for analog television signals are well known in the art. The MPEG2 compression standard for digital video signals also contemplates the possibility of overlaying a first compressed digital video signal with a second compressed digital video signal. A controller for achieving the overlay of two such digitally compressed video signals is inherently complex. In some instances, it is desirable to overlay a compressed digital video signal (such as, for example, a movie or other material made available to a cable television subscriber) with a relatively slowly changing analog signal (such as, for example, a display including a movable cursor and a number of selection buttons to permit interactive cable television service to a subscriber operating a remote control unit causing movement of the cursor and operation of the buttons). In such a case, the art currently would require, before overlaying the signal, either (i) A-to-D conversion of the analog signal and its subsequent compression or (ii) decompression and D-to-A conversion of the digital signal. Such techniques are inefficient and expensive.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention there is provided a controller, for providing, in a specified region of first television picture generated by a first digitally compressed video signal, an overlay of a second picture embodied in a second video signal. The controller includes an I-frame buffer for storing updated macroblock pixel data in I-frame format derived from the second signal. The controller also has a matte mask storage register for storing data that identifies the specified region by means of macroblocks. A matte substitution processor is in communication with the matte mask storage register and has as an input the first signal and provides an overlayed output; the controller inhibits transmission to the output of any macroblock, of the first signal's data stream, lying in the specified region. It also functions to substitute for such macroblock a corresponding macroblock from the I-frame buffer. Further embodiments permit overlay of a graphic display for interactive television on a picture derived from a digitally compressed video signal.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following description taken with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagram of the effect of an overlay in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a matte mask used to define the boundaries of the overlay in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the invention for achieving the overlay of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 4 provides detail of certain portions of FIG. 3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 illustrates the effect of an overlay of a first MPEG2 encoded digital video source, which is referred to below as source 1, by a second signal, which is referred to below as source 2. In the context of interactive television, source 1 may be, for example, a digitally compressed movie or other information service (as that term is defined above). Source 2 may be, for example, a graphic display, in analog format, showing a menu of choices available to a subscriber and a cursor movable by the subscriber (using a remote control), so arranged as to permit the subscriber to communicate interactively with the headend and to make a selection from the menu of choices. Thus, source 1 could be a movie preview, for example, and source 2 could present a menu of choices to the subscriber permitting selection of the movie or an opportunity to preview another movie, and so on. In this example, source 1 is shown in region A of FIG. 1 and source 2 is shown in region B.

In accordance with MPEG2 encoding, successive contiguous 16.times.16 square arrays (herein called "macroblocks") of pixels are identified over the entire picture area; a sample macroblock is shown as item 11 in FIG. 1. Each macroblock in the picture area is given a unique numerical address, in the general manner illustrated in FIG. 1, corresponding to its location in the picture.

The boundary between regions A and B in FIG. 1 is defined by a matte mask, shown in FIG. 2, that specifies the macroblock addresses that are included (or, alternatively, excluded) in region A.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram for an embodiment of the present invention for achieving the overlay described above. Inputs 30 include the digitally compressed source 1 signal as well as data showing activity of the subscriber's remote unit. (Additional video data may be provided for use in creating the video for region B of FIG. 1. Such additional data may come as digitally compressed data from the inputs 30 and be decompressed by decompressor 33, and/or it may come from other source 34, which may be a decompressor or TV tuner. Data from the subscriber's remote unit is processed by CPU 31, operating with RAM 35, and graphics overlay 32 provides an analog input to mixer-encoder 36. This input 321 shows cursor position and the menu choices available to the subscriber for interaction with the headend. The mixer-encoder 36 first mixes input 321 with inputs from sources 33 and 34, and then encodes the mixed analog signal as a series of I-frames in MPEG2 format. The I-frame encoded output of mixer-encoder 36 is provided to MPEG2 mixer 37, the output of which is subjected to regulation by flow controller 38 to prevent excessively high data rates from appearing at the output 39. This regulation is necessary to prevent the data rates from exceeding the capacity of the distribution system, and, particularly, of the subscriber's equipment.

Detail of the mixer-encoder 36, the MPEG2 mixer 37, and the flow controller 38 is presented in FIG. 4. The MPEG2 encoded digital video data stream identified as source 1 in FIG. 4 is here overlayed with a desired signal output, identified as source 2, from the video effects and mixer module 41. in the manner described herein. In this example, source 2 is in analog YUV format. The source 2 signal is then digitally encoded by encoder 42 as a series only of I-frames in MPEG2 format. (That is, no B-frames or P-frames are provided in the output from encoder 32. It will be appreciated that the picture content of region B is generally expected to be relatively slowly changing; the changes most commonly expected are primarily those associated with cursor motion and selection of choices by the subscriber. Accordingly, the full MPEG encoding of source 2 is not necessary.

Moreover, constraints on the system are required in order for it to provide appropriate responsiveness. Each frame duration is 1/30th of a second. Encoding source 2 as a series of I-frames will therefore mean up to 1/30th of a second until an action on the subscriber's remote unit (excluding other sources of delay) will have been encoded by encoder 42. Moveover, in addition to the time for encoding here by encoder 42, there must also be taken into account an equal time for decoding for display on the subscriber's television; thus the total delay is double the time for encoding. It is possible, for example, to use P frames along with I frames, but if P frames are used in addition to I frames, the encoding time will be doubled.

The I-frame output of encoder 42 is stored in I-frame buffer 33, the data in which is updated as necessary based on output from the encoder 42. Any of the macroblocks in the I-frame buffer that do not change do not need to be updated, and where there is little change in source 2 video there will be relatively infrequent updating of the buffer 42.

The I-frame data in buffer 43 is selectively inserted in the source 1 MPEG2 encoded data stream in the following manner. The source 1 data stream is run through macroblock detector 46 to detect macroblocks, and its output is provided to the matte substitution processor 44. Matte mask storage register 45 stores the addresses of the macroblocks constituting the matte mask of FIG. 2, and provides data to the matte processor 44. Whenever the processor identifies a macroblock (regardless whether I-, B-, or P-frame) from detector 46 that lies outside (or, alternatively, inside) the matte region defined in register 45, it substitutes an I-frame macroblock of the corresponding address from I-frame buffer 43.

It is possible, if there is a great deal of change in the picture content of source 2, then the output 39 of system would be at a data rate beyond system capacity. In such a case, the processor 44 will continue to block source 1 macroblocks lying outside the matte region, but will refrain from substituting data from the I-frame buffer 43 to the extent necessary to slow the data rate at the output to a rate within system limits.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed