U.S. patent number 5,283,079 [Application Number 07/452,099] was granted by the patent office on 1994-02-01 for process to make magnetically responsive fluorescent polymer particles.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Baxter Diagnostics Inc.. Invention is credited to Dinesh O. Shah, Chao-Huei J. Wang.
United States Patent |
5,283,079 |
Wang , et al. |
February 1, 1994 |
Process to make magnetically responsive fluorescent polymer
particles
Abstract
This invention provides a novel process of producing
magnetically responsive fluorescent polymer particles comprising
polymeric core particles coated evenly with a layer of polymer
containing magnetically responsive metal oxide. A wide variety of
polymeric particles with sizes ranging from 1 to 100 microns can be
used a core particles and transformed into magnetically responsive
polymer particles. The surface of these magnetically responsive
polymer particles can be coated further with another layer of
functionalized polymer. These magnetically responsive fluorescent
polymer particles can be used for passive or covalent coupling of
biological material such as antigens, antibodies, enzymes or
DNA/RNA hybridization and used as solid phase for various types of
immunoassays, DNA/RNA hybridization probes assays, affinity
purification, cell separation and other medical, diagnostic, and
industrial applications.
Inventors: |
Wang; Chao-Huei J. (Gurnee,
IL), Shah; Dinesh O. (Vernon Hills, IL) |
Assignee: |
Baxter Diagnostics Inc.
(Deerfield, IL)
|
Family
ID: |
26810897 |
Appl.
No.: |
07/452,099 |
Filed: |
December 14, 1989 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
337511 |
May 30, 1989 |
5091206 |
|
|
|
113294 |
Oct 26, 1987 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
427/2.13;
427/128; 427/131; 427/214; 427/222; 435/4 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B01J
8/008 (20130101); A61M 1/3618 (20140204); B01J
20/28009 (20130101); B01J 20/28016 (20130101); B03C
1/01 (20130101); C08F 257/02 (20130101); C08F
285/00 (20130101); C12Q 1/6816 (20130101); C12Q
1/6834 (20130101); G01N 33/54326 (20130101); G01N
33/5434 (20130101); G01N 33/582 (20130101); G01N
33/585 (20130101); H01F 1/111 (20130101); B01J
20/28004 (20130101); C12Q 1/6834 (20130101); G01N
2446/10 (20130101); G01N 2446/40 (20130101); G01N
2446/84 (20130101); G01N 2446/86 (20130101); C12Q
2563/143 (20130101); C12Q 2563/107 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B01J
8/00 (20060101); B01J 20/28 (20060101); B03C
1/01 (20060101); B03C 1/005 (20060101); C08F
285/00 (20060101); C08F 257/00 (20060101); C08F
257/02 (20060101); C12Q 1/68 (20060101); G01N
33/58 (20060101); G01N 33/543 (20060101); H01F
1/032 (20060101); H01F 1/11 (20060101); A61M
1/36 (20060101); A01N 001/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;427/2,128,131,214,222 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
4177253 |
December 1979 |
Davies et al. |
4490436 |
December 1984 |
Kawakami et al. |
4628037 |
December 1986 |
Chagnon et al. |
|
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lusignan; Michael
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fentress; Susan B. Barta; Kent
Tymeson; Cynthia
Parent Case Text
This invention is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 337,511,
filed May 30, 1989, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,091,206, which in turn is a
divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 113,294, filed Oct. 26,
1987, now abandoned.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A process to make monodispersed fluorescent magnetic particles
of uniform size distribution and magnetic content comprising:
a) evenly coating a fluorescent core polymer particle with a
magnetically responsive metal oxide and polymer combination, said
polymer combination being comprised of monomers able to absorb to
said inner core polymer particle.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said fluorescent core polymer
particle is comprised of polystyrene or cross-linked polystyrene,
incorporated with fluorescent dye.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said fluorescent core polymer
particle ranges from about 1 to 100 microns.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein said magnetically responsive
metal oxide is about 1 micron or less.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said magnetically responsive
metal oxide is selected from the group consisting of
superparamagnetic, paramagnetic, or ferromagnetic metal oxide.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the polymer of said magnetically
responsive metal oxide and polymer combination is selected from the
group consisting of polystyrene, cross-linked polystyrene or,
functionalized polystyrene.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the metal oxide is formed from
transition metal salts.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein additional metal oxide and
polymer combinations are added to evenly coat said first metal
oxide and polymer combination coating.
9. A process to make monodispersed fluorescent magnetic particles
of uniform size distribution and magnetic content comprising:
a) evenly coating a core polymer particle with a magnetically
responsive metal oxide and polymer combination, said polymer
combination being comprised of monomers able to adsorb to said
inner core polymer particle and said polymer combination containing
a fluorescent dye or combination of fluorescent dyes; and
b) coating said magnetically responsive metal oxide and polymer
combination with an outer polymer.
10. The process of claim 9 wherein said core polymer particle is
comprised of polystyrene, cross-linked polystyrene or
functionalized polystyrene.
11. The process of claim 9 wherein said core polymer particle
ranges from about 1 to 100 microns.
12. The process of claim 9 wherein said magnetically responsive
metal oxide particle is about 1 micron or less.
13. The process of claim 9 wherein said magnetically responsive
metal oxide is selected from the group consisting of
superparamagnetic, paramagnetic, or ferromagnetic metal oxide.
14. The process of claim 9 wherein the polymer of said magnetically
responsive metal oxide and polymer combination is selected from the
group consisting of polystyrene, cross-linked polystyrene, or
functionalized polystyrene.
15. The process of claim 9 wherein the metal oxide is formed from
transition metal salts.
16. The process of claim 9 wherein said outer polymer coating is
selected from the group consisting of polystyrene, cross-linked
polystyrene, or functionalized polystyrene.
17. A process to make monodispersed fluorescent magnetic particles
of uniform size distribution and magnetic content comprising:
a) evenly coating a core polymer particle with a magnetically
responsive metal oxide and polymer combination, said polymer
combination being comprised of monomers able to adsorb to said
inner core polymer particle and said polymer combination containing
a fluorescent dye or combination of fluorescent dyes.
18. The process of claim 17 wherein said core polymer particle is
comprised of polystyrene or cross-linked polystyrene.
19. The process of claim 17 wherein said core polymer particle
ranges from about 1 to 100 microns.
20. The process of claim 17 wherein said magnetically responsive
metal oxide particle is about 1 micron or less.
21. The process of claim 17 wherein said magnetically responsive
metal oxide is selected from the group consisting of
superparamagnetic, paramagnetic, or ferromagnetic metal oxide.
22. The process of claim 17 wherein the polymer of said
magnetically responsive metal oxide and polymer combination is
selected from the group consisting of polystyrene, cross-linked
polystyrene, or functionalized polystyrene.
23. The process of claim 17 wherein the metal oxide is formed from
transition metal salts.
24. The process of claim 17 wherein additional metal oxide and
polymer combinations evenly coat said first metal oxide and polymer
combination coating.
25. A process to make monodispersed fluorescent magnetic particles
of uniform size distribution and magnetic content comprising:
a) evenly coating a fluorescent core polymer particle with a
magnetically responsive metal oxide and polymer combination, said
polymer combination being comprised of monomers able to adsorb to
said inner core polymer particle; and
b) coating said magnetically responsive metal oxide and polymer
combination with an outer polymer.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method to make magnetically responsive
fluorescent polymer particles.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many biological techniques, such as immunoassays, affinity
purification etc., require the separation of bound from free
fractions. Magnetic particles have been used to facilitate the
desired separation.
Magnetic particles have been formed from a variety of particulate
and magnetic matter, using a variety of processes, having different
characteristics. For example, Ikeda et. al. U.S. Pat. No.
4,582,622, discloses a magnetic particle comprised of gelatin,
water-soluble polysaccharide, sodium phosphate and ferromagnetic
substances; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,628,037 and 4,554,088 disclose
magnetic particles comprised of a magnetic metal oxide core
surrounded by a coat of polymeric silane; U.S. Pat. No. 4,452,773
discloses discrete colloidal sized particles having a core of
ferromagnetic iron oxide (Fe.sub.3 O.sub.4) which is coated with a
water-soluble polysaccharide or a derivative thereof having
functional groups; and Mansfield U.S. Pat. No. 4,297,337 discloses
magnetic glass- or crystal-containing material as a particulate
carrier.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a novel process of producing
magnetically responsive fluorescent polymer particles, hereinafter
referred to as magnetic fluorescent particles, from fluorescent
polymeric particles with average size from about 1 to 100 microns
in diameter regardless of shape and composition. The fluorescent
magnetic particles of this invention may be prepared by first
producing a magnetically responsive metal oxide, hereinafter
referred to as metal oxide, with average size of about 1 micron or
less and then coating a fluorescent polymeric core particle with a
layer of polymer containing metal oxide. The surface of these
fluorescent magnetic particles can be coated further with another
layer of polymer or functionalized polymer to provide the desired
surface characteristics.
The spectral characteristics of these fluorescent magnetic
particles can be varied by using core particles incorporated with
various fluorescent dyes, either a single fluorescent dye or a
combination of several fluorescent dyes. Alternatively, the
fluorescent magnetic particles of the present invention can be
prepared by incorporating various fluorescent dyes, either a single
fluorescent dye or a combination of several fluorescent dyes, which
are soluble in the monomer and can withstand the polymerization
condition, in the presence of nonfluorescent polymeric core
particles, metal oxide, and monomer.
The fluorescent magnetic particles produced by the present
invention are monodispersed in size with rough surface and have a
magnetic metal oxide content of from about 5% to 50%, preferably
from 10% to 25%. The fluorescence intensity of these fluorescent
magnetic particles can be adjusted by varying the magnetic metal
oxide content to vary the shading due to the metal oxide and/or
varying the amount of fluorescent dye incorporated into the
fluorescent polymeric core particles.
Particles with these characteristics have been found to be useful
in immunoassays and a wide variety of biomedical applications.
These fluorescent magnetic particles can be used for passive or
covalent coupling of biological material such as antigens,
antibodies, enzymes or DNA/RNA and used as solid phase for various
types of immunoassays, DNA/RNA hybridization assays, affinity
purification, cell separation, phagocytosis, and other biomedical
applications. These fluorescent magnetic particles with or without
coupling to biological material can be incorporated at various
ratios to nonmagnetic particles for various assays to serve as
markers for making sure that the correct number of particles are
being delivered into the well and for checking the particle loss
during the assay.
Objectives and Advantages
It is the objective of this invention to:
Develop a process of producing magnetically responsive fluorescent
polymer particles easily from readily available polymer
particles.
Develop a process of producing magnetically responsive fluorescent
polymer particles with moderate sedimentation and fast magnetic
separation.
Develop a process of producing magnetically responsive fluorescent
polymer particles with various surface charges, and functional
group for passive adsorption or covalent coupling of biological
material.
Develop medical, biological, diagnostic and industrial applications
using these magnetically responsive fluorescent polymer
particles.
The advantages of this invention include:
A wide variety of fluorescent polymeric core particles with size
from about 1 to 100 microns can easily be transformed to
magnetically responsive particles.
The metal oxide content can be varied according to the
applications.
The surface can be derivatized into a wide variety of functional
groups for covalent coupling.
A wide variety of monomers can be used for the final coating to
provide different surface characteristics of the resulting
polymer.
Both crosslinked and noncrosslinked magnetically responsive
fluorescent polymer particles can be produced.
Monodispersed magnetically responsive fluorescent polymer particles
can be produced.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The fluorescent magnetic particles of this invention may be
prepared by first producing metal oxide with average size of about
1 micron or less. The metal oxide is produced by heating and
precipitating a mixture of divalent and trivalent metal salt,
preferably a mixture of ferrous and ferric sulfate or chloride with
sodium hydroxide solution. The molar ratio of divalent to trivalent
metal salt can be varied from 0.5 to 2.0, preferably 0.5 to 1.0, to
obtain the desirable size and magnetic characteristics of metal
oxide. It is observed that the molar ratio of divalent to trivalent
metal salt affects the size of the metal oxide: the smaller the
molar ratio of divalent to trivalent metal salt, the smaller the
size of metal oxide. The molar ratio of divalent to trivalent metal
salt also affects the color of the resulting magnetic particles:
the smaller the molar ratio, the lighter the brownish color of the
resulting magnetic particles. Preferably, the metal oxide is either
superparamagnetic or paramagnetic although ferromagnetic metal
oxide can also be used, provided centrifugation instead of magnetic
separation is used during the clean up.
Other divalent transition metal salts such as manganese, magnesium,
cobalt, nickel, zinc, and copper salts may be substituted for
ferrous salt.
After the metal oxide has been precipitated, it is washed several
times with centrifugation at 250 xg until the supernatant is
neutral in pH. The metal oxide is resuspended in deionized water
and mechanically stirred at high speed to break down the aggregate
of metal oxide crystals. Further centrifugation at 250.times.g will
not pellet all of the metal oxide. The supernatant which contains
smaller size metal oxide crystals is collected and the pellet is
resuspended in deionized water. This process is repeated for at
least three times or until most of metal oxide can no longer be
pelleted at 250.times.g. The metal oxide obtained this way usually
has size less than 2.0 micron. Low speed centrifugation at
100.times.g to remove larger crystals will reduce the size to less
than 0.8 micron. centrifugation at 100.times.g to remove larger
crystals will reduce the size to less than 0.8 micron.
The metal oxide with average size of 1.0 micron or less is mixed
with monomer and coated onto the fluorescent polymeric core
particles, preferably polystyrene particles, with size of 1 to 100
microns in the presence of initiator. Addition of a small quantity
of emulsifier will help prevent the particles from agglomerating.
The fluorescent magnetic particles are then coated with a
protective layer of polymer, preferably polystyrene, to prevent the
metal oxide from falling off. If functionalized fluorescent
magnetic particles are desired, the magnetic particles can be
coated further with another layer of functionalized polymer to
provide functional groups such as carboxyl, amino or hydroxyl for
covalent coupling of biological material.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The fluorescent magnetic particles prepared according to this
invention can be illustrated in FIG. I, where 1 represents the
fluorescent core particle, 2 represents the metal oxide/polymer
coating, 3 represents the protective polymer coating and 4
represents the functionalized polymer coating.
FIG. II shows the transmission electron micrograph of 0.08 to 0.1
micron slice of a magnetic particle prepared according to this
invention.
FIG. III shows a scanning electron micrograph of 6.8 micron
magnetic particles, prepared according to this invention.
FIG. IIIa is at 1000.times. and FIG. IIIb is at 5000.times.
magnification.
The fluorescent polymeric core particles useful in this invention
may be of any polymer which can be obtained as a dispersion of
small particles and which can absorb a monomer thereby causing the
metal oxide and monomer mixture to coat onto the surface of the
core particles. The core particles may be of any size and shape,
preferably of 1 to 100 microns in size and spherical in shape. When
monodispersed core particles are used the resulting magnetic
particles will also be monodispersed in size. The core particles
may be obtained by emulsion polymerization, suspension
polymerization or other means of polymerization with or without a
crosslinking agent such as divinyl benzene or the like. Among the
monomers which can be used to prepare core particles are styrene,
methyl methacrylate, vinyltoluene and the like. A mixture of the
monomers can also be used. The fluorescent core particles may be
obtained by incorporating the fluorescent dye in the core
particles, using various techniques known to those skilled in the
art. The monomer used for magnetic metal oxide coating or
protective coating may or may not be the same type as the
fluorescent core particles. The weight ratio of monomer used for
metal oxide coating to fluorescent core particles may be from 0.1
to 12, preferably from 0.2 to 6, depending upon the thickness of
metal oxide/polymer layer desired. When the metal oxide prepared
from a mixture of ferrous and ferric salts is used for coating it
is preferred to use a monomer to fluorescent core particle weight
ratio of about 0.1 to 0.5. However when the metal oxide prepared
from a mixture of manganese (II) and ferric salts is used for
coating the weight ratio of monomer to core particles may be from
0.1 to 12. As a result when crosslinked fluorescent magnetic
particles which are inert to common organic solvent are desired, it
is preferred to use the metal oxide prepared from a mixture of
manganese (II) and ferric salts with monomer containing 2% to 10%,
preferably 8% to 10% by weight of crosslinking agent and a monomer
to core particle weight ratio of 3 to 12, preferably 4 to 6 and a
monomer to fluorescent dye weight ratio of 0.1 to 10. When lower
monomer to core particle weight ratio (i.e. 0.1 to 0.5) is used
during the metal oxide/polymer coating it is preferred to overcoat
the resulting fluorescent magnetic particles with a protective
layer of polymer coating to further adhere the metal oxide to the
surface of the fluorescent magnetic particles. However, when higher
monomer to core particle ratio (i.e. 3 to 12) is used no protective
polymer coating is necessary. The polymerization temperature may be
from 50.degree. C. to 90.degree. C., preferably 55.degree. C. to
65.degree. C. The polymerization initiator may either be water
soluble such as potassium persulfate and the like or water
insoluble such as benzoyl peroxide and the like. Other means of
polymerization initiation such as radiation, ionization or the like
may also be used. It is found unexpectedly that fluorescent
magnetic particles can be produced without using any emulsifier
when the metal oxide prepared from a mixture of manganese (II) and
ferric salts is used for coating. However, a small amount of
emulsifier such as sodium dodecylsulfate, Aerosol 22, Tween 20 or
Nonidet P-40 (NP 40) is found to be useful in preventing the
particles from extensive aggregation during the metal oxide/polymer
coating when the metal oxide prepared from a mixture of ferrous and
ferric salts is used for coating. Other emulsifiers with the same
capability may also be used. The magnetic metal oxide content can
be varied from 5% to 50%, preferably from 10% to 25% by using
different amounts of metal oxide during the metal oxide/polymer
coating. Multiple metal oxide/polymer coatings can also be employed
to increase the metal oxide content. Other ingredients commonly
used in polymerization may also be added as long as magnetic
particles with desirable characteristics can be obtained. The
ingredients for metal oxide/polymer coating may be added all at
once at the beginning of metal oxide/polymer coating process or
added stepwise. When the metal oxide prepared from a mixture of
ferrous and ferric salt is used, it is preferred to add the
ingredients stepwise. The ingredients may be mixed by mechanical
stirring, tumbling or other means of agitation under vacuum or
inert gas such as argon. The functional groups can be incorporated
onto the surface of the fluorescent magnetic particles by either
using a mixture of monomer and functionalized monomer during the
metal oxide/polymer coating or overcoating the magnetic particles
with a thin layer of functionalized monomer at the end. The
functionalized monomer used may be selected from one or a mixture
of the following: 2-hyroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-aminoethyl
methacrylate, trimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate methosulfate,
dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, PG,9 methacrylic acid, undecylenic
acid, methyl propene sulfonic acid, undecylenyl alcohol, oleyl
amine, glycidyl methacrylate, acrolein, glutaraldehyde and the
like. The magnetic fluorescent particles can also be overcoated
with a layer of different polymer than the one used for metal
oxide/polymer coating or protective coating to take up the surface
characteristics of that polymer.
APPLICATIONS OF FLUORESCENT MAGNETIC PARTICLES
The uses of a wide variety of fluorescent magnetic particles as
solid phase for various applications such as fluorescence
immunoassays, radioimmunoassays, enzyme immunoassays, cell
separations, enzyme immobilizations and affinity purifications have
been reviewed in literature as examplified by the following
articles: Hirschbein et al, Chemical Technology, March 1982,
172-179 (1982); Pourfarzaneh, The Ligand Quarterly, 5(1): 41-47
(1982); Halling and Dunnill, Enzyme Microbe Technology, 2: 2-10
(1980); Mosbach and Anderson, Nature, 270: 259-261 (1977); Guesdon
et al, J. Allergy Clinical immunology, 61(1), 23-27 (1978). Some
applications have also been disclosed in the U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,152,210 and 4,343,901 for enzyme immobilizations; U.S. Pat. Nos.
3,970,518, 4,230,685, and 4,267,2343 for cell separations; U.S.
Pat. Nos. 4,554,088, 4,628,037, and 3,933,997 for immunoassays.
Some magnetic particles may be useful in one application, but not
in another application. For example, the magnetic particles
disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,554,088 and 4,628,037, which comprise
a superparamagnetic metal oxide core generally surrounded by a coat
of polymeric silane, may be useful in immunoassay and affinity
purification, due to the large surface area and slower settling
rate, but are not suitable in cell separation application such as
bone marrow purging. Due to the small size of the magnetic
particles, disclosed in these two patents, it is very difficult to
remove all of the magnetic particles from the cell suspension
effectively. Moreover, the nonspecific binding of smaller magnetic
particles to normal cells would be much higher. In using magnetic
particles for bone marrow purging, the magnetic particles are
coated with antibody, such as sheep anti-mouse IgG, and the bone
marrow is treated with a mixture of several monoclonal antibodies
against the cancer cell surface antigens. The magnetic particles
will bind only to the cancer cells and cause them to be separated
from normal cells by passing them through a strong magnetic field.
The cleansed cells are then put back into the patient.
By using the processes of this invention magnetic particles can be
optimized in terms of size, surface area, metal oxide content and
surface characteristics for a wide variety of biomedical
applications. The magnetic particles produced by this invention can
be used as solid phase for enzyme immunoassay, fluorescence
immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, DNA/RNA hybridization assay, and
other diagnostic applications. Immunoassays can be performed by
using various configurations such as sandwich assays and
competitive binding assays etc., which are obvious to those skilled
in the art. The DNA/RNA hybridization can also be performed by
using various configurations such as solid phase hybridization or
liquid phase hybridization. In solid phase hybridization
configuration a DNA or RNA probe (catcher probe) is immobilized on
the magnetic particle first. The immobilized catcher probe is then
used to hybridize with complimentary strand of DNA from the sample
(sample DNA). Finally another probe (signal probe) which is labeled
with fluorescent, radioactive or enzyme tracer and capable of
hybridizing with another part of the sample DNA is used for signal
generation. In liquid phase hybridization configuration the catcher
probe and signal probe are allowed to hybridize with the sample DNA
in the liquid phase first and then are immobilized to the magnetic
particles.
Alternatively, the signal probe can also be labelled with one or
several biotin groups and the signal is detected by binding the
biotin groups with avidin labelled fluorescent, radioactive or
enzymatic tracer to enhance the sensitivity of the assay.
The immunoassays and DNA/RNA hybridization assays can be used to
measure a wide variety of compounds such as drugs, hormones,
antibodies, peptides, DNA, RNA, nucleotides, viral antigens, and
carbohydrates in biological samples.
The magnetic particles produced by this invention can also be used
for affinity purification, cell separation, enzyme immobilization
and other biomedical applications. In cell separation the magnetic
particles are used to either remove unwanted cells (negative
selection) or enrich the wanted cells (positive selection) through
immunological reactions or nonimmunological reactions. This
principle can be used to remove cancer cells from bone marrow (bone
marrow purging), purify cell populations through either positive or
negative selection for tissue culture and perform various cellular
immunoassays etc. In affinity purification the magnetic particles
are used in place of conventional solid phase such as
polyacrylamide gels, sepharose gels or other cellulose beads to
purify a wide variety of biological materials such as antibodies,
antigens, enzymes, inhibitors, cofactors, single stranded DNA,
binding proteins, haptens and carbohydrates etc. In another
application similar to the affinity purification, the magnetic
particles can be used to cross adsorb and remove unwanted protein
components from the antisera or clinical samples. In enzyme
immobilization the enzyme is immobilized onto the magnetic
particles through various means of coupling so as to preserve the
enzyme activity and to permit the reuse of immobilized enzyme. The
magnetic particles with immobilized enzyme can be used to replace
other solid phases such as glass beads, controlled pore glass,
silica gels and cellulose beads etc., which are commonly used in
immobilized enzyme systems to produce a wide variety of materials
such as carbohydrates, amino acids, and proteins, etc.
These fluorescent magnetic particles with or without coupling to
biological material can be incorporated at various ratios to
nonmagnetic particles for various assays as mentioned in Examples
42 and 43 to serve as markers for making sure that the correct
numbere of particles are being delivered into the well and for
checking the particle loss during the assay.
These applications are all facilitated by the ease of separation,
fast reaction rate and large surface area common to most of
magnetic particles. The following examples are provided to further
illustrate the versatility and advantages of this invention, the
details thereof are not to be construed as limitations, for it will
be apparent that various equivalents, changes and modifications may
be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope thereof
and it is understood that such equivalent embodiments are intended
to be included therein.
GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR THE PREPARATION OF METAL OXIDE
EXAMPLE 1
In a three-necked round bottom flask equipped with mechanical
stirrer, condenser, thermometer, dropping funnel and heating mantle
was placed a mixture containing 0.361 mol of ferrous sulfate and
0.369 mol of ferric sulfate (Fe.sup.++ /Fe.sup.+++ ratio=1) in 400
ml of deionized water. The mixture was heated to 85.degree. to
90.degree. C. with stirring and added dropwise 850 ml of 6N sodium
hydroxide over a period of 90 minutes. The mixture was stirred at
85.degree. to 90.degree. C. for one more hour and cooled to room
temperature. The metal oxide precipitates were centrifuged at
250.times.g for 10 minutes. The clear supernatant was decanted and
the pellet was resuspended in 900 ml of deionized water using
mechanical stirrer. This cleaning process was repeated six times or
until the supernatant was almost neutral in pH. The supernatant was
decanted and resuspended in 200 ml of deionized water. Further
centrifugation at 250.times.g will not pellet all of the metal
oxide precipitates. The supernatant which contained smaller size
metal oxide crystals was collected and the pellet was resuspended
in 200 ml of deionized water. This process was repeated for at
least three times or until most of metal oxide can no longer be
pelleted at 250.times.g. The metal oxide obtained this way usually
has size less than 2.0 micron. The combined metal oxide suspension
was centrifuged at 100.times.g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was
collected to give 800 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide
suspension having the size less than 0.8 microns.
EXAMPLE 2
Same procedures as described in Example 1 were followed except
0.235 mol of ferrous sulfate, 0.297 mol of ferric sulfate
(Fe.sup.++ /Fe.sup.+++ ratio=0.79) in 400 ml of deionized water and
480 ml of 6N sodium hydroxide were used to give 2000 ml of 2.86%
w/v suspension of magnetic metal oxide.
EXAMPLE 3
Same procedures as described in Example 1 were followed except
0.178 mol of ferrous sulfate, 0.298 mol of ferric sulfate
(Fe.sup.++ /Fe.sup.+++ ratio=0.59) in 400 ml of deionized water and
520 ml of 6N sodium hydroxide were used to give 1500 ml of 2.98%
w/v suspension of magnetic metal oxide.
EXAMPLE 4
Same procedures as described in Example 1 were followed except 0.15
mol of ferrous sulfate, 0.276 mol of ferric sulfate (Fe.sup.++
/Fe.sup.+++ ratio=0.54) in 400 ml of deionized water and 520 ml of
6N sodium hydroxide were used to give 700 ml of 6.88% w/v
suspension of magnetic metal oxide.
EXAMPLE 5
Same procedures as described in Example 1 were followed except
0.116 mol of manganese sulfate, 0.146 mol of ferric sulfate
(Mn.sup.++ /Fe.sup.+++ ratio=0.79) in 225 ml of deionized water and
240 ml of 6N sodium hydroxide were used to give 1700 ml of 1.8% w/v
suspension of magnetic metal oxide.
PREPARATION OF MAGNETIC PARTICLES
EXAMPLE 6
A mixture containing 600 ml of deionized water, 6 ml of styrene and
80 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated
and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for one hour.
To the mixture were added 12 g of potassium persulfate and 850 ml
of 5% w/v, 4.0 micron polystrene particles. The bottle was
resealed, evacuated and rotated for one hour and added 50 ml of 2%
sodium dodecylsulfate. After five more hours 6 ml of styrene and 10
g of potassium persulfate were added to the mixture. The mixture
was rotated for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers
of cheese cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times
with deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 1.6 l with deionized water
to give a 2.5% w/v suspension with about 11% magnetic metal oxide
content and 4.3 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 7
The magnetic particles, 1.6 l of 2.5% w/v, prepared as described in
Example 6, were carboxylated by adding 1 g of sodium
dodecylsulfate, 10 g of potassium persulfate and a solution
containing 0.98 ml of undecylenic acid and 0.02 ml of divinyl
banzene in 4 ml of methanol. The mixture was placed in a sealed
bottle, evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C.
oven for 5 hours. The resulting carboxyl magnetic particles were
separated magnetically and washed several times with deionized
water until the supernatant was clear. The carboxyl magnetic
particles were resuspended to 680 ml with deionized water to give a
5.8% w/v suspension with about 11% magnetic metal oxide content and
4.3 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 8
A mixture containing 600 ml of deionized water, 6 ml of styrene and
80 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated
and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for one hour.
To the mixture were added 12 g of potassium persulfate and 850 ml
of 4.78% w/v, 6.1 micron polystyrene particles. The bottle was
resealed, evacuated, rotated for five hours and added 6 ml of
styrene and 10 g of potassium persulfate. The mixture was rotated
for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers of cheese
cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times with
deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 1.5 l with deionized water
and carboxylated by adding 1 g of sodium dodecylsulfate, 10 g of
potassium persulfate and a solution containing 0.98 ml of
undecylenic acid and 0.02 ml of divinyl benzene in 4 ml of
methanol. The mixture was placed in a sealed bottle, evacuated and
rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for 5 hours. The
resulting carboxyl magnetic particles were separated magnetically
and washed several times with deionized water until the supernatant
was clear. The carboxyl magnetic particles were resuspended to 800
ml with deionized water to give a 4.3% suspension with about 11.6%
magnetic metal oxide content and 6.8 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 9
A mixture containing 600 ml of deionized water, 6 ml of styrene and
60 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a three-necked round bottom flask and
stirred at 67.degree. C. for one hour under argon. To the mixture
were added 12 g of potassium persulfate and 470 ml of 5% w/v, 2.7
micron polystyrene particles. The mixture was stirred at 67.degree.
C. for one hour and added 30 ml of 2% sodium dodecylsulfate. After
stirring at 67.degree. C. under argon for five more hours 6 ml of
styrene and 6 g of potassium persulfate were added to the mixture.
The mixture was stirred at 67.degree. C. under argon for another
fifteen hours, filtered through two layers of cheese cloth,
separated magnetically and washed several times with deionized
water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting magnetic
particles were resuspended to 900 ml with deionized water and
carboxylated by adding 0.6 g of sodium dodecylsulfate, 10 g of
potassium persulfate and a solution containing 0.598 ml of
undecylenic acid and 0.012 ml of divinyl benzene in 2.4 ml of
methanol. The mixture was placed in a sealed bottle, evacuated and
rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for 5 hours. The
resulting carboxyl magnetic particles were separated magnetically
and washed several times with deionized water until the supernatant
was clear. The carboxyl magnetic particles were resuspended to 500
ml to give a 6.5% w/v suspension with about 14% magnetic metal
oxide content and 4.0 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 10
A mixture containing 600 ml of deionized water, 6 ml of styrene and
60 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated
and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for one hour.
To the mixture were added 12 g of potassium persulfate and 470 ml
of 5% w/v, 2.7 micron polystyrene particles. The bottle was
resealed, evacuated and rotated for one hour and added 30 ml of 2%
sodium dodecylsulfate. After five more hours 6 ml of styrene and 10
g of potassium persulfate were added to the mixture. The mixture
was rotated for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers
of cheese cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times
with deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 500 ml with deionized water
to give 6.8% w/v suspension with about 14% magnetic metal oxide
content and 4.0 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 11
A mixture containing 180 ml of deionized water, 2 ml of styrene and
20 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide, prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated
and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for one hour.
To the mixture were added 4 g of potassium persulfate and 160 ml of
6.8% w/v magnetic particles (3.0 micron, 14% metal oxide content),
prepared as described in Example 10. The bottle was resealed,
evacuated and rotated for one hour and added 10 ml of 2% sodium
dodecylsulfate. After 5 more hours 2 ml of styrene and 2 g of
potassium persulfate were added to the mixture. The mixture was
rotated for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers of
cheese cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times with
deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 160 ml with deionized water
to give a 7.78% w/v suspension with about 19% metal oxide content
and 4.2 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 12
A mixture containing 90 ml of deionized water, 1 ml of styrene and
10 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide, prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated
and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for one hour.
To the mixture were added 1 g of potassium persulfate and 80 ml of
7.78% w/v magnetic particles (3.2 micron, 19% metal oxide content),
prepared as described in Example 11. The bottle was resealed,
evacuated and rotated for four hour and added 5 ml of 2% sodium
dodecylsulfate. After 5 more hours 1 ml of styrene and 1 g of
potassium persulfate were added to the mixture. The mixture was
rotated for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers of
cheese cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times with
deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 160 ml with deionized water
to give a 4.5% w/v suspension with about 23% metal oxide content
and 4.5 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 13
A mixture containing 400 ml of deionized water, 1.92 ml of styrene,
0.08 ml of divinyl benzene, 4 g of potassium persulfate, 20 g of
200-400 mesh 4% divinyl benzene cross linked polystyrene beads and
10 ml of 8.6% w/v magnetic metal oxide, prepared as described in
Example 1, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated
and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for 15 hours.
The mixture was allowed to settle and the supernatant was decanted.
The resulting magnetic beads were resuspended in 200 ml of
deionized water and allowed to settle again. This process was
repeated several times until the supernatant was clear. The
resulting magnetic beads were resuspended in 200 ml of deionized
water and added 0.1 g of sodium dodecyl sulfate, 2.0 g of potassium
persulfate, 0.48 ml of styrene, and 0.02 ml of divinyl benzene. The
bottle was resealed, evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a
55.degree. C. over for one hour and added a solution containing
0.098 ml of undecylenic acid and 0.002 ml of divinyl benzene in 0.4
ml of methanol. The mixture was rotated for four more hours and
cleaned up by gravitational sedimentation as described previously.
The water was removed by filtration and the carboxyl magnetic beads
were dried to give 20 g of 200-400 mesh carboxyl magnetic
beads.
EXAMPLE 14
A mixture containing 100 ml of deionized water, 0.5 ml of styrene,
2 g of potassium persulfate, 75 ml of 5% w/v 4.0 micron polystrene
particles and 10 ml of 6.88% w/v magnetic metal oxide, prepared as
described in Example 4, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle
was evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven
for fifteen hours. The mixture was filtered through two layers of
cheese cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times with
deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 150 ml with deionized to
give a 2.5% w/v suspension with about 14% metal oxide content and
4.3 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 15
Same procedures as described in Example 14 were followed except 20
ml of 6.88% w/v magnetic metal oxide, prepared as described in
Example 4, was used to give 160 ml of 2.5% w/v suspension with
about 18% metal oxide content and 4.3 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 16
A mixture containing 2000 ml of deionized water, 13 ml of styrene
and 550 ml of 2.98% w/v magnetic metal oxide prepared as described
in Example 3, was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was
evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for
one hour. To the mixture were added 20 g of potassium persulfate
and 950 ml of 10% w/v, 3.0 micron polystyrene particles. The bottle
was resealed, evacuated and rotated for one hour and added 60 ml of
2% sodium dodecylsulfate. After five more hours 8 ml of styrene and
10 g of potassium persulfate were added to the mixture. The mixture
was rotated for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers
of cheese cloth, separated magnetically and washed several times
with deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
magnetic particles were resuspended to 3000 ml with deionized water
to give a 3.38% w/v suspension with about 12% magnetic metal oxide
content and 3.2 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 17
A mixture containing 150 ml of magnetic particles (3.2 micron,
3.38% w/v with 12% metal oxide content) prepared as described in
Example 16, 2 ml of 1% NP 40, 0.5 ml of methyl methacrylate or
styrene, 1 g of potassium persulfate and 2 ml of functionalized
monomer, trimethylammoniumethyl methacrylate methosulfate (40%
aqueous solution), was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was
rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for four hours. The
mixture was filtered through two layers of cheese cloth, separated
magnetically and washed several times with deionized water until
the supernatant was clear. The resulting magnetic particles were
resuspended to 200 ml with deionized water to give a 2.5% w/v
suspension of magnetic particles with trimethylammonium functional
groups on the surface.
EXAMPLE 18
Same procedures as described in Example 17 were followed except 1
ml of functionalized monomer, 2-aminoethyl methacrylate, was used
to give 200 ml of 2.5% w/v suspension of magnetic particles with
amino groups on the surface.
EXAMPLE 19
Same procedures as described in Example 17 were followed except 1
ml of functionalized monomer, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, was used
to give 200 ml of 2.5% w/v suspension of magnetic particles with
hydroxyl groups on the surface.
EXAMPLE 20
Same procedures as described in Example 17 were followed except 1
ml of monomer, 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone, was used to give 200 ml of
2.5% w/v suspension of magnetic particles with
polyvinylpyrrolidinone on the surface.
EXAMPLE 21
Same procedures as described in Example 17 were followed except 1 g
of functionalized monomer, methyl propene sulfonic acid, was used
to give 200 ml of 2.5% w/v suspension of magnetic particles with
sulfonic acids groups on the surface.
EXAMPLE 22
Same procedures as described in Example 17 were followed except 1
ml of functionalized monomer, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, was
used to give 200 ml of 2.5% w/v suspension of magnetic particles
with dimethylamino groups on the surface.
EXAMPLE 23
A mixture containing 20 ml of 7.0% w/v, 2.11 micron polystyrene
particles, 100 ml of 1.8% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5, 50 ml of deionized water and a solution containing 0.15
g of benzoyl peroxide in 7.5 ml of styrene was placed in a sealed
bottle. The bottle was evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a
55.degree. C. oven for fifteen hours. The mixture was filtered
through two layers of cheese cloth, separated magnetically and
washed several times with deionized water until the supernatant was
clear. The resulting magnetic particles were resuspended to 200 ml
with deionized water to give 5.0% w/v suspension with about 16.8%
metal oxide content and 3.6 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 24
A mixture containing 20 ml of 7.0% w/v, 2.11 micron polystyrene
particles, 100 ml of 1.8% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5, 50 ml of deionized water and a solution containing 0.15
g of benzoyl peroxide and 0.75 ml of divinyl benzene in 6.75 ml of
styrene was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated and
rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for fifteen hours.
The mixture was filtered through two layers of cheese cloth,
separated magnetically and washed several times with deionized
water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting crosslinked
magnetic particles were resuspended to 200 ml with deionized water
to give 5.0% w/v suspension with about 16.8% metal oxide content
and 3.6 micron average size. The crosslinked magnetic particles
prepared this way were found to be uniform in size and inert to
common organic solvents such as acetone, acetonitrile and dimethyl
formamide.
EXAMPLE 25
A mixture containing 20 ml of 7.0% w/v, 2.11 micron polystyrene
particles, 150 ml of 1.8% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5 and a solution containing 0.15 g of benzoyl peroxide,
0.75 ml of divinyl benzene in 6.75 ml of styrene was placed in a
sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm
in a 55.degree. C. oven for fifteen hours. The mixture was filtered
through two layers of cheese cloth, separated magnetically and
washed several times with deionized water until the supernatant was
clear. The resulting crosslinked magnetic particles were
resuspended to 200 ml with deionized water to give 5.4% w/v
suspension with about 23% metal oxide content and 4.0 micron
average size. The crosslinked magnetic particles prepared this way
were found to be uniform in size and inert to common organic
solvents such as acetone, actonitrile and dimethyl formamide.
EXAMPLE 26
A mixture containing 15 ml of 9.16% w/v, 3.2 micron polystyrene
particles, 100 ml of 1.8% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5, 55 ml of deionized water and a solution containing 0.15
g of benzoyl peroxide and 0.75 ml of divinyl benzene in 6.75 ml of
styrene was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated and
rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for fifteen hours.
The mixture was filtered through two layers of cheese cloth,
separated magnetically and washed several times with deionized
water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting crosslinked
magnetic particles were resuspended to 200 ml with deionized water
to give 4.7% w/v suspension with about 16.8% metal oxide content
and 5.5 micron average size. The crosslinked magnetic particles
prepared this way were found to be uniform in size and inert to
common organic solvents such as acetone, actonitrile and dimethyl
formamide.
EXAMPLE 27
A mixture containing 30 ml of 4.5% w/v, 4.1 micron polystyrene
particles, 100 ml of 1.8% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5, 40 ml of deionized water and a solution containing 0.15
g of benzoyl peroxide and 0.75 ml of divinyl benzene in 6.75 ml of
styrene was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was evacuated and
rotated at about 60 rpm in a 55.degree. C. oven for fifteen hours.
The mixture was filtered through two layers of cheese cloth,
separated magnetically and washed several times with deionized
water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting crosslinked
magnetic particles were resuspended to 200 ml with deionized water
to give 4.5% w/v suspension with about 16.9% metal oxide content
and 6.7 micron average size. The crosslinked magnetic particles
prepared this way were found to be uniform in size and inert to
common organic solvents such as acetone, acetonitrile and dimethyl
formamide.
EXAMPLE 28
A mixture containing 20 ml of 7.0% w/v, 2.11 micron polystyrene
particles, 100 ml of 1.8% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5, 50 ml of deionized water and a solution containing 0.15
g of benzoyl peroxide, 0.75 ml of undecylenyl alcohol and 0.75 ml
of divinyl benzene in 6 ml of styrene was placed in a sealed
bottle. The bottle was evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a
55.degree. C. oven for fifteen hours. The mixture was filtered
through two layers of cheese cloth, separated magnetically and
washed several times with deionized water until the supernatant was
clear. The resulting crosslinked hydroxyl magnetic particles were
filtered and dried to give 9 g of powder with about 16.8% metal
oxide content and 3.9 micron average size. The crosslinked hydroxyl
magnetic particles prepared this way were found to be uniform in
size and inert to common organic solvents such as acetone,
acetonitrile and dimethyl formamide.
COUPLING BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS TO MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMPLE 29
In a 80 ml bottle was place 30 ml of 4.3 micron, 5.0% w/v carboxyl
magnetic particles prepared as described in Example 7. The
particles were separated magnetically and resuspended in 50 ml of
phosphate buffer (0.1M. pH 5.5). To the particle suspension were
added 20 mg of bovine serum albumin and 100 mg of
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC). The mixture
was rotated end to end at room temperature for two hours and
separated magnetically. The particles were washed once with 80 ml
of phosphate buffer and resuspended to 75 ml with phosphate
buffered saline (0.1M, pH 7.0) to give a 2.0% w/v suspension.
To couple bovine serum albumin to magnetic particles by passive
adsorption the same procedures were followed except no EDC was
used.
EXAMPLE 30
In a 4 ml vial was placed 1 ml of 4.3 micron, 5.0% w/v carboxyl
magnetic particles prepared as described in Example 7. The
particles were separated magnetically and washed once with 2 ml of
phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 5.5) and resuspended to 2 ml with the
same buffer. To the particles suspension were added 140 ml of 1.4
mg/ml Goat (Gt) anti Mouse (Ms) IgG and 10 mg of
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimenthylaminopropyl) carbodiimide. The vial was
rotated end to end at room temperature for two hours. The particles
were separated magnetically, washed once with 2 ml of phosphate
buffer and resuspended to 2 ml with phosphate buffered saline
(0.1M, pH 7.0) to give a 2.5% w/v Gt anti Ms IgG coated magnetic
particles. Other kind of antibody either monoclonal or polyclonal
could also be coupled to carboxyl magnetic particles by using the
same procedures.
To couple Gt anti Ms IgG or other kind of antibody to the magnetic
particles by passive adsorption the same procedures were followed
except no EDC was used.
EXAMPLE 31
In a 4 ml vial was placed a 2.5 ml of bovine serum albumin coated
magnetic particles (4.3 micron, 2% w/v) prepared as described in
Example 29. The particles were separated magnetically and
resuspended to 2 ml with phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 5.5). To the
mixture were added 10 ul of Ms anti B red cells surface antigen (20
mg/ml) and 1 mg of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide.
The mixture was rotated end to end at room temperature for two
hours. The particles were separated magnetically, washed once with
phosphate buffer and resuspended in 2 ml of phosphate buffered
saline (0.1M, pH 7.0) to give a 2.5% w/v suspension.
EXAMPLE 32
Same procedures as described in Example 31 were followed except
using 40 ul of Ms anti A red cells surface antigen (5 mg/ml) to
give 2 ml of 2.5% w/v suspension.
BLOOD TYPING USING MAGNETIC PARTICLES
EXAMPLE 33
In a 5 mm.times.65 mm test tube labeled A was placed 25 ul of 2.5%
w/v Ms anti A coated magnetic particles prepared as described in
Example 31. To the other test tube labeled B was placed 25 ul of
2.5% w/v Ms anti B coated magnetic particles prepared as described
in Example 31. To both test tubes was added 50 ul of 1% packed red
blood cells prepared by 1 to 100 dilution of packed red blood cells
in isotonic buffered saline. The test tubes were shaker by finger
tapping for several times and placed on the top of a magnet. The
results were summarized as follows:
______________________________________ BLOOD TYPE A B O AB
______________________________________ TUBE A + - - + TUBE B - + -
+ ______________________________________
Where + represent a positive reaction, meaning the red cells were
agglutinated by the corresponding antibody coated magnetic
particles as a result the supernatant in the test tube was clear
after magnetic separation. On the other hand the supernatant of a
negative reaction would remain cloudy after magnetic separation due
to the absence of agglutination between the red cells and the
antibody coated magnetic particles.
IMMUNOASSAYS USING MAGNETIC PARTICLES
EXAMPLE 34
In a 2 ml microcentrifuge tube was placed 1 ml of 6% w/v, 3 micron
carboxyl magnetic particles. The particles were centrifuged for 3
minutes at 10000 rpm. The supernatant was aspirated and the
particles were resuspened by vortexing with 1 ml of 5 to 100 ug/ml
recombinant HBcAg in acetate buffer. The tube was rotated at room
temperature for two hours and centrifuged as described before. The
supernatant was aspirated and the particles were resuspended in 1
ml of overcoat solution containing acetate buffer and 2 to 10% of
normal animal serum. The tube was rotated at room temperature for 2
to 16 hours and centrifuged as described before. The supernatant
was aspirated and the particles were washed three times with 1 ml
of isotonic buffered slaine (IBS) by centrifugation and
resuspension. Finally, the particles were resuspended with 1 ml of
IBS and stored at 2.degree. to 8.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 35
To the first two columns of a 96-well microtiter plate was placed
20 ul of 0.25% w/v hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) coated magnetic
particles prepared as described in Example 34. Sample preparation
consisted of various dilutions of a HBcAb positive serum into a
negative plasma, followed by a 1:100 dilution of each sample into
specimen dilution buffer (SDB). The SDB contained phosphate buffer,
protein stabilizers, detergent, and antimicrobial agents. To the
wells containing the particles were added 50 ul of each final
sample dilution. After 30 minutes incubation at 37.degree. C., the
particles were separated for two minutes on a magnetic separator
and washed three times with 200 ul wash buffer containing salts and
detergent. To each well containing the particles was added 50 ul of
goat antihuman IgG-B-D-galactosidase conjugate (0.5 ug/ml) in
diluent containing salts, protein stabilizers, glycerol, detergent
and antimicrobial agents. After 15 minutes incubation at 37.degree.
C. the particles were separated and washed three times as described
above and resuspended in 30 ul of IBS. The particles were
transferred to the first two columns of a black microtiter plate
(Dynatech). To each well containing the particles was added 100 ul
of a solution containing 4-methylumbelliferyl-B-galactopyranoside
(MUG, Sigma). The plate was incubated at 37.degree. C. and the
fluorescence intensity was measured by using a Fluorescence
Concentration Analyzer (FCA, Pandex) equipped with 365 nm
excitation and 450 nm emission filters at five minutes interval and
10.times.gain setting. The increase in fluorescence intensity in a
five minutes interval was recorded in arbitrary fluorescence unit
(AFU) and presented in Table I.
TABLE I ______________________________________ Dilution of Positive
AFU (5 Minutes) Specimen Average of Two Wells
______________________________________ 1:100 22687 1:1000 5933
1:5000 1516 1:8000 835 1:10000 639 1:15000 495 1:20000 427 1:25000
307 ______________________________________
EXAMPLE 36
The coupling of mouse antiHBsAg to carboxyl magnetic particles was
similar to Example 30.
To the wells of a black 96-well microtiter plate (Dynatech) were
added 20 ul of 0.25% w/v, 3.2 micron, mouse antiHBsAg coated
carboxyl magnetic particles in duplicate. To the wells containing
the magnetic particles was added 100 ul of neat plasma containing
various amounts of HBsAg or a HBsAg-negative plasma. After 30
minutes incubation at 37.degree. C., the particles were separated
for two minutes on a magnetic separator and washed once with 100 ul
of wash buffer containing salts and detergent. To each will
containing the particles was added 20 ul of mouse
antiHBsAg--B-galactosidase conjugate in diluent containing salts,
protein stabilizers, glycerol, detergent and antimicrobial agents.
After 15 minutes incubation at 37.degree. C., the particles were
separated and washed five times as described above. To each will
containing the particles was added 50 ul of a solution containing
4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-galactopyranoside (MUG, Sigma). The plate
was incubated at 37.degree. C. and the fluorescence intensity was
measured by using a Fluorescence Concentration Analyzer (FCA,
Pandex) equipped with 365 nm excitation and 450 nm emission filters
or five minutes interval and 10.times.gain setting. The increase in
fluorescence intensity in a five minutes interval was recorded in
arbitrary fluorescence unit (AFU) and presented in Table II.
TABLE II ______________________________________ HBsAg Conc. AFU (5
Minutes) (nano gm) Average of Two Wells
______________________________________ 1.0 1149 0.5 455 0.25 218
0.125 118 neg. 14 ______________________________________
EXAMPLE 37
The HIV-1 antigens from HTLV-IIIB/H-9 cells (Gallo Strain) were
coupled to 3.6 micron carboxyl magnetic particles by using similar
procedures as described in Example 34.
To the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate were added 20 ul of
0.25% w/v of HIV coated magnetic particles in duplicate. To the
wells containing the particles were added 50 ul of positive,
borderline and negative specimens diluted 1:100 in specimen
dilution buffer (SDB) containing phosphate buffer, protein
stabilizers, detergent and antimicrobial agents. After 30 minutes
incubation at 37.degree. C., the particles were separated for two
minutes on a magnetic separator and washed three times with 100 ul
of washed buffer containing salts and detergent. To each well
containing particles was added 50 ul of goat
antihuman-B-galactosidase (approximately 0.5 ug/ml) conjugate in
diluent containing salts, protein stabilizers, glycerol, detergent
and antimicrobial agents. After 15 minutes incubation at 37.degree.
C., the particles were washed four times as described above. The
particles were transferred to the black microtiter plate
(Dynatech). To each well containing particles was added 100 ul of a
solution containing 4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-galactopyranoside
(MUG, Sigma). The plate was incubated at 37.degree. C. and the
fluorescence intensity was measured by using a Fluorescence
Concentration Analyzer (FCA, Pandex) equipped with 365 nm
excitation and 450 nm emission filters at five minutes intervals
and 25.times.gain setting. The increase in fluorescence intensity
in a five minutes interval was recorded in arbitrary fluorescence
unit (AFU) and presented in Table III.
TABLE III ______________________________________ Anti-HIV AFU (5
minutes) Specimens Average of Two Wells
______________________________________ Positive Control 9462
Borderline Specimen 527 Negative Control 86
______________________________________
CELL SEPARATION USING MAGNETIC PARTICLES
EXAMPLE 38
The 4.3 micron carboxyl magnetic particles prepared as described in
Example 7 were washed and sonicated in phosphate buffered saline
(PBS, pH 7.7), sterilized in 70% ethanol for 10 minutes, washed
three times in PBS and incubated for 48 hours at 4.degree. C. with
affinity-purified sheep anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody (SAM) at
0.5 mg/ml and a ratio of 3.3 mg antibody/100 mg particles. Before
use, the antibody coated magnetic particles were washed in PBS and
resuspend at the desired concentration in PBS.
Human tissue culture cALLa-positive NALM-16 leukemia cells were
washed and suspended in PBS. One fraction was not treated with
antibody (-MoAb). The other fraction was treated with two anti-CD10
and one anti-CD9 monoclonal antibodies (+MoAb) for 30 minutes at
4.degree. C., washed in PBS and adjusted to 3.5.times.10.sup.6
cells/ml on PBS. To two tubes, one containing the antibody treated
cells (+MoAb), the other containing untreated cells (-MoAb) were
added SAM coated magnetic particles at a particle to starting cell
ratio of 45. The tubes were rotated at 4.degree. C. for 30 minutes.
The particles were separated with a magnetic separator. The
supernatant was collected and centrifuged to collect the remaining
cells. The pellet was resuspended in 100 ul of trypan blue and
total cell count was made. The results were presented in Table
IV.
TABLE IV ______________________________________ Particle/cell Cells
Cells % Ratio +/- MoAb Received Depletion
______________________________________ 0 + 7.62 .times. 10.sup.5 0
(Control) 45 + 2.89 .times. 10.sup.4 96.2 45 - 7.33 .times.
10.sup.5 4.6 ______________________________________
EXAMPLE 39
A mixture containing 576 ml of deionized water, 9 ml of styrene,
and 288 ml of 3.0% w/v magnetic metal oxide prepared as described
in Example 1 was placed in a sealed bottle. The bottle was
evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a 65.+-.4.degree. C. oven
for one hour. To the mixture were added 18 g of potassium
persulfate and 712 ml of 5% w/v, 4.0 micron fluorescent Nile Red
polystyrene particles. The bottle was resealed, evacuated and
rotated for one hour, and added 45 ml of 2.0% sodium
dodecylsulfate. After five more hours, 9 ml of styrene and 9 g of
potassium persulfate were added to the mixture. The mixture was
rotated for another fifteen hours, filtered through two layers of
cheese cloth, separated magnetically, and washed several times with
deionized water until the supernatant was clear. The resulting
fluorescent magnetic particles were resuspended to 1580 ml with
deionized water to give 3.0% w/v suspension with about 11.0%
magnetic metal oxide content and 4.4 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 40
The fluorescent Nile Red magnetic particles, 1.580 l of 3.0% w/v,
prepared as described in Example 39, were carboxylated by adding
1.23 g of sodium dodecylsulfate, 17.50 g of potassium persulfate,
and solution containing 1.2 ml of undecylenic acid and 0.024 ml of
divinyl benzene in 4.8 ml of methanol. The mixture was placed in a
sealed bottle; evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a
55.degree.-65.degree. oven for five hours. The resulting
fluorescent Nile Red carboxyl magnetic particles were separated
magnetically and washed several times with deionized water until
the supernatant was clear. The fluorescent Nile Red carboxyl
magnetic particles were resuspended to 850 ml with deionized water
to give a 5.0% w/v suspension with about 11.0% magnetic metal oxide
content and 4.4 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 41
A mixture containing 12.4 ml of 11.28% w/v, 2.24 micron polystyrene
particles, 65 ml of 2.78% w/v metal oxide prepared as described in
Example 5, 75 ml of deionized water and a solution containing 0.18
g of benzoyl peroxide, 7 mg of Nile Red, and 0.75 ml of divinyl
benzene in 6.75 ml of styrene was placed in a sealed bottle. The
bottle was evacuated and rotated at about 60 rpm in a
60.degree.-70.degree. oven for about fifteen hours. The mixture was
filtered through two layers of cheese cloth, separated
magnetically, and washed several times with deionized water until
the supernatant was clear. The resulting fluorescent crosslinked
magnetic particles were resuspended to 170 ml with deionized water
to give 5.4% w/v suspension with about 16.5% w/v metal oxide
content and 4.0 micron average size.
EXAMPLE 42
The coupling of Goat anti HBsAg to fluorescent and nonfluorescent
carboxyl magnetic particles (having about the same as metal oxide
content) was similar to Example 30.
To the wells of black 96-well microtiter plate (Pandex.TM.) were
added 20 .mu.l of 0.125% w/v, 4.0 micron, Goat anti HBsAg coated
thorough mixed fluorescent and nonfluorescent carboxyl magnetic
particles (at the ratio 1:1). To the wells containing the magnetic
particles was added 100 .mu.l of neat plasma containing various
amounts of HBsAg or HBsAg-negative plasma. After thirty minutes of
incubation at 37.degree. C., the particles were separated on a
magnetic separator and washed twice with 100 .mu.l of wash buffer.
To each well containing particles was added 20 .mu.l of mouse
anti-HBsAg conjugated to B-galactosidase in dilution buffer. After
fifteen minutes incu- bation at 37.degree. C., the particles were
separated and washed six times as described above. To each well
containing particles was added 50 .mu.l of a solution containing
4-methylumbelliferyl-B-D-galactopyranoside (MUG,Sgma). The plate
was incubated at 37.degree. C. and fluorescence intensity was
measured by using a Fluorescence Concentration Analyzer (FCA,
Pandex.TM.) equipped with 525 nm excitation and 580 nm emission
filters (Channel C, reference Channel) at eight minutes interval
and 25.times.gain setting. The fluorescence intensity in Channel C
was recorded in arbitrary fluorescence (AFU) and presented in Table
1. The results showed that the fluorescent magnetic particles can
detect the empty wells and also indicate the wells with less than
average fluorescent intensity; due to the pipetting error or
particles loss during the assay.
TABLE I ______________________________________ Channel C (Reference
Channel) Nos. of Well .DELTA. AFU Range .DELTA. AFU Range
______________________________________ 12 Empty 4832-4900 4867 17
29826-33200 31480 1 -- 19458* 1 -- 27952
______________________________________ *AFU 19458 for one well
compare to average AFU 31480 for 17 wells indicative of either loss
of particles from particular well or less numbe of particles
delivered at the start of the assay.
EXAMPLE 43
Same procedures as described in Example 42 were followed except
fluorescent and nonfluorescent carboxylated magnetic particles
coated with Goat anti HBsAg, used simultaneously in the assay to
compare the assay performance. The fluorescent intensity was
measured by using Channel D (assay channel 365 nm excitation and
450 nm emission filters) and presented in Table II. The results
showed that both fluorescent and nonfluorescent particles performed
equally in the assay.
TABLE II ______________________________________ AFU Fluorescent
Nonfluorescent HBsAg Conc. Particles Particles
______________________________________ High 27238 30059 Medium 5820
5976 Low 1688 1816 Negative 326 403
______________________________________
* * * * *